Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2021; 104; 103698; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103698

Characteristics of the Flight Arc in Horses Jumping Three Different Types of Fences in Olympic Competition.

Abstract: Show jumping horses must execute fences of varying height and width, but the effect of this on jumping kinematics during the airborne phase have not been described. The aim of this study was to describe differences within- and between-horses in CM trajectory, trunk orientation and average trunk angular velocity in a group of elite horses executing three fences: vertical fence (1.60 m), spread fence (1.50 × 1.80 m), water jump (4.5 m) during an Olympic competition. Two-dimensional kinematic data (60 Hz) were collected from video cameras set perpendicular to each fence. After manual digitization, linear and angular variables related to the position and rotation of the CM and trunk were calculated. Linear fixed effects models evaluated within-group differences between fences and kinematic variables. Repeated measures correlation (rmcorr) evaluated within-horse associations between kinematic variables and fence type. Compared with the water jump, CM vertical velocity, CM peak height, and average trunk angular velocity were significantly higher (P < .05) and CM horizontal velocity was significantly lower (P < .05) for the vertical and spread fences. Peak CM height coincided approximately with the middle of the spread fence, toward the take-off for the water jump and landing for the vertical fence. The trunk was significantly more inclined at take-off for the vertical fence and significantly less inclined for the water jump at landing. Rmcorr analysis revealed that individual horses generally employ similar jumping techniques for each fence type. Findings provide original insight into the mechanical requirements for elite horses jumping different fence types.
Publication Date: 2021-06-25 PubMed ID: 34416997DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103698Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the impact of varying fence types on the airborne phase of a jumping horse in Olympic competitions. The study specifically studies how variations in the trajectory, trunk orientation, and angular velocity of a horse differ when they jump over vertical, spread, and water fences.

Methodology

  • The research was conducted on a group of elite horses during an Olympic competition.
  • Three types of fences were studied: a vertical fence of 1.60 m, a spread fence of 1.50 x 1.80 m, and a water jump of 4.5 m.
  • Two-dimensional kinematic data at a rate of 60 Hz were collected using video cameras set perpendicular to each fence.
  • After manual digitization, position-related and rotation-related linear and angular variables were calculated for the horse’s center of mass (CM) and trunk.
  • Linear fixed effects models were used to evaluate the differences between fences and kinematic variables within the group.
  • Repeated measures correlation (rmcorr) was used to assess the associations between kinematic variables and fence type within individual horses.

Results

  • Compared to the water jump, the horses achieved higher CM vertical velocity, CM peak height, and average trunk angular velocity while jumping over vertical and spread fences; CM horizontal velocity, on the other hand, was significantly lower.
  • The peak of CM height was found to occur around the middle of the spread fence, during the take-off for the water jump, and at the landing for the vertical fence.
  • The trunk of the horse was found to be significantly more inclined during the take-off for the vertical fence and significantly less inclined during the landing for the water jump.
  • Rmcorr analysis revealed that individual horses generally employed similar jumping techniques for each of the three fence types.

Implications

  • The findings of the research provide new insight into the mechanical requirements for elite horses jumping over different fence types.
  • This information could have practical implications for training elite showjumping horses, as it allows for a better understanding of the physical demands and techniques required for handling different fence types in competitions.

Cite This Article

APA
Clayton HM, St George L, Sinclair J, Hobbs SJ. (2021). Characteristics of the Flight Arc in Horses Jumping Three Different Types of Fences in Olympic Competition. J Equine Vet Sci, 104, 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103698

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 104
Pages: 103698
PII: S0737-0806(21)00328-2

Researcher Affiliations

Clayton, Hilary M
  • Sport Horse Science, Mason, MI.
St George, Lindsay
  • Research Center for Applied Sport, Physical Activity and Performance, School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston. Electronic address: lbstgeorge@uclan.ac.uk.
Sinclair, Jonathan
  • Research Center for Applied Sport, Physical Activity and Performance, School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
Hobbs, Sarah Jane
  • Research Center for Applied Sport, Physical Activity and Performance, School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Horses
  • Sports
  • Torso

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM. The Olympic motto through the lens of equestrian sports.. Anim Front 2022 Jun;12(3):45-53.
    doi: 10.1093/af/vfac025pubmed: 35711501google scholar: lookup