Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2009; 235(1); 70-75; doi: 10.2460/javma.235.1.70

Comparison of ultrasonography versus radiography for the diagnosis of dorsal fragmentation of the metacarpophalangeal or metatarsophalangeal joint in horses.

Abstract: To compare clinical usefulness of ultrasonography versus radiography for detection of fragmentation of the dorsal aspect of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints in horses. Methods: Cross-sectional study. Methods: 36 horses with fragmentation of the MCP (n = 19) and MTP (29) joints. Methods: In all joints, radiography (4 standard projections) and ultrasonography were performed prior to arthroscopic examination and fragment removal. Number and location of fragments identified radiographically and ultrasonographically were compared with arthroscopic findings. Results: Radiographic and arthroscopic findings were in agreement with respect to both number and location of fragments in 21 of the 48 (44%) joints. Ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings were in agreement with respect to number and location of fragments for 46 of the 48 (96%) joints. In the remaining 2 joints, arthroscopy revealed additional fragments that were not identified ultrasonographically. When ultrasonographic findings were compared with radiographic findings, more fragments were seen ultrasonographically in 3 joints and fewer fragments were seen ultrasonographically in 1 joint. Ultrasonographic findings also confirmed the absence (4 joints) or presence (3 joints) of fragmentation at the dorsoproximal aspect of the joint that had been suspected on the basis of radiographic findings. Ultrasonography was also able to determine the location of the fragments in the joints where this was not possible radiographically. Conclusions: Results of the present study suggested that ultrasonography was a useful method for determining the number and location of fragments in horses with dorsal fragmentation of the MCP or MTP joint.
Publication Date: 2009-07-02 PubMed ID: 19566459DOI: 10.2460/javma.235.1.70Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examined the efficacy of ultrasonography compared to radiography in diagnosing dorsal fragmentation of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints in horses. Conclusions drawn suggest that ultrasonography provides a more accurate diagnosis, capable of working out the number and location of fragments within the joints.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted as a cross-sectional analysis involving 36 horses displaying fragmentation of either the MCP or MTP joints.
  • Radiography and ultrasonography scans were performed on all test subjects before their respective arthroscopic examinations and removal of fragment operations.
  • The techniques were compared on their ability to effectively identify the number and location of the fragments, with the results corroborated with arthroscopic findings.

Findings

  • A relative parity was noted between the radiography scan findings and arthroscopic results in identifying the number and location of fragments in approximately 44% of the subjects’ joints.
  • Ultrasonography scans produced notably better results, with findings aligning with arthroscopic examinations in 96% of the joints under observation. However, in two instances additional fragments were discovered during the arthroscopy which the ultrasonography failed to detect.
  • A comparison of the two scanning techniques indicated that ultrasonography was able to identify more fragments in three of the scanned joints and fewer fragments in one.
  • Ultrasonography also verified the presence or absence of fragmentation at the dorsoproximal aspect of the joint in a handful of cases where such a conclusion was only speculated in the radiography findings.
  • Furthermore, ultrasonography was successful in determining the locations of fragments in joints where radiography scans failed to do so.

Conclusions

  • The results of this study advocate the use of ultrasonography over radiography when diagnosing dorsal fragmentation of the MCP or MTP joint in horses. This conclusion is based on ultrasonography’s superior ability to accurately determine the number and location of fragments within the joint.
  • However, the study’s findings are inconclusive on matters concerning fragments which ultrasonography failed to detect, an aspect that calls for further investigation.

Cite This Article

APA
Vanderperren K, Martens AM, Declercq J, Duchateau L, Saunders JH. (2009). Comparison of ultrasonography versus radiography for the diagnosis of dorsal fragmentation of the metacarpophalangeal or metatarsophalangeal joint in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 235(1), 70-75. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.235.1.70

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 235
Issue: 1
Pages: 70-75

Researcher Affiliations

Vanderperren, Katrien
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging of Domestic Animals and Small Animal Orthopaedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.
Martens, Ann M
    Declercq, Jeroen
      Duchateau, Luc
        Saunders, Jimmy H

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Arthrography / veterinary
          • Cross-Sectional Studies
          • Forelimb / diagnostic imaging
          • Forelimb / pathology
          • Fractures, Bone / diagnostic imaging
          • Fractures, Bone / veterinary
          • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
          • Horse Diseases / pathology
          • Horses
          • Joints / diagnostic imaging
          • Joints / injuries
          • Joints / pathology
          • Ultrasonography

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.