Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal2025; 103(4); 163-170; doi: 10.1111/avj.13423

Blood culture isolates and antimicrobial sensitivities from 1621 critically ill neonatal foals (2005-2022).

Abstract: Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal foals. Administration of appropriate antimicrobials and early aggressive supportive treatment is central to the efficacious treatment of neonatal sepsis and has proven to positively influence outcomes. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate microorganism results and antimicrobial sensitivities of neonatal foals with a positive blood culture submitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) during 2005-2022. The secondary aim was to compare the results to those of a similar previous study performed at the same ICU during 1999-2004. Methods: Retrospective analysis of bacterial blood culture results from neonatal foals ≤7 days of age admitted to Scone Equine Hospital between 2005 and 2022 was analysed. Samples were collected at admission. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was assessed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Susceptibility results from the two study periods were compared using Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was achieved at P value <0.05. Results: From 1621 blood cultures submitted, 380 returned a positive result (380/1621; 23.4%). A total of 402 bacterial isolates were recovered: 55.5% Gram-positive isolates (223/402), 42.6% Gram-negative isolates (171/402) and 1.7% anaerobic isolates (7/409). A significant increase in Gram-positive isolates between time periods was observed (P = 0.002). Gram-negative isolates had significant increases of resistance in seven out of nine antimicrobials tested. Conclusions: This study provides Australian veterinarians with information on common bacterial pathogens in critically ill neonatal foals to assist with making informed empirical antimicrobial choices to optimise treatment efficacy. Increases in bacterial resistance to commonly administered antimicrobials were observed; therefore, culture and sensitivity testing should guide antimicrobial choices. Judicious use of antimicrobials in equine practice is imperative.
Publication Date: 2025-01-28 PubMed ID: 39873324DOI: 10.1111/avj.13423Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Bloodstream infections in critically ill newborn foals were studied over 17 years to identify the responsible bacteria and their antibiotic resistance patterns. The research compared findings to a previous period and highlighted changes in bacterial types and antimicrobial resistance, providing guidance for effective treatment.

Study Background and Purpose

  • Neonatal sepsis (blood infection) is a major cause of illness and death in newborn foals.
  • Effective treatment depends on early use of appropriate antibiotics and supportive care.
  • The study aimed to analyze bacterial species found in blood cultures from critically ill foals admitted to an ICU between 2005-2022 and examine their antibiotic sensitivities.
  • A secondary aim was to compare the data with findings from an earlier study conducted at the same ICU from 1999-2004 to identify trends over time.

Methods

  • Retrospective study of blood cultures collected from foals aged 7 days or younger admitted to Scone Equine Hospital ICU.
  • Blood samples were collected upon admission to the ICU to detect bacterial infections.
  • Bacterial isolation and identification were performed, followed by antibiotic susceptibility testing using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, a standard laboratory technique to assess bacterial resistance.
  • Statistical analysis compared results from two periods (1999-2004 and 2005-2022) using Fisher’s exact test, with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results

  • Out of 1621 blood cultures, 380 (23.4%) were positive for bacterial infection.
  • A total of 402 bacterial isolates were identified; some samples had multiple isolates.
  • Bacterial classification:
    • 55.5% were Gram-positive bacteria (223/402)
    • 42.6% were Gram-negative bacteria (171/402)
    • 1.7% were anaerobic bacteria (7/409)
  • A significant increase in the proportion of Gram-positive bacterial isolates was observed when compared to the earlier study period (P = 0.002).
  • Gram-negative bacteria showed a significant increase in resistance to seven out of the nine tested antibiotics over time, indicating rising antimicrobial resistance.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The study provides updated information about the types of bacterial pathogens commonly causing bloodstream infections in critically ill neonatal foals in Australia.
  • Identification of changing patterns in bacterial species (increase in Gram-positive organisms) influences empirical antibiotic choices when culture results are unavailable.
  • The increase in antibiotic resistance, especially among Gram-negative bacteria, highlights the need for routine culture and sensitivity testing to guide effective antimicrobial therapy.
  • Judicious use of antibiotics in equine medicine is critical to prevent further development of resistance and ensure treatments remain effective.
  • Veterinarians should use this data to optimize early antimicrobial therapy for neonatal foals with sepsis, improving survival and outcomes.

Cite This Article

APA
Flood JA, Collins NM, Russell CM, Cuming RS, Carrick JB, Cudmore LA. (2025). Blood culture isolates and antimicrobial sensitivities from 1621 critically ill neonatal foals (2005-2022). Aust Vet J, 103(4), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13423

Publication

ISSN: 1751-0813
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 103
Issue: 4
Pages: 163-170

Researcher Affiliations

Flood, J A
  • Scone Equine Hospital, 406 Bunnan Road, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
Collins, N M
  • Scone Equine Hospital, 406 Bunnan Road, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
Russell, C M
  • Scone Equine Hospital, 406 Bunnan Road, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
Cuming, R S
  • Scone Equine Hospital, 406 Bunnan Road, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
Carrick, J B
  • Equine Specialist Consulting, Kingdon Street, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
Cudmore, L A
  • Scone Equine Hospital, 406 Bunnan Road, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / blood
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Animals, Newborn
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Blood Culture / veterinary
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
  • Critical Illness
  • Sepsis / veterinary
  • Sepsis / microbiology
  • Sepsis / drug therapy
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
  • Female
  • Gram-Negative Bacteria / drug effects
  • Gram-Negative Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Male
  • Gram-Positive Bacteria / drug effects
  • Gram-Positive Bacteria / isolation & purification

References

This article includes 18 references
  1. Furr M, McKenzie H III. Factors associated with the risk of positive blood culture in neonatal foals presented to a referral center (2000–2014). J Vet Intern Med 2020;34:2738–2750.
  2. Giguère S, Weber EJ, Sanchez LC. Factors associated with outcome and gradual improvement in survival over time in 1065 equine neonates admitted to an intensive care unit. Equine Vet J 2017;49:45–50.
  3. Eaton S. Neonatal sepsis – pathology and clinical signs. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35:498–503.
  4. Theelen MJ, Wilson WD, Edman JM. Temporal trends in prevalence of bacteria isolated from foals with sepsis: 1979–2010. Equine Vet J 2014;46:169–173.
  5. Vendrig JC, Fink‐Gremmels J. Intestinal barrier function in neonatal foals: options for improvement. Vet J 2012;193:32–37.
  6. Bookbinder LC, Mani R, Carr EA. Antibiograms of field and hospital acquired equine neonatal bacterial fluid cultures in the Midwestern United States: 149 samples (2007‐2018). J Vet Intern Med 2023;37:1193–1200.
  7. Theelen MJP, Wilson WD, Byrne BA. Initial antimicrobial treatment of foals with sepsis: do our choices make a difference?. Vet J 2019;243:74–76.
  8. Floyd EF, Easton‐Jones CA, Theelen MJP. Systemic antimicrobial therapy in foals. Equine Vet Educ 2022;34:49–56.
  9. Baggot JD. Drug therapy in the neonatal foal. Vet Clinics North Am: Equine Pract 1994;10:87–107.
  10. Organization WH. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2014.
  11. Johns IC, Adams EL. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in equine bacterial isolates: 1999–2012. Vet Rec 2015;176:334.
  12. Russell C, Axon J, Blishen A. Blood culture isolates and antimicrobial sensitivities from 427 critically ill neonatal foals. Aust Vet J 2008;86:266–271.
  13. Stewart AJ, Hinchcliff KW, Saville WJ. Actinobacillus sp. bacteremia in foals: clinical signs and prognosis. J Vet Intern Med 2002;16:464–471.
  14. Giancola S, Hart KA. Equine blood cultures: can we do better?. Equine Vet J 2023;55:584–592.
  15. Maddox TW, Clegg PD, Williams NJ. Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from horses: epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance. Equine Vet J 2015;47:756–765.
  16. Hammerum AM. Enterococci of animal origin and their significance for public health. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:619–625.
  17. Willis AT, Magdesian KG, Byrne BA. Enterococcus infections in foals. Vet J 2019;248:42–47.
  18. Tang A, Shi Y, Dong Q. Prognostic differences in sepsis caused by gram‐negative bacteria and gram‐positive bacteria: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Crit Care 2023;27:467.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Hardefeldt L, Thomas K, Page S, Norris J, Browning G, El Hage C, Stewart A, Gilkerson J, Muscatello G, Verwilghen D, van Galen G, Bauquier J, Cuming R, Reynolds B, Whittaker C, Wilkes E, Clulow J, Burden C, Begg L. Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for horses in Australia. Aust Vet J 2025 Dec;103(12):781-889.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.70003pubmed: 40903020google scholar: lookup
  2. Graham AE, Colgate VA, Floyd EF. Antibiograms of Bacterial Cultures From Equine Neonates at a United Kingdom Hospital: 381 Samples (2018-2023). J Vet Intern Med 2025 Sep-Oct;39(5):e70198.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.70198pubmed: 40802493google scholar: lookup
  3. Hardefeldt LY, Thomas K, Begg L. Antimicrobial use and prescribing practices by equine veterinarians in Australia: Insights into reproduction, dentistry, compounding and use for nonbactericidal effects. Aust Vet J 2025 Jun;103(6):307-313.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.13428pubmed: 40000246google scholar: lookup