Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2013; 243(6); 869-873; doi: 10.2460/javma.243.6.869

Comparison of basilar and axial sesamoidean approaches for digital flexor tendon sheath synoviocentesis and injection in horses.

Abstract: To define a method for the basilar sesamoidean approach (BSA) to the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) in horses and compare it with the axial sesamoidean approach (ASA) for DFTS synoviocentesis and injection. Methods: Evaluation study. Methods: 12 healthy adult mares without evidence of abnormalities related to the lower limbs. Methods: Each horse had 1 forelimb and 1 hind limb assigned to each DFTS approach (basilar vs axial, relative to the proximal sesamoid bones) in a Latin square design. The order of horses and of limb injection for each horse was randomly selected. All procedures were performed in standing sedated horses. The number of attempts to place a needle in the DFTS, presence of synovial fluid in the needle hub, time for DFTS injection, and number of accurate injections of sterile contrast material into the DFTS (evaluated by means of radiography) were compared between methods. Results: Median time for injection was significantly shorter for the BSA, compared with the ASA. The median number of times the needle was redirected was also significantly less for the BSA. Odds of obtaining synovial fluid via the BSA were 5.7 times as great as for the ASA (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 278). Successful injection of contrast material into the DFTS did not differ significantly between the BSA (24/24 limbs) and ASA (23/24). Conclusions: The BSA was a useful method for DFTS synoviocentesis in the forelimbs and hind limbs of standing sedated horses and was superior to the ASA in most aspects. This approach to the DFTS should be considered when DFTS injection or synovial fluid retrieval is desired, particularly in horses with minimal DFTS effusion.
Publication Date: 2013-09-06 PubMed ID: 24004236DOI: 10.2460/javma.243.6.869Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study is about finding a more effective method for the injection and synovial fluid retrieval from the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) in horses. The basilar sesamoidean approach (BSA) was compared with the axial sesamoidean approach (ASA) and found the former to be superior in most aspects.

Study Methodology

  • The research incorporated 12 healthy adult mares without any anomalies related to their lower limbs. They utilized the Latin square design to randomly assign one forelimb and one hind limb to each DFTS approach.
  • The order of horses chosen and the limb to be injected for each horse was selected randomly. All procedures were conducted on horses that were standing and sedated.
  • The study benchmarked the two methods based on the following criteria: the number of attempts required to place a needle in the DFTS, the presence of synovial fluid in the needle hub, the time taken for DFTS injection, and the number of successful injections of sterile contrast material into the DFTS, which was then evaluated by radiography.

Findings

  • The average time for injection using the BSA was significantly shorter in comparison with the ASA.
  • The median number of times that the needle was redirected was also substantially less for the BSA, making it a more efficient method.
  • The probability of obtaining synovial fluid via the BSA was 5.7 times higher in comparison with the ASA.
  • The success rate for the injection of contrast material into the DFTS did not exhibit a significant difference between the BSA (100% success rate) and ASA (96% success rate).

Conclusion

  • The BSA was deduced as a more effective method for DFTS synoviocentesis in both the forelimbs and hind limbs of standing sedated horses. This was mainly because it recorded faster injection times, required fewer needle redirection, and had a higher probability of harvesting synovial fluid.
  • Despite both the BSA and ASA showing high success rates in injecting contrast material into the DFTS, the BSA exhibited superiority in most aspects.
  • Considering these findings, the research recommends that the BSA should be the preferred approach for DFTS injection or synovial fluid retrieval, particularly in horses with minimal DFTS effusion.

Cite This Article

APA
Rocconi RA, Sampson SN. (2013). Comparison of basilar and axial sesamoidean approaches for digital flexor tendon sheath synoviocentesis and injection in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 243(6), 869-873. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.243.6.869

Publication

ISSN: 1943-569X
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 243
Issue: 6
Pages: 869-873

Researcher Affiliations

Rocconi, Richard A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, MS 39762, USA.
Sampson, Sarah N

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Female
    • Foot
    • Forelimb
    • Horses
    • Injections, Intra-Articular / methods
    • Injections, Intra-Articular / veterinary
    • Surgical Procedures, Operative / methods
    • Surgical Procedures, Operative / veterinary
    • Synovial Fluid
    • Tendons / surgery

    Citations

    This article has been cited 1 times.
    1. Bertuglia A, Mollo G, Bullone M, Riccio B. Identification of surgically-induced longitudinal lesions of the equine deep digital flexor tendon in the digital flexor tendon sheath using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: an ex-vivo pilot study. Acta Vet Scand 2014 Nov 25;56(1):78.
      doi: 10.1186/s13028-014-0078-7pubmed: 25421569google scholar: lookup