FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Associations between Racing Thoroughbred Movement Asymmetrie...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(7); 1086; doi: 10.3390/ani14071086

Associations between Racing Thoroughbred Movement Asymmetries and Racing and Training Direction.

Abstract: Racehorses commonly train and race in one direction, which may result in gait asymmetries. This study quantified gait symmetry in two cohorts of Thoroughbreds differing in their predominant exercising direction; we hypothesized that there would be significant differences in the direction of asymmetry between cohorts. Methods: 307 Thoroughbreds (156 from Singapore Turf Club (STC)-anticlockwise; 151 from Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC)-clockwise) were assessed during a straight-line, in-hand trot on firm ground with inertial sensors on their head and pelvis quantifying differences between the minima, maxima, upward movement amplitudes (MinDiff, MaxDiff, UpDiff), and hip hike (HHD). The presence of asymmetry (≥5 mm) was assessed for each variable. Chi-Squared tests identified differences in the number of horses with left/right-sided movement asymmetry between cohorts and mixed model analyses evaluated differences in the movement symmetry values. Results: HKJC had significantly more left forelimb asymmetrical horses (Head: MinDiff < 0.0001, MaxDiff < 0.03, UpDiff < 0.01) than STC. Pelvis MinDiff ( = 0.010) and UpDiff ( = 0.021), and head MinDiff ( = 0.006) and UpDiff ( = 0.017) values were significantly different between cohorts; HKJC mean values indicated left fore- and hindlimb asymmetry, and STC mean values indicated right fore- and hindlimb asymmetry. Conclusions: the asymmetry differences between cohorts suggest that horses may adapt their gait to their racing direction, with kinematics reflecting reduced 'outside' fore- and hindlimb loading.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-04-03 PubMed ID: 38612325PubMed Central: PMC11011192DOI: 10.3390/ani14071086Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research evaluates how the direction in which racehorses train and race can impact their gait symmetry. Using sensors to measure motion, the study found significant differences between two groups of horses, whose predominant direction of movement during training was either clockwise or anti-clockwise.

Research Methodology

  • The sample for the study consisted of 307 Thoroughbred horses, drawn from two sources: 156 from the Singapore Turf Club (STC), who predominantly ran anti-clockwise; and 151 from the Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC), who predominantly ran clockwise.
  • The horse’s movement was studied as they trotted in a straight line on solid ground. Inertial sensors were placed on their heads and pelvis. This allowed the research team to quantify and compare various aspects of their movements, including the minimum, maximum, and upward amplitudes (referred to as MinDiff, MaxDiff, UpDiff), alongside hip hike deviation (HHD).
  • Dynamic movement symmetry was evaluated by checking for asymmetry (≥5 mm) across each variable.

Findings from the Study

  • Chi-Squared statistical tests were used to identify any material differences in the occurrence of left/right-sided movement asymmetry between the two groups.
  • The results revealed that the HKJC cohort had significantly more horses with a pronounced left forelimb asymmetry compared to the STC group. This observation was consistent across measurement variables (head: MinDiff <0.0001, MaxDiff <0.03, UpDiff <0.01).
  • A comparison of the movement symmetry values using mixed model analyses demonstrated meaningful differences in the MinDiff, MaxDiff, and UpDiff for both the head and pelvis between the two groups.
  • Based on the average values observed, the researchers deduced that the HKJC horses were more inclined to have left fore- and hindlimb asymmetry, while the STC cohort showed a prevalence for right fore- and hindlimb asymmetry.

Conclusion and Interpretation of the Findings

  • The study concluded that there is a connection between the primary direction of a horse’s movement (during training and racing) and the symmetry of its gait. The direction in which horses race appears to influences their gait adaptability.
  • These findings are significant as they suggest that horses modify their gait to their racing direction, with their movement reflecting diminished load on the ‘outside’ fore- and hindlimbs. This pattern may have implications for the long-term joint health and overall performance of racehorses.

Cite This Article

APA
Forbes B, Ho W, Parkes RSV, Sepulveda Caviedes MF, Pfau T, Martel DR. (2024). Associations between Racing Thoroughbred Movement Asymmetries and Racing and Training Direction. Animals (Basel), 14(7), 1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071086

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 7
PII: 1086

Researcher Affiliations

Forbes, Bronte
  • Hong Kong Jockey Club, Hong Kong, China.
  • Singapore Turf Club, Singapore 738078, Singapore.
Ho, Winnie
  • Hong Kong Jockey Club, Hong Kong, China.
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Parkes, Rebecca S V
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sepulveda Caviedes, Maria Fernanda
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London NW1 0TU, UK.
Pfau, Thilo
  • Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Martel, Daniel R
  • Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

Grant Funding

  • MRG-[1379] / Hong Kong Jockey Club Equine Welfare Research Foundation Limited
  • vet/prj/767 / Horserace Betting Levy Board

Conflict of Interest Statement

Daniel Martel’s postdoc study is funded by the Hong Kong Jockey Club’s Equine Welfare Research Foundation Limited grant (Reference No.: 1379). Thilo Pfau is a co-owner of EquiGait Ltd., a company offering gait analysis products and services. Bronte Forbes is employed by the HKJC as the Head of Veterinary Regulation, Welfare, and Biosecurity, but has no direct involvement with the Hong Kong Jockey Club’s Equine Welfare Foundation Limited.

References

This article includes 47 references
  1. Lam KH, Parkin TDH, Riggs CM, Morgan KL. Descriptive analysis of retirement of Thoroughbred racehorses due to tendon injuries at the Hong Kong Jockey Club (1992–2004). Equine Vet. J. 2007;39:143–148.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X159132pubmed: 17378443google scholar: lookup
  2. McGreevy PD, Rogers LJ. Motor and sensory laterality in thoroughbred horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;92:337–352.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.012google scholar: lookup
  3. McGreevy PD, Thomson PC. Differences in motor laterality between breeds of performance horse. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;99:183–190.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.010google scholar: lookup
  4. Chateau H, Camus M, Holden-Douilly L, Falala S, Ravary B, Vergari C, Lepley J, Denoix JM, Pourcelot P, Crevier-Denoix N. Kinetics of the forelimb in horses circling on different ground surfaces at the trot. Vet. J. 2013;198:e20–e26.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.028pubmed: 24511634google scholar: lookup
  5. Hobbs SJ, Licka T, Polman R. The difference in kinematics of horses walking, trotting and cantering on a flat and banked 10 m circle. Equine Vet. J. 2011;43:686–694.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00334.xpubmed: 21496095google scholar: lookup
  6. Pfau T, Stubbs NC, Kaiser LJ, Brown LEA, Clayton HM. Effect of trotting speed and circle radius on movement symmetry in horses during lunging on a soft surface. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012;73:1890–1899.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.12.1890pubmed: 23176414google scholar: lookup
  7. Starke SD, Willems E, May SA, Pfau T. Vertical head and trunk movement adaptations of sound horses trotting in a circle on a hard surface. Vet. J. 2012;193:73–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.10.019pubmed: 22104508google scholar: lookup
  8. Hardeman AM, Serra Bragança FM, Swagemakers JH, Weeren PR, Roepstorff L. Variation in gait parameters used for objective lameness assessment in sound horses at the trot on the straight line and the lunge. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:831–839.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13075pmc: PMC6850282pubmed: 30648286google scholar: lookup
  9. Serra Bragança FM, Rhodin M, van Weeren PR. On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: What evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model?. Vet. J. 2018;234:11–23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.006pubmed: 29680381google scholar: lookup
  10. Cully P, Nielsen B, Lancaster B, Martin J, McGreevy P. The laterality of the gallop gait in Thoroughbred racehorses. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0198545.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198545pmc: PMC5993273pubmed: 29883459google scholar: lookup
  11. Sepulveda Caviedes MF, Forbes BS, Pfau T. Repeatability of gait analysis measurements in Thoroughbreds in training. Equine Vet. J. 2017;50:513–518.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12802pubmed: 29284186google scholar: lookup
  12. Pfau T, Reilly P. How low can we go? Influence of sample rate on equine pelvic displacement calculated from inertial sensor data. Equine Vet. J. 2020;53:1075–1081.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13371pubmed: 33113248google scholar: lookup
  13. Pfau T, Witte TH, Wilson AM. A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor. J. Exp. Biol. 2005;208:2503–2514.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01658pubmed: 15961737google scholar: lookup
  14. Warner SM, Koch TO, Pfau T. Inertial sensors for assessment of back movement in horses during locomotion over ground. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42((Suppl. S3)):417–424.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00200.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  15. Starke SD, Witte TH, May SA, Pfau T. Accuracy and precision of hind limb foot contact timings of horses determined using a pelvis-mounted inertial measurement unit. J. Biomech. 2012;45:1522–1528.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.014pubmed: 22483227google scholar: lookup
  16. Martig S, Chen W, Lee PVS, Whitton RC. Bone fatigue and its implications for injuries in racehorses. Equine Vet. J. 2014;46:408–415.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12241pubmed: 24528139google scholar: lookup
  17. Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF, Dent EV, Kellerman TE, Wilson DA, Reed SK. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor–based lameness evaluation system for horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2011;72:1156–1163.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1156pubmed: 21879972google scholar: lookup
  18. Morrice-West AV, Hitchens PL, Walmsley EA, Tasker K, Lim SL, Smith AD, Whitton RC. Relationship between Thoroughbred workloads in racing and the fatigue life of equine subchondral bone. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:11528.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14274-ypmc: PMC9262984pubmed: 35798766google scholar: lookup
  19. Bell RP, Reed SK, Schoonover MJ, Whitfield CT, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF, Keegan KG. Associations of force plate and body-mounted inertial sensor measurements for identification of hind limb lameness in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2016;77:337–345.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.4.337pubmed: 27027831google scholar: lookup
  20. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, Gedon CA, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012;73:368–374.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.3.368pubmed: 22369528google scholar: lookup
  21. McCracken MJ, Kramer J, Keegan KG, Lopes M, Wilson DA, Reed SK, Lacarrubba A, Rasch M. Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation. Equine Vet. J. 2012;44:652–656.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00571.xpubmed: 22563674google scholar: lookup
  22. Parkes RSV, Pfau T, Weller R, Witte TH. The effect of curve running on distal limb kinematics in the Thoroughbred racehorse. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0244105.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244105pmc: PMC7771664pubmed: 33373408google scholar: lookup
  23. Bonnaerens S, Fiers P, Galle S, Derie R, Aerts P, Frederick E, Kaneko Y, Derave W, De Clercq D, Segers V. Relationship between duty factor and external forces in slow recreational runners. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2021;7:e000996.
    doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000996pmc: PMC7931753pubmed: 33747540google scholar: lookup
  24. Alexander RM, Maloiy GMO, Hunter B, Jayes AS, Nturibi J. Mechanical stresses in fast locomotion of buffalo (Syncews coffer) and elephant (Loxodonta africana). J. Zool. 1979;189:135–144.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1979.tb03956.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  25. Witte TH, Knill K, Wilson M. Determination of peak vertical ground reaction force from duty factor in the horse (Equus caballus). J. Exp. Biol. 2004;207:3639–3648.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01182pubmed: 15371472google scholar: lookup
  26. Parkes RSV, Weller R, Pfau T, Witte TH. The effect of training on stride duration in a cohort of two-year-old and three-year-old thoroughbred racehorses. Animals 2019;9:466.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070466pmc: PMC6680649pubmed: 31336595google scholar: lookup
  27. Firth EC. The response of bone, articular cartilage and tendon to exercise in the horse. J. Anat. 2006;208:513–526.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00547.xpmc: PMC2100207pubmed: 16637875google scholar: lookup
  28. Malekipour F, Whitton RC, Lee PVS. Distribution of mechanical strain in equine distal metacarpal subchondral bone: A microCT-based finite element model. Med. Nov. Technol. Devices. 2020;6:100036.
    doi: 10.1016/j.medntd.2020.100036google scholar: lookup
  29. Smith RKW, Goodship AE. The Effect of Early Training and the Adaptation and Conditioning of Skeletal Tissues. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2008;24:37–51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.005pubmed: 18314035google scholar: lookup
  30. Castejon-Riber C, Riber C, Rubio MD, Agüera E, Muñoz A. Objectives, Principles, and Methods of Strength Training for Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;56:93–103.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.04.011google scholar: lookup
  31. Greve L, Dyson S. What can we learn from visual and objective assessment of non-lame and lame horses in straight lines, on the lunge and ridden?. Equine Vet. Educ. 2020;32:479–491.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13016google scholar: lookup
  32. Johnson KA, Muir P, Nicoll RG, Roush JK. Asymmetric adaptive modeling of central tarsal bones in racing greyhounds. Bone 2000;27:257–263.
    doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00313-6pubmed: 10913919google scholar: lookup
  33. Malekipour F, Hitchens PL, Whitton RC, Vee-Sin Lee P. Effects of in vivo fatigue-induced microdamage on local subchondral bone strains. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2022;136:105491.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105491pubmed: 36198232google scholar: lookup
  34. Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne RW. Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans. Anim. Cogn. 2010;13:229–238.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0260-xpubmed: 19618222google scholar: lookup
  35. Lucidi P, Bacco G, Sticco M, Mazzoleni G, Benvenuti M, Bernabò N, Trentini R. Assessment of motor laterality in foals and young horses (Equus caballus) through an analysis of derailment at trot. Physiol. Behav. 2013;109:8–13.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.11.006pubmed: 23201413google scholar: lookup
  36. Williams DE, Norris BJ. Laterality in stride pattern preferences in racehorses. Anim. Behav. 2007;74:941–950.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.014google scholar: lookup
  37. Bloom F, Draper S, Bennet E, Marlin D, Williams J. Risk factors for lameness elimination in British endurance riding. Equine Vet. J. 2023;55:632–641.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13875pubmed: 36102466google scholar: lookup
  38. Bragança FMS, Brommer H, Van Den Belt AJM, Maree JTM, Van Weeren PR, Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MMS. Subjective and objective evaluations of horses for fit-to-compete or unfit-to-compete judgement. Vet. J. 2020;257:105454.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2020.105454pubmed: 32546354google scholar: lookup
  39. Scheidegger MD, Gerber V, Dolf G, Burger D, Flammer SA, Ramseyer A. Quantitative Gait Analysis Before and After a Cross-country Test in a Population of Elite Eventing Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;117:104077.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104077pubmed: 35820497google scholar: lookup
  40. Macaire C, Hanne-Poujade S, De Azevedo E, Denoix J-M, Coudry V, Jacquet S, Bertoni L, Tallaj A, Audigié F, Hatrisse C. Investigation of Thresholds for Asymmetry Indices to Represent the Visual Assessment of Single Limb Lameness by Expert Veterinarians on Horses Trotting in a Straight Line. Animals 2022;12:3498.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12243498pmc: PMC9774792pubmed: 36552418google scholar: lookup
  41. Dalin G, Drevemo S, Fredricson I, Jonsson K, Nilsson G. Ergonomic aspects of locomotor asymmetry in standardbred horses trotting through turns. An investigation with special reference to the fetlock joint, using high-speed cinematography and thermography. Acta Vet. Scandinavica. Suppl. 1973;44:111–139.
  42. Kallerud AS, Hernlund E, Byström A, Persson-Sjodin E, Rhodin M, Hendrickson EH, Fjordbakk CT. Non-banked curved tracks influence movement symmetry in two-year-old Standardbred trotters. Equine Vet. J. 2021;53:1178–1187.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13409pubmed: 33345343google scholar: lookup
  43. Azevedo M, Côrte F, Brass K, Gallio M, Dau S, Pozzobon R, Lopes M, Lopes L. Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2015;67:1475–1482.
    doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-8454google scholar: lookup
  44. Bergh MS, Piras A, Samii VF, Weisbrode SE, Johnson KA. Fractures in regions of adaptive modeling and remodeling of central tarsal bones in racing Greyhounds. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012;73:375–380.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.3.375pubmed: 22369529google scholar: lookup
  45. Pearce G, May-Davis S, Greaves D. Femoral asymmetry in the Thoroughbred racehorse. Aust. Vet. J. 2005;83:367–370.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2005.tb15636.xpubmed: 15986917google scholar: lookup
  46. Dow SM, Leendertz JA, Silver IA, Goodship AE. Identification of Subclinical Tendon Injury From Ground Reaction Force Analysis. Equine Vet. J. 1991;23:266–272.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1991.tb03715.xpubmed: 1915225google scholar: lookup
  47. Wong ASM, Morrice-West AV, Whitton RC, Hitchens PL. Changes in Thoroughbred speed and stride characteristics over successive race starts and their association with musculoskeletal injury. Equine Vet. J. 2022;55:194–204.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13581pmc: PMC10084173pubmed: 35477925google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.