FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Basic Needs in Horses?-A Literature Review.
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(6); 1798; doi: 10.3390/ani11061798

Basic Needs in Horses?-A Literature Review.

Abstract: Every animal species has particular environmental requirements that are essential for its welfare, and when these so-called "basic needs" are not fulfilled, the animals suffer. The basic needs of horses have been claimed to be social contact, social companionship, free movement and access to roughage. To assess whether horses suffer when one or more of the four proposed basic needs are restricted, we examined several studies ( = 38) that reported behavioural and physiological reactions to these restrictions. We assigned the studies according to the four types of responses investigated: (a) Stress, (b) Active, (c) Passive, and (d) Abnormal Behaviour. Furthermore, the number of studies indicating that horses reacted to the restrictions were compared with the number of studies reporting no reaction. The limited number of studies available on single management restrictions did not allow conclusions to be drawn on the effect of each restriction separately, especially in the case of social companionship. However, when combinations of social contact, free movement and access to roughage were restricted, many of the horses had developed responses consistent with suffering. Passive Responses, indicating acute suffering, and Abnormal Behaviour, indicating suffering currently or at some time in the past, were especially clearly demonstrated. This provides further evidence of the usefulness of assessing behavioural parameters in combination with physiological measurements when evaluating horse welfare. This meta-analysis of the literature confirms that it is justified to claim that social contact, free movement and access to roughage are basic needs in horses.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-06-16 PubMed ID: 34208615PubMed Central: PMC8235049DOI: 10.3390/ani11061798Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aims to evaluate the basic needs of horses and the potential suffering they experience when these needs are not met, with a focus on the four proposed essentials: social contact, social companionship, free movement, and access to roughage. A number of existing studies were analyzed to determine the consequences on horse behavior and physiological responses when these needs are restricted or denied.

Understanding the Basic Needs of Horses

Horses, like all animals, require certain specific environmental conditions in order to maintain good health and welfare. In this research, the authors propose that the basic needs of horses can be categorised into four:

  • Social Contact: Interaction with other horses.
  • Social Companionship: A sustained bond or relationship with other horses.
  • Free Movement: The ability to move without confinement.
  • Access to Roughage: The availability of grains, forages, hay, or other bulky food.

Analytical Approach

In order to verify whether horses indeed suffer when denied these basic needs, the authors combed through 38 different studies that have examined the behavioral and physiological impacts of such restrictions on horses. These studies were classified based on the type of response being examined. These responses are:

  • Stress: Measurements of stress and discomfort.
  • Active: Proactive behavioural responses.
  • Passive: Reduced activity, possibly indicating pain or distress.
  • Abnormal Behaviour: Behaviours not typically seen in healthy and content horses.

Findings and Interpretation

The authors noted that because there’s a shortage of studies analyzing the impact of single management restrictions, notably social companionship, it’s challenging to draw conclusions on the effect of each restriction individually. However, they observed that when horses were denied a combination of social contact, freedom of movement, and access to roughage, clear signs of distress and abnormal behavior were exhibited. This indicates that the animal might be in acute suffering or may have suffered in the past.

Overall, they found that behavioral parameters coupled with physiological measurements offer a practical method for assessing horse welfare. Their large-scale analysis of existing literature supports the claim that social interaction, free movement, and access to roughage are indeed basic needs for horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Krueger K, Esch L, Farmer K, Marr I. (2021). Basic Needs in Horses?-A Literature Review. Animals (Basel), 11(6), 1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061798

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 6
PII: 1798

Researcher Affiliations

Krueger, Konstanze
  • Department of Equine Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nürtingen, Germany.
  • Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Esch, Laureen
  • Department of Equine Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nürtingen, Germany.
  • Department of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Veterinarian Medicine, Veterinaerstr. 13/R, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Farmer, Kate
  • Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland KY16 9JPh, UK.
Marr, Isabell
  • Department of Equine Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nürtingen, Germany.
  • Behavioural Physiology of Farm Animals, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70599 Hohenheim, Germany.

Grant Funding

  • none / Ministry of Science, Research and Art (MWK), Baden-Wu00fcrttemberg, Germany

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 66 references
  1. Noë R, Hammerstein P. Biological markets.. Trends Ecol Evol 1995 Aug;10(8):336-9.
    doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89123-5pubmed: 21237061google scholar: lookup
  2. Pusey AE, Packer C. The Ecology of relationships. Behavioural Ecology 2003 pp. 254–283.
  3. Korb J, Heinze J. Ecology of Social Evolution. 2008.
  4. Berger J. Wild Horses of the Great Basin. 1986.
  5. Rubenstein DI. Ecology and sociality in horses and zebras. Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution 1986 pp. 282–302.
  6. Mills D, Clarke A. Housing, Management and Welfare. The Welfare of Horses 2002 pp. 77–97.
  7. Goodwin D. Horse behaviour: Evolution, domestication and feralisation. The Welfare of Horses 2002 pp. 1–18.
  8. Waters AJ, Nicol CJ, French NP. Factors influencing the development of stereotypic and redirected behaviours in young horses: findings of a four year prospective epidemiological study.. Equine Vet J 2002 Sep;34(6):572-9.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776180241pubmed: 12357996google scholar: lookup
  9. Krueger K. Social Ecology of Horses. Ecology of Social Evolution 2008 pp. 195–206.
  10. Löckener S, Reese S, Erhard MH, Wöhr A-C. Pasturing in herds after housing in horseboxes induces a positive cognitive bias in horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2016;11:50–55.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.11.005google scholar: lookup
  11. Hoffmann G, Bentke A, Rose-Meierhöfer S, Berg W, Mazetti P, Hardarson GH. Influence of an active stable system on the behavior and body condition of Icelandic horses.. Animal 2012 Oct;6(10):1684-93.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000699pubmed: 22717220google scholar: lookup
  12. Heleski C, Shelle A, Nielsen B, Zanella A. Influence of housing on weanling horse behavior and subsequent welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:291–302.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00108-9google scholar: lookup
  13. Yarnell K, Hall C, Royle C, Walker SL. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing.. Physiol Behav 2015 May 1;143:51-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040pubmed: 25725117google scholar: lookup
  14. Mal ME, Friend TH, Lay DC, Vogelsang SG, Jenkins OC. Behavioural responses of mares to short-term confinement and social isolation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1991;31:13–24.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(91)90149-Rgoogle scholar: lookup
  15. Rivera E, Benjamin S, Nielsen B, Shelle J, Zanella A. Behavioral and physiological responses of horses to initial training: The comparison between pastured versus stalled horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:235–252.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00091-6google scholar: lookup
  16. Harewood E, McGowan C. Behavioral and physiological responses to stabling in naive horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2005;25:164–170.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2005.03.008google scholar: lookup
  17. Niederhöfer S. Stressbelastung bei Pferden in Abhängigkeit des Haltungssystems. 2009.
  18. Hartmann E. Managing Horses in Groups to Improve Horse Welfare and Human Safety. 2010.
  19. Erber R, Wulf M, Aurich J, Rose-Meierhöfer S, Hoffmann G, Von Lewinski M, Möstl E, Aurich C. Stress Response of Three-year-old Horse Mares to Changes in Husbandry System During Initial Equestrian Training. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:1088–1094.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.04.008google scholar: lookup
  20. Hoffmann G, Bockisch F-J, Kreimeier P. Einfluss des Haltungssystems auf die Bewegungsaktivität und Stressbelastung bei Pferden in Auslaufhaltungssystemen [Influence of the husbandry system on the movement activity and stress exposure of horses in discharge husbandry systems]. Agric. For. Res. 2009;2:105–112.
  21. Werhahn H, Hessel EF, Van den Weghe HF. Competition Horses Housed in Single Stalls (II): Effects of Free Exercise on the Behavior in the Stable, the Behavior during Training, and the Degree of Stress. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2012;32:22–31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2011.06.009google scholar: lookup
  22. Fureix C, Bourjade M, Henry S, Sankey C, Hausberger M. Exploring aggression regulation in managed groups of horses Equus caballus. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;138:216–228.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.009google scholar: lookup
  23. Aurich J, Wulf M, Ille N, Erber R, von Lewinski M, Palme R, Aurich C. Effects of season, age, sex, and housing on salivary cortisol concentrations in horses.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2015 Jul;52:11-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2015.01.003pubmed: 25700267google scholar: lookup
  24. Wille E. Vergleichende Untersuchungen von Pferden in Zeitweiliger Anbindehaltung, Einzelboxenhaltung und Gruppenhal-tung unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung des Liegeverhaltens. 2010.
  25. Marr I, Preisler V, Farmer K, Stefanski V, Krueger K. Non-invasive stress evaluation in domestic horses (Equus caballus): impact of housing conditions on sensory laterality and immunoglobulin A.. R Soc Open Sci 2020 Feb;7(2):191994.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.191994pmc: PMC7062079pubmed: 32257351google scholar: lookup
  26. Stomp M, D’Ingeo S, Henry S, Cousillas H, Hausberger M. Brain activity reflects (chronic) welfare state: Evidence from individual electroencephalography profiles in an animal model. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;236:105271.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105271google scholar: lookup
  27. Rowe JB, Lees MJ, Pethick DW. Prevention of acidosis and laminitis associated with grain feeding in horses.. J Nutr 1994 Dec;124(12 Suppl):2742S-2744S.
    doi: 10.1093/jn/124.suppl_12.2747Spubmed: 7996285google scholar: lookup
  28. Larose C, Richard-Yris MA, Hausberger M, Rogers LJ. Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations.. Laterality 2006 Jul;11(4):355-67.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500600624221pubmed: 16754236google scholar: lookup
  29. De Boyer Des Roches A, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S, Ezzaouïa M, Hausberger M. Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects' emotional value.. Physiol Behav 2008 Jun 9;94(3):487-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.03.002pubmed: 18455205google scholar: lookup
  30. Rogers LJ. Relevance of brain and behavioural lateralization to animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;127:1–11.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.06.008google scholar: lookup
  31. Marr I, Farmer K, Krüger K. Evidence for Right-Sided Horses Being More Optimistic than Left-Sided Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2018 Nov 22;8(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8120219pmc: PMC6315450pubmed: 30469484google scholar: lookup
  32. Giljov A, Karenina K. Differential roles of the right and left brain hemispheres in the social interactions of a free-ranging ungulate.. Behav Processes 2019 Nov;168:103959.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103959pubmed: 31513830google scholar: lookup
  33. Cooper JJ, McDonald L, Mills DS. The effect of increasing visual horizons on stereotypic weaving: implications for the social housing of stabled horses.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000 Aug 1;69(1):67-83.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00115-5pubmed: 10856785google scholar: lookup
  34. Flauger B, Krueger K. Aggression level and enclosure size in horses (Equus caballus). Pferdeheilkunde 2013;29:495–504.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20130404google scholar: lookup
  35. Søndergaard E, Ladewig J. Group housing exerts appositive effect on the behaviour of young horses during training. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;87:105–118.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.12.010google scholar: lookup
  36. Christensen JW, Ladewig J, Søndergaard E, Malmkvist J. Effects of individual versus group stabling on social behaviour in domestic stallions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;75:233–248.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00196-4google scholar: lookup
  37. Knubben JM, Furst A, Gygax L, Staﾬher M. Bite and kick injuries in horses: prevalence, risk factors and prevention.. Equine Vet J 2008 May;40(3):219-23.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X253118pubmed: 18086579google scholar: lookup
  38. Werhahn H, Hessel EF, Schulze H, Weghe HFV D. Temporary Turnout for Free Exercise in Groups: Effects on the Behavior of Competition Horses Housed in Single Stalls. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2011;31:417–425.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2011.01.006google scholar: lookup
  39. Chaplin SJ, Gretgrix L. Effect of housing conditions on activity and lying behaviour of horses.. Animal 2010 May;4(5):792-5.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731109991704pubmed: 22444135google scholar: lookup
  40. Nicol C, Badnell-Waters A, Bice R, Kelland A, Wilson A, Harris P. The effects of diet and weaning method on the behaviour of young horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;95:205–221.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.004google scholar: lookup
  41. Visser EK, Ellis AD, Van Reenen CG. The effect of two different housing conditions on the welfare of young horses stabled for the first time. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:521–533.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.003google scholar: lookup
  42. Jørgensen GHM, Liestøl SH-O, Bøe KE. Effects of enrichment items on activity and social interactions in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;129:100–110.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.11.004google scholar: lookup
  43. Ruet A, Lemarchand J, Parias C, Mach N, Moisan MP, Foury A, Briant C, Lansade L. Housing Horses in Individual Boxes Is a Challenge with Regard to Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 28;9(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090621pmc: PMC6770668pubmed: 31466327google scholar: lookup
  44. Pell SM, McGreevy PD. Prevalence of stereotypic and other problem behaviours in thoroughbred horses.. Aust Vet J 1999 Oct;77(10):678-9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1999.tb13166.xpubmed: 10590799google scholar: lookup
  45. McGreevy PD, French NP, Nicol CJ. The prevalence of abnormal behaviours in dressage, eventing and endurance horses in relation to stabling.. Vet Rec 1995 Jul 8;137(2):36-7.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.137.2.36pubmed: 8525580google scholar: lookup
  46. McGreevy PD, Cripps PJ, French NP, Green LE, Nicol CJ. Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the thoroughbred horse.. Equine Vet J 1995 Mar;27(2):86-91.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03041.xpubmed: 7607155google scholar: lookup
  47. Cooper JJ, Mason GJ. The identification of abnormal behaviour and behavioural problems in stabled horses and their relationship to horse welfare: a comparative review.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1998 Nov;(27):5-9.
    pubmed: 10484995doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb05136.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  48. Bachmann I, Audigé L, Staﾬher M. Risk factors associated with behavioural disorders of crib-biting, weaving and box-walking in Swiss horses.. Equine Vet J 2003 Mar;35(2):158-63.
    doi: 10.2746/042516403776114216pubmed: 12638792google scholar: lookup
  49. Nicol C. Equine learning: Progress and suggestions for future research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:193–208.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00093-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  50. Christensen JW, Søndergaard E, Thodberg K, Halekoh U. Effects of repeated regrouping on horse behaviour and injuries. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;133:199–206.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.013google scholar: lookup
  51. Brinkmann L, Gerken M, Riek A. Effect of long-term feed restriction on the health status and welfare of a robust horse breed, the Shetland pony (Equus ferus caballus).. Res Vet Sci 2013 Jun;94(3):826-31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.10.010pubmed: 23141417google scholar: lookup
  52. Brinkmann L, Gerken M, Hambly C, Speakman JR, Riek A. Saving energy during hard times: energetic adaptations of Shetland pony mares.. J Exp Biol 2014 Dec 15;217(Pt 24):4320-7.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.111815pubmed: 25359931google scholar: lookup
  53. Vitale V, Balocchi R, Varanini M, Sgorbini M, Macerata A, Sighieri C, Baragli P. The effects of restriction of movement on the reliability of heart rate variability measurements in the horse (Equus caballus). J. Vet. Behav. 2013;8:400–403.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.02.003google scholar: lookup
  54. Lesimple C, Reverchon-Billot L, Galloux P, Stomp M, Boichot L, Coste C, Henry S, Hausberger M. Free movement: A key for welfare improvement in sport horses?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;225:104972.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104972google scholar: lookup
  55. Redbo I, Redbo-Torstensson P, Ödberg FO, Hedendahl A, Holm J. Factors affecting behavioural disturbances in race-horses. Anim. Sci. 1998;66:475–481.
    doi: 10.1017/S1357729800009644google scholar: lookup
  56. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, Cronin E, Decullier E, Easterbrook PJ, Von Elm E, Gamble C, Ghersi D, Ioannidis JP, Simes J, Williamson PR. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.. PLoS One 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081pmc: PMC2518111pubmed: 18769481google scholar: lookup
  57. Nicol C. Understanding equine stereotypies.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Apr;(28):20-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05151.xpubmed: 11314230google scholar: lookup
  58. Kupriyanov R, Zhdanov R. The eustress concept: Problems and outlooks. World J. Med. Sci. 2014;11:179–185.
  59. Cooper J, Albentosa MJ. Behavioural adaptation in the domestic horse: Potential role of apparently abnormal responses including stereotypic behaviour. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005;92:177–182.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.017google scholar: lookup
  60. Costa ED, Dai F, Lebelt D, Scholz P, Barbieri S, Canali E, Minero M. Welfare assessment of horses: The AWIN approach. Anim. Welf. 2016;25:481–488.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.25.4.481google scholar: lookup
  61. McBride SD, Parker M, Roberts K, Hemmings A. Applied neurophysiology of the horse; implications for training, husbandry and welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:90–101.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.014google scholar: lookup
  62. Pawluski J, Jego P, Henry S, Bruchet A, Palme R, Coste C, Hausberger M. Low plasma cortisol and fecal cortisol metabolite measures as indicators of compromised welfare in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0182257.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182257pmc: PMC5590897pubmed: 28886020google scholar: lookup
  63. Von Borstel UK, Visser E, Hall C. Indicators of stress in equitation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:43–56.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.018google scholar: lookup
  64. May A. Evaluierung von Stressparametern beim Pferd im Zusammenhang mit dem Klinikaufenthalt [Evaluation of Stress Parameters in the Hospitalized Horse]. 2007.
  65. Rogers LJ. A Matter of Degree: Strength of Brain Asymmetry and Behaviour. Symmetry 2017;9:57.
    doi: 10.3390/sym9040057google scholar: lookup
  66. Fureix C, Jego P, Henry S, Lansade L, Hausberger M. Towards an ethological animal model of depression? A study on horses.. PLoS One 2012;7(6):e39280.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039280pmc: PMC3386251pubmed: 22761752google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 12 times.
  1. Foury A, Mach N, Ruet A, Lansade L, Moisan MP. Transcriptomic signature related to poor welfare of sport horses.. Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol 2023 Nov;16:100201.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100201pubmed: 37655309google scholar: lookup
  2. Krueger K, Gruentjens T, Hempel E. Wolf contact in horses at permanent pasture in Germany.. PLoS One 2023;18(8):e0289767.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289767pubmed: 37561797google scholar: lookup
  3. Annan R, Trigg LE, Hockenhull J, Allen K, Butler D, Valenchon M, Mullan S. Racehorse welfare across a training season.. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1208744.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1208744pubmed: 37448582google scholar: lookup
  4. Torres Borda L, Auer U, Jenner F. Equine Social Behaviour: Love, War and Tolerance.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 26;13(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13091473pubmed: 37174510google scholar: lookup
  5. Moore-Colyer M, Westacott A, Rousson L, Harris P, Daniels S. Where Are We Now? Feeds, Feeding Systems and Current Knowledge of UK Horse Owners When Feeding Haylage to Their Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 7;13(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13081280pubmed: 37106843google scholar: lookup
  6. Wiśniewska A, Janczarek I, Tkaczyk E, Wilk I, Janicka W, Próchniak T, Kaczmarek B, Pokora E, Łuszczyński J. Minimizing the Effects of Social Isolation of Horses by Contact with Animals of a Different Species: The Domestic Goat as an Example.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 2;12(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12172271pubmed: 36077991google scholar: lookup
  7. Greening L, McBride S. A Review of Equine Sleep: Implications for Equine Welfare.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:916737.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.916737pubmed: 36061116google scholar: lookup
  8. Schmucker S, Preisler V, Marr I, Krüger K, Stefanski V. Single housing but not changes in group composition causes stress-related immunomodulations in horses.. PLoS One 2022;17(8):e0272445.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272445pubmed: 35976860google scholar: lookup
  9. Krueger K, Trager L, Farmer K, Byrne R. Tool Use in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jul 22;12(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12151876pubmed: 35892526google scholar: lookup
  10. Krueger K, Schwarz S, Marr I, Farmer K. Laterality in Horse Training: Psychological and Physical Balance and Coordination and Strength Rather Than Straightness.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 16;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12081042pubmed: 35454288google scholar: lookup
  11. Schwarz S, Marr I, Farmer K, Graf K, Stefanski V, Krueger K. Does Carrying a Rider Change Motor and Sensory Laterality in Horses?. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 12;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12080992pubmed: 35454239google scholar: lookup
  12. Krueger K, Esch L, Byrne R. Need or opportunity? A study of innovations in equids.. PLoS One 2021;16(9):e0257730.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257730pubmed: 34570831google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.