FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Development of a Colic Scoring System to Predict Outcome in ...
Frontiers in veterinary science2021; 8; 697589; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.697589

Development of a Colic Scoring System to Predict Outcome in Horses.

Abstract: Acute abdominal pain in the horse is a common emergency presenting to equine practices. The wide variety of etiologies makes prognosticating survival a challenge. A retrospective, multi-institutional clinical study was performed to determine clinical parameters associated with survival of horses with colic, and to use them to develop a colic survival scoring system. The scoring system was then validated using clinical data in the prospective portion of the study. Medical records from 67 horses presenting for acute abdominal pain were evaluated to develop the colic assessment score. Twenty eight variables were compared between survivors and non-survivors and entered into logistic regression models for survival. Of these, six variables were included in the colic assessment score. A total colic assessment score range was from 0 to 12, with the highest score representing the lowest probability of survival. The optimal cutoff value to predict survival was seven resulting in an 86% sensitivity and 64% specificity with a positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 57%. Data from 95 horses presenting for abdominal pain to two equine hospitals was then collected prospectively to validate the colic assessment score. Horses from the prospective portion of the study that received a score >7 were classified as predicted to die and those with a score ≤7 were predicted to survive. The classification was compared to the actual outcome, of which the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the colic assessment score were 84, 62, 88, and 52%, respectively.
Copyright © 2021 Farrell, Kersh, Liepman and Dembek.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-10-08 PubMed ID: 34692803PubMed Central: PMC8531487DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.697589Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article presents the development and validation of a scoring system aiming to predict survival outcomes in horses experiencing acute abdominal pain, commonly known as colic. The study develops the colic assessment score, based on 6 key clinical variables, and tests its effectiveness using real-world data, showing promising prediction rates.

Research Background

  • Colic in horses, characterized by acute abdominal pain, presents a common emergency for equine practices.
  • The diverse range of etiologies makes determining survival outcomes for these cases quite difficult.

Study Design

  • The research carried out was a multi-institutional clinical study, done in two parts: retrospectively for developing the scoring system, and prospectively for validating its effectiveness.
  • In the retrospective part of the study, medical records from 67 horses presenting for colic were analyzed.
  • 28 variables related to survival outcomes were compared between surviving horses and those that did not survive, with six of these variables being used to create the colic assessment score.

The Scoring System

  • The colic assessment score developed in the retrospective study ranged from 0 to 12, where a higher score indicates a lower probability of survival.
  • The score threshold for survival was determined to be seven, resulting in sensitivity and specificity rates of 86% and 64%, respectively.
  • Additionally, the score had positive and negative predictive values of 88% and 57%, respectively.

Validation of the Scoring System

  • In the prospective part of the study, data from 95 horses presenting for abdominal pain at two equine hospitals was collected to verify the effectiveness of the colic assessment score.
  • Horses receiving a score above 7 were predicted to die, while those with a score of 7 and below were predicted to survive.
  • After comparing these classifications with the actual outcomes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of the colic assessment score were found to be 84%, 62%, 88%, and 52% respectively.

Conclusion

  • The development and validation of a colic scoring system can assist veterinary professionals in predicting survival outcomes in horses presenting with acute abdominal pain.
  • Validation results demonstrate that this scoring system can indeed provide a reliable estimation of survival probability, supporting its potential application in equine practices.

Cite This Article

APA
Farrell A, Kersh K, Liepman R, Dembek KA. (2021). Development of a Colic Scoring System to Predict Outcome in Horses. Front Vet Sci, 8, 697589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.697589

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: 697589
PII: 697589

Researcher Affiliations

Farrell, Alanna
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Kersh, Kevin
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Liepman, Rachel
  • Chaparral Veterinary Medical Center, Cave Creek, AZ, United States.
Dembek, Katarzyna A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 35 references
  1. Viljoen A, Saulez MN, Donnellan CM, Bester L, Gummow B. After-hours equine emergency admissions at a university referral hospital (1998-2007): causes and interventions.. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2009 Sep;80(3):169-73.
    doi: 10.4102/jsava.v80i3.196pubmed: 20169750google scholar: lookup
  2. Dolente BA, Lindborg S, Russel G, Southwood LL. Emergency case admissions at a large animal tertiary university referral hospital during a 12-month period.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (2008) 18:298–305.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2008.00305.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  3. Roy MF, Kwong GP, Lambert J, Massie S, Lockhart S. Prognostic Value and Development of a Scoring System in Horses With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2017 Mar;31(2):582-592.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.14670pmc: PMC5354005pubmed: 28207163google scholar: lookup
  4. Tinker MK, White NA, Lessard P, Thatcher CD, Pelzer KD, Davis B, Carmel DK. Prospective study of equine colic incidence and mortality.. Equine Vet J 1997 Nov;29(6):448-53.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03157.xpubmed: 9413717google scholar: lookup
  5. Furr MO, White NA. Prognosis for acute abdominal disease.. Current Practice of Equine Surgery 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; (1990). p. 390–4.
  6. Marshall JF, Blikslager AT. Colic: Diagnosis, surgical decision, preoperative management, and surgical approaches to the abdomen.. Equine Surgery 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier-Health Science Division; (2018). p. 521–5.
  7. Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff CC, Tobler PN. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016 Nov 3;16(1):138.
    doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1pmc: PMC5093937pubmed: 27809908google scholar: lookup
  8. Furr MO, Lessard P, White NA 2nd. Development of a colic severity score for predicting the outcome of equine colic.. Vet Surg 1995 Mar-Apr;24(2):97-101.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1995.tb01302.xpubmed: 7778263google scholar: lookup
  9. van der Linden MA, Laffont CM, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. Prognosis in equine medical and surgical colic.. J Vet Intern Med 2003 May-Jun;17(3):343-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2003.tb02459.xpubmed: 12774977google scholar: lookup
  10. Sutton GA, Paltiel O, Soffer M, Turner D. Validation of two behaviour-based pain scales for horses with acute colic.. Vet J 2013 Sep;197(3):646-50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.04.007pubmed: 23993390google scholar: lookup
  11. Sutton GA, Dahan R, Turner D, Paltiel O. A behaviour-based pain scale for horses with acute colic: scale construction.. Vet J 2013 Jun;196(3):394-401.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.008pubmed: 23141961google scholar: lookup
  12. van Loon JP, Van Dierendonck MC. Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A scale-construction study.. Vet J 2015 Dec;206(3):356-64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.023pubmed: 26526526google scholar: lookup
  13. Klohnen A, Vachon AM, Fischer AT Jr. Use of diagnostic ultrasonography in horses with signs of acute abdominal pain.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996 Nov 1;209(9):1597-601.
    pubmed: 8899025
  14. Scharner D, Rotting A, Gerlach K, Rasch K, Freeman DE. Ultrasonography of the abdomen in the horse with colic.. Clin Tech Equine Pract (2002) 1:118–124.
    doi: 10.1053/ctep.2002.35579google scholar: lookup
  15. Beccati F, Pepe M, Gialletti R, Cercone M, Bazzica C, Nannarone S. Is there a statistical correlation between ultrasonographic findings and definitive diagnosis in horses with acute abdominal pain?. Equine Vet J Suppl 2011 Aug;(39):98-105.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00428.xpubmed: 21790762google scholar: lookup
  16. Southwood LL, Fehr JE. Abdominal palpation per rectum.. Practical Guide to Equine Colic Ames, IA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 22–3.
    doi: 10.1002/9781118704783.ch3google scholar: lookup
  17. Royston P, Altman DG. Visualizing and assessing discrimination in the logistic regression model.. Stat Med 2010 Oct 30;29(24):2508-20.
    doi: 10.1002/sim.3994pubmed: 20641144google scholar: lookup
  18. Thoefner MB, Ersbøll AK, Hesselholt M. Prognostic indicators in a Danish hospital-based population of colic horses.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2000 Jun;(32):11-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2000.tb05328.xpubmed: 11202376google scholar: lookup
  19. Reeves MJ, Curtis CR, Salman MD, Hilbert BJ. Prognosis in equine colic patients using multivariable analysis.. Can J Vet Res 1989 Jan;53(1):87-94.
    pmc: PMC1255520pubmed: 2914230
  20. Moore JN, Owen RR, Lumsden JH. Clinical evaluation of blood lactate levels in equine colic.. Equine Vet J 1976 Apr;8(2):49-54.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1976.tb03289.xpubmed: 4300google scholar: lookup
  21. Henderson I. Diagnostic and prognostic use of L-lactate measurement in equine practice.. Equine Vet Educ (2013) 25:468–75.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12033google scholar: lookup
  22. Johnston K, Holcombe SJ, Hauptman JG. Plasma lactate as a predictor of colonic viability and survival after 360 degrees volvulus of the ascending colon in horses.. Vet Surg 2007 Aug;36(6):563-7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00305.xpubmed: 17686130google scholar: lookup
  23. Orsini JA, Elser AH, Galligan DT, Donawick WJ, Kronfeld DS. Prognostic index for acute abdominal crisis (colic) in horses.. Am J Vet Res 1988 Nov;49(11):1969-71.
    pubmed: 3247920
  24. Grulke S, Olle E, Detilleux J, Gangl M, Caudron I, Serteyn D. Determination of a gravity and shock score for prognosis in equine surgical colic.. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2001 Oct;48(8):465-73.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00374.xpubmed: 11710672google scholar: lookup
  25. Latson KM, Nieto JE, Beldomenico PM, Snyder JR. Evaluation of peritoneal fluid lactate as a marker of intestinal ischaemia in equine colic.. Equine Vet J 2005 Jul;37(4):342-6.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054529319pubmed: 16028624google scholar: lookup
  26. Lumsden JH, Rowe R, Mullen K. Hematology and biochemistry reference values for the light horse.. Can J Comp Med 1980 Jan;44(1):32-42.
    pmc: PMC1320032pubmed: 7397597
  27. Toribio RE, Kohn CW, Hardy J, Rosol TJ. Alterations in serum parathyroid hormone and electrolyte concentrations and urinary excretion of electrolytes in horses with induced endotoxemia.. J Vet Intern Med 2005 Mar-Apr;19(2):223-31.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2005.tb02686.xpubmed: 15822568google scholar: lookup
  28. Toribio RE. Disorders of calcium and phosphate metabolism in horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2011 Apr;27(1):129-47.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.12.010pubmed: 21392658google scholar: lookup
  29. Garcia-Lopez JM, Provost PJ, Rush JE, Zicker SC, Burmaster H, Freeman LM. Prevalence and prognostic importance of hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia in horses that have colic surgery.. Am J Vet Res 2001 Jan;62(1):7-12.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.7pubmed: 11197564google scholar: lookup
  30. Delesalle C, Dewulf J, Lefebvre RA, Schuurkes JA, Van Vlierbergen B, Deprez P. Use of plasma ionized calcium levels and Ca2+ substitution response patterns as prognostic parameters for ileus and survival in colic horses.. Vet Q 2005 Dec;27(4):157-72.
    doi: 10.1080/01652176.2002.9695197pubmed: 16402513google scholar: lookup
  31. Dart AJ, Snyder JR, Spier SJ, Sullivan KE. Ionized calcium concentration in horses with surgically managed gastrointestinal disease: 147 cases (1988-1990).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992 Oct 15;201(8):1244-8.
    pubmed: 1429169
  32. Ehrhardt EE, Lowe JE. Observer variation in equine abdominal auscultation.. Equine Vet J 1990 May;22(3):182-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04244.xpubmed: 2361506google scholar: lookup
  33. Sasaki N, Murata A, Lee I, Yamada H. Evaluation of equine cecal motility by ausculation, ultrasonography and electrointestinography after jejunocecostomy.. Res Vet Sci 2008 Apr;84(2):305-10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.04.009pubmed: 17570455google scholar: lookup
  34. Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS, Aggarwal R. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Logistic regression.. Perspect Clin Res 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):148-151.
    doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_123_17pmc: PMC5543767pubmed: 28828311google scholar: lookup
  35. Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models.. Psychosom Med 2004 May-Jun;66(3):411-21.
    doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9pubmed: 15184705google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Cummings CO, Krucik DDR, Price E. Clinical predictive models in equine medicine: A systematic review.. Equine Vet J 2023 Jul;55(4):573-583.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13880pubmed: 36199162google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.