Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science2014; 92(5); 1821-1831; doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7586

BIOETHICS SYMPOSIUM II: current factors influencing perceptions of animals and their welfare.

Abstract: To address escalating concerns about livestock animal care and welfare it is necessary to better understand the factors that may predispose people to develop such concerns. It has been hypothesized that experiences with, beliefs about, and emotional connections to animals may influence level of perceived obligation toward and therefore concern for animals. However, the extent to which people's classifications of animals and their status as pet owners may impact their views on food animal care and welfare practices remains unclear. An online survey of 798 U.S. households was therefore conducted in June 2012 to understand differences in consumer sentiment towards various animal species, classification of certain species (as pet, livestock or neither), and variations in food animal welfare concerns between dog and/or cat owners and those who do not own such species. Sixty-six percent of households in the survey owned at least 1 animal. Forty-eight percent owned dogs, 41% owned cats, 3% owned horses, and 10% owned other animals. As expected, dogs and cats were classified by most respondents (90%) as pets. Most respondents similarly categorized rabbits (58%) and horses (55%) as pets, although consensus was not found for horses with 27% classifying them as livestock animals and 18% as neither pets nor livestock. Over 80% of respondents classified beef cows, dairy cows, pigs, chickens, and turkeys as livestock. The majority of survey respondents were opposed to eating cats and dogs followed closely by horses due to ethical and/or spiritual reasons. Dog and/or cat owners more often reported having a source for animal welfare information (68%) than those who did not own these species (49%). Additionally, dog and/or cat owners were more concerned about food animal welfare for both domestically raised food animals and those raised outside the United States (dog and/or cat owners mean level of concern was 3.88 for domestic animal welfare and 5.16 for those raised outside the United States compared with non-dog or -cat owners with means of 4.46 and 5.46, respectively). Although a causal relationship cannot be established, pet ownership and increased concern for food animal welfare appear to be correlated. These data suggest that increased interest in protecting food animals may stem from interactions with and emotional connections to pets, especially when combined with other factors such as having a source for animal welfare information, education level, age, and gender.
Publication Date: 2014-03-26 PubMed ID: 24671600DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-7586Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article examines the factors that may influence people’s perceptions of animal care and welfare, particularly of livestock. Using an online survey of U.S. households, the study explored how ownership and classification of different animal species might impact people’s views on animal welfare in food production. Results suggest that pet ownership, particularly dogs and cats, is correlated with enhanced concern for food animal welfare.

Background and Objectives

  • The study was conducted in response to growing concerns about the care and welfare of livestock animals.
  • The main objective was to understand factors that may predispose people to develop concerns about animal welfare.
  • Specifically, the researchers explored whether people’s experiences with, beliefs about, and emotional connections to animals influence their perceptions of animal welfare.
  • The study also examined the potential impact of people’s classification of animals (as pet, livestock, or neither) and their status as pet owners on their views regarding food animal care and welfare practices.

Method

  • The research utilized an online survey of 798 U.S. households conducted in June 2012.
  • The survey probed into the differences in consumer sentiment towards various animal species, their classification, and variations in food animal welfare concerns between dog and/or cat owners, and those who do not own such species.

Findings

  • Results revealed that 66% of the households in the survey owned at least one animal, predominantly dogs and cats.
  • The majority of respondents classified dogs and cats as pets, along with rabbits and horses. However, consensus was not established for horses with some respondents classifying them as livestock animals.
  • Most respondents classified beef cows, dairy cows, pigs, chickens, and turkeys as livestock, and were opposed to eating cats, dogs, and horses due to ethical or spiritual reasons.
  • Dog and/or cat owners were more often found to have a source for animal welfare information compared to those who did not own these species.
  • The study also found that dog and/or cat owners were more concerned about food animal welfare, both domestically raised and those raised outside the United States, compared to non-dog or -cat owners.

Conclusions

  • Although a direct causal relationship could not be established, a correlation was found between pet ownership and increased concern for food animal welfare.
  • The researchers suggest that this increased interest in protecting food animals may stem from interactions with and emotional connections to pets, in combination with other factors such as having a source for animal welfare information, education level, age, and gender.

Cite This Article

APA
McKendree MG, Croney CC, Olynk Widmar NJ. (2014). BIOETHICS SYMPOSIUM II: current factors influencing perceptions of animals and their welfare. J Anim Sci, 92(5), 1821-1831. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7586

Publication

ISSN: 1525-3163
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 92
Issue: 5
Pages: 1821-1831

Researcher Affiliations

McKendree, M G S
  • Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.
Croney, C C
    Olynk Widmar, N J

      MeSH Terms

      • Animal Husbandry / ethics
      • Animal Husbandry / standards
      • Animal Welfare / ethics
      • Animal Welfare / standards
      • Animals
      • Cats
      • Congresses as Topic
      • Dogs
      • Human-Animal Bond
      • Ownership
      • Pets
      • Rabbits
      • United States

      Citations

      This article has been cited 4 times.
      1. Bir C, Davis M, Widmar N, Zuelly S, Erasmus M. Perceptions of Animal Welfare With a Special Focus on Turkeys.. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:413.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00413pubmed: 31824971google scholar: lookup
      2. Byrd E, Lee JG, Widmar NJO. Perceptions of Hunting and Hunters by U.S. Respondents.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Nov 4;7(11).
        doi: 10.3390/ani7110083pubmed: 29113041google scholar: lookup
      3. Byrd E, Widmar NO, Fulton J. Of Fur, Feather, and Fin: Human's Use and Concern for Non-Human Species.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Mar 9;7(3).
        doi: 10.3390/ani7030022pubmed: 28282913google scholar: lookup
      4. Widmar NJ, Byrd ES, Dominick SR, Wolf CA, Acharya L. Social desirability bias in reporting of holiday season healthfulness.. Prev Med Rep 2016 Dec;4:270-6.
        doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.06.017pubmed: 27453811google scholar: lookup