Analyze Diet
The Journal of veterinary medical science2016; 78(6); 937-942; doi: 10.1292/jvms.15-0511

Characterization of equine hyalocytes: their immunohistochemical properties, morphologies and distribution.

Abstract: In horse, the characterizations of hyalocytes under the steady state are still unclear. Therefore, we investigated characterizations of hyalocytes in normal equine eyes by their immunohistochemical phenotype, histomorphology and distribution. Thirty-one eyes from 18 horses, divided into 4 groups (G) by age, were used: early (G1) and late gestation (G2) fetuses, 1- to 3-year-old (G3) and 8- to 24-year-old (G4) horses. Equine hyalocytes were histologically classified into 4 types, and they immunohistochemically expressed MHC II and CD163. Hyalocytes were detected on and/or around ciliary processes and pars plana in G2, G3 and G4, but were not located on retina and optic papilla. A significant increase in distribution was found between G2 and both G3 and G4, and the largest distribution was found at ciliary processes in these groups. Equine hyalocytes were characterized as residential ocular macrophage and MHC II antigen-bearing cell, accompanied by a pleomorphic appearance and located in the contiguous ciliary body. Our data provided characterizations of hyalocytes in normal equine eyes and may well contribute to improving the understanding of pathogenesis of equine ocular disease.
Publication Date: 2016-02-18 PubMed ID: 26888584PubMed Central: PMC4937152DOI: 10.1292/jvms.15-0511Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examined the properties, forms, and distribution of hyalocytes (a type of cell) in healthy horse eyes relating to their immunological signature, morphology, and placement, with an aim to better understand equine eye diseases.

Methodology

  • This study used a sample size of 31 eyes from 18 horses, which were divided into four age-based groups: early and late-stage fetuses (G1 and G2), one to three years old (G3), and eight to 24 years old (G4).
  • The researchers conducted an immunohistochemical analysis – a process used to detect antigens (proteins that stimulate an immune response) in cells of a tissue section – and a morphological examination on these samples, particularly focusing on the eyes’ hyalocytes.

Findings

  • The hyalocytes in horse eyes were categorized into four distinct types based on their morphology.
  • These cells expressed Major Histocompatibility Complex II (MHC II) and CD163, both of these are proteins significant in immune response and often used as markers to identify certain types of cells.
  • Hyalocytes were found around or on the ciliary processes and pars plana (parts of the eye) in G2, G3, and G4 horse groups, but they weren’t located on the retina and optic papilla (the part where the optic nerve enters the eyeball).
  • There was a significant increase in hyalocyte distribution between late-stage fetuses and the two groups of older horses, with the largest distribution found at the ciliary processes.
  • Hyalocytes were classified as residential ocular macrophages, meaning they reside permanently in the eye and work as part of the immune defence system. They appeared pleomorphic, signifying they had various forms, and were located mainly in the ciliary body (the part of the eye that produces the transparent liquid within the eye).

Implications

  • The findings provide valuable insight into the properties and distribution of hyalocytes in normal horse eyes.
  • Understanding the normal behavior and placement of these cells could contribute to improving the comprehension of the pathogenesis―the biological mechanism that leads to a disease―of equine ocular diseases, perhaps eventually leading to better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Cite This Article

APA
Sano Y, Matsuda K, Okamoto M, Takehana K, Hirayama K, Taniyama H. (2016). Characterization of equine hyalocytes: their immunohistochemical properties, morphologies and distribution. J Vet Med Sci, 78(6), 937-942. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.15-0511

Publication

ISSN: 1347-7439
NlmUniqueID: 9105360
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 78
Issue: 6
Pages: 937-942

Researcher Affiliations

Sano, Yuto
  • Department of Veterinary Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido 069-8501, Japan.
Matsuda, Kazuya
    Okamoto, Minoru
      Takehana, Kazushige
        Hirayama, Kazuko
          Taniyama, Hiroyuki

            MeSH Terms

            • Age Factors
            • Animals
            • Female
            • Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect / veterinary
            • Horses / anatomy & histology
            • Horses / embryology
            • Major Histocompatibility Complex / immunology
            • Male
            • Vitreous Body / cytology
            • Vitreous Body / ultrastructure

            References

            This article includes 31 references
            1. BALAZS EA, TOTH LZ, ECKL EA, MITCHELL AP. STUDIES ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE VITREOUS BODY. XII. CYTOLOGICAL AND HISTOCHEMICAL STUDIES ON THE CORTICAL TISSUE LAYER.. Exp Eye Res 1964 Mar;3:57-71.
              doi: 10.1016/S0014-4835(64)80008-7pubmed: 14160361google scholar: lookup
            2. Bloom GD, Balazs EA. An electron microscopic study of hyalocytes.. Exp Eye Res 1965 Sep;4(3):249-55.
              doi: 10.1016/S0014-4835(65)80038-0pubmed: 5839239google scholar: lookup
            3. Boltz-Nitulescu G, Grabner G, Förster O. Macrophage-like properties of human hyalocytes.. Adv Exp Med Biol 1979;121B:223-8.
              pubmed: 546135doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8914-9_20google scholar: lookup
            4. Chinnery HR, McLenachan S, Humphries T, Kezic JM, Chen X, Ruitenberg MJ, McMenamin PG. Accumulation of murine subretinal macrophages: effects of age, pigmentation and CX3CR1.. Neurobiol Aging 2012 Aug;33(8):1769-76.
            5. Davidson M. G.. Equine ophthalmology. Veterinary Ophthalmology 1991;pp. 576–610.
            6. Donato R. Perspectives in S-100 protein biology. Review article.. Cell Calcium 1991 Nov;12(10):713-26.
              doi: 10.1016/0143-4160(91)90040-Lpubmed: 1769063google scholar: lookup
            7. Dubielzig R. R., Ketring K. L., Mclellan G. J., Albert D. M.. The uvea. Veterinary Ocular Pathology: A Comparative Review 2010;pp. 245–322.
            8. Dubielzig R. R., Ketring K. L., Mclellan G. J., Albert D. M.. The Retina. Veterinary Ocular Pathology: A Comparative Review 2010;pp. 349–397.
            9. Fabriek BO, Dijkstra CD, van den Berg TK. The macrophage scavenger receptor CD163.. Immunobiology 2005;210(2-4):153-60.
              doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2005.05.010pubmed: 16164022google scholar: lookup
            10. Forrester JV, Grierson I, Lee WR. Vitreous membrane formation after experimental vitreous haemorrhage.. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1980;212(3-4):227-42.
              doi: 10.1007/BF00410518pubmed: 6906136google scholar: lookup
            11. Gloor BP. Mitotic activity in the cortical vitreous cells (hyalocytes) after photocoagulation.. Invest Ophthalmol 1969 Dec;8(6):633-46.
              pubmed: 5359580
            12. Haddad A, André JC. Hyalocyte-like cells are more numerous in the posterior chamber than they are in the vitreous of the rabbit eye.. Exp Eye Res 1998 Jun;66(6):709-18.
              doi: 10.1006/exer.1997.0476pubmed: 9657903google scholar: lookup
            13. Jacobson B. Biosynthesis of hyaluronic acid in the vitreous. V. Studies on a particulate hyalocyte glycosyl transferase.. Exp Eye Res 1978 Sep;27(3):247-58.
              doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(78)90161-6pubmed: 710538google scholar: lookup
            14. Joshi M, Agrawal S, Christoforidis JB. Inflammatory mechanisms of idiopathic epiretinal membrane formation.. Mediators Inflamm 2013;2013:192582.
              pmc: PMC3844245pubmed: 24324293doi: 10.1155/2013/192582google scholar: lookup
            15. Kawahara S, Hata Y, Kita T, Arita R, Miura M, Nakao S, Mochizuki Y, Enaida H, Kagimoto T, Goto Y, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Ishibashi T. Potent inhibition of cicatricial contraction in proliferative vitreoretinal diseases by statins.. Diabetes 2008 Oct;57(10):2784-93.
              doi: 10.2337/db08-0302pmc: PMC2551690pubmed: 18599521google scholar: lookup
            16. Kohno RI, Hata Y, Kawahara S, Kita T, Arita R, Mochizuki Y, Aiello LP, Ishibashi T. Possible contribution of hyalocytes to idiopathic epiretinal membrane formation and its contraction.. Br J Ophthalmol 2009 Aug;93(8):1020-6.
              doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.155069pubmed: 19429593google scholar: lookup
            17. Komohara Y, Hirahara J, Horikawa T, Kawamura K, Kiyota E, Sakashita N, Araki N, Takeya M. AM-3K, an anti-macrophage antibody, recognizes CD163, a molecule associated with an anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype.. J Histochem Cytochem 2006 Jul;54(7):763-71.
              doi: 10.1369/jhc.5A6871.2006pubmed: 16517975google scholar: lookup
            18. Lau SK, Chu PG, Weiss LM. CD163: a specific marker of macrophages in paraffin-embedded tissue samples.. Am J Clin Pathol 2004 Nov;122(5):794-801.
              doi: 10.1309/QHD6YFN81KQXUUH6pubmed: 15491976google scholar: lookup
            19. Lazarus HS, Hageman GS. In situ characterization of the human hyalocyte.. Arch Ophthalmol 1994 Oct;112(10):1356-62.
            20. Miller T. R., Gelatt K. N.. Food animal ophthalmology. Veterinary Ophthalmology 1991;pp. 611–655.
            21. Newsome DA, Linsenmayer TF, Trelstad RL. Vitreous body collagen. Evidence for a dual origin from the neural retina and hyalocytes.. J Cell Biol 1976 Oct;71(1):59-67.
              doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.1.59pmc: PMC2109724pubmed: 977655google scholar: lookup
            22. Ogawa K. Scanning electron microscopic study of hyalocytes in the guinea pig eye.. Arch Histol Cytol 2002 Aug;65(3):263-8.
              doi: 10.1679/aohc.65.263pubmed: 12389665google scholar: lookup
            23. Qiao H, Hisatomi T, Sonoda KH, Kura S, Sassa Y, Kinoshita S, Nakamura T, Sakamoto T, Ishibashi T. The characterisation of hyalocytes: the origin, phenotype, and turnover.. Br J Ophthalmol 2005 Apr;89(4):513-7.
              doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.050658pmc: PMC1772586pubmed: 15774935google scholar: lookup
            24. Sakamoto T. [Cell biology of hyalocytes].. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2003 Dec;107(12):866-82; discussion 883.
              pubmed: 14733134
            25. Shrestha P, Muramatsu Y, Kudeken W, Mori M, Takai Y, Ilg EC, Schafer BW, Heizmann CW. Localization of Ca(2+)-binding S100 proteins in epithelial tumours of the skin.. Virchows Arch 1998 Jan;432(1):53-9.
              doi: 10.1007/s004280050134pubmed: 9463588google scholar: lookup
            26. Snyder P. W.. Disease of immunology. Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease 2012;pp. 242–288.
            27. SZIRMAI JA, BALAZS EA. Studies on the structure of the vitreous body. III. Cells in the cortical layer.. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1958 Jan;59(1):34-48.
            28. Uehara M, Imagawa T, Kitagawa H. Morphological studies of the hyalocytes in the chicken eye: scanning electron microscopy and inflammatory response after the intravitreous injection of carbon particles.. J Anat 1996 Jun;188 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):661-9.
              pmc: PMC1167494pubmed: 8763483
            29. Vagaja NN, Chinnery HR, Binz N, Kezic JM, Rakoczy EP, McMenamin PG. Changes in murine hyalocytes are valuable early indicators of ocular disease.. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012 Mar 15;53(3):1445-51.
              doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8601pubmed: 22297487google scholar: lookup
            30. Xu H, Chen M, Manivannan A, Lois N, Forrester JV. Age-dependent accumulation of lipofuscin in perivascular and subretinal microglia in experimental mice.. Aging Cell 2008 Jan;7(1):58-68.
            31. Yamate J, Yoshida H, Tsukamoto Y, Ide M, Kuwamura M, Ohashi F, Miyamoto T, Kotani T, Sakuma S, Takeya M. Distribution of cells immunopositive for AM-3K, a novel monoclonal antibody recognizing human macrophages, in normal and diseased tissues of dogs, cats, horses, cattle, pigs, and rabbits.. Vet Pathol 2000 Mar;37(2):168-76.
              doi: 10.1354/vp.37-2-168pubmed: 10714646google scholar: lookup

            Citations

            This article has been cited 2 times.
            1. Nuzzi R, Bergandi L, Zabetta LC, D'Errico L, Riscaldino F, Menegon S, Silvagno F. In vitro generation of primary cultures of human hyalocytes. Mol Vis 2020;26:818-829.
              pubmed: 33456301
            2. Mazzoldi EL, Benini G, Ferraro RM, Micheletti M, Martellosio G, Balduchelli V, Sacristani P, Lussignoli D, Semeraro F, Rezzola S, Presta M, Bergandi L, Meduri A, Giliani SC. Differentiation of human hyalocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells through ascorbic acid treatment. Hum Cell 2025 Feb 12;38(2):52.
              doi: 10.1007/s13577-025-01182-2pubmed: 39937308google scholar: lookup