Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2023; 10; 1305360; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1305360

Assessment of worm control practices recommended by equine veterinarians in Australia.

Abstract: This study aimed to assess Australian veterinarians' knowledge, perceptions and treatment strategies for worm control in horses with an online questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised 64 questions covering various aspects of: (i) veterinary practice; (ii) the veterinarian's knowledge of gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) and the importance of parasites in different age groups of horses; (iii) the diagnosis and control of worms; (iv) anthelmintics and anthelmintic resistance (AR); (v) grazing management; and (vi) the means of communication and the discussion between veterinarians and their clients regarding worm control. Following a pilot survey, a link for the questionnaire survey was sent to all ( = 1,148) registered members of Equine Veterinarians Australia in April 2020. The response rate for the questionnaire was 10% (118 of 1,148). The findings of this study illustrate veterinarians' good understanding of aspects of equine parasites, including control. However, respondents mainly recommended frequent, interval-based prophylactic deworming in young horses, and only 40% (96 of 239) diagnosed GIN infections based on faecal egg count (FEC) results in all age groups of horses. Furthermore, only 27% (88 of 330) of the respondents made deworming decisions based on FECs. Most of the respondents recommended macrocyclic lactones (MLs) for all age groups of horses (71%, 481 of 677), and the most frequently used method to calculate the dose of anthelmintics was by estimating the weight of animals visually (53%, 63 of 118). Although the majority of respondents (97%, 115 of 118) perceived AR to be a critical issue in managing worms in horses, 58% (67 of 118) of them were unaware of the status of AR on their clients' properties. Forty-two percent (50 of 118) of the respondents perceived the presence of AR in worms, including pinworms (16%), strongylins (15%), species of and (6%), (2%) and tapeworms (1%). Twenty-seven percent (32 of 118) of the respondents rarely discussed equine worm control practices with their clients. This study provides insights into the perception and worm control practices recommended by Australian veterinarians to manage equine parasites. The findings highlight the importance of continued education and awareness of AR, and the use of non-chemical methods as well as consideration of the legislation of prescription-only use of anthelmintics based on FECs to achieve sustainable control of GINs in Australian horses.
Publication Date: 2023-11-03 PubMed ID: 38026649PubMed Central: PMC10654783DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1305360Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research evaluated the understanding and treatment recommendations of Australian veterinarians concerning worm control in horses. The study found that while vets have a good grasp of parasite control, they tend to suggest frequent, scheduled preventative deworming, especially in younger horses. Most vets prefer a specific class of drugs, macrocyclic lactones, for all horses but often underestimate the extent of worm drug resistance on their client’s properties.

Research Method

  • A comprehensive online questionnaire was designed to gauge veterinary understanding and practices surrounding worm control in horses.
  • The questionnaire, consisting of 64 questions, was divided into six sections: veterinary practice, knowledge about gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) and their importance in different horse age groups, diagnosis and control methods, anti-worm drugs and resistance, grazing management, and communication lines between vets and clients on worm control matters.
  • The questionnaire link was dispatched to all registered members of Equine Veterinarians Australia, a total of 1,148 individuals, in April 2020.
  • The received response rate was 10%, garnering 118 responses out of the potential 1,148.

Selected Results

  • Most vets showed good comprehension of equine parasites, including their control. However, there was heavy reliance on frequent, scheduled preventive deworming, especially in young horses.
  • About 40% of respondents utilize fecal egg counts (FECs) to diagnose GIN infections in horses of various age groups, while only 27% made deworming decisions based on FECs.
  • The most preferred class of anti-worm drugs was macrocyclic lactones, for all horse age groups.
  • 53% of vets estimated the drug dosage required by visually determining the horse’s weight.
  • While 97% recognized anti-worm drug resistance (AR) as an essential factor in worm management, a significant 58% were unaware of the AR status on their clients’ properties. This lack of awareness was despite 42% acknowledging the presence of AR in different worm species.
  • About 27% of respondents hardly discussed worm control practices with their clients.

Suggestions and Conclusions

  • The study underscores the need for ongoing education and awareness on AR and the use of non-chemical methods for worm control in horses.
  • Details also hint at the possibility of creating regulations requiring prescription-only usage of anti-worm drugs based on FECs, to ensure sustainable GIN control in Australian horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Abbas G, Stevenson MA, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Jacobson C, El-Hage C, Wilkes EJA, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Hurley J, Beveridge I, Nielsen MK, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. (2023). Assessment of worm control practices recommended by equine veterinarians in Australia. Front Vet Sci, 10, 1305360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1305360

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Pages: 1305360
PII: 1305360

Researcher Affiliations

Abbas, Ghazanfar
  • Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Stevenson, Mark A
  • Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Bauquier, Jenni
  • Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Beasley, Anne
  • School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Jacobson, Caroline
  • Centre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
El-Hage, Charles
  • Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Wilkes, Edwina J A
  • Racing Victoria, Flemington, VIC, Australia.
Carrigan, Peter
  • Scone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, Australia.
Cudmore, Lucy
  • Scone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, Australia.
Hurley, John
  • Swettenham Stud, Nagambie, VIC, Australia.
Beveridge, Ian
  • Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Nielsen, Martin K
  • M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Hughes, Kristopher J
  • School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Jabbar, Abdul
  • Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors of this manuscript are members of the Australian Equine Parasitology Advisory Panel (AEPAP), including Abdul Jabbar, Ghazanfar Abbas, Jenni Bauquier, Charles El-Hage, Abdul Ghafar and Ian Beveridge (The University of Melbourne), Anne Beasley (University of Queensland), Kristopher Hughes (Charles Sturt University), Caroline Jacobson and Emma McConnell (Murdoch University), Edwina Wilkes (Racing Victoria), Peter Carrigan and Lucy Cudmore (Scone Equine Hospital) and John Hurley (Swettenham Stud). Boehringer Ingelheim supported the panel. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

References

This article includes 65 references
  1. Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN. An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance.. Vet Parasitol (2012) 186:70–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.048pubmed: 22154968google scholar: lookup
  2. Bellaw JL, Nielsen MK. Meta-analysis of cyathostomin species-specific prevalence and relative abundance in domestic horses from 1975–2020: emphasis on geographical region and specimen collection method.. Parasit Vectors (2020) 13:509.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04396-5pmc: PMC7552500pubmed: 33046130google scholar: lookup
  3. Matthews JB. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist (2014) 4:310–5.
  4. Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. An evidence-based approach to equine parasite control: it ain’t the 60s anymore.. Equine Vet Educ (2010) 22:306–16.
  5. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: current status and emerging trends.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist (2022) 20:76–88.
  6. Macdonald SL, Abbas G, Ghafar A, Gauci CG, Bauquier J, el-Hage C. Egg reappearance periods of anthelmintics against equine cyathostomins: the state of play revisited.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist (2023) 21:28–39.
  7. Armstrong SK, Woodgate RG, Gough S, Heller J, Sangster NC, Hughes KJ. The efficacy of ivermectin, pyrantel and fenbendazole against Parascaris equorum infection in foals on farms in Australia.. Vet Parasitol (2014) 205:575–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.028pubmed: 25224788google scholar: lookup
  8. Wilkes E, McConaghy FF, Thompson RL, Dawson K, Sangster NC, Hughes KJ. Efficacy of a morantel-abamectin combination for the treatment of resistant ascarids in foals.. Aust Vet J (2017) 95:85–8.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.12559pubmed: 28239856google scholar: lookup
  9. Beasley AM, Kotze AC, Allen K, Coleman GT. A survey of macrocyclic lactone efficacy in Australian cyathostomin populations.. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud (2017) 8:127–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.03.009pubmed: 31014629google scholar: lookup
  10. Abbas G, McConnell E, Ghafar A, Gauci CG, Bauquier J, El-Hage C. A national survey of anthelmintic resistance in ascarid and strongylid nematodes in Australian thoroughbred horses.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist (2023) (In press).
    pubmed: 37844388
  11. Pook JF, Power ML, Sangster NC, Hodgson JL, Hodgson DR. Evaluation of tests for anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes.. Vet Parasitol (2002) 106:331–43.
    doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00093-6pubmed: 12079739google scholar: lookup
  12. Abbas G, Ghafar A, Hurley J, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Wilkes EJA. Cyathostomin resistance to moxidectin and combinations of anthelmintics in Australian horses.. Parasit Vectors (2021) 14:597.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05103-8pmc: PMC8645149pubmed: 34863271google scholar: lookup
  13. Nielsen MK, Mittel L, Grice A, Erskine M, Graves E, Vaala W. American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) parasite control guidelines.. (2019).
  14. Cabaret J, Benoit M, Laignel G, Nicourt C. Current management of farms and internal parasites by conventional and organic meat sheep French farmers and acceptance of targeted selective treatments.. Vet Parasitol (2009) 164:21–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.04.018pubmed: 19414221google scholar: lookup
  15. Berrag B, Ouzir M, Cabaret J. A survey on meat sheep farms in two regions of Morocco on farm structure and the acceptability of the targeted selective treatment approach to worm control.. Vet Parasitol (2009) 164:30–5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.04.019pubmed: 19419816google scholar: lookup
  16. Wilkes EJA, Heller J, Raidal SL, Woodgate RG, Hughes KJ. A questionnaire study of parasite control in thoroughbred and Standardbred horses in Australia.. Equine Vet J (2020) 52:547–55.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13207pubmed: 31725925google scholar: lookup
  17. Bolwell CF, Rosanowski SM, Scott I, Sells PD, Rogers CW. Questionnaire study on parasite control practices on thoroughbred and Standardbred breeding farms in New Zealand.. Vet Parasitol (2015) 209:62–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.011pubmed: 25740568google scholar: lookup
  18. Rosanowski SM, Scott I, Sells PD, Rogers CW, Bolwell CF. Cross-sectional survey of parasite control practices on thoroughbred and Standardbred training yards in New Zealand.. Equine Vet J (2016) 48:387–93.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12558pubmed: 26708731google scholar: lookup
  19. Fritzen B, Rohn K, Schnieder T, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Endoparasite control management on horse farms--lessons from worm prevalence and questionnaire data.. Equine Vet J (2010) 42:79–83.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x471485pubmed: 20121919google scholar: lookup
  20. Schneider S, Pfister K, Becher AM, Scheuerle MC. Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses—a risk assessment.. BMC Vet Res (2014) 10:262.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0262-zpmc: PMC4232665pubmed: 25387542google scholar: lookup
  21. Papini RA, De Bernart FM, Sgorbini M. A questionnaire survey on intestinal worm control practices in horses in Italy.. J Equine Vet (2015) 35:70–5.
  22. O’Meara B, Mulcahy G. A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland.. Vet Parasitol (2002) 109:101–10.
    doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00249-2pubmed: 12383629google scholar: lookup
  23. Ras-Norynska M, Sokol R. Parasite control practices in Polish horse farms.. Med Weter (2017) 73:683–6.
    doi: 10.21521/mw.5809google scholar: lookup
  24. Relf VE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. A questionnaire study on parasite control practices on UK breeding thoroughbred studs.. Equine Vet J (2012) 44:466–71.
  25. Tzelos T, Morgan ER, Easton S, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. A survey of the level of horse owner uptake of evidence-based anthelmintic treatment protocols for equine helminth control in the UK.. Vet Parasitol (2019) 274:108926.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.108926pubmed: 31563583google scholar: lookup
  26. Robert M, Hu W, Nielsen MK, Stowe CJ. Attitudes towards implementation of surveillance-based parasite control on Kentucky thoroughbred farms – current strategies, awareness and willingness-to-pay.. Equine Vet J (2015) 47:694–700.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12344pubmed: 25196091google scholar: lookup
  27. Nielsen M, Branan M, Wiedenheft A, Digianantonio R, Garber L, Kopral C. Parasite control strategies used by equine owners in the United States: a national survey.. Vet Parasitol (2018) 250:45–51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.12.012pubmed: 29329623google scholar: lookup
  28. Lind EO, Rautalinko E, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Morrison DA, Hoglund J. Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms.. Acta Vet Scand (2007) 49:25.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-49-25pmc: PMC2093939pubmed: 17897438google scholar: lookup
  29. Nielsen MK, Monrad J, Olsen SN. Prescription-only anthelmintics—a questionnaire survey of strategies for surveillance and control of equine strongyles in Denmark.. Vet Parasitol (2006) 135:47–55.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.020pubmed: 16309841google scholar: lookup
  30. Becher A, van Doorn DC, Pfister K, Kaplan R, Reist M, Nielsen M. Equine parasite control and the role of national legislation–a multinational questionnaire survey.. Vet Parasitol (2018) 259:6–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.07.001pubmed: 30056985google scholar: lookup
  31. Gómez-Cabrera K, Salas-Romero J, Sifontes JA, de la Torre CR, Salas JE, Nielsen MK. Feasibility of selective anthelmintic therapy to horses in tropical conditions: the Cuban scenario.. Trop Anim Health Prod (2021) 53:545.
    doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02966-ypubmed: 34779918google scholar: lookup
  32. Sallé G, Cabaret J. A survey on parasite management by equine veterinarians highlights the need for a regulation change.. Vet Rec (2015) 2:e000104.
    doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000104pmc: PMC4581345pubmed: 26421153google scholar: lookup
  33. Easton S, Bartley DJ, Hotchkiss E, Hodgkinson JE, Pinchbeck GL, Matthews JB. Use of a multiple choice questionnaire to assess UK prescribing channels’ knowledge of helminthology and best practice surrounding anthelmintic use in livestock and horses.. Prev Vet Med (2016) 128:70–7.
  34. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing.. (2023).
  35. Van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R.. J Stat Softw (2011) 45:1–67.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03google scholar: lookup
  36. Upton GJG. Fisher’s exact test.. J R Stat Soc Ser A (1992) 155:395–402.
    doi: 10.2307/2982890google scholar: lookup
  37. Nielsen MK. Apparent treatment failure of praziquantel and pyrantel pamoate against anoplocephalid tapeworms.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist (2023) 22:96–101.
  38. Miok K, Nguyen-Doan D, Robnik-Šikonja M, Zaharie D. Multiple imputation for biomedical data using Monte Carlo dropout autoencoders.. arXiv [Preprint] (2019).
    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.06173google scholar: lookup
  39. Zhong H, Hu W, Penn JM. Application of multiple imputation in dealing with missing data in agricultural surveys: the case of bmp adoption.. J Agric Resour Econ (2018) 43:78–102.
    doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.267611google scholar: lookup
  40. Lind EO, Höglund J, Ljungstrom BL, Nilsson O, Uggla A. A field survey on the distribution of strongyle infections of horses in Sweden and factors affecting faecal egg counts.. Equine Vet J (1999) 31:68–72.
  41. Reinemeyer CR, Nielsen MK. Review of the biology and control of Oxyuris equi.. Equine Vet Educ (2014) 26:584–91.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12218google scholar: lookup
  42. Ghafar A, Abbas G, King J, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, el-Hage C. Comparative studies on faecal egg counting techniques used for the detection of gastrointestinal parasites of equines: a systematic review.. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis (2021) 1:100046.
  43. Easton S, Pinchbeck GL, Bartley DJ, Hotchkiss E, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. A survey of UK prescribers’ experience of, and opinions on, anthelmintic prescribing practices for livestock and equines.. Prev Vet Med (2016) 134:69–81.
  44. Gomez HH, Georgi JR. Equine helminth infections: control by selective chemotherapy.. Equine Vet J (1991) 23:198–200.
  45. Leathwick D, Besier R. The management of anthelmintic resistance in grazing ruminants in Australasia—strategies and experiences.. Vet Parasitol (2014) 204:44–54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.12.022pubmed: 24439840google scholar: lookup
  46. Leathwick DM, Sauermann CW, Nielsen MK. Managing anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin parasites: investigating the benefits of refugia-based strategies.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist (2019) 10:118–24.
  47. Lyons E, Tolliver S, Drudge J. Historical perspective of cyathostomes: prevalence, treatment and control programs.. Vet Parasitol (1999) 85:97–112.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00091-6pubmed: 10485357google scholar: lookup
  48. Beasley A, Kotze A, Barnes T, Coleman G. Equine helminth prevalence and management practices on Australian properties as shown by coprological survey and written questionnaire.. Anim Prod Sci (2020) 60:2131–44.
    doi: 10.1071/AN18378google scholar: lookup
  49. Tydén E, Enemark HL, Franko MA, Höglund J, Osterman-Lind E. Prevalence of strongylus vulgaris in horses after ten years of prescription usage of anthelmintics in Sweden.. Vet Parasitol (2019) 276:100013.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100013pubmed: 34311935google scholar: lookup
  50. Scala A, Tamponi C, Sanna G, Predieri G, Dessì G, Sedda G. Gastrointestinal strongyles egg excretion in relation to age, gender, and management of horses in Italy.. Animals (Basel) (2020) 10:2283.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122283pmc: PMC7761647pubmed: 33287298google scholar: lookup
  51. Earle CG, Kington HA, Coles GC. Helminth control used by trainers of thoroughbreds in England.. Vet Rec (2002) 150:405–8.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.150.13.405pubmed: 11999277google scholar: lookup
  52. Stratford C, Lester H, Morgan E, Pickles K, Relf V, McGorum B. A questionnaire study of equine gastrointestinal parasite control in Scotland.. Equine Vet J (2014) 46:25–31.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12101pubmed: 23879737google scholar: lookup
  53. Bellaw JL, Krebs K, Reinemeyer CR, Norris JK, Scare JA, Pagano S. Anthelmintic therapy of equine cyathostomin nematodes – larvicidal efficacy, egg reappearance period, and drug resistance.. Int J Parasitol (2018) 48:97–105.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.08.009pubmed: 29050919google scholar: lookup
  54. Gokbulut C, McKellar QA. Anthelmintic drugs used in equine species.. Vet Parasitol (2018) 261:27–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.08.002pubmed: 30253849google scholar: lookup
  55. Nielsen MK, Banahan M, Kaplan RM. Importation of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins on a US thoroughbred farm.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist (2020) 14:99–104.
  56. Nielsen MK, Littman BA, Orzech SW, Ripley NE. Equine strongylids: ivermectin efficacy and fecal egg shedding patterns.. Parasitol Res (2022) 121:1691–7.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07509-4pubmed: 35384503google scholar: lookup
  57. Proudman C, Matthews J. Control of intestinal parasites in horses.. In Pract (2000) 22:90–7.
    doi: 10.1136/inpract.22.2.90google scholar: lookup
  58. Kumar N, Rao TKS, Varghese A, Rathor VS. Internal parasite management in grazing livestock.. J Parasit Dis (2013) 37:151–7.
    doi: 10.1007/s12639-012-0215-zpmc: PMC3793100pubmed: 24431559google scholar: lookup
  59. Herd RP. Epidemiology and control of equine strongylosis at newmarket.. Equine Vet J (1986) 18:447–52.
  60. Forteau L, Dumont B, Sallé G, Bigot G, Fleurance G. Horses grazing with cattle have reduced strongyle egg count due to the dilution effect and increased reliance on macrocyclic lactones in mixed farms.. Animal (2020) 14:1076–82.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002738pmc: PMC7163393pubmed: 31679547google scholar: lookup
  61. Abbas G, Ghafar A, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Ling E, Gauci CG. Prevalence and diversity of ascarid and strongylid nematodes in Australian thoroughbred horses using next-generation sequencing and Bioinformatic tools.. Vet Parasitol (2023) 323:110048.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.110048pubmed: 37844388google scholar: lookup
  62. Abbas G, Ghafar A, Koehler AV, Bauquier J, Wilkes EJA, Jacobson C. Molecular detection of Strongyloides sp. in Australian thoroughbred foals.. Parasit Vectors (2021) 14:444.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04966-1pmc: PMC8414860pubmed: 34479608google scholar: lookup
  63. Saeed MA, Beveridge I, Abbas G, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes E. Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia.. Parasit Vectors (2019) 12:188.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3445-4pmc: PMC6489199pubmed: 31036059google scholar: lookup
  64. Nielsen MK. Restrictions of anthelmintic usage: perspectives and potential consequences.. Parasit Vectors (2009) 2:S7.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S7pmc: PMC2751843pubmed: 19778468google scholar: lookup
  65. von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Traversa D, Demeler J, Rohn K, Milillo P, Schurmann S. Effects of worm control practices examined by a combined faecal egg count and questionnaire survey on horse farms in Germany, Italy and the UK.. Parasit Vectors (2009) 2:S3.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S3pmc: PMC2751839pubmed: 19778464google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.