Analyze Diet
Journal of biomechanical engineering2005; 127(5); 736-741; doi: 10.1115/1.1993663

Determining effective centroid position in biomechanical testing: a technique for simplifying whole bone analysis.

Abstract: Whole bone in vitro biomechanical compressive testing can be complicated by three factors: sample asymmetry, heterogeneous material properties, and unknown effective centroid location. Methods: The technique presented here facilitates the calculation of effective centroid position, modulus of elasticity and equivalent uniform strain magnitude for a cross section of bone from a simple whole bone compressive test. Simplification of section response to load is achieved through a combination of linear beam and simple planer geometry theory. The technique requires three longitudinal strain gauges be affixed around the test specimen cross section of interest, gauge position need not be determined. Sample loading is then accomplished using a simple four point loading jig. Results: Results of the technique are presented on an object with known elasticity and geometry, an aluminium tube, and seven pairs of equine third metacarpal whole bones. Conclusions: Average cross section modulus of elasticity, equivalent uniform cross section strain, and effective centroid locations were all predicted to within the range of published values. Employing the testing setup and analysis technique presented in this paper resulted in a significant savings in both implementation complexity and cost over previously available techniques.
Publication Date: 2005-10-27 PubMed ID: 16248302DOI: 10.1115/1.1993663Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research introduces a simplified method for calculating the position of the effective centroid, modulus of elasticity, and equivalent uniform strain magnitude in a cross-section of bone using a simple whole bone compressive test, saving both implementation complexity and cost.

Methods Used

The research involved the use of:

  • A linear beam theory in combination with simple planer geometry theory for the simplification of section response to load.
  • Three longitudinal strain gauges fixed around the test specimen cross section of interest. The positioning of the gauge was not necessary for the calculation.
  • A simple four-point loading jig for undertaking the sample loading.

Result Analysis

The testing was done on:

  • An object with well-known elasticity and geometry, which was an aluminium tube, to act as the control group in the experiment.
  • Seven pairs of equine third metacarpal whole bones to ensure reliability of results.

The results indicated that average cross-sectional modulus of elasticity, equivalent uniform cross-sectional strain, and effective centroid locations were predicted accurately within the range of published values.

Conclusion

From the findings, the research concluded that the testing setup and analysis technique introduced were cost-effective and simplified compared to the formerly available techniques. Thus, this technique for determining the effective centroid position in biomechanical testing could be of immense help in whole bone analysis, especially when dealing with factors like sample asymmetry, heterogeneous material properties, and unknown effective centroid location that typically complicate the process.

Cite This Article

APA
Whan G, Runciman RJ, Hurtig M. (2005). Determining effective centroid position in biomechanical testing: a technique for simplifying whole bone analysis. J Biomech Eng, 127(5), 736-741. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1993663

Publication

ISSN: 0148-0731
NlmUniqueID: 7909584
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 127
Issue: 5
Pages: 736-741

Researcher Affiliations

Whan, Gabrielle
  • School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.
Runciman, R John
    Hurtig, Mark

      MeSH Terms

      • Algorithms
      • Animals
      • Anisotropy
      • Biomechanical Phenomena / methods
      • Bone Density / physiology
      • Compressive Strength / physiology
      • Computer Simulation
      • Elasticity
      • Horses
      • In Vitro Techniques
      • Metacarpus / physiology
      • Models, Biological
      • Organ Size
      • Stress, Mechanical

      Citations

      This article has been cited 0 times.