FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / BEVA primary care clinical guidelines: Wound management in t...
Equine veterinary journal2020; 53(1); 18-29; doi: 10.1111/evj.13289

BEVA primary care clinical guidelines: Wound management in the horse.

Abstract: There are currently no evidence summaries on wounds in the horse. Objective: To develop evidence-based guidelines on wound management in the horse. Methods: Evidence review using the GRADE framework. Methods: Research questions were proposed by a panel of veterinarians, and developed into PICO format. Evidence in the veterinary literature was evaluated using the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework. Searches for human evidence summaries were conducted in the NICE, Cochrane and JBI databases. Final recommendations were based on both veterinary and human evidence. Conclusions: The research questions were categorised into three areas: A. Wound lavage and topical treatments; B. Wound debridement and closure; C. Therapeutics for wound healing. Three hundred and six veterinary publications were identified across thirteen different topics. Fourteen papers were assessed using the GRADE criteria. Twenty-five human evidence summaries were reviewed. The results were developed into recommendations: Wound lavage and topical treatments: (i) Tap water should be considered instead of saline for lavage; (ii) Povidone iodine lavage should be considered for contaminated wounds; (iii) Topical silver sulfadiazine may not be suitable for acute wounds; (iv) Optimal lavage pressures are around 13 psi. Wound debridement and closure: (i) Debridement pads should be considered for wound preparation; (ii) Larvae debridement should be considered in selected cases; (iii) Hydrosurgery should be considered in acute contaminated wounds. Therapeutics for wound healing: (i) Honey may reduce duration of some phases of wound healing. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on the use of chemical debridement, therapeutic ultrasound, laser therapy, wound closure with staples compared to sutures, or identify optimal concentrations of antiseptic lavage solutions. Conclusions: Low quality evidence in veterinary literature; majority of recommendations were based on human evidence. Conclusions: These findings should be used to inform decision-making in equine primary care practice.
© 2020 EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-07-17 PubMed ID: 32463930DOI: 10.1111/evj.13289Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research provides evidence-based guidelines for treating wounds in horses. The study evaluates both veterinary and human literature on this topic, and categorizes the findings into three key areas: wound lavage and topical treatments, wound debridement and closure, and therapeutics for wound healing.

Objective of the Study

  • This research aims to establish evidence-based guidelines on how to manage wound injuries in horses. Previously, there were no such guidelines, which made this study necessary.

Methodology

  • The study uses the GRADE framework for its evidence review, where research questions are proposed and formulated into the PICO format. This involves identifying the Problem or Patient group, Intervention, Comparison group and Outcome.
  • The researchers started by reviewing veterinary literature for relevant evidence, and further conducted searches for human evidence summaries in the NICE, Cochrane, and JBI databases.
  • The guidelines were derived from analyses of both veterinary and human evidence.

Results and Recommendations

  • The research questions were split into three categories: wound lavage and topical treatments, debridement and closure, and therapeutics for wound healing.
  • 306 relevant veterinary publications were identified from thirteen different topics. Further, 14 papers were assessed using the GRADE framework and 25 human evidence summaries were reviewed.
  • In case of wound lavage, tap water was recommended over saline for washing the wound. Povidone iodine is also recommended for contaminated wounds, while topical silver sulfadiazine may not be suitable for fresh wounds. The optimal lavage pressure was determined to be around 13 psi.
  • For debridement and closure, debridement pads and larvae debridement are recommended for wound preparation. Hydrosurgery is recommended for acute contaminated wounds.
  • In the case of therapeutics for wound healing, honey was found to reduce the duration of some phases of wound healing.

Limitations and Conclusions

  • The researchers found insufficient evidence to make conclusions on the use of chemical debridement, therapeutic ultrasound, laser therapy, wound closure with staples compared to sutures, or identifying optimal concentrations of antiseptic lavage solutions.
  • They concluded that the veterinary literature available is of low quality. Hence, most of the recommendations are based on human evidence. However, these guidelines should help inform decision-making in equine primary care practice for wound management.

Cite This Article

APA
Freeman SL, Ashton NM, Elce YA, Hammond A, Hollis AR, Quinn G. (2020). BEVA primary care clinical guidelines: Wound management in the horse. Equine Vet J, 53(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13289

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 1
Pages: 18-29

Researcher Affiliations

Freeman, Sarah L
  • University of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK.
Ashton, Neal M
  • Oakham Veterinary Hospital, Oakham, Rutland, UK.
Elce, Yvonne A
  • Equine Referral Hospital, Langford Vets, Langford, Bristol, UK.
Hammond, Anna
  • Equine Referral Hospital, Langford Vets, Langford, Bristol, UK.
Hollis, Anna R
  • Centre for Equine Studies, Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK.
Quinn, Greg
  • Waikato Equine Veterinary Centre, Cambridge, New Zealand.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horses
  • Primary Health Care
  • Surgical Wound Infection / drug therapy
  • Surgical Wound Infection / veterinary
  • Wound Healing

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Bowden A, England GCW, Burford JH, Mair TS, Furness W, Freeman SL. Prevalence and outcome of conditions seen ‘out of hours’ by first opinion equine clinicians at two practices over a three year period (2011-2013).. Equine Vet J 2017;49:11.
  2. Bowen IM, Redpath A, Burford JH, Hallowell GD, Dugdale A, Watson T. BEVA primary care clinical guidelines: analgesia.. Equine Vet J 2020;52:13-27.
  3. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:395-400.
  4. Grindlay DJ, Brennan ML, Dean RS. Searching the veterinary literature: a comparison of the coverage of veterinary journals by nine bibliographic databases.. J Vet Med Educ 2012;39:404-12.
  5. Fernandez R, Griffiths R, Ussia C. Effectiveness of solutions, techniques and pressure in wound cleansing.. JBI Libr Syst Rev 2004;2:1-55.
  6. Queirós P, Santos E, Apóstolo J, Cardoso D, Cunha M, Rodrigues M. The effectiveness of cleansing solutions for wound treatment: a systematic review.. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep 2014;12:121-51.
  7. Fernandez R, Griffiths R. Water for wound cleansing.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:CD003861.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd003861.pub3google scholar: lookup
  8. Norman G, Atkinson RA, Smith TA, Rowlands C, Rithalia AD, Crosbie EJ. Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;10:CD012234.
  9. Berry DB 2nd, Sullins KE. Effects of topical application of antimicrobials and bandaging on healing and granulation tissue formation in wounds of the distal aspect of the limbs in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:88-92.
  10. Harmon CCG, Hawkins JF, Li J, Connell S, Miller M, Saenger M. Effects of topical application of silver sulfadiazine cream, triple antimicrobial ointment, or hyperosmolar nanoemulsion on wound healing, bacterial load, and exuberant granulation tissue formation in bandaged full-thickness equine skin wounds.. Am J Vet Res 2017;78:638-46.
  11. Khafaga AF, Abu-Ahmed HM, El-Khamary AN, Elmehasseb IM, Shaheen HM. Enhancement of equid distal limb wounds healing by topical application of silver nanoparticles.. J Equine Vet Sci 2018;61:76-87.
  12. Toth T, Brostrom H, Baverud V, Emanuelson U, Bagge E, Karlsson T. Evaluation of LHP(R) (1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study.. Acta Vet Scand 2011;53:45.
  13. Vermeulen H, van Hattem JM, Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink DT. Topical silver for treating infected wounds.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD005486.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd005486.pub2google scholar: lookup
  14. Storm-Versloot MN, Vos CG, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H. Topical silver for preventing wound infection.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD006478.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd006478.pub2google scholar: lookup
  15. Cullum N, Davies M, Harrison M, Howers LM, Murphy S, Walters B. Chronic wounds: advanced wound dressings and antimicrobial dressings.. 2016.
  16. Campbell B. The Debrisoft monofilament debridement pad for use in acute or chronic wounds.. 2019.
  17. Bader OA, Eesa MJ. Treatment of hyper-granulated limb wounds in horses.. Iraqi J Vet Sci 2011;25:71-80.
  18. Smith F, Dryburgh N, Donaldson J, Mitchell M. Debridement for surgical wounds.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD006214.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd006214.pub4google scholar: lookup
  19. Lepage OM, Doumbia A, Perron-Lepage MF, Gangl M. The use of maggot debridement therapy in 41 equids.. Equine Vet J 2012;43:120-5.
  20. Sherman RA, Morrison S, Ng D. Maggot debridement therapy for serious horse wounds - a survey of practitioners.. Vet J 2007;174(1):86-91.
  21. Edwards J, Stapley S. Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD003556.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd003556.pub2google scholar: lookup
  22. Markevich YO, McLeod-Roberts J, Mousley M, Melloy E. Maggot therapy for diabetic neuropathic foot wounds.. 2000;p A15.
  23. Skarlina EM, Wilmink JM, Fall N, Gorvy DA. Effectiveness of conventional and hydrosurgical debridement methods in reducing Staphylococcus aureus inoculation of equine muscle in vitro.. Equine Vet J 2015;47:218-22.
  24. Meads C. The Versajet II hydrosurgery system for surgical debridement of acute and chronic wounds and burns.. 2014.
  25. Krishnan R, MacNeil SD, Malvankar-Mehta MS. Comparing sutures versus staples for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009257.
  26. Hemming K, Pinkney T, Futaba K, Pennant M, Morton DG, Lilford RJ. A systematic review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis: staples versus sutures for surgical procedures.. PLoS One 2013;8:e75132.
  27. Tsang AS, Dart AJ, Sole-Guitart A, Dart CM, Perkins NR, Jeffcott LB. Comparison of the effects of topical application of UMF20 and UMF5 manuka honey with a generic multifloral honey on wound healing variables in an uncontaminated surgical equine distal limb wound model.. Aust Vet J 2017;95:333-7.
  28. Bischofberger AS, Dart CM, Horadagoda N, Perkins NR, Jeffcott LB, Little CB. Effect of Manuka honey gel on the transforming growth factor beta1 and beta3 concentrations, bacterial counts and histomorphology of contaminated full-thickness skin wounds in equine distal limbs.. Aust Vet J 2016;94:27-34.
  29. Bischofberger AS, Dart CM, Perkins NR, Dart AJ. A preliminary study on the effect of manuka honey on second-intention healing of contaminated wounds on the distal aspect of the forelimbs of horses.. Vet Surg 2011;40:898-902.
  30. Bischofberger AS, Dart CM, Perkins NR, Kelly A, Jeffcott L, Dart AJ. The effect of short- and long-term treatment with manuka honey on second intention healing of contaminated and noncontaminated wounds on the distal aspect of the forelimbs in horses.. Vet Surg 2013;42:154-60.
  31. . Chronic wounds: advanced wound dressings and antimicrobial dressings, Ed: NICE. .
  32. Jull AB, Cullum N, Dumville JC, Westby MJ, Deshpande S, Walker N. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD005083.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd005083.pub4google scholar: lookup
  33. Fretz PB, Li Z. Low energy laser irradiation treatment for second intention wound healing in horses.. Can Vet J 1992;33:650-3.
  34. Petersen SL, Botes C, Olivier A, Guthrie AJ. The effect of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on wound healing in horses.. Equine Vet J 1999;31:228-31.
  35. Chen C, Hou WH, Chan ES, Yeh ML, Lo HL. Phototherapy for treating pressure ulcers.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD009224.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd009224.pub2google scholar: lookup
  36. Wang HT, Yuan JQ, Zhang B, Dong ML, Mao C, Hu D. Phototherapy for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD011979.
  37. Cullum N, Liu Z. Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;5:CD001180.
  38. Baba-Akbari Sari A, Flemming K, Cullum NA, Wollina U. Therapeutic ultrasound for pressure ulcers.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD001275.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd001275.pub2google scholar: lookup
  39. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Chapter 10: umbrella reviews.. 2017.
  40. Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: clinical practice guidelines.. BMJ 2016;353:i2089.
  41. Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.. BMJ 2016;353:i2016.
  42. Hinchcliff KW, Couetil LL, Knight PK, Morley PS, Robinson NE, Sweeney CR. Exercise induced pulmonary hemorrhage in horses: American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement.. J Vet Intern Med 2015;29:743-58.

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Hmb O, L W, M V, Jm W, Ct F. A topographic analysis of skin thickness in horses. Vet Res Commun 2026 Feb 25;50(3).
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-026-11124-4pubmed: 41739265google scholar: lookup
  2. Partusch L, Rutland CS, Martens A, Du Cheyne C, De Spiegelaere W, Michler JK. Collagen composition in equine exuberant granulation tissue reflects tissue immaturity. PLoS One 2025;20(11):e0335179.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335179pubmed: 41196884google scholar: lookup
  3. Albanese V, Straticò P, Fischer H, Petrizzi L. Equine Distal Limb Wounds: Economic Impact and Short-Term Prognosis of Non-Synovial Versus Synovial Lesions in Southern Germany. Vet Sci 2025 Mar 1;12(3).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12030205pubmed: 40266953google scholar: lookup
  4. Ribeiro G, Carvalho L, Borges J, Prazeres J. The Best Protocol to Treat Equine Skin Wounds by Second Intention Healing: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2024 May 18;14(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14101500pubmed: 38791717google scholar: lookup
  5. Helal IE, Al-Abbadi HA, El-Daharawy MH, Ahmed MF. Enhancement of chronic wound healing with maltodextrin/ascorbic acid gel: a clinical evaluation of distal limb wounds in horses. J Anim Sci Technol 2022 Sep;64(5):997-1007.
    doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e52pubmed: 36287738google scholar: lookup
  6. Jørgensen E, Bjarnsholt T, Jacobsen S. Biofilm and Equine Limb Wounds. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 27;11(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102825pubmed: 34679846google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.