Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2018; 5; 233; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00233

Bone Marrow Aspiration Does Not Induce a Measurable Pain Response Compared to Sham Procedure.

Abstract: Bone marrow is commonly collected from horses for regenerative medicine applications. Little information is available regarding pain experienced by the horse during bone marrow aspiration. The objective of this study was to characterize horse reaction and pain response during bone marrow aspiration (BMA) compared to a sham (SHAM) procedure. We hypothesized there would be significantly greater horse reaction or pain response measured by salivary cortisol, heart rate variability, and depth and duration of sedation between BMA and SHAM. Twelve university owned horses underwent a BMA and sham procedure, 4 weeks apart in a randomized cross-over design, while sedated with 0.4 mg/kg xylazine hydrochloride. As measures of sedation depth, head height was recorded and sedation level was scored at specific procedural time points. Salivary cortisol was measured immediately before and 2 h after each procedure. Heart rate variability was assessed before, during, and after each procedure. There were no differences in head height, sedation score, or salivary cortisol between groups. No differences were noted between groups in heart rate variability before or during the procedure, but there was a significant decrease in low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio after the procedure in the BMA group. Over time, there was a significant reduction in LF/HF ratio during the procedure in both groups. Overall, BMA from the sternum did not result in a measurable pain response during, or in the 2 h following the procedure, in comparison to a sham procedure.
Publication Date: 2018-10-01 PubMed ID: 30327768PubMed Central: PMC6174850DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00233Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper studies the pain response in horses during Bone Marrow Aspiration (BMA), comparing it to a mock procedure. The results suggest that the BMA procedure does not cause any measurable pain response in horses.

Objective and Hypothesis

  • The objective of this research was to assess the pain responses in horses during bone marrow aspiration (BMA), a procedure used regularly to collect bone marrow for regenerative medicine applications.
  • Prior to this study, there was limited information concerning the extent of discomfort or pain that horses experience during BMA, which prompted this investigation.
  • The researchers hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in the horse’s reaction or pain response, as measured by salivary cortisol, heart rate variability, and depth and duration of sedation, between the BMA and a sham (placebo) procedure.

Methodology

  • Twelve horses owned by the university underwent a BMA and sham procedure, four weeks apart in a randomized cross-over design. The purpose of the sham procedure was to act as a control against the BMA.
  • For consistent results, all horses were sedated with 0.4 mg/kg of xylazine hydrochloride during the procedures.
  • The researchers recorded various metrics such as head height (a measure of sedation depth), sedation level at specific procedural timepoints, salivary cortisol levels before and 2 hours after each procedure, as well as heart rate variability before, during, and after each procedure.

Findings

  • The study found no significant differences in the head height, sedation score, or salivary cortisol levels between the groups – meaning the BMA procedure didn’t discernably increase these metrics compared to the sham procedure.
  • No differences were observed in heart rate variability before or during the procedure between the two groups. However, a significant decrease in the low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio after the procedure was observed in the BMA group.
  • Over time, a significant reduction in the LF/HF ratio, a sign often linked to pain or stress, was detected during the procedure in both groups.

Conclusion

  • In conclusion, the study revealed that BMA from the sternum did not result in a measurable pain response, either during or in the 2 hours following the procedure, when compared to a sham procedure.
  • This vital information contributes to ensuring better well-being and welfare of horses undergoing BMA for regenerative medicine applications.

Cite This Article

APA
Rowland AL, Navas de Solis C, Lepiz MA, Cummings KJ, Watts AE. (2018). Bone Marrow Aspiration Does Not Induce a Measurable Pain Response Compared to Sham Procedure. Front Vet Sci, 5, 233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00233

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 5
Pages: 233
PII: 233

Researcher Affiliations

Rowland, Aileen L
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Navas de Solis, Cristobal
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Lepiz, Mauricio A
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Cummings, Kevin J
  • Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Watts, Ashlee E
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

References

This article includes 28 references
  1. Goodrich LR, Frisbie DD, Kisiday JD. How to harvest bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells for expansion and injection. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 2008, Vol. 54 San Diego, CA: (2008). p. 252–7.
  2. Narbona-Carceles J, Vaquero J, Suárez-Sancho S, Forriol F, Fernández-Santos ME. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell aspirates from alternative sources: is the knee as good as the iliac crest?. Injury 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 4:S42-7.
    doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(14)70009-9pubmed: 25384474google scholar: lookup
  3. Yuvalı Karacan Y, Demircioğlu B, Ali R. Pain, anxiety, and depression during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.. Agri 2017 Oct;29(4):167-172.
    doi: 10.5505/agri.2017.90582pubmed: 29171647google scholar: lookup
  4. Vanhelleputte P, Nijs K, Delforge M, Evers G, Vanderschueren S. Pain during bone marrow aspiration: prevalence and prevention.. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003 Sep;26(3):860-6.
    doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00312-9pubmed: 12967736google scholar: lookup
  5. Oel C, Gerhards H, Gehlen H. Effect of retrobulbar nerve block on heart rate variability during enucleation in horses under general anesthesia.. Vet Ophthalmol 2014 May;17(3):170-4.
    doi: 10.1111/vop.12061pubmed: 23738675google scholar: lookup
  6. McConachie EL, Giguère S, Rapoport G, Barton MH. Heart rate variability in horses with acute gastrointestinal disease requiring exploratory laparotomy.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2016 Mar-Apr;26(2):269-80.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.12362pubmed: 26260488google scholar: lookup
  7. Peeters M, Sulon J, Beckers JF, Ledoux D, Vandenheede M. Comparison between blood serum and salivary cortisol concentrations in horses using an adrenocorticotropic hormone challenge.. Equine Vet J 2011 Jul;43(4):487-93.
  8. Christensen JW, Beekmans M, van Dalum M, VanDierendonck M. Effects of hyperflexion on acute stress responses in ridden dressage horses.. Physiol Behav 2014 Apr 10;128:39-45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.024pubmed: 24518858google scholar: lookup
  9. Becker-Birck M, Schmidt A, Wulf M, Aurich J, von der Wense A, Möstl E, Berz R, Aurich C. Cortisol release, heart rate and heart rate variability, and superficial body temperature, in horses lunged either with hyperflexion of the neck or with an extended head and neck position.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2013 Apr;97(2):322-30.
  10. Mair TS, Sherlock CE, Boden LA. Serum cortisol concentrations in horses with colic.. Vet J 2014 Sep;201(3):370-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.06.005pubmed: 24986316google scholar: lookup
  11. Rietmann TR, Staᆲher M, Bernasconi P, Auer JA, Weishaupt MA. The association between heart rate, heart rate variability, endocrine and behavioural pain measures in horses suffering from laminitis.. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2004 Jun;51(5):218-25.
  12. Erber R, Wulf M, Becker-Birck M, Kaps S, Aurich JE, Möstl E, Aurich C. Physiological and behavioural responses of young horses to hot iron branding and microchip implantation.. Vet J 2012 Feb;191(2):171-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.008pubmed: 21917490google scholar: lookup
  13. Kang OD, Lee WS. Changes in Salivary Cortisol Concentration in Horses during Different Types of Exercise.. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016 May;29(5):747-52.
    doi: 10.5713/ajas.16.0009pmc: PMC4852239pubmed: 26954193google scholar: lookup
  14. van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM, Kollée LA, Hopman JC, Stoelinga GB, van Geijn HP. Heart rate variability.. Ann Intern Med 1993 Mar 15;118(6):436-47.
  15. von Rosenberg W, Chanwimalueang T, Adjei T, Jaffer U, Goverdovsky V, Mandic DP. Resolving Ambiguities in the LF/HF Ratio: LF-HF Scatter Plots for the Categorization of Mental and Physical Stress from HRV.. Front Physiol 2017;8:360.
    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00360pmc: PMC5469891pubmed: 28659811google scholar: lookup
  16. Rajendra Acharya U, Paul Joseph K, Kannathal N, Lim CM, Suri JS. Heart rate variability: a review.. Med Biol Eng Comput 2006 Dec;44(12):1031-51.
    doi: 10.1007/s11517-006-0119-0pubmed: 17111118google scholar: lookup
  17. Abramovich-Sivan S, Bitton Y, Karin J, David D, Akselrod S. The effects of lidocaine on cardiac parasympathetic control in normal subjects and in subjects after myocardial infarction.. Clin Auton Res 1996 Dec;6(6):313-9.
    doi: 10.1007/bf02556301pubmed: 8985619google scholar: lookup
  18. Shafqat K, Pal SK, Kumari S, Kyriacou PA. Changes in Heart Rate Variability in patients under local anesthesia.. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;2007:299-302.
    doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352283pubmed: 18001949google scholar: lookup
  19. Nagaraj SB, McClain LM, Zhou DW, Biswal S, Rosenthal ES, Purdon PL, Westover MB. Automatic Classification of Sedation Levels in ICU Patients Using Heart Rate Variability.. Crit Care Med 2016 Sep;44(9):e782-9.
  20. de Grauw JC, van Loon JP. Systematic pain assessment in horses.. Vet J 2016 Mar;209:14-22.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.07.030pubmed: 26831169google scholar: lookup
  21. Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH. An equine pain face.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015 Jan;42(1):103-14.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12212pmc: PMC4312484pubmed: 25082060google scholar: lookup
  22. Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration.. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e92281.
  23. Virgin J, Hendrickson D, Wallis T, Rao S. Comparison of intraoperative behavioral and hormonal responses to noxious stimuli between mares sedated with caudal epidural detomidine hydrochloride or a continuous intravenous infusion of detomidine hydrochloride for standing laparoscopic ovariectomy.. Vet Surg 2010 Aug;39(6):754-60.
  24. Jochle W, Moore JN, Brown J, Baker GJ, Lowe JE, Fubini S, Reeves MJ, Watkins JP, White NA. Comparison of detomidine, butorphanol, flunixin meglumine and xylazine in clinical cases of equine colic.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1989 Jun;(7):111-6.
  25. Paddleford RR, Harvey RC. Alpha 2 agonists and antagonists.. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999 May;29(3):737-45.
    doi: 10.1016/S0195-5616(99)50058-2pubmed: 10332820google scholar: lookup
  26. Degen C, Christen S, Rovo A, Gratwohl A. Bone marrow examination: a prospective survey on factors associated with pain.. Ann Hematol 2010 Jun;89(6):619-24.
    doi: 10.1007/s00277-010-0934-0pubmed: 20333524google scholar: lookup
  27. Brunetti GA, Tendas A, Meloni E, Mancini D, Maggiore P, Scaramucci L, Giovannini M, Niscola P, Cartoni C, Alimena G. Pain and anxiety associated with bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: a prospective study on 152 Italian patients with hematological malignancies.. Ann Hematol 2011 Oct;90(10):1233-5.
    doi: 10.1007/s00277-011-1166-7pubmed: 21287348google scholar: lookup
  28. Hjortholm N, Jaddini E, Hałaburda K, Snarski E. Strategies of pain reduction during the bone marrow biopsy.. Ann Hematol 2013 Jan;92(2):145-9.
    doi: 10.1007/s00277-012-1641-9pmc: PMC3542425pubmed: 23224244google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Rowland AL, Burns ME, Levine GJ, Watts AE. Preparation Technique Affects Recipient Immune Targeting of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:724041.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.724041pubmed: 34595230google scholar: lookup