Analyze Diet
Reproduction, fertility, and development1997; 9(1); 105-110; doi: 10.1071/r96052

Case studies in wildlife immunocontraception: wild and feral equids and white-tailed deer.

Abstract: Non-lethal management methods are required for wild equids that are protected by law and for deer inhabiting areas where lethal controls are not legal or safe. Single or multiple inoculations of porcine zona pellucida (PZP) vaccine have been delivered to wild horses and deer by means of darts. Contraceptive efficacy in horses after two inoculations ranged from 90% to 100%, and after a single inoculation ranged from 19% to 28%. Mares given a controlled-release form of the vaccine had foaling rates ranging from 7% to 20%. No detectable changes in social organization or behaviours among treated horses occurred. Contraceptive effects were reversible after 4 consecutive years of treatment but 5-7 years of treatment resulted in ovulation failure and decreased urinary oestrogen concentrations. Among deer, two inoculations were 70-100% effective in preventing fawns, but one inoculation yielded a contraceptive efficacy of < or = 20%, with pregnancies occurring late in the breeding season; a single annual booster inoculation reduced fertility to 20% in the second year. Energy costs of extended breeding seasons were less than those resulting from pregnancy. After two years of treatment, ovaries appeared normal. These studies suggest that PZP immunocontraception can be successfully applied to certain free-roaming populations of wild horses and deer.
Publication Date: 1997-01-01 PubMed ID: 9109199DOI: 10.1071/r96052Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discusses the successful use of porcine zona pellucida (PZP) immunocontraception as a non-lethal control method for managing the population growth of wild horses and deer.

Objective and Methods

  • The study aimed to investigate non-lethal methods for wild equines and deer management, particularly in situations where lethal controls aren’t allowed or safe.
  • The researchers employed the use of single or multiple doses of Porcine Zona Pellucida (PZP) vaccination, delivered to the wild horses and deer via darts.
  • They looked at the contraceptive efficacy of the vaccine in both animals, assessing potency after single or multiple inoculations. They also monitored behavioral changes, the contraceptive effects’ reversibility, and physiological changes in the animals.

Findings

  • In horses, the contraceptive efficacy after administering two doses of PZP ranged from 90% to 100%, and after a single dose, from 19% to 28%.
  • Controlled-release form of the PZP vaccine resulted in pregnancy rates of 7% to 20% in mares.
  • No discernible alterations in the social organization or behaviors among the treated horses were detected.
  • The contraceptive effects were reversible after four consecutive years of treatment. However, after 5-7 years of treatment, mares exhibited signs of ovulation failure and decreased urinary estrogen concentrations were noted.
  • For deer, two PZP shots were 70-100% effective in preventing fawn births for the first year and one shot was less or equal to 20% effective, with late-season pregnancies. A single annual booster shot decreased fertility to 20% for the following year.
  • Extended breeding seasons due to the contraceptive treatment led to less energy consumption compared to that caused by pregnancy. After two years of treatment, the ovaries of the deer remained normal.

Conclusion

  • These research findings suggest that the use of PZP immunocontraception can be successfully used to manage the population of certain free-roaming groups of wild horses and deer. It not only offers a non-lethal solution to control wildlife population but also appears to have minimal impact on animal behavior and health over time.

Cite This Article

APA
Kirkpatrick JF, Turner JW, Liu IK, Fayrer-Hosken R, Rutberg AT. (1997). Case studies in wildlife immunocontraception: wild and feral equids and white-tailed deer. Reprod Fertil Dev, 9(1), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1071/r96052

Publication

ISSN: 1031-3613
NlmUniqueID: 8907465
Country: Australia
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Pages: 105-110

Researcher Affiliations

Kirkpatrick, J F
  • ZooMontana, Billings 59108, USA.
Turner, J W
    Liu, I K
      Fayrer-Hosken, R
        Rutberg, A T

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Antigens / immunology
          • Contraception, Immunologic / veterinary
          • Deer
          • Equidae
          • Female
          • Immunization, Secondary
          • Pest Control / methods
          • Pregnancy
          • Swine
          • Vaccines / administration & dosage
          • Zona Pellucida / immunology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 7 times.
          1. Nuñez CMV, Adelman JS, Carr HA, Alvarez CM, Rubenstein DI. Lingering effects of contraception management on feral mare (Equus caballus) fertility and social behavior. Conserv Physiol 2017;5(1):cox018.
            doi: 10.1093/conphys/cox018pubmed: 29977561google scholar: lookup
          2. Gastal GDA, Hamilton A, Alves BG, de Tarso SGS, Feugang JM, Banz WJ, Apgar GA, Nielsen CK, Gastal EL. Ovarian features in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fawns and does. PLoS One 2017;12(5):e0177357.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177357pubmed: 28542265google scholar: lookup
          3. Raiho AM, Hooten MB, Bates S, Hobbs NT. Forecasting the Effects of Fertility Control on Overabundant Ungulates: White-Tailed Deer in the National Capital Region. PLoS One 2015;10(12):e0143122.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143122pubmed: 26650739google scholar: lookup
          4. Lekhwani S, Vaswani N, Ghalaut VS, Shanker V, Singh R. Immunocontraceptives: How far from reality?. Adv Biomed Res 2014;3:247.
            doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.146369pubmed: 25590025google scholar: lookup
          5. Nuñez CM, Adelman JS, Rubenstein DI. Immunocontraception in wild horses (Equus caballus) extends reproductive cycling beyond the normal breeding season. PLoS One 2010 Oct 26;5(10):e13635.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013635pubmed: 21049017google scholar: lookup
          6. Childs JE. Pre-spillover prevention of emerging zoonotic diseases: what are the targets and what are the tools?. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2007;315:389-443.
            doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70962-6_16pubmed: 17848073google scholar: lookup
          7. Koilpillai JN, Nunan E, Butler L, Pinaffi F, Butcher JT. Reversible Contraception in Males: An Obtainable Target?. Biology (Basel) 2024 Apr 25;13(5).
            doi: 10.3390/biology13050291pubmed: 38785772google scholar: lookup