Analyze Diet

Comparison of applanation tonometers in dogs and horses.

Abstract: Two Mackay-Marg tonometers and 2 Tono-Pen tonometers were evaluated in eyes in which intraocular pressure (IOP) had been altered and measured by use of a manometer. Eyes of anesthetized dogs and enucleated horse eyes were used. Compared with the manometer, none of the tonometers accurately measured IOP over the range between 0 and 100 mm of Hg. However at manometer measurements from 0 to 30 mm of Hg, several of the tonometers accurately measured IOP. In addition, significant differences were observed when the measurement accuracy of one tonometer was compared with that of another, especially at high IOP. Coefficient of determination (r2) values for a linear model ranged from 0.979 to 0.991 in dogs, and from 0.982 to 0.996 in horse eyes.
Publication Date: 1992-08-01 PubMed ID: 1506245
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about a comparison of two types of applanation tonometers—Mackay-Marg and Tono-Pen—in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in dog and horse eyes at various pressure levels.

Objective of the Study

  • This study aimed to determine the level of accuracy in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) by two types of applanation tonometers—Mackay-Marg and Tono-Pen—against a manometer, which was used as the standard measure. The IOP was manipulated over a range of pressures from 0 to 100 millimeters of mercury (mm of Hg) in anesthetized dogs and enucleated horse eyes.

Methods and Study Design

  • Four separate tonometers were evaluated (two Mackay-Marg tonometers and two Tono-Pen tonometers) in eyes where the intraocular pressure had been deliberately altered.
  • The research used eyes from anesthetized dogs and eyeballs removed from horses (enucleated horse eyes), altering the intraocular pressure using a manometer – a device for measuring the pressure of a fluid.

Key Findings

  • The study found that none of the tonometers were accurate throughout the entire range of 0 to 100 mm of Hg when compared to the manometer. This suggests the limitations of these tonometers at higher levels of IOP.
  • However, when the pressure ranged from 0 to 30 mm Hg, several of the tonometers provided accurate measurements. This indicates that these devices may have high efficiency and precision within a certain range of pressure levels.
  • The researchers also noted significant differences amongst the tonometers themselves, especially at higher IOP levels, demonstrating that not all tonometers perform equally under the same conditions.
  • The coefficient of determination (r2) values for a linear model ranged from 0.979 to 0.991 in dogs, and from 0.982 to 0.996 in horse eyes. The r2 value is a statistical measure that shows the proportion of the variance for a dependent variable that’s explained by an independent variable or variables in a regression model. Higher r2 values mean that the model explains more variation, showing that these tonometers were broadly accurate within the above-mentioned range.

Cite This Article

APA
Dziezyc J, Millichamp NJ, Smith WB. (1992). Comparison of applanation tonometers in dogs and horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 201(3), 430-433.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 201
Issue: 3
Pages: 430-433

Researcher Affiliations

Dziezyc, J
  • Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.
Millichamp, N J
    Smith, W B

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Dogs / physiology
      • Horses / physiology
      • Intraocular Pressure
      • Manometry / veterinary
      • Ocular Physiological Phenomena
      • Organ Culture Techniques
      • Tonometry, Ocular / veterinary

      Citations

      This article has been cited 5 times.
      1. Passareli JVGC, Nascimento FF, Estanho GJG, Ricci CL, Kanashiro GP, Giuffrida R, Andrade SF. Comparison among TonoVet, TonoVet Plus, Tono-Pen Avia Vet, and Kowa HA-2 portable tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs.. Vet World 2021 Sep;14(9):2444-2451.
      2. Mustikka MP, Pietilä EM, Mykkänen AK, Grönthal TSC. Comparison of two rebound tonometers in healthy horses.. Vet Ophthalmol 2020 Sep;23(5):892-898.
        doi: 10.1111/vop.12819pubmed: 32888242google scholar: lookup
      3. Gemensky-Metzler AJ, Wilkie DA, Weisbrode SE, Kuhn SE. The location of sites and effect of semiconductor diode trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation on the buphthalmic equine globe.. Vet Ophthalmol 2014 Jul;17 Suppl 1(0 0):107-16.
        doi: 10.1111/vop.12166pubmed: 24697980google scholar: lookup
      4. Andrade SF, Kupper DS, Pinho LF, Franco EC, Prataviera MV, Duarte RR, Junqueira JR. Evaluation of the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in horses and cattle.. J Vet Sci 2011 Jun;12(2):171-6.
        doi: 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.2.171pubmed: 21586877google scholar: lookup
      5. Passaglia CL, Guo X, Chen J, Troy JB. Tono-Pen XL calibration curves for cats, cows and sheep.. Vet Ophthalmol 2004 Jul-Aug;7(4):261-4.