Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 105852; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105852

Clinical nutrition in equine colic: a scoping review from an equine nutritionist’s perspective.

Abstract: Colic represents one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in equine medicine, with nutritional management recognized as a key modifiable factor influencing postoperative recovery. However, guiding principles for nutritional enteral support in horses after colic remain limited, and current practices are largely empirical. Objective: This scoping review aimed to (1) examine enteral nutritional support protocols reported in literature through a scoping review to map the available evidence on equine clinical nutrition in the context of colic, and (2) propose a physiology-based interpretative framework to consider when formulating dietary plans for post-colic horses, from a clinical nutritionist's perspective. Methods: PRISMA 2020-ScR guidelines were applied in Scopus and Web of Science databases using "horse colic" AND "clinical nutrition." Inclusion criteria comprised English-peer-reviewed studies reporting nutritional interventions in horses with colic. Data were extracted into predefined different categories. Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing marked heterogeneity. Early reintroduction of enteral nutrition (12-24 h postoperatively) was associated with faster recovery, whereas parenteral nutrition was reserved for severe intestinal dysfunction. Evidence supports the use of forage-based, low-starch diets to promote intestinal motility and microbiome stability, while prolonged fasting or high-NSC feeds increase the risk of dysmotility and recurrence. Post-colic horses benefit from the "feed pyramid" approach-maximizing forages, low-NSC, balanced supplements, avoiding fasting and offering small frequent meals in wet, digestible feed forms. Conclusions: Current evidence underscores the central role of early, forage-based enteral feeding in post-colic management. The integration of nutritional planning within multidisciplinary decision-making is essential to balance clinical, metabolic, and nutritional priorities.
Publication Date: 2026-03-14 PubMed ID: 41839322DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105852Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study reviews how nutrition is managed in horses recovering from colic, a serious digestive condition, to identify best feeding practices and develop guidelines for post-colic nutritional care.

Background

  • Colic is a major cause of illness and death in horses, often requiring surgery.
  • Nutritional management after colic surgery significantly impacts how well horses recover.
  • Currently, feeding practices after colic are largely based on anecdotal experience rather than evidence-based protocols.
  • There is a lack of comprehensive guidelines on how to optimally provide enteral (via the digestive tract) nutrition after colic surgery.

Objectives

  • To systematically map the existing scientific literature on nutritional support in horses diagnosed and treated for colic.
  • To create a physiology-based framework for clinical nutritionists to design effective diets that support recovery after colic.

Methods

  • Conducted a scoping review adhering to PRISMA 2020-ScR standards for transparent reporting.
  • Searches performed in two major academic databases: Scopus and Web of Science.
  • Used specific search terms: “horse colic” AND “clinical nutrition”.
  • Included only peer-reviewed English studies that examined nutritional interventions in colic-affected horses.
  • Extracted data according to predefined categories to ensure systematic synthesis and comparison.

Results

  • Identified 23 relevant studies showing wide variation in nutritional protocols post-colic surgery.
  • Early enteral nutrition, typically reintroducing feeding within 12-24 hours post-surgery, correlated with faster recovery times.
  • Parenteral nutrition (intravenous feeding) was primarily reserved for horses with severe intestinal dysfunction where enteral feeding was unsafe or impossible.
  • Evidence indicates feeding diets high in forage and low in starch (low non-structural carbohydrates, NSC) supports healthy intestinal motility and maintains microbiome balance.
  • Prolonged fasting or feeding high-NSC diets increased risks of gut motility problems and colic recurrence.

Interpretative Framework for Nutritional Planning

  • Advocates a “feed pyramid” approach prioritizing:
    • Maximizing forage intake as the foundation of the diet.
    • Using low-NSC feeds to reduce digestive upset and support gut microbial health.
    • Incorporating balanced nutritional supplements to meet macro- and micronutrient requirements.
    • Avoiding extended periods of fasting post-surgery to prevent negative gastrointestinal effects.
    • Offering small, frequent meals in wet and easily digestible forms to enhance tolerance and absorption.
  • This framework integrates physiological understanding of equine digestive processes with clinical nutrition principles.

Conclusions

  • The review highlights the critical importance of early refeeding with forage-based diets for optimal post-colic recovery.
  • Feeding strategies must be balanced to address clinical condition, metabolic needs, and nutritional status.
  • Coordinated, multidisciplinary clinical decision-making that includes nutrition experts is essential for successful outcomes.
  • Further research is needed to refine evidence-based feeding protocols that can be standardized in equine clinical practice.

Cite This Article

APA
Danese T, Asti V, Ablondi M, Raspa F, Cavallini D, Valle E. (2026). Clinical nutrition in equine colic: a scoping review from an equine nutritionist’s perspective. J Equine Vet Sci, 105852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105852

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 105852
PII: S0737-0806(26)00088-2

Researcher Affiliations

Danese, Tommaso
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Asti, Vittoria
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Ablondi, Michela
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Raspa, Federica
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy. Electronic address: federica.raspa@unito.it.
Cavallini, Damiano
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Valle, Emanuela
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.