FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Parasitol Res / Comparison of PCR-based methods for the detection of Babesia...
Parasitology research2021; 120(6); 2157-2164; doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07153-4

Comparison of PCR-based methods for the detection of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in field samples collected in Central Italy.

Abstract: Equine piroplasmosis (EP) is a disease of equids caused by Theileria equi and Babesia caballi, members of the order Piroplasmida, transmitted by several species of ticks. As the disease is endemic in many countries, a clinical examination or a serological test are required prior to movement of horses to prove freedom from infection and to avoid the introduction of EP with its sanitary and economic impact, especially in areas where it is absent. Currently, numerous diagnostic PCR protocols are available, some of which are recommended by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). In order to adopt this diagnostic method, the Italian National Reference Centre for Equine Diseases (NRC-ED) conducted a preliminary comparison between an end-point PCR, nested PCR, real-time PCR, and commercial real-time PCR, for the detection of T. equi and B. caballi, respectively. One hundred and three field samples, collected during spring-summer 2013 in Latium and Tuscany regions, were employed for the study, and results discordant between detection assays were confirmed by sequencing. The reference assay was defined as that showing the highest sensitivity, and the relative sensitivity (rSe) and specificity (rSp) of the other methods were estimated referring to this assay. Agreement between methods was estimated by calculating the concordance between each pair of methods. Although no statistical differences were detected among PCR-based methods, the non-commercial real-time PCR assays seemed to be the most suitable for detection of T. equi and B. caballi, respectively. An important advantage of direct PCR detection of the pathogen, in comparison to indirect detection using serological methods, is that it allows specific treatment against the causative pathogen species responsible of the infection as well as for the definition of the infectious status of an animal for international movement.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-04-15 PubMed ID: 33855619PubMed Central: 3505731DOI: 10.1007/s00436-021-07153-4Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Validation Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research evaluates the comparative efficacy of different PCR-based diagnostic methods for detecting two pathogens causing equine piroplasmosis, a disease which impacts horses and is transmitted by ticks.

Objective of the Study

  • The main goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness of four PCR-based diagnostic methods: end-point PCR, nested PCR, real-time PCR, and commercial real-time PCR. These methods were used to detect two pathogens, Theileria equi and Babesia caballi, which are responsible for equine piroplasmosis, a disease prevalent in horses and other equids.

Disease background and Significance

  • Equine piroplasmosis is a disease of horses transmitted by several species of ticks. The disease is endemic in many countries and requires meticulous diagnostic tests to prove a horse is infection-free before it can be moved to a new location.
  • Accurate detection of the disease-causing pathogens is important to avoid the sanitary and economic impacts of the disease, especially in areas where it is not currently present.

Methodology

  • The study used 103 field samples collected from two regions in Italy during the spring-summer season of 2013.
  • The diagnostic methods compared were end-point PCR, nested PCR, real-time PCR, and commercial real-time PCR.
  • Results that were inconsistent between detection assays were confirmed by sequencing.

Findings

  • The research determined that although there were no statistical differences among the PCR-based methods, non-commercial real-time PCR tests were most suitable for detecting T. equi and B. caballi.
  • The reference assay (the assay with the highest sensitivity) was used to estimate the relative sensitivity and specificity of the other diagnostic methods. The concordance between each pair of methods was also calculated.

Significance of PCR-based Detection

  • PCR-based pathogen detection has an important advantage over indirect detection using serological methods: it allows for specific treatment against the causative species responsible for the infection.
  • Furthermore, it provides definite information on the infectious status of the animal, which is crucial for international movement of horses.

Cite This Article

APA
(2021). Comparison of PCR-based methods for the detection of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in field samples collected in Central Italy. Parasitol Res, 120(6), 2157-2164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-021-07153-4

Publication

Parasitology research
ISSN: 1432-1955
NlmUniqueID: 8703571
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 120
Issue: 6
Pages: 2157-2164

Researcher Affiliations

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Babesia / genetics
  • Babesia / isolation & purification
  • Babesiosis / epidemiology
  • Babesiosis / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horses
  • Italy / epidemiology
  • Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / veterinary
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Theileria / genetics
  • Theileria / isolation & purification
  • Theileriasis / epidemiology
  • Theileriasis / parasitology

Grant Funding

  • IZSLT 16/11 / Ministero della Salute

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Avarzed A, Igarashi I, Kanemaru T. Improved in vitro cultivation of Babesia caballi. J Vet Med Sci 59:479–481.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.59.479google scholar: lookup
  2. Bartolomé Del Pino LE, Nardini R, Veneziano V, Iacoponi F, Cersini A, Autorino GL, Buono F, Scicluna M. Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infections in horses in Central-Southern Italy: Sero-molecular survey and associated risk factors.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2016 Apr;7(3):462-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.01.011pubmed: 26847198google scholar: lookup
  3. Battsetseg B, Xuan X, Ikadai H, Bautista JL, Byambaa B, Boldbaatar D, Battur B, Battsetseg G, Batsukh Z, Igarashi I, Nagasawa H, Mikami T, Fujisaki K. Detection of Babesia caballi and Babesia equi in Dermacentor nuttalli adult ticks.. Int J Parasitol 2001 Apr;31(4):384-6.
    doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00120-5pubmed: 11306116google scholar: lookup
  4. Bhoora RV, Pienaar R, Cornelius F, Josemans A, Matthee O, Marumo R, Troskie C, Mans BJ. Multiplex hydrolysis-probe assay for the simultaneous detection of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in equids.. Vet Parasitol 2018 May 15;255:61-68.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.03.022pubmed: 29773138google scholar: lookup
  5. Bhoora R, Quan M, Franssen L, Butler CM, van der Kolk JH, Guthrie AJ, Zweygarth E, Jongejan F, Collins NE. Development and evaluation of real-time PCR assays for the quantitative detection of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infections in horses from South Africa.. Vet Parasitol 2010 Mar 25;168(3-4):201-11.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.011pubmed: 20031328google scholar: lookup
  6. Bhoora R, Quan M, Zweygarth E, Guthrie AJ, Prinsloo SA, Collins NE. Sequence heterogeneity in the gene encoding the rhoptry-associated protein-1 (RAP-1) of Babesia caballi isolates from South Africa.. Vet Parasitol 2010 May 11;169(3-4):279-88.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.009pubmed: 20138703google scholar: lookup
  7. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafò MR. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013 May;14(5):365-76.
    doi: 10.1038/nrn3475pubmed: 23571845google scholar: lookup
  8. Montes-Cortés MG, Fernandez-Garcia JL, Martínez-Estéllez MÁH. A multinested PCR for detection of the equine piroplasmids Babesia caballi and Theileria equi. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 10:305–313.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.11.008google scholar: lookup
  9. Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Saraña A, Barba-Carretero JC. Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria and Hepatozoon in southern Europe. Part II. Phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary history.. Vet Parasitol 2003 Jun 11;114(3):173-94.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00141-9pubmed: 12788253google scholar: lookup
  10. Debode F, Marien A, Janssen É. The influence of amplicon length on real-time PCR results. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 21(1):3–11.
  11. Directive 90/426/CEE on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/ALL/?uri=CELEX:31990 L0426
  12. Donnellan CM, Page PC, Nurton JP, van den Berg JS, Guthrie AJ. Comparison of glycopyrrolate and atropine in ameliorating the adverse effects of imidocarb dipropionate in horses.. Equine Vet J 2013 Sep;45(5):625-9.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12032pubmed: 23461655google scholar: lookup
  13. Friedhoff KT, Tenter AM, Müller I. Haemoparasites of equines: impact on international trade of horses. Rev Sci Tech 9(4):1187–1194.
    doi: 10.20506/rst.9.4.535google scholar: lookup
  14. Grause JF, Ueti MW, Nelson JT, Knowles DP, Kappmeyer LS, Bunn TO. Efficacy of imidocarb dipropionate in eliminating Theileria equi from experimentally infected horses.. Vet J 2013 Jun;196(3):541-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.025pubmed: 23199699google scholar: lookup
  15. Ikadai H, Xuan X, Igarashi I, Tanaka S, Kanemaru T, Nagasawa H, Fujisaki K, Suzuki N, Mikami T. Cloning and expression of a 48-kilodalton Babesia caballi merozoite rhoptry protein and potential use of the recombinant antigen in an enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 37:3475–3480.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.11.3475-3480.1999google scholar: lookup
  16. Kappmeyer LS, Thiagarajan M, Herndon DR, Ramsay JD, Caler E, Djikeng A, Gillespie JJ, Lau AO, Roalson EH, Silva JC, Silva MG, Suarez CE, Ueti MW, Nene VM, Mealey RH, Knowles DP, Brayton KA. Comparative genomic analysis and phylogenetic position of Theileria equi.. BMC Genomics 2012 Nov 9;13:603.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-603pubmed: 23137308pmc: 3505731google scholar: lookup
  17. Kim CM, Blanco LB, Alhassan A, Iseki H, Yokoyama N, Xuan X, Igarashi I. Diagnostic real-time PCR assay for the quantitative detection of Theileria equi from equine blood samples.. Vet Parasitol 2008 Feb 14;151(2-4):158-63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.10.023pubmed: 18077095google scholar: lookup
  18. Lobanov VA, Peckle M, Massard CL, Brad Scandrett W, Gajadhar AA. Development and validation of a duplex real-time PCR assay for the diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis. Parasit Vectors 11:1–12.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2751-6google scholar: lookup
  19. Manna G, Cersini A, Nardini R, Bartolomé Del Pino LE, Antognetti V, Zini M, Conti R, Lorenzetti R, Veneziano V, Autorino GL, Scicluna MT. Genetic diversity of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infecting horses of Central-Southern Italy and preliminary results of its correlation with clinical and serological status.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2018 Jul;9(5):1212-1220.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.05.005pubmed: 29752142google scholar: lookup
  20. Nagore D, García-Sanmartín J, García-Pérez AL, Juste RA, Hurtado A. Detection and identification of equine Theileria and Babesia species by reverse line blotting: epidemiological survey and phylogenetic analysis.. Vet Parasitol 2004 Aug 13;123(1-2):41-54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.04.010pubmed: 15265570google scholar: lookup
  21. Nicolaiewsky TB, Richter MF, Lunge VR, Cunha CW, Delagostin O, Ikuta N, Fonseca AS, da Silva SS, Ozaki LS. Detection of Babesia equi (Laveran, 1901) by nested polymerase chain reaction.. Vet Parasitol 2001 Oct 31;101(1):9-21.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00471-Xpubmed: 11587829google scholar: lookup
  22. OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (2019) http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.05.08_EQUINE_PIROPLASMOSIS.pdf
  23. Rampersad J, Cesar E, Campbell MD, Samlal M, Ammons D. A field evaluation of PCR for the routine detection of Babesia equi in horses.. Vet Parasitol 2003 May 30;114(2):81-7.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00129-8pubmed: 12781470google scholar: lookup
  24. Schnittger L, Rodriguez AE, Florin-Christensen M, Morrison DA. Babesia: a world emerging.. Infect Genet Evol 2012 Dec;12(8):1788-809.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.07.004pubmed: 22871652google scholar: lookup
  25. Scoles GA, Ueti MW. Vector ecology of equine piroplasmosis.. Annu Rev Entomol 2015 Jan 7;60:561-80.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021110pubmed: 25564746google scholar: lookup
  26. Tirosh-Levy S, Steinman A, Levy H. Parasite load and genotype are associated with clinical outcome of piroplasm infected equines in Israel. Parasit Vectors 1–9.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04133-ygoogle scholar: lookup
  27. Toffan A, Olivier A, Mancin M, Tuttoilmondo V, Facco D, Capua I, Terregino C. Evaluation of different serological tests for the detection of antibodies against highly pathogenic avian influenza in experimentally infected ostriches (Struthio camelus).. Avian Pathol 2010 Feb;39(1):11-5.
    doi: 10.1080/03079450903431390pubmed: 20390531pmc: 2817560google scholar: lookup
  28. Veiga Quemelo PR, Lopes da Fonseca BA, Malta Lima D, Peres LC. Influence of amplicon size on the polymerase chain reaction of Parvovirus B19 genome in formalin-fixed specimens. J Bras Patol e Med Lab 45:119–123.
    doi: 10.1590/S1676-24442009000200006google scholar: lookup
  29. Yokoyama N, Suthisak B, Hirata H. Cellular localization of Babesia bovis merozoite rhoptry-associated protein 1 and its erythrocyte-binding activity. 70:5822–5826.
    doi: 10.1128/iai.70.10.5822google scholar: lookup
  30. Zweygarth E, Just MC, De Waal DT. In vitro cultivation of Babesia equi: detection of carrier animals and isolation of parasites.. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 1997 Mar;64(1):51-6.
    pubmed: 9204504

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Yao XY, Yu SQ, Tian N, Wang F, Li SZ, Li LH. Nucleic Acid Prevalence of Zoonotic Babesia in Humans, Animals and Questing Ticks, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trop Med Infect Dis 2023 Feb 22;8(3).
    doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8030132pubmed: 36977133google scholar: lookup
  2. Lv K, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Liu Z, Deng L. Development of Nested PCR and Duplex Real-Time Fluorescence Quantitative PCR Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:873190.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.873190pubmed: 35664851google scholar: lookup
  3. Facile V, Magliocca M, Dini FM, Imposimato I, Mariella J, Freccero F, Urbani L, Rinnovati R, Sel E, Gallina L, Castagnetti C, Galuppi R, Battilani M, Balboni A. Molecular Diagnosis and Identification of Equine Piroplasms: Challenges and Insights from a Study in Northern Italy. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 5;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030437pubmed: 39943207google scholar: lookup
  4. Mendoza FJ, Pérez-Écija A, Kappmeyer LS, Suarez CE, Bastos RG. New insights in the diagnosis and treatment of equine piroplasmosis: pitfalls, idiosyncrasies, and myths. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1459989.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1459989pubmed: 39205808google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.