Comparison of the larvicidal efficacies of moxidectin or a five-day regimen of fenbendazole in horses harboring cyathostomin populations resistant to the adulticidal dosage of fenbendazole.
Abstract: Despite widespread acknowledgement of cyathostomin resistance to adult icidal dosages of benzimidazole (BZD) anthelmintics, many strongyle control programs continue to feature regularly scheduled larvicidal treatment with fenbendazole (FBZ). However, no studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of larvicidal regimens against encysted cyathostomins in a BZD-resistant (BZD-R) population. A masked, randomized, controlled clinical study was conducted with 18 juvenile horses harboring populations of cyathostomins that were considered BZD-R on the basis of fecal egg count reduction (FECR). Horses were blocked by prior history, ranked by egg counts, and allocated randomly to one of three treatment groups: 1--control, 2--FBZ >10mg/kg once daily for five consecutive days, or 3--moxidectin (MOX) >0.4 mg/kg once. Fecal samples were collected prior to treatment and seven and 14 days after the final dose of anthelmintic. On Days 18-20, complete replicates of horses were euthanatized and necropsied, and 1% aliquots of large intestinal contents were recovered for determination of complete worm counts. The cecum and ventral colon were weighed, and measured proportions of the respective organ walls were processed for quantitation and characterization of encysted cyathostomin populations. The five-day regimen of FBZ achieved 44.6% fecal egg count reduction, had 56.4% activity against luminal adults and larvae, and was 38.6% and 71.2% effective against encysted early third stage (EL3) and late third stage/ fourth stage (LL3/L4) cyathostomin larvae, respectively. In contrast, MOX provided 99.9% FECR, removed 99.8% of luminal stages, and exhibited 63.6% and 85.2% efficacy against EL3 and LL3/L4 mucosal cyathostomins, respectively. Although BZD-R was the most feasible explanation for the lower larvicidal efficacies of FBZ, mean larval counts of moxidectin-treated horses were not significantly different from controls or those treated with FBZ. The lack of significant differences between larvicidal treatments was partially attributed to a small sample size and high variability among worm burdens. Historical differences in the time intervals between treatment and necropsy were identified as a confounding factor for accurate estimation of larvicidal efficacy. Determining appropriate post-treatment intervals for measuring larvicidal efficacy remains a critical regulatory and scientific challenge for this therapeutic area.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2015-10-21 PubMed ID: 26477278DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.10.003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research conducted a clinical study to compare the effectiveness of moxidectin and fenbendazole in treating horses infected with a species of worm (cyathostomin) that is resistant to a common deworming drug. The study found that moxidectin was more effective, however, the sample size was small, and further studies are necessary.
Objective of the Study
- The key objective of the research was to assess the effectiveness of two anthelmintic drugs, fenbendazole and moxidectin, in dealing with horses infestations by worms resistant to benzimidazole, a common equine dewormer.
Methodology
- 18 young horses infected by Benzimidazole-Resistant(BZD-R) worms were involved in the study.
- The horses were assorted into three groups, one as the control group receiving no treatment, the second group treated with fenbendazole, and the third group treated with moxidectin.
- The treatment efficacy was evaluated through fecal samples gathered prior to and post treatment, complete worm counts from intestinal contents, and the examination of the cecal and ventral colon from euthanized horses.
Results
- It was found that fenbendazole resulted in a reduction of 44.6% in egg counts and was 56.4% effective against adults and larvae, but its efficacy dropped to 38.6% and 71.2% for younger worm stages.
- In comparison, moxidectin provided a much higher egg count reduction (99.9%) and was nearly entirely effective against adult stages, with 63.6% and 85.2% efficacy against younger worm stages.
- Despite the relative success of moxidectin, no significant difference was found in the number of larval counts between the treated and control groups. This could be due to a small sample size and the high variability in worm burdens among the horses.
Conclusion
- The study concludes that although moxidectin displayed better results in dealing with resistant worms, the small sample size, high variability, and timing discrepancies could be impacting the experiment results.
- Therefore, figuring out the optimum post-treatment interval to assess larvicidal efficacy poses a critical challenge and would be important for further studies in this subject.
Cite This Article
APA
Reinemeyer CR, Prado JC, Nielsen MK.
(2015).
Comparison of the larvicidal efficacies of moxidectin or a five-day regimen of fenbendazole in horses harboring cyathostomin populations resistant to the adulticidal dosage of fenbendazole.
Vet Parasitol, 214(1-2), 100-107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.10.003 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- East Tennessee Clinical Research, 80 Copper Ridge Farm Road, Rockwood, TN 37854, USA. Electronic address: creinemeyer@easttenncr.com.
- East Tennessee Clinical Research, 80 Copper Ridge Farm Road, Rockwood, TN 37854, USA.
- M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Anthelmintics / administration & dosage
- Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Drug Resistance
- Female
- Fenbendazole / administration & dosage
- Fenbendazole / therapeutic use
- Horse Diseases / drug therapy
- Horse Diseases / parasitology
- Horses
- Macrolides / therapeutic use
- Male
- Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
- Strongyle Infections, Equine / drug therapy
- Strongyle Infections, Equine / parasitology
Citations
This article has been cited 4 times.- Bull KE, Allen KJ, Hodgkinson JE, Peachey LE. The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2023 Apr;21:125-130.
- Macdonald SL, Abbas G, Ghafar A, Gauci CG, Bauquier J, El-Hage C, Tennent-Brown B, Wilkes EJA, Beasley A, Jacobson C, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Hurley J, Beveridge I, Hughes KJ, Nielsen MK, Jabbar A. Egg reappearance periods of anthelmintics against equine cyathostomins: The state of play revisited.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2023 Apr;21:28-39.
- Jürgenschellert L, Krücken J, Bousquet E, Bartz J, Heyer N, Nielsen MK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Occurrence of Strongylid Nematode Parasites on Horse Farms in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, With High Seroprevalence of Strongylus vulgaris Infection.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:892920.
- Clark A, Sallé G, Ballan V, Reigner F, Meynadier A, Cortet J, Koch C, Riou M, Blanchard A, Mach N. Strongyle Infection and Gut Microbiota: Profiling of Resistant and Susceptible Horses Over a Grazing Season.. Front Physiol 2018;9:272.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists