FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Changes in muscle activation with graded surfaces during can...
PloS one2024; 19(6); e0305622; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305622

Changes in muscle activation with graded surfaces during canter in Thoroughbred horses on a treadmill.

Abstract: Understanding how muscle activity changes with different surface grades during canter is essential for developing training protocols in Thoroughbreds because canter is their primary gait in training and races. We measured the spatiotemporal parameters and the activation of 12 surface muscles in the leading limb side of 7 Thoroughbreds. Horses were equipped with hoof strain gauges and cantered at 10 m/s on a treadmill set to grades of -4%, 0%, 4%, and 8%, randomly, for 30 seconds each without a lead change. Integrated electromyography (iEMG) values during stance and swing phases were calculated and normalized to mean iEMG values during stride duration at 0% grade in each muscle. The iEMG values at each grade were compared using a generalized mixed model. Stride duration significantly decreased due to shorter swing duration on an 8% grade (P < 0.001) compared to all other grades, where no significant changes were observed. Compared to a 0% grade, the normalized iEMG values during the stance phase on an 8% grade in five muscles significantly increased (Musculus infraspinatus; +9%, M. longissimus dorsi (LD); +4%, M. gluteus medius (GM); +29%, M. biceps femoris; +47%, M. flexor digitorum lateralis; +16%). During the swing phase, the normalized iEMG values in six muscles significantly increased on an 8% grade compared to a 0% grade (M. splenius; +21%, M. triceps brachii; +54%, LD; +37%, GM; +24%, M. semitendinosus; +51%, M. extensor digitorum longus; +10%). No significant changes were observed in iEMG values on -4% and 4% grades compared to the 0% grade. Although +/- 4% grades had little effect on neuromuscular responses, 8% uphill canter reduced stride duration due to decreased swing duration and required increase of muscle activation during either stance and swing phase. Canter on an 8% grade might strengthen equine muscles to increase propulsive force and stride frequency.
Copyright: © 2024 Takahashi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-06-14 PubMed ID: 38875264PubMed Central: PMC11178216DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305622Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates how muscle activity in Thoroughbred racehorses changes when the horses are running at different surface gradients. The primary finding is that a higher incline leads to increased activation in certain muscles and a decrease in stride duration.

Research Methodology

  • In this research, the activity in 12 surface muscles of the leading limb of 7 Thoroughbred horses was observed and recorded.
  • The horses were made to run at a speed of 10 m/s on a treadmill that was set at different gradients (-4%, 0%, 4%, and 8%) for a duration of 30 seconds each.
  • The horses didn’t switch leading limbs (or lead) during this period.
  • During this period, Integrated Electromyography (iEMG) values were measured for both the stance and swing phases.
  • These iEMG values were then normalized to the average iEMG values observed during the stride duration at a 0% gradient.

Findings and Analysis

  • Stride duration was found to decrease significantly at an 8% gradient compared to other gradients due to a shorter swing duration.
  • Normalized iEMG values were found to increase significantly in five muscles engaged in the stance phase on an 8% grade compared to the same muscle values at a 0% gradient.
  • The trend was similar for the swing phase of the stride, with six muscles exhibiting significantly increased iEMG values on an 8% uphill grade as opposed to a level gradient.
  • No substantial changes were noted when the treadmill was set at -4% and 4% gradients.

Conclusion

  • According to these findings, changes in surface gradients of +/- 4% had little impact on neuromuscular responses in the horses.
  • However, an 8% uphill gradient led to decreased stride duration due to a shortened swing phase and an increase in muscle activation during both the stance and swing phases of the stride.
  • This suggests that the muscles of Thoroughbred horses become significantly more engaged when running on an uphill gradient of 8%, which could potentially be used to improve the performance of these animals in racing scenarios by strengthening their muscles and enhancing propulsive force and stride frequency.

Cite This Article

APA
Takahashi Y, Takahashi T, Mukai K, Ebisuda Y, Ohmura H. (2024). Changes in muscle activation with graded surfaces during canter in Thoroughbred horses on a treadmill. PLoS One, 19(6), e0305622. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305622

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 19
Issue: 6
Pages: e0305622
PII: e0305622

Researcher Affiliations

Takahashi, Yuji
  • Sports Science Division, Division of Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Takahashi, Toshiyuki
  • Sports Science Division, Division of Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Mukai, Kazutaka
  • Sports Science Division, Division of Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Ebisuda, Yusaku
  • Sports Science Division, Division of Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Ohmura, Hajime
  • Sports Science Division, Division of Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Electromyography
  • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology
  • Gait / physiology
  • Exercise Test
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Male
  • Female
  • Physical Conditioning, Animal / physiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interest exist.

References

This article includes 59 references
  1. Self ZT, Spence AJ, Wilson AM. Speed and incline during Thoroughbred horse racing: racehorse speed supports a metabolic power constraint to incline running but not to decline running.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2012;113(4): 602–607.
    doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00560.2011pmc: PMC3424062pubmed: 22678967google scholar: lookup
  2. Takahashi T. The effect of age on the racing speed of Thoroughbred racehorses.. J Equine Sci 2015;26(2): 43–48.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.26.43pmc: PMC4496421pubmed: 26170760google scholar: lookup
  3. Morrice-West AV, Hitchens PL, Walmsley EA, Stevenson MA, Wong ASM, Whitton RC. Variation in GPS and accelerometer recorded velocity and stride parameters of galloping Thoroughbred horses.. Equine Vet J 2021;53(5): 1063–1074.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13370pubmed: 33098592google scholar: lookup
  4. Jones JH, Carlson GP. Estimation of metabolic energy cost and heat production during a 3-day-event.. Equine Vet J 1995;27(S20): 23–30.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb05004.xpubmed: 8933081google scholar: lookup
  5. Gabaldón AM, Nelson FE, Roberts TJ. Mechanical function of two ankle extensors in wild turkeys: shifts from energy production to energy absorption during incline versus decline running.. J Exp Biol 2004;207(Pt 13): 2277–2288.
    pubmed: 15159432
  6. Arnold AS, Lee DV, Biewener AA. Modulation of joint moments and work in the goat hindlimb with locomotor speed and surface grade.. J Exp Biol 2013;216(Pt 12): 2201–2212.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.082495pmc: PMC3667127pubmed: 23470662google scholar: lookup
  7. McGuigan MP, Yoo E, Lee DV, Biewener AA. Dynamics of goat distal hind limb muscle-tendon function in response to locomotor grade.. J Exp Biol 2009;212(Pt 13): 2092–2104.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.028076pmc: PMC2702455pubmed: 19525436google scholar: lookup
  8. Vernillo G, Giandolini M, Edwards WB, Morin JB, Samozino P, Horvais N. Biomechanics and Physiology of Uphill and Downhill Running.. Sports Med 2017;47(4): 615–629.
    doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0605-ypubmed: 27501719google scholar: lookup
  9. Crook TC, Wilson A, Hodson-Tole E. The effect of treadmill speed and gradient on equine hindlimb muscle activity.. Equine Vet J 2010;42(S38): 412–416.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00222.xpubmed: 21059038google scholar: lookup
  10. Parsons KJ, Pfau T, Ferrari M, Wilson AM. High-speed gallop locomotion in the Thoroughbred racehorse. II. The effect of incline on centre of mass movement and mechanical energy fluctuation.. J Exp Biol 2008;211(Pt 6): 945–956.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.006692pubmed: 18310120google scholar: lookup
  11. Birn-Jeffery AV, Higham TE. The Scaling of Uphill and Downhill Locomotion in Legged Animals.. Integr Comp Biol 2014;54(6): 1159–1172.
    doi: 10.1093/icb/icu015pubmed: 24733147google scholar: lookup
  12. Hoyt DF, Wickler SJ, Garcia SF. Oxygen consumption () during trotting on a 10% decline.. Equine Vet J 2006;38(S36): 573–576.
    pubmed: 17402486
  13. Robert C, Valette JP, Denoix JM. The effects of treadmill inclination and speed on the activity of two hindlimb muscles in the trotting horse.. Equine Vet J 2000;32(4): 312–317.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400777032246pubmed: 10952380google scholar: lookup
  14. Robert C, Valette JP, Denoix JM. The effects of treadmill inclination and speed on the activity of three trunk muscles in the trotting horse.. Equine Vet J 2001;33(5): 466–472.
    doi: 10.2746/042516401776254745pubmed: 11558741google scholar: lookup
  15. Wickler SJ, Hoyt DF, Biewener AA, Cogger EA, De La Paz KL. In vivo muscle function vs speed. II. Muscle function trotting up an incline.. J Exp Biol 2005;208(Pt 6): 1191–1200.
    pubmed: 15767317
  16. Takahashi T, Matsui A, Mukai K, Ohmura H, Hiraga A, Aida H. The Effects of Inclination (Up and Down) of the Treadmill on the Electromyogram Activities of the Forelimb and Hind limb Muscles at a Walk and a Trot in Thoroughbred Horses.. J Equine Sci 2014;25(4): 73–77.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.25.73pmc: PMC4266754pubmed: 25558180google scholar: lookup
  17. Hoyt DF, Wickler SJ, Cogger EA. Time of contact and step length: the effect of limb length, running speed, load carrying and incline.. J Exp Biol 2000;203(Pt 2): 221–227.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.203.2.221pubmed: 10607532google scholar: lookup
  18. Kai M, Hiraga A, Kubo K, Tokurik M. Comparison of stride characteristics in a cantering horse on a flat and inclined treadmill.. Equine Vet J 1997;29(S23): 76–79.
    pubmed: 9354295
  19. Parsons KJ, Pfau T, Wilson AM. High-speed gallop locomotion in the Thoroughbred racehorse. I. The effect of incline on stride parameters.. J Exp Biol 2008;211(Pt 6): 935–944.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.006650pubmed: 18310119google scholar: lookup
  20. Hodson-Tole E. Effects of treadmill inclination and speed on forelimb muscle activity and kinematics in the horse.. Equine and Comp Exerc Physiol 2006;3(2): 61–72.
  21. Eaton MD, Evans DL, Hodgson DR, Rose RJ. Effect of treadmill incline and speed on metabolic rate during exercise in Thoroughbred horses.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1995;79(3): 951–957.
    doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.3.951pubmed: 8567539google scholar: lookup
  22. Hiraga A, Kai M, Kubo K, Yamaya Y, Erickson BK. The Effects of Incline on Cardiopulmonary Function during Exercise in the Horse.. J Equine Sci 1995;6(2): 55–60.
  23. Ohmura H, Mukai K, Takahashi T, Aida H, Jones JH. Cardiorespiratory function in Thoroughbreds during locomotion on a treadmill at an incline or decline.. Am J Vet Res 2017;78(3): 340–349.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.78.3.340pubmed: 28240953google scholar: lookup
  24. Gillis GB, Biewener AA. Effects of surface grade on proximal hindlimb muscle strain and activation during rat locomotion.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2002;93(5): 1731–1743.
    doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00489.2002pubmed: 12381761google scholar: lookup
  25. Payne RC, Hutchinson JR, Robilliard JJ, Smith NC, Wilson AM. Functional specialisation of pelvic limb anatomy in horses (Equus caballus).. J Anat 2005;206(6): 557–574.
    pmc: PMC1571521pubmed: 15960766
  26. Payne RC, Veenman P, Wilson AM. The role of the extrinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion.. J Anat 2005;206(2): 193–204.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00353.xpmc: PMC1571467pubmed: 15730484google scholar: lookup
  27. Jansen MO, van Raaij JAGM, van den Bogert AJ, Schamhardt HC, Hartman W. Quantitative analysis of computer-averaged electromyographic profiles of intrinsic limb muscles in ponies at the walk.. Am J Vet Res 1992;53(12): 2343–2349.
    pubmed: 1476320
  28. Takahashi Y, Mukai K, Matsui A, Ohmura H, Takahashi T. Electromyographic changes in hind limbs of Thoroughbreds with fatigue induced by treadmill exercise.. Am J Vet Res 2018;79(8): 828–835.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.79.8.828pubmed: 30058845google scholar: lookup
  29. Takahashi Y, Mukai K, Ohmura H, Takahashi T. Do Muscle Activities of M. Splenius and M. Brachiocepalicus Decrease Because of Exercise-Induced Fatigue in Thoroughbred Horses?. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;86: 102901.
    pubmed: 32067667
  30. Takahashi Y, Mukai K, Ohmura H, Takahashi T. Changes in muscle activity with exercise-induced fatigue in Thoroughbred horses.. Comp Exerc Physiol 2021;17(1): 25–34.
  31. Thomason JJ, Biewener AA, Bertram JEA. Surface strain on the equine hoof wall in vivo: implications for the material design and functional morphology of the wall.. J Exp Biol 1992;166(1): 145–168.
  32. Shahkhosravi NA, Bellenzani MCR, Davies HMS, Komeili A. The influence of equine limb conformation on the biomechanical responses of the hoof: An in vivo and finite element study.. J Biomech 2021;128(9): 110715.
    pubmed: 34482223
  33. Vernillo G, Martinez A, Baggaley M, Khassetarash A, Giandolini M, Horvais N. Biomechanics of graded running: Part I—Stride parameters, external forces, muscle activations.. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020;30(9): 1632–1641.
    doi: 10.1111/sms.13708pubmed: 32396672google scholar: lookup
  34. St George L, Clayton HM, Sinclair J, Richards J, Roy SH, Hobbs SJ. Muscle Function and Kinematics during Submaximal Equine Jumping: What Can Objective Outcomes Tell Us about Athletic Performance Indicators?. Animals (Basel) 2021;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020414pmc: PMC7915507pubmed: 33562875google scholar: lookup
  35. Watson JC, Wilson AM. Muscle architecture of biceps brachii, triceps brachii and supraspinatus in the horse.. J Anat 2007;210(1): 32–40.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00669.xpmc: PMC2100266pubmed: 17229281google scholar: lookup
  36. Takahashi Y, Takahashi T, Mukai K, Ebisuda Y, Ohmura H. Effect of speed and leading or trailing limbs on surface muscle activities during canter in Thoroughbred horses.. PloS one 2023;18(5): e0286409.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286409pmc: PMC10218737pubmed: 37235556google scholar: lookup
  37. Wilson AM, Watson JC, Lichtwark GA. Biomechanics: A catapult action for rapid limb protraction.. Nature 2003;421(6918): 35–36.
    doi: 10.1038/421035apubmed: 12511944google scholar: lookup
  38. Burdas KD, Sack WO, Röck S.. Anatomy of the horse.. 6th ed. Hannover: Schlütersche; 2011.
  39. Clayton HM, Back W. Hind limb function.. In: Back W, Clayton H, editors. Equine locomotion. 2nd ed. London: Saunders; 2013. pp. 127–145.
  40. St. George LB, Clayton HM, Sinclair JK, Richards J, Roy SH, Hobbs SJ. Electromyographic and Kinematic Comparison of the Leading and Trailing Fore-and Hindlimbs of Horses during Canter.. Animals 2023;13(11): 1755.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13111755pmc: PMC10252091pubmed: 37889657google scholar: lookup
  41. Dunbar DC, Macpherson JM, Simmons RW, Zarcades A. Stabilization and mobility of the head, neck and trunk in horses during overground locomotion: comparisons with humans and other primates.. J Exp Biol 2008;211(Pt 24): 3889–3907.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.020578pmc: PMC2768006pubmed: 19043061google scholar: lookup
  42. Wolschrijn C, Audigié F, Wijnberg ID, Johnston C, Denoix JM, Back W. The neck and back.. In: Back W, Clayton H, editors. Equine locomotion. 2nd ed. London: Saunders; 2013. pp. 199–227.
  43. Minetti AE, Ardigò LP, Reinach E, Saibene F. The relationship between mechanical work and energy expenditure of locomotion in horses.. J Exp Biol 1999;202(Pt 17): 2329–2338.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.17.2329pubmed: 10441084google scholar: lookup
  44. Faber M, Johnston C, Schamhardt HC, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L, Barneveld A. Three-dimensional kinematics of the equine spine during canter.. Equine Vet J 2001;33(S33): 145–149.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb05378.xpubmed: 11721556google scholar: lookup
  45. Robert C, Valette JP, Pourcelot P, Audigié F, Denoix JM. Effects of trotting speed on muscle activity and kinematics in saddlehorses.. Equine Vet J 2002;34(S34): 295–301.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05436.xpubmed: 12405704google scholar: lookup
  46. Tokuriki M, Aoki O. Electromyographic activity of the hindlimb muscles during the walk, trot and canter.. Equine Vet J 1995;27(S18): 152–155.
  47. Harrison SM, Whitton RC, King M, Haussler KK, Kawcak CE, Stover SM. Forelimb muscle activity during equine locomotion.. J Exp Biol 2012;215(Pt 17): 2980–2991.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.065441pubmed: 22875767google scholar: lookup
  48. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Barneveld A, Schamhardt HC. Effects of treadmill inclination on kinematics of the trot in Dutch Warmblood horses.. EquineVet J 1997;29(S23): 71–75.
    pubmed: 9354294
  49. Roberts TJ, Marsh RL, Weyand PG, Taylor CR. Muscular Force in Running Turkeys: The Economy of Minimizing Work.. Science 1997;275(5303): 1113–1115.
    doi: 10.1126/science.275.5303.1113pubmed: 9027309google scholar: lookup
  50. Carlson-Kuhta P, Trank TV, Smith JL. Forms of Forward Quadrupedal Locomotion. II. A Comparison of Posture, Hindlimb Kinematics, and Motor Patterns for Upslope and Level Walking.. J Neurophysiol 1998;79(4): 1687–1701.
    pubmed: 9535939
  51. Daley MA, Biewener AA. Muscle force-length dynamics during level versus incline locomotion: a comparison of in vivo performance of two guinea fowl ankle extensors.. J Exp Biol 2003;206(Pt 17): 2941–2958.
    pubmed: 12878663
  52. Kram R, Taylor CR. Energetics of running: a new perspective.. Nature 1990;346(6281): 265–267.
    doi: 10.1038/346265a0pubmed: 2374590google scholar: lookup
  53. Dutto DJ, Hoyt DF, Cogger EA, Wickler SJ. Ground reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds.. J Exp Biol 2004;207(Pt 20): 3507–3514.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01171pubmed: 15339946google scholar: lookup
  54. Lee DV. Effects of grade and mass distribution on the mechanics of trotting in dogs.. J Exp Biol 2011;214(Pt 3): 402–411.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.044487pubmed: 21228199google scholar: lookup
  55. Back W, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Kinematic comparison of the leading and trailing fore—and hindlimbs at the canter.. Equine Vet J 1997;29(S23): 80–83.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb05060.xpubmed: 9354296google scholar: lookup
  56. Crevier-Denoix N, Falala S, Holden-Douilly L, Camus M, Martino J, Ravary-Plumioen B. Comparative kinematic analysis of the leading and trailing forelimbs of horses cantering on a turf and a synthetic surface.. Equine Vet J 2013;45(S45): 54–61.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12160pubmed: 24304405google scholar: lookup
  57. Khassetarash A, Vernillo G, Martinez A, Baggaley M, Giandolini M, Horvais N. Biomechanics of graded running: Part II-Joint kinematics and kinetics.. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020;30(9): 1642–1654.
    doi: 10.1111/sms.13735pubmed: 32485036google scholar: lookup
  58. St George L, Hobbs SJ, Richards J, Sinclair J, Holt D, Roy SH. The effect of cut-off frequency when high-pass filtering equine sEMG signals during locomotion.. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2018;43: 28–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.09.001pubmed: 30219734google scholar: lookup
  59. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, Merkens HW, Barneveld A. Kinematics of treadmill versus overground locomotion in horses.. Vet Q 1994;16(2): S87–90.
    doi: 10.1080/01652176.1994.9694509pubmed: 7801509google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.