Analyze Diet
PloS one2022; 17(10); e0275396; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275396

Characterization of preantral follicle clustering and neighborhood patterns in the equine ovary.

Abstract: Understanding the transition from quiescent primordial follicles to activated primary follicles is vital for characterizing ovarian folliculogenesis and improving assisted reproductive techniques. To date, no study has investigated preantral follicle crowding in the ovaries of livestock or characterized these crowds according to follicular morphology and ovarian location (portions and regions) in any species. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the crowding (clustering and neighborhood) patterns of preantral follicles in the equine ovary according to mare age, follicular morphology and developmental stage, and spatial location in the ovary. Ovaries from mares (n = 8) were collected at an abattoir and processed histologically for evaluation of follicular clustering using the Morisita Index and follicular neighborhoods in ovarian sections. Young mares were found to have a large number of preantral follicles with neighbors (n = 2,626), while old mares had a small number (n = 305). Moreover, young mares had a higher number of neighbors per follicle (2.6 ± 0.0) than old mares (1.2 ± 0.1). Follicle clustering was shown to be present in all areas of the ovary, with young mares having more clustering overall than old mares and a tendency for higher clustering in the ventral region when ages were combined. Furthermore, follicles with neighbors were more likely to be morphologically normal (76.5 ± 6.5%) than abnormal (23.5 ± 6.5%). Additionally, morphologically normal activated follicles had increased odds of having neighbors than normal resting follicles, and these normal activated follicles had more neighbors (2.6 ± 0.1) than normal resting follicles (2.3 ± 0.1 neighbors). In the present study, it was demonstrated that preantral follicles do crowd in the mare ovary and that clustering/neighborhood patterns are dynamic and differ depending on mare age, follicular morphology, and follicular developmental stage.
Publication Date: 2022-10-04 PubMed ID: 36194590PubMed Central: PMC9531796DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275396Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper investigates the clustering patterns of preantral follicles in the horse ovary, taking into consideration factors such as the mare’s age, follicular morphology and development stage, and follicular location within the ovary. It was found that preantral follicles do crowd in the horse ovary, with young mares having more clustering than old ones.

Objective of the Study

  • The main aim of this study is to examine the crowding patterns; clustering and neighborhood of preantral follicles in the equine ovary. This was necessitated by the lack of a comprehensive study addressing the topic and considering that this knowledge is vital in the understanding of ovarian folliculogenesis, which is essential to improving assisted reproductive techniques.

Methodology

  • Ovaries were collected from horses and processed histologically majorly to evaluate follicular clustering using a recognized mathematical model known as the Morisita Index estimating dispersion.
  • During evaluation, factors such as mare age, follicular morphology and developmental stage, and their spatial location in the ovary were taken into consideration.

Findings

  • Younger mares were discovered to have a larger number of preantral follicles with neighbors than older mares, indicating more follicle clustering in younger mares.
  • Follicle clustering was found in all areas of the ovary, with young mares showing more overall clustering than older mares and showing a tendency for higher clustering in the ventral region, regardless of age.
  • Follicles with neighboring follicles were discovered to be more likely to have normal morphology than those that didn’t.
  • Normal activated follicles were more likely to have neighbors than normal resting follicles, presenting another aspect of how follicle morphology correlates with their clustering.
  • The study shows that the clustering and neighborhood patterns of follicles in the ovaries are dynamic and vary depending on the horse’s age, the morphology of the follicles, and the developmental stage of the follicles.

Implications

  • The findings of this research provide a better understanding of ovarian folliculogenesis, especially the transition process from primordial follicles to activated primary follicles.
  • They also provide insights that could be applied in advancing assisted reproductive techniques for horses and potentially for other livestock species.

Cite This Article

APA
Hyde KA, Aguiar FLN, Alvarenga PB, Rezende AL, Alves BG, Alves KA, Gastal GDA, Gastal MO, Gastal EL. (2022). Characterization of preantral follicle clustering and neighborhood patterns in the equine ovary. PLoS One, 17(10), e0275396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275396

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 10
Pages: e0275396

Researcher Affiliations

Hyde, Kendall A
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Aguiar, Francisco L N
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Sousa Campus, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Paraíba, Sousa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Alvarenga, Paula B
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Rezende, Amanda L
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Alves, Benner G
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Alves, Kele A
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Gastal, Gustavo D A
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
  • Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental INIA La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
Gastal, Melba O
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Gastal, Eduardo L
  • Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Ovarian Follicle
  • Ovary

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 39 references
  1. McGee EA, Hsueh AJW. Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr Rev 2000; 21:200–214.
    doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.2.0394pubmed: 10782364google scholar: lookup
  2. Tatone C, Amicarelli F, Carbone MC, Monteleone P, Caserta D, Marci R. Cellular and molecular aspects of ovarian follicle ageing. Hum Reprod Update 2008; 14:131–142.
    doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm048pubmed: 18239135google scholar: lookup
  3. Carnevale EM. The mare model for follicular maturation and reproductive aging in the woman. Theriogenology 2008; 69:23–30.
  4. Aguiar FLN, Gastal GDA, Alves KA, Alves BG, Figueiredo JR, Gastal EL. Supportive techniques to investigate in vitro culture and cryopreservation efficiencies of equine ovarian tissue: A review. Theriogenology 2020; 156:296–309.
  5. Gastal EL, Aguiar FLN, Gastal GDA, Alves KA, Alves BG, Figueiredo JR. Harvesting, processing, and evaluation of in vitro-manipulated equine preantral follicles: A review. Theriogenology 2020; 156:283–295.
    pubmed: 32905900
  6. Benammar A, Derisoud E, Vialard F, Palmer E, Ayoubi JM, Poulain M. The mare: A pertinent model for human assisted reproductive technologies?. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:2304.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082304pmc: PMC8388489pubmed: 34438761google scholar: lookup
  7. Skinner MK. Regulation of primordial follicle assembly and development. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11:461–471.
    doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi020pubmed: 16006439google scholar: lookup
  8. Reddy R, Zhen W, Liu K. Mechanisms maintaining the dormancy and survival of mammalian primordial follicles. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010; 21:96–103.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.10.001pubmed: 19913438google scholar: lookup
  9. Wang ZP, Mu XY, Guo M, Wang YJ, Teng Z, Mao GP. Transforming growth factor-β signaling participates in the maintenance of the primordial follicle pool in the mouse ovary. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:8299–8311.
    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.532952pmc: PMC3961657pubmed: 24515103google scholar: lookup
  10. Alves KA, Alves BG, Gastal GD, de Tarso SG, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR. The mare model to study the effects of ovarian dynamics on preantral follicle features. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0149693.
  11. Kristensen SG, Rasmussen A, Byskov AG, Andersen CY. Isolation of pre-antral follicles from human ovarian medulla tissue. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:157–166.
    doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq318pubmed: 21112953google scholar: lookup
  12. Silva-Santos KC, Santos GM, Siloto LS, Hertel MF, Andrade ER, Rubin MI. Estimate of the population of preantral follicles in the ovaries of Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle. Theriogenology 2011; 76:1051–1057.
  13. Malki S, Tharp ME, Bortvin AA. A whole-mount approach for accurate quantitative and spatial assessment of fetal oocyte dynamics in mice. Biol Reprod 2015; 93:1–9.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.132118pubmed: 26423126google scholar: lookup
  14. Gastal GDA, Hamilton A, Alves BG, de Tarso SGS, Feugang JM, Banz WJ. Ovarian features in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fawns and does. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0177357.
  15. Fransolet M, Labied S, Henry L, Masereel MC, Rozet E, Kirschvink N. Strategies for using the sheep ovarian cortex as a model in reproductive medicine. PLoS One 2014; 9:e91073.
  16. Brandão FAS, Alves BG, Alves KA, Souza SS, Silva YP, Freitas VJF. Laparoscopic ovarian biopsy pick-up method for goats. Theriogenology 2018; 107:219–225.
  17. Woodruff TK, Shea LD. A new hypothesis regarding ovarian follicle development: Ovarian rigidity as a regulator of selection and health. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011; 28:3–6.
    doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9478-4pmc: PMC3045494pubmed: 20872066google scholar: lookup
  18. Alves BG, Alves KA, Gastal GDA, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR, Gastal EL. Spatial distribution of preantral follicles in the equine ovary. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198108.
  19. Hyde KA, Aguiar FLN, Alves BG, Alves KA, Gastal GDA, Gastal MO. Preantral follicle population and distribution in the horse ovary. Reprod Fertil 2022; 3:90–102.
    doi: 10.1530/RAF-21-0100pmc: PMC9175592pubmed: 35706578google scholar: lookup
  20. Gaytan F, Morales C, Leon S, Garcia-Galiano D, Roa J, Tena-Sempere M. Crowding and follicular fate: spatial determinants of follicular reserve and activation of follicular growth in the mammalian ovary. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0144099.
  21. Haag KT, Magalhães-Padilha DM, Fonseca GR, Wischral A, Gastal MO, King SS. Quantification, morphology, and viability of equine preantral follicles obtained via the Biopsy Pick-Up method. Theriogenology 2013; 79:599–609.
  22. Alves KA, Alves BG, Gastal GDA, Haag KT, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR. Preantral follicle density in ovarian biopsy fragments and effects of mare age. Reprod Fertil Dev 2017; 29:867–875.
    doi: 10.1071/RD15402pubmed: 28442043google scholar: lookup
  23. Alves KA, Alves BG, Rocha CD, Visonná M, Mohallem RF, Gastal MO. Number and density of equine preantral follicles in different ovarian histological section thicknesses. Theriogenology 2015; 83:1048–1055.
  24. Wang X, Page-McCaw A. A matrix metalloproteinase mediates long-distance attenuation of stem cell proliferation. J Cell Biol 2014; 206:923–936.
    doi: 10.1083/jcb.201403084pmc: PMC4178971pubmed: 25267296google scholar: lookup
  25. Morisita M. Iδ-Index, a measure of dispersion of individuals. Res Popul Ecol (Kyoto) 1962; 4:1–7.
  26. Armstrong RA. Methods of studying the planar distribution of objects in histological sections of brain tissue. J Microsc 2006; 221:153–158.
  27. Zhang D, Dong Y, Zhang Y, Su X, Chen T, Zhang Y. Spatial distribution and correlation of adipocytes and mast cells in superficial fascia in rats. Histochem Cell Biol 2019; 152:439–451.
    doi: 10.1007/s00418-019-01812-5pubmed: 31549232google scholar: lookup
  28. Hutcheson K, Lyons NI. A significance test for Morisita’s index of dispersion and the moments when the population is negative binomial and Poisson. 1989. pp. 335–346.
  29. Faire M, Skillern A, Arora R, Nguyen DH, Wang J, Chamberlain C. Follicle dynamics and global organization in the intact mouse ovary. Dev Biol 2015; 403:69–79.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.04.006pmc: PMC4469539pubmed: 25889274google scholar: lookup
  30. Feng Y, Cui P, Lu X, Hsueh B, Billig FM, Yanez LZ. CLARITY reveals dynamics of ovarian follicular architecture and vasculature in three-dimensions. Sci Rep 2017; 7:44810.
    doi: 10.1038/srep44810pmc: PMC5363086pubmed: 28333125google scholar: lookup
  31. Schenck A, Vera-Rodriguez M, Greggains G, Davidson B, Fedorcsák P. Spatial and temporal changes in follicle distribution in the human ovarian cortex. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 42:375–383.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.10.013pubmed: 33309389google scholar: lookup
  32. Briley SM, Jasti S, McCracken JM, Hornick JE, Fegley B, Pritchard MT. Reproductive age-associated fibrosis in the stroma of the mammalian ovary. Reproduction 2016; 152:245–260.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0129pmc: PMC4979755pubmed: 27491879google scholar: lookup
  33. Ouni E, Bouzin C, Dolmans MM, Marbaix E, Pyr dit Ruys S, Vertommen D. Spatiotemporal changes in mechanical matrisome components of the human ovary from prepuberty to menopause. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:1391–1410.
    doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa100pubmed: 32539154google scholar: lookup
  34. Amargant F, Manuel SL, Tu Q, Parkes WS, Rivas F, Zhou LT. Ovarian stiffness increases with age in the mammalian ovary and depends on collagen and hyaluronan matrices. Aging Cell 2020; 19:e13259.
    doi: 10.1111/acel.13259pmc: PMC7681059pubmed: 33079460google scholar: lookup
  35. Gougeon A, Chainy GBN. Morphometric studies of small follicles in ovaries of women at different ages. J Reprod Fertil 1987; 81:433–442.
    doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0810433pubmed: 3430463google scholar: lookup
  36. Gleicher N, Barad DH. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011; 9:67.
    doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-67pmc: PMC3112409pubmed: 21586137google scholar: lookup
  37. Malhi PS, Adams GP, Singh J. Bovine model for the study of reproductive aging in women: Follicular, luteal, and endocrine characteristics. Biol Reprod 2005; 73:45–53.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.038745pubmed: 15744017google scholar: lookup
  38. Nichols SM, Bavister BD, Brenner CA, Didier PJ, Harrison RM, Kubisch HM. Ovarian senescence in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Hum Reprod 2005; 20:79–83.
    doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh576pmc: PMC4968694pubmed: 15498779google scholar: lookup
  39. Lliberos C, Liew SH, Zareie P, La Gruta NL, Mansell A, Hutt K. Evaluation of inflammation and follicle depletion during ovarian ageing in mice. Sci Rep 2021; 11:278.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79488-4pmc: PMC7801638pubmed: 33432051google scholar: lookup