FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Comparison Between Ultrasonographic and Standing Magnetic Re...
Frontiers in veterinary science2021; 8; 675180; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.675180

Comparison Between Ultrasonographic and Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Podotrochlear Apparatus of Horses With Foot Pain.

Abstract: This prospective study aimed to blindly compare the ultrasonographic and standing magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) findings in deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT), navicular bone, and navicular bursa in horses with foot pain, positive digital analgesia, and without definitive radiographic diagnosis. Ultrasonography detected more DDFT abnormalities (32/34 feet vs. 27/34 with sMRI) but identified less palmar navicular abnormalities (23/34 feet vs. 30/34 with sMRI). In suprasesamoidean DDFT lesions, which were mainly dorsally located, changes in echogenicity did not correspond to a particular pattern of sMRI signal change. Transcuneal ultrasonography did not allow assessment of morphology and extent of distal DDFT lesions, and sporadically discriminated the affected lobe compared to sMRI. Defects of the palmar compact bone were identified with both modalities except a parasagittal defect, which was only seen at sMRI.
Copyright © 2021 Evrard, Joostens, Vandersmissen, Audigié and Busoni.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-07-05 PubMed ID: 34291100PubMed Central: PMC8287171DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.675180Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is a comparative analysis between ultrasonography and standing magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) in diagnosing deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT), navicular bone, and navicular bursa abnormalities in horses suffering from foot pain without a clear radiographic diagnosis.

Objectives of the Study

  • The study had a primary objective of conducting a blind comparison between ultrasonography and sMRI in their effectiveness to detect abnormalities in the deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT), navicular bone, and navicular bursa of horses.
  • The research also aimed to provide insights into the limitations and efficiencies of both diagnostic tools in veterinary practice, specifically in horses with foot pain without definitive radiographic diagnosis.

Key Findings of the Study

  • Ultrasonography was found to be more effective in detecting DDFT abnormalities, with a success rate of 32 out of 34 horse feet tested versus the 27 out of 34 feet identified using sMRI.
  • However, sMRI demonstrated stronger performance in identifying palmar navicular abnormalities by spotting them in 30 out of 34 feet, whereas, ultrasonography spotted them only in 23 out of 34 feet.
  • In cases of suprasesamoidean DDFT lesions (mainly located dorsally), no correlation was found between changes in echogenicity (ultrasound) and specific patterns of sMRI signal change.
  • Transcuneal ultrasonography was limited in assessing the morphology and extent of distal DDFT lesions and was only occasionally able to distinguish the affected lobe compared to sMRI.
  • Both ultrasonography and sMRI were able to identify defects in the palmar compact bone, with the exception of a parasagittal defect, which was solely identified through sMRI.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The study concluded that while both ultrasonography and sMRI presented effective capabilities for identifying different abnormalities, there were clear differences between the two modalities, each with its own strengths and limitations.
  • This finding underlines the importance of utilizing both diagnostic tools in the practice of equine medicine for an all-encompassing diagnosis and treatment approach.
  • This research contributes significantly to the field of veterinary science by improving our understanding of which technique would better serve the process of diagnosis and consequently treatment, when dealing with specific abnormalities in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Evrard L, Joostens Z, Vandersmissen M, Audigié F, Busoni V. (2021). Comparison Between Ultrasonographic and Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Podotrochlear Apparatus of Horses With Foot Pain. Front Vet Sci, 8, 675180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.675180

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: 675180
PII: 675180

Researcher Affiliations

Evrard, Laurence
  • Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals and Equids, Equine Division, Diagnostic Imaging Section, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Joostens, Zoë
  • Medical Imaging Department, Equitom Equine Clinic, Lummen, Belgium.
Vandersmissen, Maxime
  • Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals and Equids, Equine Division, Diagnostic Imaging Section, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Audigié, Fabrice
  • Centre d'Imagerie et de Recherche sur les Affections Locomotrices Equines, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Goustranville, France.
Busoni, Valeria
  • Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals and Equids, Equine Division, Diagnostic Imaging Section, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 51 references
  1. Baxter G, Stashak T. Lameness in the extremities – the foot. 2014; p. 475–558.
  2. Bolen G, Busoni V, Jacqmot O, Snaps F. Sonographic anatomy of the palmarodistal aspect of the equine digit.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007 May-Jun;48(3):270-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00241.xpubmed: 17508516google scholar: lookup
  3. Rabba S, Bolen G, Verwilghen D, Salciccia A, Busoni V. Ultrasonographic findings in horses with foot pain but without radiographically detectable osseous abnormalities.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):95-102.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01730.xpubmed: 21322394google scholar: lookup
  4. Seignour M, Pasquet H, Coudry V, Denoix JM. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of injuries to the deep digital flexor tendon and associated structures in the equine foot (suprasesamoidean area). Equine Vet Educ 2011 23:369–76.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2010.00220.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Busoni V, Denoix JM. Ultrasonography of the podotrochlear apparatus in the horse using a transcuneal approach: technique and reference images.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001 Nov-Dec;42(6):534-40.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2001.tb00983.xpubmed: 11768522google scholar: lookup
  6. Busoni V, Méan M-N, Brignone L, Snaps F. Echographie de l'appareil podotrochléaire : étude in vitro sur 30 membres isolés de cheval. Ann Méd Vétér 2002 146:181–7.
  7. Busoni V, Lahaye B, Denoix JM. Transcuneal ultrasonographic findings in the podotrochlear apparatus: comparison with postmortem in 14 equine digits. J Equine Vet Sci 2006 26:113–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2006.01.006google scholar: lookup
  8. Schneider N, Busoni V, de la Rebière de Pouyade G, Denoix JM, Weyrauch KD. Examen échographique transcunéen post mortem de l'appareil podotrochléaire équin à l'aide des sondes linéaires et sectorielles. Ann Méd Vétér 2008 152:246–50.
  9. Spriet M, Rossier Y. Use of ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of chronic palmar foot pain: 3 cases. Equine Vet Educ 2005 17:230–4.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2005.tb00379.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  10. Jacquet S, Denoix JM. Ultrasonographic examination of the distal podotrochlear apparatus of the horse: a transcuneal approach. Equine Vet Educ 2012 24:90–6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2011.00305.xpubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  11. MacDonald JL, Richter RA, Wimer CL. Ultrasonographic variations are present in the distal sesamoidean impar ligament of clinically sound horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018 Sep;59(5):607-612.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12623pubmed: 29750845google scholar: lookup
  12. Busoni V, Lahaye B, Jamar M, Seiller J, Snaps F. Soft tissue imaging of the palmar aspect of the equine podotrochlear apparatus. IVRA 2005 Annual Congress, South-Africa.
  13. Spriet M, David F, Rossier Y. Ultrasonographic control of navicular bursa injection.. Equine Vet J 2004 Nov;36(7):637-9.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044864534pubmed: 15581331google scholar: lookup
  14. Perrin R, Diguet AC, Cantet P, Bailly C, Brogniez L, Dugdale A, Nisolle JF, Vandeweerd JM. Ex Vivo Assessment of an Ultrasound-Guided Injection Technique of the Navicular Bursa in the Horse.. Anat Histol Embryol 2016 Dec;45(6):450-456.
    doi: 10.1111/ahe.12220pubmed: 26620874google scholar: lookup
  15. Nottrott K, De Guio C, Khairoun A, Schramme M. An ultrasound-guided, tendon-sparing, lateral approach to injection of the navicular bursa.. Equine Vet J 2017 Sep;49(5):655-661.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12673pubmed: 28128875google scholar: lookup
  16. Busoni V, Snaps F, Trenteseaux J, Dondelinger RF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the palmar aspect of the equine podotrochlear apparatus: normal appearance.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004 May-Jun;45(3):198-204.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04033.xpubmed: 15200255google scholar: lookup
  17. Busoni V, Heimann M, Trenteseaux J, Snaps F, Dondelinger RF. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the equine deep digital flexor tendon and distal sesamoid bone in advanced navicular disease--an ex vivo study.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005 Jul-Aug;46(4):279-86.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00051.xpubmed: 16229425google scholar: lookup
  18. Dyson SJ, Murray R, Schramme MC. Lameness associated with foot pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses (January 2001--December 2003) and response to treatment.. Equine Vet J 2005 Mar;37(2):113-21.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054223804pubmed: 15779622google scholar: lookup
  19. Murray RC, Blunden TS, Schramme MC, Dyson SJ. How does magnetic resonance imaging represent histologic findings in the equine digit?. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006 Jan-Feb;47(1):17-31.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00101.xpubmed: 16429981google scholar: lookup
  20. Dyson S, Murray R. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 264 horses with foot pain: the podotrochlear apparatus, deep digital flexor tendon and collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint.. Equine Vet J 2007 Jul;39(4):340-3.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X185566pubmed: 17722726google scholar: lookup
  21. Sampson SN, Schneider RK, Gavin PR, Ho CP, Tucker RL, Charles EM. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in horses with recent onset navicular syndrome but without radiographic abnormalities.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009 Jul-Aug;50(4):339-46.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01547.xpubmed: 19697596google scholar: lookup
  22. Gutierrez-Nibeyro S, Werpy N, White Ii N. Standing low-field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with chronic foot pain.. Aust Vet J 2012 Mar;90(3):75-83.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2011.00875.xpubmed: 22339118google scholar: lookup
  23. Dyson S, Blunden T, Murray R. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and histological findings in the navicular bone of horses with foot pain.. Equine Vet J 2012 Nov;44(6):692-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00565.xpubmed: 22494146google scholar: lookup
  24. Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M, Branch M. Lameness in 46 horses associated with deep digital flexor tendonitis in the digit: diagnosis confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging.. Equine Vet J 2003 Nov;35(7):681-90.
    doi: 10.2746/042516403775696294pubmed: 14649360google scholar: lookup
  25. Murray RC, Schramme MC, Dyson SJ, Branch MV, Blunden TS. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the foot in horses with palmar foot pain and control horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006 Jan-Feb;47(1):1-16.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00100.xpubmed: 16429980google scholar: lookup
  26. Blunden A, Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M. Histopathology in horses with chronic palmar foot pain and age-matched controls. Part 2: The deep digital flexor tendon.. Equine Vet J 2006 Jan;38(1):23-7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374342pubmed: 16411582google scholar: lookup
  27. Sherlock C, Mair T, Blunden T. Deep erosions of the palmar aspect of the navicular bone diagnosed by standing magnetic resonance imaging.. Equine Vet J 2008 Nov;40(7):684-92.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X330365pubmed: 19165939google scholar: lookup
  28. Werpy N. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine patient: a comparison of high- and low-field systems. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2007 6:37–45.
    doi: 10.1053/j.ctep.2006.11.004google scholar: lookup
  29. Murray RC, Mair TS, Sherlock CE, Blunden AS. Comparison of high-field and low-field magnetic resonance images of cadaver limbs of horses.. Vet Rec 2009 Sep 5;165(10):281-8.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.165.10.281pubmed: 19734560google scholar: lookup
  30. Blunden A, Murray R, Dyson S. Lesions of the deep digital flexor tendon in the digit: a correlative MRI and post mortem study in control and lame horses.. Equine Vet J 2009 Jan;41(1):25-33.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X343028pubmed: 19301578google scholar: lookup
  31. Sherlock CE, Mair TS, Ireland J, Blunden T. Do low field magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities correlate with macroscopical and histological changes within the equine deep digital flexor tendon?. Res Vet Sci 2015 Feb;98:92-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.12.008pubmed: 25555604google scholar: lookup
  32. Porter EG, Werpy NM. New concepts in standing advanced diagnostic equine imaging.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2014 Apr;30(1):239-68.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2013.11.001pubmed: 24680215google scholar: lookup
  33. Murray RC, Roberts BL, Schramme MC, Dyson SJ, Branch M. Quantitative evaluation of equine deep digital flexor tendon morphology using magnetic resonance imaging.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004 Mar-Apr;45(2):103-11.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04017.xpubmed: 15072140google scholar: lookup
  34. Vanel M, Olive J, Gold S, Mitchell RD, Walker L. Clinical significance and prognosis of deep digital flexor tendinopathy assessed over time using MRI.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012 Nov-Dec;53(6):621-7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2012.01961.xpubmed: 22741926google scholar: lookup
  35. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa.. J Clin Epidemiol 1993 May;46(5):423-9.
    doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-Vpubmed: 8501467google scholar: lookup
  36. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.. Phys Ther 2005 Mar;85(3):257-68.
    doi: 10.1093/ptj/85.3.257pubmed: 15733050google scholar: lookup
  37. Shields GE, Barrett MF, Frisbie DD. Comparison of ultrasound and MRI for detection of soft tissue injuries in the palmar aspect of the equine foot. AAEP 2017: Proceedings of the 63d Annual Convention of the AAEP. San Antonio, TX; 2017 p. 208.
  38. Rowbotham EL, Grainger AJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: ultrasound versus MRI.. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011 Sep;197(3):541-6.
    doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6798pubmed: 21862794google scholar: lookup
  39. Smith MR, Wright IM. Endoscopic evaluation of the navicular bursa: observations, treatment and outcome in 92 cases with identified pathology.. Equine Vet J 2012 May;44(3):339-45.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00443.xpubmed: 21848532google scholar: lookup
  40. Busoni V. Diagnosing and characterising deep digital flexor tendon and significance of adhesions. Proceedings of the British Equine Veterinary Association. Birmingham, UK; 2019 p. 48.
  41. Milner PI, Sidwell S, Talbot AM, Clegg PD. Short-term temporal alterations in magnetic resonance signal occur in primary lesions identified in the deep digital flexor tendon of the equine digit.. Equine Vet J 2012 Mar;44(2):157-62.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00410.xpubmed: 21696437google scholar: lookup
  42. Cillán-García E, Milner PI, Talbot A, Tucker R, Hendey F, Boswell J, Reardon RJ, Taylor SE. Deep digital flexor tendon injury within the hoof capsule; does lesion type or location predict prognosis?. Vet Rec 2013 Jul 20;173(3):70.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.101512pubmed: 23736518google scholar: lookup
  43. Zani D, Rabbogliatti V, Ravasio G, Pettinato C, Giancamillo MD, Zani DD. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the foot in horses using intravenous versus regional intraarterial injection of gadolinium.. Open Vet J 2018;8(4):471-478.
    doi: 10.4314/ovj.v8i4.19pmc: PMC6356101pubmed: 30775287google scholar: lookup
  44. Aarsvold S, Solano M, Garcia-Lopez J. Magnetic resonance imaging following regional limb perfusion of gadolinium contrast medium in 26 horses.. Equine Vet J 2018 Sep;50(5):649-657.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12818pubmed: 29417635google scholar: lookup
  45. Ohberg L, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H. Neovascularisation in Achilles tendons with painful tendinosis but not in normal tendons: an ultrasonographic investigation.. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001 Jul;9(4):233-8.
    doi: 10.1007/s001670000189pubmed: 11522081google scholar: lookup
  46. Rabba S, Grulke S, Verwilghen D, Evrard L, Busoni V. B-mode and power Doppler ultrasonography of the equine suspensory ligament branches: A descriptive study on 13 horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018 Jul;59(4):453-460.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12610pubmed: 29498123google scholar: lookup
  47. Hodgson RJ, O'Connor PJ, Grainger AJ. Tendon and ligament imaging.. Br J Radiol 2012 Aug;85(1016):1157-72.
    doi: 10.1259/bjr/34786470pmc: PMC3495576pubmed: 22553301google scholar: lookup
  48. Garwood M. MRI of fast-relaxing spins.. J Magn Reson 2013 Apr;229:49-54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.01.011pmc: PMC3602136pubmed: 23465800google scholar: lookup
  49. Szkudlarek M, Narvestad E, Klarlund M, Court-Payen M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination.. Arthritis Rheum 2004 Jul;50(7):2103-12.
    doi: 10.1002/art.20333pubmed: 15248207google scholar: lookup
  50. Døhn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Court-Payen M, Hasselquist M, Narvestad E, Szkudlarek M, Møller JM, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints.. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8(4):R110.
    doi: 10.1186/ar1995pmc: PMC1779369pubmed: 16848914google scholar: lookup
  51. Schramme M, Kerekes Z, Hunter S, Nagy K, Pease A. Improved identification of the palmar fibrocartilage of the navicular bone with saline magnetic resonance bursography.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):606-14.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01590.xpubmed: 19999343google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Barrett MF, Goorchenko GE, Frisbie DD. Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Identifying Soft Tissue Abnormalities in the Palmar Aspect of the Equine Digit. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jul 17;13(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13142328pubmed: 37508105google scholar: lookup
  2. Scharf A, Acutt E, Bills K, Werpy N. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing and managing deep digital flexor tendinopathy in equine athletes: Insights, advances and future directions. Equine Vet J 2025 Sep;57(5):1183-1203.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14508pubmed: 40314097google scholar: lookup
  3. Vullo C, Gugliandolo E, Biondi V, Biffarella M, Catone G, Tambella AM. Comparison of Detomidine or Romifidine in Combination with Morphine for Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Horses. Vet Sci 2024 Mar 8;11(3).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci11030124pubmed: 38535858google scholar: lookup
  4. Castro-Mesa AF, Resende Faleiros R, Martínez-Aranzales JR. Transmural Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Horse Hoof Internal Structures: Comparative Qualitative Findings-Part 1. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 10;13(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13121951pubmed: 37370461google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.