Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice1990; 6(3); 575-585; doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30532-1

Clinical use of positive-pressure ventilation in the horse.

Abstract: Positive-pressure ventilation is used to provide improved ventilatory support during anesthesia in the horse. Because of the horse's size and the physiologic changes it undergoes during anesthesia, however, the use of positive-pressure ventilation does not always provide the improvement seen in smaller species. Careful attention to respiratory rate, inspiratory pressure, and I:E ratio minimizes the negative aspect of IPPV on the cardiovascular system. The goal of future ventilatory techniques will be to improve oxygenation without cardiovascular compromise and to do so at a reasonable cost to the client.
Publication Date: 1990-12-01 PubMed ID: 2282549DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30532-1Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about the use of positive-pressure ventilation in horses during anesthesia, its limitations due to horse’s size, the physiologic changes that occur and how careful control of respiratory parameters can minimize negative impacts on the cardiovascular system.

Positive-Pressure Ventilation in Horses

  • The article begins by discussing the use of positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) in anesthetized horses. This procedure is used to offer better respiratory support during the administration of anesthesia.
  • Despite its benefits, the efficiency of positive-pressure ventilation isn’t as high in horses as it is in smaller species due to their large size and the particular physiological changes they experience under anesthesia.

Impact on the Cardiovascular System

  • A significant section of the article is dedicated to discussing the impact of PPV on the cardiovascular system of horses. The use of positive-pressure ventilation can negatively affect the horse’s cardiovascular system.
  • The researchers suggest that controlling certain parameters—namely the respiratory rate, inspiratory pressure, and the Inspiration:Expiration (I:E) ratio—can help in reducing the adverse impacts of IPPV on the cardiovascular system.

Future Perspectives

  • In concluding, the authors express their hope for future advancements in ventilation techniques. The ultimate aim is to improve oxygenation without negatively affecting the cardiovascular system, providing a safer anesthetic procedure for horses.
  • Moreover, they acknowledge the importance of affordability in such future developments, indicating that any new techniques would need to be financially viable for horse-owners.

Cite This Article

APA
Shawley RV, Mandsager RE. (1990). Clinical use of positive-pressure ventilation in the horse. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 6(3), 575-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30532-1

Publication

ISSN: 0749-0739
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 6
Issue: 3
Pages: 575-585

Researcher Affiliations

Shawley, R V
  • Boren Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Oklahoma State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Stillwater.
Mandsager, R E

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Horses / physiology
    • Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation / veterinary
    • Ventilators, Mechanical / veterinary

    Citations

    This article has been cited 1 times.
    1. Sanchez AF, Ambrósio AM, Pinto ACBCF, Pereira MAA, Andrade FSRM, Rodrigues RR, de Carvalho Martins AR, Baroni CO, Ferrante B, Fantoni DT. Effects of a stepwise alveolar recruitment maneuver on lung volume distribution in dogs assessed by computed tomography. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1232635.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1232635pubmed: 38292132google scholar: lookup