Equine veterinary journal2012; 44(6); 652-656; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00571.x

Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation.

Abstract: Subjective evaluation of mild lameness has been shown to have poor interobserver reliability. Traditional methods of objective lameness evaluation require specialised conditions and equipment. Wireless inertial sensor systems have been developed to allow for simple, rapid, objective lameness detection in horses trotted over ground. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivities of an inertial sensor system and subjective evaluation performed by experienced equine practitioners at detecting lameness in horses. We hypothesised that the inertial sensor system would identify lameness at a lower level of sole pressure than a consensus of 3 experienced equine veterinarians. Methods: Fifteen horses were fitted with special shoes that allowed for lameness induction via sole pressure. Horses were simultaneously evaluated by 3 equine veterinarians and a wireless inertial sensor system. Horses were subjected to multiple trials: 1) before inserting the screw; 2) after inserting the screw to just touch the sole; and 3) after tightening the screw in half turn increments. The number of screw turns required for lameness identification in the correct limb by the inertial sensors and by consensus of 3 equine veterinarians was compared using the Wilcoxon test. Results: The inertial sensor system selected the limb with the induced lameness after fewer screw turns than did the 3 veterinarians (P<0.0001). The inertial sensor system selected the correct limb before the 3 veterinarians in 35 trials (58.33%), the evaluators selected the correct limb before the inertial sensors in 5 trials (8.33%), and in 20 trials (33.33%) they selected the correct limb at the same time. Conclusions: The inertial sensor system was able to identify lameness at a lower level of sole pressure than the consensus of 3 equine veterinarians. The inertial sensor system may be an effective aid to lameness localisation in clinical cases.
Publication Date: 2012-05-06 PubMed ID: 22563674DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00571.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study compares the effectiveness of a wireless inertial sensor system and traditional subjective evaluation by experienced veterinarians in detecting lameness in horses. The results suggest that the inertial sensor system is more sensitive and can identify lameness at a lower level of sole pressure than a consensus of three equine veterinarians.

Introduction

  • The researchers highlighted the challenge of accurately evaluating mild lameness in horses, noting the unreliability of subjective observations and the limitations of traditional, objective evaluation methods which require specialized conditions and equipment.
  • They introduced wireless inertial sensor systems as a more simple and rapid alternative designed for easy lameness detection when a horse is trotting on the ground.
  • The main aim of the research was to compare the effectiveness of this inertial sensor technology with the traditional subjective evaluation by experienced veterinarians.

Methods

  • Fifteen horses were used in the study, all fitted with special shoes that enabled the researchers to induce lameness by increasing the pressure on the sole of their feet.
  • These horses were evaluated by both three equine veterinarians and a wireless inertial sensor system.
  • The horses were subjected to several trials involving the incremental tightening of a screw to increase the pressure on the sole. The resulting degree of lameness was then assessed by both methods.
  • Both the inertial sensors and the consensus of the veterinarians were compared based on the number of screw turns needed to identify lameness in the correct limb using the Wilcoxon statistical test.

Results

  • The results show that the inertial sensor system could detect the lameness after fewer screw turns than the veterinarians, indicating its superior sensitivity.
  • Further, in most trials, the inertial sensors identified the correct lame limb before the veterinarians did.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that the inertial sensor system could detect lameness at a lower level of sole pressure than a consensus of three veterinarians.
  • This suggests that inertial sensor systems may be a more effective tool for lameness detection in clinical cases. Thus, such systems could enhance equine healthcare by allowing early detection and treatment of lameness issues.

Cite This Article

APA
McCracken MJ, Kramer J, Keegan KG, Lopes M, Wilson DA, Reed SK, LaCarrubba A, Rasch M. (2012). Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation. Equine Vet J, 44(6), 652-656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00571.x

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 44
Issue: 6
Pages: 652-656

Researcher Affiliations

McCracken, M J
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA. mccrackenme@missouri.edu
Kramer, J
    Keegan, K G
      Lopes, M
        Wilson, D A
          Reed, S K
            LaCarrubba, A
              Rasch, M

                MeSH Terms

                • Animals
                • Biomechanical Phenomena
                • Forelimb / physiopathology
                • Hindlimb / physiopathology
                • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
                • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
                • Horses
                • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
                • Monitoring, Ambulatory / veterinary
                • Pain / diagnosis
                • Pain / veterinary
                • Wireless Technology / instrumentation

                Citations

                This article has been cited 41 times.
                1. Crecan CM, Peu0219tean CP. Inertial Sensor Technologies-Their Role in Equine Gait Analysis, a Review.. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Jul 11;23(14).
                  doi: 10.3390/s23146301pubmed: 37514599google scholar: lookup
                2. Mercer MA, Davis JL, McKenzie HC. The Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Evaluation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Adult Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 10;13(10).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani13101597pubmed: 37238029google scholar: lookup
                3. Lawin FJ, Bystru00f6m A, Roepstorff C, Rhodin M, Almlu00f6f M, Silva M, Andersen PH, Kjellstru00f6m H, Hernlund E. Is Markerless More or Less? Comparing a Smartphone Computer Vision Method for Equine Lameness Assessment to Multi-Camera Motion Capture.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 24;13(3).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani13030390pubmed: 36766279google scholar: lookup
                4. Davu00edu00f0sson HB, Rees T, u00d3lafsdu00f3ttir MR, Einarsson H. Efficient Development of Gait Classification Models for Five-Gaited Horses Based on Mobile Phone Sensors.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 3;13(1).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani13010183pubmed: 36611791google scholar: lookup
                5. Macaire C, Hanne-Poujade S, De Azevedo E, Denoix JM, Coudry V, Jacquet S, Bertoni L, Tallaj A, Audigiu00e9 F, Hatrisse C, Hu00e9bert C, Martin P, Marin F, Chateau H. Investigation of Thresholds for Asymmetry Indices to Represent the Visual Assessment of Single Limb Lameness by Expert Veterinarians on Horses Trotting in a Straight Line.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 11;12(24).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani12243498pubmed: 36552418google scholar: lookup
                6. Timmerman I, Macaire C, Hanne-Poujade S, Bertoni L, Martin P, Marin F, Chateau H. A Pilot Study on the Inter-Operator Reproducibility of a Wireless Sensors-Based System for Quantifying Gait Asymmetries in Horses.. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Dec 6;22(23).
                  doi: 10.3390/s22239533pubmed: 36502233google scholar: lookup
                7. Panos KE, Morgan K, Gately R, Wilkinson J, Uden A, Reed SA. Short Communication: changes in gait after 12 wk of shoeing in previously barefoot horses.. J Anim Sci 2023 Jan 3;101.
                  doi: 10.1093/jas/skac374pubmed: 36383438google scholar: lookup
                8. Crecan CM, Morar IA, Lupsan AF, Repciuc CC, Rus MA, Pestean CP. Development of a Novel Approach for Detection of Equine Lameness Based on Inertial Sensors: A Preliminary Study.. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Sep 19;22(18).
                  doi: 10.3390/s22187082pubmed: 36146429google scholar: lookup
                9. Hoffmann JR, Geburek F, Hagen J, Bu00fcttner K, Cruz AM, Ru00f6cken M. Bilateral Change in Vertical Hoof Force Distribution in Horses with Unilateral Forelimb Lameness before and after Successful Diagnostic Anaesthesia.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 19;12(18).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani12182485pubmed: 36139345google scholar: lookup
                10. Bailey J, Redpath A, Hallowell G, Bowen M. An objective study into the effects of an incline on naturally occurring lameness in horses.. Vet Med Sci 2022 Nov;8(6):2390-2395.
                  doi: 10.1002/vms3.900pubmed: 35982535google scholar: lookup
                11. Figueirinhas P, Sanchez A, Rodru00edguez O, Vilar JM, Rodru00edguez-Altu00f3naga J, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Quesada A. Development of an Artificial Neural Network for the Detection of Supporting Hindlimb Lameness: A Pilot Study in Working Dogs.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jul 8;12(14).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani12141755pubmed: 35883302google scholar: lookup
                12. Pfau T, Bolt DM, Fiske-Jackson A, Gerdes C, Hoenecke K, Lynch L, Perrier M, Smith RKW. Linear Discriminant Analysis for Investigating Differences in Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Horses before/after Diagnostic Analgesia in Relation to Expert Judgement.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Mar 17;12(6).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani12060762pubmed: 35327159google scholar: lookup
                13. Pfau T, Scott WM, Sternberg Allen T. Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Reining Quarter Horses during Trot In-Hand, on the Lunge and during Ridden Exercise.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 27;12(5).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani12050596pubmed: 35268165google scholar: lookup
                14. Wang Y, Wagner ES, Yu D, Chen KJ, Keel TJ, Pownder SL, Koff MF, Cheetham J, Samaroo KJ, Reesink HL. Assessment of osteoarthritis functional outcomes and intra-articular injection volume in the rat anterior cruciate ligament transection model.. J Orthop Res 2022 Sep;40(9):2004-2014.
                  doi: 10.1002/jor.25245pubmed: 34994469google scholar: lookup
                15. Kongsawasdi S, Brown JL, Boonprasert K, Pongsopawijit P, Wantanajittikul K, Khammesri S, Tajarernmuang T, Thonglorm N, Kanta-In R, Thitaram C. Impact of Weight Carriage on Joint Kinematics in Asian Elephants Used for Riding.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 17;11(8).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani11082423pubmed: 34438880google scholar: lookup
                16. Quam V, Yardley J, Quam M, Paz C, Belknap J. Cryotherapy provides transient analgesia in an induced lameness model in horses.. Can Vet J 2021 Aug;62(8):834-838.
                  pubmed: 34341594
                17. Pfau T, Persson-Sjodin E, Gardner H, Orssten O, Hernlund E, Rhodin M. Effect of Speed and Surface Type on Individual Rein and Combined Left-Right Circle Movement Asymmetry in Horses on the Lunge.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:692031.
                  doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.692031pubmed: 34322537google scholar: lookup
                18. Briggs EV, Mazzu00e0 C. Automatic methods of hoof-on and -off detection in horses using wearable inertial sensors during walk and trot on asphalt, sand and grass.. PLoS One 2021;16(7):e0254813.
                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254813pubmed: 34310630google scholar: lookup
                19. Steinke SL, Montgomery JB, Barden JM. Accelerometry-Based Step Count Validation for Horse Movement Analysis During Stall Confinement.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:681213.
                  doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.681213pubmed: 34239913google scholar: lookup
                20. Marunova E, Dod L, Witte S, Pfau T. Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 3;11(6).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani11061665pubmed: 34204921google scholar: lookup
                21. Jansson A, Gunnarsson Vu00de, Ringmark S, Ragnarsson S, Su00f6derroos D, u00c1sgeirsson E, Ju00f3hannsdu00f3ttir TR, Liedberg C, Stefu00e1nsdu00f3ttir GJ. Increased body fat content in horses alters metabolic and physiological exercise response, decreases performance, and increases locomotion asymmetry.. Physiol Rep 2021 Jun;9(11):e14824.
                  doi: 10.14814/phy2.14824pubmed: 34110691google scholar: lookup
                22. MacKechnie-Guire R, Fisher M, Mathie H, Kuczynska K, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Pfau T. A Systematic Approach to Comparing Thermal Activity of the Thoracic Region and Saddle Pressure Distribution beneath the Saddle in a Group of Non-Lame Sports Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Apr 13;11(4).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani11041105pubmed: 33924326google scholar: lookup
                23. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral Spine in High-Level Dressage Horses Ridden in a Straight Line, in Sitting Trot and Seated Canter Compared to In-Hand Trot.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 20;11(3).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
                24. Schwarz J, Vidondo B, Maninchedda UE, Sprick M, Schu00f6pfer MC, Cruz AM. Inter-evaluator and Intra-evaluator Reliability of a Software Program Used to Extract Kinematic Variables Obtained by an Extremity-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit System in Sound Horses at the Trot Under Soft and Hard Ground Conditions and Treadmill Exercise.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:595455.
                  doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.595455pubmed: 33748204google scholar: lookup
                25. Sotelo EDP, Vendruscolo CP, Fu00fclber J, Seidel SRT, Jaramillo FM, Agreste FR, Silva LCLCD, Baccarin RYA. Effects of Joint Lavage with Dimethylsulfoxide on LPS-Induced Synovitis in Horses-Clinical and Laboratorial Aspects.. Vet Sci 2020 Apr 30;7(2).
                  doi: 10.3390/vetsci7020057pubmed: 32365982google scholar: lookup
                26. Zhao J, Marghitu DB, Schumacher J. Tranquilizer effect on the Lyapunov exponents of lame horses.. Heliyon 2020 Apr;6(4):e03726.
                  doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03726pubmed: 32322720google scholar: lookup
                27. Tabor G, Nankervis K, Fernandes J, Williams J. Generation of Domains for the Equine Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Outcome Score: Development by Expert Consensus.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 25;10(2).
                  doi: 10.3390/ani10020203pubmed: 31991716google scholar: lookup
                28. Neuenschwander HM, Moreira JJ, Vendruscolo CP, Fu00fclber J, Seidel SRT, Michelacci YM, Baccarin RYA. Hyaluronic acid has chondroprotective and joint-preserving effects on LPS-induced synovitis in horses.. J Vet Sci 2019 Nov;20(6):e67.
                  doi: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e67pubmed: 31775194google scholar: lookup
                29. Persson-Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Haubro Andersen P, Holm Forsstru00f6m K, Rhodin M. Effect of meloxicam treatment on movement asymmetry in riding horses in training.. PLoS One 2019;14(8):e0221117.
                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221117pubmed: 31408491google scholar: lookup
                30. Lee D, May K, Faramarzi B. Comparison of first and second acupuncture treatments in horses with chronic laminitis.. Iran J Vet Res 2019 Winter;20(1):9-12.
                  pubmed: 31191693
                31. Radtke A, Fortier LA, Regan S, Kraus S, Delco ML. Intra-articular anaesthesia of the equine stifle improves foot lameness.. Equine Vet J 2020 Mar;52(2):314-319.
                  doi: 10.1111/evj.13135pubmed: 31087355google scholar: lookup
                32. Broeckx SY, Martens AM, Bertone AL, Van Brantegem L, Duchateau L, Van Hecke L, Dumoulin M, Oosterlinck M, Chiers K, Hussein H, Pille F, Spaas JH. The use of equine chondrogenic-induced mesenchymal stem cells as a treatment for osteoarthritis: A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study.. Equine Vet J 2019 Nov;51(6):787-794.
                  doi: 10.1111/evj.13089pubmed: 30815897google scholar: lookup
                33. Vertz J, Deblanc D, Rhodin M, Pfau T. Effect of a unilateral hind limb orthotic lift on upper body movement symmetry in the trotting horse.. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0199447.
                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199447pubmed: 29928020google scholar: lookup
                34. Bosch S, Serra Braganu00e7a F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait.. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
                  doi: 10.3390/s18030850pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup
                35. Serra Braganu00e7a FM, Rhodin M, Wiestner T, Hernlund E, Pfau T, van Weeren PR, Weishaupt MA. Quantification of the effect of instrumentation error in objective gait assessment in the horse on hindlimb symmetry parameters.. Equine Vet J 2018 May;50(3):370-376.
                  doi: 10.1111/evj.12766pubmed: 29032614google scholar: lookup
                36. Faramarzi B, Lee D, May K, Dong F. Response to acupuncture treatment in horses with chronic laminitis.. Can Vet J 2017 Aug;58(8):823-827.
                  pubmed: 28761187
                37. Rhodin M, Egenvall A, Haubro Andersen P, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement asymmetries at trot in riding horses in training and perceived as free from lameness by the owner.. PLoS One 2017;12(4):e0176253.
                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176253pubmed: 28441406google scholar: lookup
                38. Banse H, Cribb AE. Comparative efficacy of oral meloxicam and phenylbutazone in 2 experimental pain models in the horse.. Can Vet J 2017 Feb;58(2):157-167.
                  pubmed: 28216685
                39. Delco ML, Kennedy JG, Bonassar LJ, Fortier LA. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: A distinct clinical entity requiring new research approaches.. J Orthop Res 2017 Mar;35(3):440-453.
                  doi: 10.1002/jor.23462pubmed: 27764893google scholar: lookup
                40. Maninchedda U, Lepage OM, Gangl M, Hilairet S, Remandet B, Meot F, Penarier G, Segard E, Cortez P, Jorgensen C, Steinberg R. Development of an equine groove model to induce metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis: a pilot study on 6 horses.. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0115089.
                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115089pubmed: 25680102google scholar: lookup
                41. Hammarberg M, Egenvall A, Pfau T, Rhodin M. Rater agreement of visual lameness assessment in horses during lungeing.. Equine Vet J 2016 Jan;48(1):78-82.
                  doi: 10.1111/evj.12385pubmed: 25399722google scholar: lookup