Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2018; 253(6); 781-787; doi: 10.2460/javma.253.6.781

Clinical features, diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes associated with ingested wires in the abdomen of horses: 16 cases (2002-2013).

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To describe clinical features, diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes associated with ingested wire foreign bodies in the abdomen of horses. DESIGN Retrospective case series. ANIMALS 16 client-owned horses with ingested wire in their abdomens that were evaluated at a veterinary teaching hospital between April 2002 and February 2013. PROCEDURES Data for each case were collected from medical records and owners and then reviewed. Differences in clinicopathologic variables between horses that did (survivors) or did not (nonsurvivors) survive to discharge from the hospital were assessed. RESULTS The median duration of clinical signs prior to admission was 5.5 days (range, 0.5 to 1,095 days). Survivors (n = 4) had significantly lower median WBC count, neutrophil count, and plasma total protein concentration, compared with nonsurvivors (12), and all survivors underwent surgical treatment. Peritoneal fluid analysis revealed suppurative or septic peritonitis in all 8 horses tested. The presence of wire was confirmed by abdominal radiography (n = 6), exploratory laparotomy (2), and necropsy (8). The median length of ingested wire was 6 cm; wire had perforated viscera in 13 horses, 10 of which subsequently developed abdominal abscesses. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Abdominal perforation by wire should be considered a differential diagnosis for horses with peritonitis and abdominal abscesses. Radiography is useful for detection of wire foreign bodies in the abdomens of horses. Given the guarded prognosis for affected horses suggested by results of the present study, early and aggressive treatment, including exploratory laparotomy to retrieve the wire and address perforations, peritonitis, and abscesses, should be considered.
Publication Date: 2018-09-05 PubMed ID: 30179083DOI: 10.2460/javma.253.6.781Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper examines the symptoms, diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes of cases involving the ingestion of wire foreign bodies by horses. The study, taken from a review of 16 such cases over a period of 11 years, suggests a guarded prognosis and recommends early and aggressive treatment.

Overview of the Research

  • The research is a retrospective case series study that analyzed 16 instances where horses had ingested wire. The cases were inspected at a veterinary teaching hospital between April 2002 and February 2013.
  • Information for each case was gathered from medical records and owners for a comprehensive review.
  • The researchers sought to identify differences in clinicopathologic variables between horses that survived to discharge from the hospital and those that did not.

Clinical Findings and Diagnostic Methods

  • The median time for the display of clinical signs before admission was calculated to be 5.5 days. Some cases displayed signs as early as half a day while some took up to 1,095 days (about three years).
  • Peritoneal fluid analysis was performed on eight horses, with all of them showing signs of suppurative or septic peritonitis.
  • The research found out the presence of ingested wire using abdominal radiography, exploratory laparotomy, or necropsy.
  • Most horses (13 out of 16) had ingested wire that had perforated viscera, with ten of these horses subsequently developing abdominal abscesses.

Treatments and Outcomes

  • All four survivors showed significantly lower median white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, and plasma total protein concentration as compared to the 12 nonsurvivors. These survivors also underwent surgical treatment.
  • The paper did not specify the exact methods of treatment but suggested that given the guarded prognosis, prompt and aggressive action including exploratory laparotomy to retrieve the wire and address perforations, peritonitis, and abscesses should be considered.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance

  • The study concludes that when horses show signs of peritonitis and abdominal abscess, veterinarians should consider the possibility of abdominal perforation due to ingested wires.
  • Radiography was found useful in detecting wire foreign bodies in the abdomen area of horses.
  • The researchers recommend early and aggressive treatment due to the guarded prognosis for affected horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Marley LK, Soffler C, Hackett ES. (2018). Clinical features, diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes associated with ingested wires in the abdomen of horses: 16 cases (2002-2013). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 253(6), 781-787. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.253.6.781

Publication

ISSN: 1943-569X
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 253
Issue: 6
Pages: 781-787

Researcher Affiliations

Marley, Laura K
    Soffler, Carl
      Hackett, Eileen S

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Colorado
        • Female
        • Foreign Bodies / diagnosis
        • Foreign Bodies / veterinary
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
        • Horse Diseases / surgery
        • Horses
        • Intestinal Perforation / diagnosis
        • Intestinal Perforation / veterinary
        • Laparotomy / veterinary
        • Male
        • Records / veterinary
        • Stomach / pathology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 1 times.
        1. Maire U, Genton M, Vitte-Rossignol A. Iatrogenic cecal perforation after abdominal drain placement on a horse. Can Vet J 2025 Feb;66(2):138-142.
          pubmed: 39898165