Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2023; 293; 105955; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.105955

Arena surface vertical impact forces vary with surface compaction.

Abstract: Mechanical properties of arena surfaces are extrinsic factors for musculoskeletal injury. Vertical impact forces of harrowed and compacted cushion were measured at five locations on 12 arena surfaces (five dirt, seven synthetic [dirt and fiber]). Eight variables related to impact force, displacement, and acceleration were calculated. Surface temperature, cushion depth and moisture content were also measured. The effects of surface material type (dirt/synthetic) and cushion compaction (harrowed/compacted) on vertical impact properties were assessed using an analysis of variance. Relationships of manageable surface properties with vertical impact forces were examined through correlations. Compacted cushion exhibited markedly higher vertical impact force and deceleration with lower vertical displacement than harrowed cushion (P < 0.001), and the effect was greater on dirt than synthetic surfaces (P = 0.039). Vertical displacement (P = 0.021) and soil rebound (P = 0.005) were the only variables affected by surface type. Surface compaction (harrowed, compacted) had a significantly greater effect on vertical impact forces than surface type (dirt, synthetic). By reducing surface compaction through harrowing, extrinsic factors related to musculoskeletal injury risk are reduced. These benefits were more pronounced on dirt than synthetic surfaces. These results indicate that arena owners should regularly harrow surfaces, particularly dirt surfaces.
Publication Date: 2023-02-11 PubMed ID: 36781018DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.105955Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research under study investigates how different levels of surface compaction in equine arenas can alter the vertical impact force experienced by horses. By comparing both dirt and synthetic surfaces, and examining them both when harrowed and compacted, results ultimately suggested that less compact (harrowed) surfaces can help lower the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in horses, with these benefits being more notable on dirt surfaces.

Research Goals and Methodology

The experiment was designed to measure and compare the vertical impact forces on different types of arena surfaces, namely dirt and synthetic. This was done in an effort to understand and manage the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in horses, which can be influenced by the mechanical properties of the surfaces they move on. The tests were performed at five different locations on a total of 12 arenas, five of which had dirt surfaces and seven synthetic.

  • Eight impact-related variables were calculated considering factors like impact force, displacement and acceleration.
  • Additional observations were made regarding the surface temperature, cushion depth, and moisture content of the arena.
  • Both types of surfaces were tested under harrowed and compacted conditions.
  • An analysis of variance was employed to assess the effects of surface material and cushion compaction on the vertical impact properties.
  • The relationships between surface properties that can be managed and vertical impact forces were examined through correlations.

Findings

The results showed a notable difference in vertical impact force between harrowed and compacted cushions. Compacted cushions exhibited higher vertical impact force and deceleration, with reduced vertical displacement compared to their harrowed counterparts. The effect was found to be stronger on dirt surfaces compared to synthetic ones.

  • Surface type affected only two of the several considered variables: vertical displacement and soil rebound.
  • Any changes in the surface compaction had a more significant effect on the resulting vertical impact forces as compared to changes made to the type of surface (dirt or synthetic).

Conclusion

The research concludes that by reducing surface compaction via harrowing, one can minimize the risk of musculoskeletal injury in horses. Of the surfaces examined, these benefits were more pronounced on dirt surfaces compared to their synthetic counterparts. Consequently, the study recommends regular harrowing of surfaces, especially those composed of dirt, to reduce the potential for injury in equines.

Cite This Article

APA
Rohlf CM, Garcia TC, Fyhrie DP, le Jeune SS, Peterson ML, Stover SM. (2023). Arena surface vertical impact forces vary with surface compaction. Vet J, 293, 105955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.105955

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 293
Pages: 105955
PII: S1090-0233(23)00006-0

Researcher Affiliations

Rohlf, C M
  • JD Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, University of California-Davis, 1285 Veterinary Medicine Dr. Bldg. VM3A Rm, 4206, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, 451 E. Health Sciences Dr, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: cmrohlf@ucdavis.edu.
Garcia, T C
  • JD Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, University of California-Davis, 1285 Veterinary Medicine Dr. Bldg. VM3A Rm, 4206, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, 1275 Medical Science Dr, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Fyhrie, D P
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, 451 E. Health Sciences Dr, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
le Jeune, S S
  • Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, 1275 Medical Science Dr, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Peterson, M L
  • Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory, University of Kentucky, 907 National Ave, Lexington, KY, USA.
Stover, S M
  • JD Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, University of California-Davis, 1285 Veterinary Medicine Dr. Bldg. VM3A Rm, 4206, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, 1275 Medical Science Dr, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Running
  • Surface Properties

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of Interest Statement None of the authors has financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Rohlf CM, Garcia TC, Marsh LJ, Acutt EV, le Jeune SS, Stover SM. Effects of Jumping Phase, Leading Limb, and Arena Surface Type on Forelimb Hoof Movement.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 27;13(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13132122pubmed: 37443919google scholar: lookup