Case-control investigation of the factors affecting the risk of horses falling during steeplechase racing in the UK.
Abstract: A concurrent case-control study of 12 UK racecourses was made between March 1, 2000, and August 31, 2001, to identify and quantify the factors associated with the risk of horses falling in steeplechase races. Cases were defined as a jumping effort at a steeplechase fence that resulted in a fall and controls were defined as a successful jumping effort over any steeplechase fence at any of the 12 racecourses within 14 days before or after the case fall. Information on the horse, the jockey and the race were collected and all the fences on all the courses were surveyed. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine the relationships between the predictor variables and the risk of falling. There was one fall per 254 jumping efforts. The risk of a horse falling decreased the more times it had raced on a particular racecourse. The number of fences, the distance from the previous fence and the nature of the previous fence also affected the risk of falling. If the previous fence was a water jump the risk of falling increased; fences that were sited on flat or slight uphill gradients (up to approximately 1 in 25) were associated with a lower risk of horses falling than downhill fences, and higher takeoff boards were associated with a higher risk of falling.
Publication Date: 2004-07-22 PubMed ID: 15264483DOI: 10.1136/vr.155.1.11Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research paper involves a case-control study conducted on 12 UK racecourses over a period of around 18 months, aiming to identify the factors affecting the risk of horses falling during a steeplechase race.
Research Scope and Definition
- The research was done between March 2000 and August 2001 on 12 UK racecourses.
- Case falling was defined as a situation where a horse attempts a jump at a steeplechase but ends up falling.
- Control cases were considered as successful jumps over any steeplechase fence at any of the 12 racecourses within 14 days before or after a case fall.
Data Collection
- Data about the horse, the jockey, and the race were collected to provide a comprehensive view of all the factors that could potentially affect the risk of falling.
- Every fence on all the courses was surveyed to collect detailed and accurate information about them, as they are one of the most significant factors affecting the risk of falling.
Analysis Method
- Conditional logistic regression was used to examine the relationships between the predictor variables, which include details about the horse, the jockey, the race, and the fence, and the falling risk.
Findings of the Research
- The research found that there was one fall per every 254 jumping attempts.
- The more a horse raced on a particular course, the less its risk of falling.
- The number of fences, their distance from the previous fence, and the type of previous fence also had an impact on the falling risk.
- If the previous fence was a water jump, it increased the risk of falling.
- Fences located on flat or slight uphill gradients (up to about 1 in 25) were associated with a lower risk of falling when compared to downhill fences.
- Higher takeoff boards were linked with a greater risk of falling.
Cite This Article
APA
Pinchbeck GL, Clegg PD, Proudman CJ, Morgan KL, French NP.
(2004).
Case-control investigation of the factors affecting the risk of horses falling during steeplechase racing in the UK.
Vet Rec, 155(1), 11-15.
https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.155.1.11 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston CH64 7TE.
MeSH Terms
- Accidental Falls / prevention & control
- Accidental Falls / statistics & numerical data
- Animals
- Athletic Injuries / epidemiology
- Athletic Injuries / etiology
- Athletic Injuries / prevention & control
- Athletic Injuries / veterinary
- Case-Control Studies
- England / epidemiology
- Horses / injuries
- Risk Factors
- Running / injuries
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists