Analyze Diet
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023; 23(9); doi: 10.3390/s23094232

Circle Diameter Impacts Stride Frequency and Forelimb Stance Duration at Various Gaits in Horses.

Abstract: The effects of gait and diameter have been studied independently, but rarely together in equine circular exercise studies. This study aimed to determine the impact of diameter (10-m or 15-m) at various gaits (walk, trot, and canter) on stride frequency or forelimb stance duration. Nine mature horses were outfitted with Tekscan™ Hoof Sensors on their forelimbs during circular and straight-line exercise at various gaits on a clay and sand arena surface. Statistical analysis was performed in SAS 9.4 with fixed effects of exercise type, recording, leg, and breed (PROC GLIMMIX, p < 0.05 significance). At walk (p < 0.0001) and trot (p < 0.001), stride frequency was lower during circular exercise. Stride frequency was similar between forelimbs at all gaits. At walk (p < 0.001) and canter (p = 0.01), stance duration was greatest during 10-m circle exercise. At walk (p = 0.0007), trot (p < 0.001), and canter (p < 0.0001), the inside forelimb had longer stance duration than the outside forelimb. Differences between forelimb stance durations may support asymmetrical travel while horses exercise on a circle at the walk, trot, and canter. These results demonstrate diameter and gait are important factors when evaluating forelimb kinematics during circular exercise.
Publication Date: 2023-04-24 PubMed ID: 37177435PubMed Central: PMC10181099DOI: 10.3390/s23094232Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study explores the influence of gait and diameter on stride frequency and stance duration in horses. The research found that these variables have notable impacts on equine locomotion during circular exercises.

Research Objectives

  • The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of diameter (10-m or 15-m) on stride frequency and forelimb stance duration as horses execute various gaits like walking, trotting, and cantering.
  • The study aimed to bridge a gap in research, as the effects of gait and diameter are often studied separately, but not usually together in the context of equine circular exercises.

Methodology

  • Nine full-grown horses were fitted with Tekscan™ Hoof Sensors which were attached to their forelimbs. This was done to accurately measure and record their stride frequencies and stance durations during the exercises.
  • The exercises involved both circular and straight-line movement over different surfaces including clay and sand. These different scenarios allowed the researchers to gather a wide scope of data in varying contexts.
  • A comprehensive statistical analysis of the collected data was performed using the SAS 9.4 software. The analysis considered the fixed effects of the type of exercise, recording, leg, and breed of the horse.

Findings

  • The study found that at both walking and trotting gaits, the stride frequency was lower during circular exercises compared to straight-line movements.
  • In terms of stance duration, the greatest durations were recorded during a 10-m circle exercise at both walk and canter gaits.
  • Moreover, the data indicated that the inside forelimb had a longer stance duration compared to the outside forelimb across all gaits. This observation suggests that forelimb stance duration differences may facilitate asymmetrical travel in horses while they’re performing circular exercises at various gaits.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that both diameter and gait significantly influence stride frequency and the stance duration of forelimb in horses during circular exercises.
  • This research illustrates the necessity to consider both factors when evaluating equine locomotion and kinematics during circular exercises.

Cite This Article

APA
Logan AA, Snyder AJ, Nielsen BD. (2023). Circle Diameter Impacts Stride Frequency and Forelimb Stance Duration at Various Gaits in Horses. Sensors (Basel), 23(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094232

Publication

ISSN: 1424-8220
NlmUniqueID: 101204366
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 23
Issue: 9

Researcher Affiliations

Logan, Alyssa A
  • School of Agriculture, Middle Tennessee State University, 314 W. Thompson Ln., Murfreesboro, TN 37129, USA.
Snyder, Alyson J
  • School of Agriculture, Middle Tennessee State University, 314 W. Thompson Ln., Murfreesboro, TN 37129, USA.
Nielsen, Brian D
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, 474 S. Shaw Ln., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Gait
  • Walking
  • Forelimb
  • Upper Extremity
  • Biomechanical Phenomena

Grant Funding

  • AA-19-034 / Michigan Alliance for Animal Agriculture
  • 396690 / American Quarter Horse Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest and the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 22 references
  1. Chateau H, Camus M, Holden-Douilly L, Falala S, Ravary B, Vergari C, Lepley J, Denoix JM, Pourcelot P, Crevier-Denoix N. Kinetics of the Forelimb in Horses Circling on Different Ground Surfaces at the Trot. Vet. J. 2013;198:e20–e26.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.028pubmed: 24511634google scholar: lookup
  2. Clayton HM, Sha DH. Head and Body Centre of Mass Movement in Horses Trotting on a Circular Path. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:462–467.
  3. Hobbs SJ, Licka T, Polman R. The Difference in Kinematics of Horses Walking, Trotting and Cantering on a Flat and Banked 10 m Circle. Equine Vet. J. 2011;43:686–694.
  4. Brocklehurst C, Weller R, Pfau T. Effect of Turn Direction on Body Lean Angle in the Horse in Trot and Canter. Vet. J. 2014;199:258–262.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.11.009pubmed: 24360754google scholar: lookup
  5. Pfau T, Stubbs NC, Kaiser LAJ, Brown LEA, Clayton HM. Effect of Trotting Speed and Circle Radius on Movement Symmetry in Horses during Lunging on a Soft Surface. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012;73:1890–1899.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.12.1890pubmed: 23176414google scholar: lookup
  6. Pfau T, Simons V, Rombach N, Stubbs N, Weller R. Effect of a 4-Week Elastic Resistance Band Training Regimen on Back Kinematics in Horses Trotting in-Hand and on the Lunge. Equine Vet. J. 2017;49:829–835.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12690pubmed: 28432739google scholar: lookup
  7. Parkes RSV, Weller R, Pfau T, Witte TH. The Effect of Training on Stride Duration in a Cohort of Two-Year-Old and Three-Year-Old Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals 2019;9:466.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070466pmc: PMC6680649pubmed: 31336595google scholar: lookup
  8. Logan AA, Nielsen BD, Hallock DB, Robison CI, Popovich JM. Evaluation of Within- and between- Session Reliability of the TekscanTM Hoof System with a Glue-on Shoe. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;110:103862.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103862pubmed: 34979263google scholar: lookup
  9. Hüppler M, Häfner F, Geiger S, Mäder D, Hagen J. Modifying the Surface of Horseshoes: Effects of Eggbar, Heartbar, Open Toe, and Wide Toe Shoes on the Phalangeal Alignment, Pressure Distribution, and the Footing Pattern. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;37:86–97.
  10. Hagen J, Hüppler M, Geiger SM, Mäder D, Häfner FS. Modifying the Height of Horseshoes: Effects of Wedge Shoes, Studs, and Rocker Shoes on the Phalangeal Alignment, Pressure Distribution, and Hoof-Ground Contact During Motion. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;53:8–18.
  11. Oehme B, Grund S, Munzel J, Mülling C. Kinetic Effect of Different Ground Conditions on the Sole of the Claws of Standing and Walking Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2019;102:10119–10128.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16183pubmed: 31495627google scholar: lookup
  12. Logan AA, Nielsen BD, Robison CI, Hallock DB, Manfredi JM, Hiney KM, Buskirk DD, Popovich JM. Impact of Gait and Diameter during Circular Exercise on Front Hoof Area, Vertical Force, and Pressure in Mature Horses. Animals 2021;11:3581.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11123581pmc: PMC8697886pubmed: 34944357google scholar: lookup
  13. Judy CE, Galuppo LD, Snyder JR, Willits NH. Evaluation of an In-Shoe Pressure Measurement System in Horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001;62:23–28.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.23pubmed: 11197554google scholar: lookup
  14. Dyson S, Greve L. Subjective Gait Assessment of 57 Sports Horses in Normal Work: A Comparison of the Response to Flexion Tests, Movement in Hand, on the Lunge, and Ridden. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;38:1–7.
  15. Robartes H, Fairhurst H, Pfau T. Head and Pelvic Movement Symmetry in Horses during Circular Motion and in Rising Trot. Vet. J. 2013;198:e52–e58.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.033pubmed: 24144771google scholar: lookup
  16. McIlwraith CW, Kawcak CE, Frisbie DD, Little CB, Clegg PD, Peffers MJ, Karsdal MA, Ekman S, Laverty S, Slayden RA. Biomarkers for Equine Joint Injury and Osteoarthritis. J. Orthop. Res. 2018;36:823–831.
    doi: 10.1002/jor.23738pubmed: 28921609google scholar: lookup
  17. Greve L, Pfau T, Dyson S. Thoracolumbar Movement in Sound Horses Trotting in Straight Lines in Hand and on the Lunge and the Relationship with Hind Limb Symmetry or Asymmetry. Vet. J. 2017;220:95–104.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.003pubmed: 28190505google scholar: lookup
  18. Logan AA, Nielsen BD, Hiney KM, Robison CI, Manfredi JM, Buskirk DD, Popovich JM. The Impact of Circular Exercise Diameter on Bone and Joint Health of Juvenile Animals. Animals 2022;12:1379.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12111379pmc: PMC9179390pubmed: 35681842google scholar: lookup
  19. Thomsen M, Sahl-Tjørnholm C, Sørensen H, Tolver A. Effect of Lungeing and Circle Size on Movement Symmetry in Sound Riding Horses. Equine Vet. J. 2014;46:49–50.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12267_151google scholar: lookup
  20. Parkes RSV, Pfau T, Weller R, Witte TH. The Effect of Curve Running on Distal Limb Kinematics in the Thoroughbred Racehorse. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0244105.
  21. Byström A, Clayton HM, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Egenvall A. Equestrian and Biomechanical Perspectives on Laterality in the Horse. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2020;16:35–45.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP190022google scholar: lookup
  22. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. Ground Reaction Forces: The Sine Qua Non of Legged Locomotion. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;76:25–35.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.022pubmed: 31084749google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Marunova E, Hernlund E, Persson-Sjödin E. Effect of circle, surface type and stride duration on vertical head and pelvis movement in riding horses with pre-existing movement asymmetries in trot. PLoS One 2024;19(8):e0308996.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308996pubmed: 39150961google scholar: lookup