FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Artificial Intelligence for Lameness Detection in Horses-A P...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(20); 2804; doi: 10.3390/ani12202804

Artificial Intelligence for Lameness Detection in Horses-A Preliminary Study.

Abstract: Lameness in horses is a long-known issue influencing the welfare, as well as the use, of a horse. Nevertheless, the detection and classification of lameness mainly occurs on a subjective basis by the owner and the veterinarian. The aim of this study was the development of a lameness detection system based on pose estimation, which permits non-invasive and easily applicable gait analysis. The use of 58 reference points on easily detectable anatomical landmarks offers various possibilities for gait evaluation using a simple setup. For this study, three groups of horses were used: one training group, one analysis group of fore and hindlimb lame horses and a control group of sound horses. The first group was used to train the network; afterwards, horses with and without lameness were evaluated. The results show that forelimb lameness can be detected by visualising the trajectories of the reference points on the head and both forelimbs. In hindlimb lameness, the stifle showed promising results as a reference point, whereas the tuber coxae were deemed unsuitable as a reference point. The study presents a feasible application of pose estimation for lameness detection, but further development using a larger dataset is essential.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-10-17 PubMed ID: 36290189PubMed Central: PMC9597839DOI: 10.3390/ani12202804Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research involved the development of a system for detecting lameness in horses using pose estimation. The aim was to devise a non-invasive method for analyzing a horse’s gait, using a network of 58 reference points on visible anatomical landmarks. This was trialed on three groups of horses (one for training purposes, another for analyzing both forelimb and hindlimb lame horses, and a control group of sound horses). Results indicate that this method shows promise but needs further development using larger datasets.

Objective of the Research

  • The study aimed at creating an objective, non-invasive system to detect lameness in horses. The primary technique used is pose estimation, relying on identifiable anatomical landmarks on the horse’s body.

Methodology

  • The research involved 58 reference points, chosen based on their easy visibility and relevance to the horse’s gait.
  • Three groups of horses were involved: a training group, an analysis group comprising forelimb and hindlimb lame horses, and a control group of healthy horses.
  • The training group was used to train the AI system.
  • Upon successful training, the system was tested on the analysis group (lame horses) and the control group (healthy horses).

Results and Findings

  • Forelimb lameness detection was achieved by visualising the trajectories of reference points on the horse’s head and both forelimbs.
  • Hindlimb lameness detection was more challenging. The stifle (joint above the horse’s hind leg) proved useful as a reference point.
  • The tuber coxae (hip bone region of the horse) was found to be unsuitable as a reference point.

Conclusions

  • This study provided a potential application of pose estimation in diagnosing lameness in horses.
  • Despite the promising results, the research acknowledges the need for further development and expansion of the study using larger datasets to establish the system’s accuracy and reliability.

Cite This Article

APA
Feuser AK, Gesell-May S, Müller T, May A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for Lameness Detection in Horses-A Preliminary Study. Animals (Basel), 12(20), 2804. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202804

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 20
PII: 2804

Researcher Affiliations

Feuser, Ann-Kristin
  • Equine Hospital in Parsdorf, 85599 Vaterstetten, Germany.
Gesell-May, Stefan
  • Anirec GmbH, Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Veterinary Medicine, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Müller, Tobias
  • Anirec GmbH, Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Veterinary Medicine, 80539 Munich, Germany.
May, Anna
  • Equine Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 55 references
  1. Seitzinger AH. A comparison of the economic costs of equine lameness, colic, and equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM). Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics Breckenridge, CO, USA. 6–11 August 2000; pp. 1–4.
  2. Nielsen TD, Dean RS, Robinson NJ, Massey A, Brennan ML. Survey of the UK veterinary profession: common species and conditions nominated by veterinarians in practice.. Vet Rec 2014 Mar 29;174(13):324.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.101745pmc: PMC3995283pubmed: 24570401google scholar: lookup
  3. USDA. Part I: Baseline Reference of 1998 Equine Health and Management. USDA Washington, DC, USA: 1998. p. N280.898.
  4. Slater J. National Equine Health Survey (NEHS) 2016. Blue Cross for Pets Burford, UK: 2016.
  5. Müller-Quirin J, Dittmann MT, Roepstorff C, Arpagaus S, Latif SN, Weishaupt MA. Riding Soundness-Comparison of Subjective With Objective Lameness Assessments of Owner-Sound Horses at Trot on a Treadmill.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020 Dec;95:103314.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103314pubmed: 33276930google scholar: lookup
  6. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of a Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram and Its Relationship with Gait in a Convenience Sample of 60 Riding Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 17;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061044pmc: PMC7341225pubmed: 32560486google scholar: lookup
  7. Starke SD, May SA. Veterinary student competence in equine lameness recognition and assessment: a mixed methods study.. Vet Rec 2017 Aug 12;181(7):168.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.104245pubmed: 28801497google scholar: lookup
  8. Keegan KG, Dent EV, Wilson DA, Janicek J, Kramer J, Lacarrubba A, Walsh DM, Cassells MW, Esther TM, Schiltz P, Frees KE, Wilhite CL, Clark JM, Pollitt CC, Shaw R, Norris T. Repeatability of subjective evaluation of lameness in horses.. Equine Vet J 2010 Mar;42(2):92-7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X479568pubmed: 20156242google scholar: lookup
  9. Fuller CJ, Bladon BM, Driver AJ, Barr AR. The intra- and inter-assessor reliability of measurement of functional outcome by lameness scoring in horses.. Vet J 2006 Mar;171(2):281-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.10.012pubmed: 16490710google scholar: lookup
  10. Parkes RS, Weller R, Groth AM, May S, Pfau T. Evidence of the development of 'domain-restricted' expertise in the recognition of asymmetric motion characteristics of hindlimb lameness in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2009 Feb;41(2):112-7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X343000pubmed: 19418737google scholar: lookup
  11. Arkell M, Archer RM, Guitian FJ, May SA. Evidence of bias affecting the interpretation of the results of local anaesthetic nerve blocks when assessing lameness in horses.. Vet Rec 2006 Sep 9;159(11):346-9.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.159.11.346pubmed: 16963714google scholar: lookup
  12. Back W, Clayton HM. 1. History. Equine Locomotion In: van Weeren PR, editor. 2nd ed. Saunders Elsevier; Edinburgh, UK; New York, NY, USA: 2013. pp. 1–30.
  13. Keegan KG. Evidence-based lameness detection and quantification.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007 Aug;23(2):403-23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.04.008pubmed: 17616320google scholar: lookup
  14. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait.. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s18030850pmc: PMC5877382pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup
  15. Weishaupt MA, Hogg HP, Wiestner T, Denoth J, Stüssi E, Auer JA. Instrumented treadmill for measuring vertical ground reaction forces in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2002 Apr;63(4):520-7.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.520pubmed: 11939313google scholar: lookup
  16. Back W, Clayton HM. 9. Gait Adaption in Lameness. Equine Locomotion In: Buchner HH, editor. Saunders Elsevier; Edinburgh, UK; New York, NY, USA: 2013. pp. 175–197.
  17. Morris E, Seeherman H. Redistribution of ground reaction forces in experimentally induced equine carpal lameness. Equine Exercise Physiology Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 1987. pp. 553–563.
  18. Byström A, Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Rhodin M, Bragança FS, Hernlund E, van Weeren R, Weishaupt MA, Clayton HM. Biomechanical findings in horses showing asymmetrical vertical excursions of the withers at walk.. PLoS One 2018;13(9):e0204548.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204548pmc: PMC6160136pubmed: 30261019google scholar: lookup
  19. Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Huppes T, Gasthuys F, Back W. Comparison of pressure plate and force plate gait kinetics in sound Warmbloods at walk and trot.. Vet J 2010 Dec;186(3):347-51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.024pubmed: 19751984google scholar: lookup
  20. Keegan KG. Objective measures of lameness evaluation. Proceedings of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons Symposium National Harbor, MD, USA. 1–3 November 2012; pp. 127–131.
  21. Serra Bragança FM, Rhodin M, van Weeren PR. On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: What evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model?. Vet J 2018 Apr;234:11-23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.006pubmed: 29680381google scholar: lookup
  22. Keegan KG, Yonezawa Y, Pai PF, Wilson DA, Kramer J. Evaluation of a sensor-based system of motion analysis for detection and quantification of forelimb and hind limb lameness in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2004 May;65(5):665-70.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.665pubmed: 15141889google scholar: lookup
  23. Barrey E. Methods, applications and limitations of gait analysis in horses.. Vet J 1999 Jan;157(1):7-22.
    doi: 10.1053/tvjl.1998.0297pubmed: 10030124google scholar: lookup
  24. Rhodin M, Persson-Sjodin E, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Pfau T, Roepstorff L, Weishaupt MA, Thomsen MH, van Weeren PR, Hernlund E. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot.. Equine Vet J 2018 Nov;50(6):818-824.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12844pmc: PMC6175082pubmed: 29658147google scholar: lookup
  25. Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF, Dent EV, Kellerman TE, Wilson DA, Reed SK. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor-based lameness evaluation system for horses.. Am J Vet Res 2011 Sep;72(9):1156-63.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1156pubmed: 21879972google scholar: lookup
  26. Titterton D, Weston J. 4 Gyroscope Technology 1. Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology Institution of Engineering and Technology; London, UK: 2004. pp. 59–112.
  27. van Weeren PR, Pfau T, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Serra Bragança F, Weishaupt MA. Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis?. Equine Vet J 2017 Sep;49(5):567-569.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12715pubmed: 28804943google scholar: lookup
  28. van Weeren PR, Pfau T, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Serra Bragança F, Weishaupt MA. What is lameness and what (or who) is the gold standard to detect it?. Equine Vet J 2018 Sep;50(5):549-551.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12970pubmed: 29953639google scholar: lookup
  29. Mathis A, Mamidanna P, Cury KM, Abe T, Murthy VN, Mathis MW, Bethge M. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning.. Nat Neurosci 2018 Sep;21(9):1281-1289.
    doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0209-ypubmed: 30127430google scholar: lookup
  30. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning.. Nature 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44.
    doi: 10.1038/nature14539pubmed: 26017442google scholar: lookup
  31. Kil N, Ertelt K, Auer U. Development and Validation of an Automated Video Tracking Model for Stabled Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 30;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122258pmc: PMC7760072pubmed: 33266297google scholar: lookup
  32. Banzato T, Wodzinski M, Burti S, Osti VL, Rossoni V, Atzori M, Zotti A. Automatic classification of canine thoracic radiographs using deep learning.. Sci Rep 2021 Feb 17;11(1):3964.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83515-3pmc: PMC7889925pubmed: 33597566google scholar: lookup
  33. May A, Gesell-May S, Müller T, Ertel W. Artificial intelligence as a tool to aid in the differentiation of equine ophthalmic diseases with an emphasis on equine uveitis.. Equine Vet J 2022 Sep;54(5):847-855.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13528pubmed: 34713490google scholar: lookup
  34. Insafutdinov E, Andriluka M, Pishchulin L. ArtTrack: Articulated Multi-Person Tracking in the Wild. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Honolulu, HI, USA. 21–26 July 2017; pp. 6457–6465.
    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.01465google scholar: lookup
  35. Cao Z, Simon T, Wei S-E. Realtime Multi-person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Honolulu, HI, USA. 21–26 July 2017.
  36. Nath T, Mathis A, Chen AC, Patel A, Bethge M, Mathis MW. Using DeepLabCut for 3D markerless pose estimation across species and behaviors.. Nat Protoc 2019 Jul;14(7):2152-2176.
    doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0176-0pubmed: 31227823google scholar: lookup
  37. Andriluka M, Pishchulin L, Gehler P. 2D Human Pose Estimation: New Benchmark and State of the Art Analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Columbus, OH, USA. 23–28 June 2014.
  38. Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Kramer J, Reed SK, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF, Lopes MA. Comparison of a body-mounted inertial sensor system-based method with subjective evaluation for detection of lameness in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2013 Jan;74(1):17-24.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.1.17pubmed: 23270341google scholar: lookup
  39. Baxter GM, Adams OR, Stashak TS. Adams and Stashak’s Lameness in Horses. Wiley-Blackwell 6th ed. Chichester, UK; Ames, IA, USA: 2011. p. xxviii.1242p.
  40. Ross MW, Dyson SJ. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. Saunders 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: 2011.
  41. Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore- or hindlimb lameness.. Equine Vet J 1996 Jan;28(1):71-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01592.xpubmed: 8565958google scholar: lookup
  42. Kramer J, Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Smith BK, Wilson DJ. Kinematics of the hind limb in trotting horses after induced lameness of the distal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal joints and intra-articular administration of anesthetic.. Am J Vet Res 2000 Sep;61(9):1031-6.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.1031pubmed: 10976732google scholar: lookup
  43. Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Limb movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore- or hindlimb lameness.. Equine Vet J 1996 Jan;28(1):63-70.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01591.xpubmed: 8565956google scholar: lookup
  44. May SA, Wyn-Jones G. Identification of hindleg lameness.. Equine Vet J 1987 May;19(3):185-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1987.tb01371.xpubmed: 3608952google scholar: lookup
  45. Church EE, Walker AM, Wilson AM, Pfau T. Evaluation of discriminant analysis based on dorsoventral symmetry indices to quantify hindlimb lameness during over ground locomotion in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2009 Mar;41(3):304-8.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X397352pubmed: 19469241google scholar: lookup
  46. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC London, UK: 1999. p. XII.611p.
  47. Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Merkens HW, Barneveld A. Kinematics of treadmill versus overground locomotion in horses.. Vet Q 1994 May;16 Suppl 2:S87-90.
    doi: 10.1080/01652176.1994.9694509pubmed: 7801509google scholar: lookup
  48. Audigié F, Pourcelot P, Degueurce C, Geiger D, Denoix JM. Kinematic analysis of the symmetry of limb movements in lame trotting horses.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2001 Apr;(33):128-34.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb05375.xpubmed: 11721553google scholar: lookup
  49. Kramer J, Keegan KG, Kelmer G, Wilson DA. Objective determination of pelvic movement during hind limb lameness by use of a signal decomposition method and pelvic height differences.. Am J Vet Res 2004 Jun;65(6):741-7.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.741pubmed: 15198212google scholar: lookup
  50. Leelamankong P, Estrada R, Mählmann K, Rungsri P, Lischer C. Agreement among equine veterinarians and between equine veterinarians and inertial sensor system during clinical examination of hindlimb lameness in horses.. Equine Vet J 2020 Mar;52(2):326-331.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13144pubmed: 31233625google scholar: lookup
  51. Hardeman AM, Serra Bragança FM, Swagemakers JH, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L. Variation in gait parameters used for objective lameness assessment in sound horses at the trot on the straight line and the lunge.. Equine Vet J 2019 Nov;51(6):831-839.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13075pmc: PMC6850282pubmed: 30648286google scholar: lookup
  52. Rhodin M, Pfau T, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A. Effect of lungeing on head and pelvic movement asymmetry in horses with induced lameness.. Vet J 2013 Dec;198 Suppl 1:e39-45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.031pubmed: 24140227google scholar: lookup
  53. Whay HR, Main DC, Green LE, Webster AJ. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records.. Vet Rec 2003 Aug 16;153(7):197-202.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.153.7.197pubmed: 12956296google scholar: lookup
  54. Whay HR, Shearer JK. The Impact of Lameness on Welfare of the Dairy Cow.. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2017 Jul;33(2):153-164.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2017.02.008pubmed: 28392188google scholar: lookup
  55. Haubro Andersen P, Bech Gleerup K, Wathan J. Can a Machine Learn to See Horse Pain?: An Interdisciplinary Approach Towards Automated Decoding of Facial Expressions of Pain in the Horse. Animals 2018;11:1643.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061643google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Guyard KC, Montavon S, Bertolaccini J, Deriaz M. Validation of Alogo Move Pro: A GPS-Based Inertial Measurement Unit for the Objective Examination of Gait and Jumping in Horses.. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Apr 22;23(9).
    doi: 10.3390/s23094196pubmed: 37177397google scholar: lookup
  2. Parmentier JIM, Bosch S, van der Zwaag BJ, Weishaupt MA, Gmel AI, Havinga PJM, van Weeren PR, Braganca FMS. Prediction of continuous and discrete kinetic parameters in horses from inertial measurement units data using recurrent artificial neural networks.. Sci Rep 2023 Jan 13;13(1):740.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27899-4pubmed: 36639409google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,034 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.