Comparison of two approaches to performing an inferior alveolar nerve block in the horse.
Abstract: To compare two approaches to performing the inferior alveolar nerve block in the horse and to evaluate the consistency of described topographical landmarks. Methods: Experimental cadaver model. Methods: Eleven cadaver heads were positioned to mimic a standing sedated horse and the position of the mandibular foramen approximated. The vertical approach to the approximate location of the mandibular foramen was undertaken and red dye was deposited. The angled approach was then undertaken and blue ink was used to identify it. The heads were then dissected to determine the location of the dye. Placement was categorised as a hit or a miss for each technique for each side of the head. The distance of the dye from the nerve was recorded. Straight lateral radiographs of the sectioned heads were taken to evaluate the topographical landmarks for performing this nerve block. Results: Each method was performed 22 times. A hit was achieved 16 times (73%) for the angled approach and 13 times (59%) for the vertical approach. There was no significant difference between the two approaches (P = 0.34). Radiographs revealed that the topographical landmarks used to approximate the mandibular foramen were relatively accurate. Conclusions: Both methods were found to be equivalently accurate. The previously reported topographic landmarks for locating the approximate position of the mandibular foramen on the medial aspect of the mandible were found to be accurate, but currently recommended doses of local anaesthetic may be excessive.
© 2012 The Authors. Australian Veterinary Journal © 2012 Australian Veterinary Association.
Publication Date: 2012-03-27 PubMed ID: 22443331DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.00897.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research paper compares two methods for performing the inferior alveolar nerve block in horses and evaluates the accuracy of used topographical landmarks. It concludes that both methods are equivalently accurate, and the identified landmarks for the mandibular foramen’s location are precisely accurate.
Research Methods
The researchers used the following methods:
- An experimental cadaver model was used which comprised of eleven horse heads. They were positioned to mimic a standing sedated horse.
- Approximation of the position of the mandibular foramen was carried out on these model horse heads.
- Two different techniques of inferior alveolar nerve block were performed. The vertical approach was carried out first, and red dye was used to mark the attempted location. Then, the angled approach was performed where a blue ink was used instead.
- After the approaches were performed, the model heads were dissected to reveal the exact location of the dye, and thus the accuracy of each approach. Hits and misses with each technique were recorded on both sides of the head.
- Measurements of the distance between the dye (which would represent the block injection) and the nerve were noted.
- Straight lateral radiographs were taken of the sectioned heads for further evaluation of the topographical landmarks utilized for the nerve block.
Results
The results of the research can be summarized as follows:
- Each method was performed 22 times (once on each side of the 11 cadaver heads). The angled approach hit the target 16 times (73%) while the vertical method was successful in 59% of attempts (13 hits).
- No significant difference in accuracy was found between the two methods; the P value was found to be 0.34.
- Through the radiographs, it was observed that the topographical landmarks used to approximate the mandibular foramen were accurate, therefore providing a reliable method for locating this position.
Conclusions
At the end of the research, a few conclusions were made:
- Both the angled and vertical approach are essentially equivalent in accuracy with no significant difference found between them.
- The topographical landmarks that have been traditionally used to locate the approximate position of the mandibular foramen are accurate.
- The currently recommended doses of local anaesthetic may be excessive, which suggests a need for further review in this aspect.
Cite This Article
APA
Harding PG, Smith RL, Barakzai SZ.
(2012).
Comparison of two approaches to performing an inferior alveolar nerve block in the horse.
Aust Vet J, 90(4), 146-150.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.00897.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Equine Medicine and Surgery, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, Western Australia 6159, Australia. p.harding@murdoch.edu.au
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cadaver
- Cephalometry / methods
- Cephalometry / veterinary
- Horses
- Mandible / innervation
- Mandibular Nerve
- Nerve Block / methods
- Nerve Block / veterinary
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Johnson JP, Vinardell T, David F. Ultrasound-guided injections of the equine head and neck: review and expert opinion.. J Equine Sci 2021 Dec;32(4):103-115.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists