Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2013; 46(2); 227-232; doi: 10.1111/evj.12113

Distal hindlimb kinematics of galloping Thoroughbred racehorses on dirt and synthetic racetrack surfaces.

Abstract: The effect of racetrack surface (dirt or synthetic) on distal hindlimb kinematics of racehorses running at competition speeds is not known. Objective: To compare distal hindlimb and hoof kinematics during stance of breezing (unrestrained gallop) racehorses between dirt and synthetic surfaces. Methods: Two-dimensional kinematic video analysis of 5 Thoroughbred racehorses galloping at high speeds (12-17 m/s) on a dirt racetrack and a synthetic racetrack. Methods: The positions of kinematic markers applied to the left hindlimb were recorded at 500 Hz. Position, velocity and acceleration of joint angles and hoof translation during stance were calculated in the sagittal plane. Peak translational and angular kinematic values were compared between the dirt and synthetic race surfaces using mixed model analyses of covariance. Results: Maximum and heel-strike metatarsophalangeal (fetlock) angles were greater (P<0.05) on the dirt surface than on the synthetic surface. Maximum fetlock angle occurred earlier during stance on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Greater horizontal displacement of the heel during slide occurred on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Conclusions: During high-speed gallop, hindlimb fetlock hyperextension and horizontal hoof slide are greater on a dirt surface than on a synthetic surface. Synthetic race surfaces may mitigate risk of injury to hindlimb fetlock structures by reducing fetlock hyperextension and associated strains in fetlock support structures. Differences in hoof slide may contribute to different distal hindlimb kinematics between surfaces.
Publication Date: 2013-08-30 PubMed ID: 23742040DOI: 10.1111/evj.12113Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the impact of different racetrack surfaces – dirt and synthetic – on the hindlimb and hoof movements of Thoroughbred racehorses during high-speed galloping.

Research Objective

  • The aim of this study was to compare the distal hindlimb and hoof kinematics during stance (the phase of a stride in which the foot remains in contact with the ground) of galloping horses on dirt versus synthetic racetrack surfaces. This analysis can further our understanding of how different racetrack surfaces influence horse motion and potentially influence injury risk.

Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a two-dimensional kinematic video analysis of five Thoroughbred horses galloping unrestrained (breezing) at high speeds (12-17 m/s) on dirt and synthetic racetracks.
  • Kinematic markers were applied to the left hindlimb of the horses and recorded at a frequency of 500 Hz.
  • The team analyzed position, velocity, and acceleration of joint angles and hoof movement in the sagittal plane (the vertical plane which divides the body into left and right).
  • To compare the differences on both surfaces, peak translational (linear motion along a straight path) and angular kinematic values were studied using statistical models.

Results

  • Several key differences were observed in hindlimb and hoof motion on the two track surfaces. Angles at the fetlock (joint analogous to the human wrist, located between hoof and shank) were greater and occurred earlier during stance on the dirt surface than on the synthetic surface.
  • A larger horizontal displacement of the horse’s heel during sliding was also seen on the dirt surface.

Conclusions

  • The research concludes that high-speed galloping on a dirt surface causes greater hindlimb fetlock hyperextension (increased bending beyond the normal range) and horizontal hoof slide than on a synthetic surface. Such variation may impart different strain patterns on fetlock support structures, potentially increasing injury risk.
  • By reducing fetlock hyperextension and its associated strains, synthetic race surfaces may help mitigate the risk of injury to hindlimb fetlock structures.
  • Differences in hoof slide on the different surfaces could also contribute to the observed differences in distal hindlimb kinematics between track surfaces. Such findings could influence racehorse training regimens, track material selection, and injury prevention practices.

Cite This Article

APA
Symons JE, Garcia TC, Stover SM. (2013). Distal hindlimb kinematics of galloping Thoroughbred racehorses on dirt and synthetic racetrack surfaces. Equine Vet J, 46(2), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12113

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 2
Pages: 227-232

Researcher Affiliations

Symons, J E
  • Biomedical Engineering Graduate Group, University of California, USA; J. D. Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, University of California, USA.
Garcia, T C
    Stover, S M

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Biomechanical Phenomena
      • Hindlimb / physiology
      • Hoof and Claw / physiology
      • Horses / physiology
      • Physical Conditioning, Animal / physiology
      • Running
      • Sports
      • Surface Properties

      Citations

      This article has been cited 5 times.
      1. Horan K, Price H, Day P, Mackechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Timing Differences in Stride Cycle Phases in Retired Racehorses Ridden in Rising and Two-Point Seat Positions at Trot on Turf, Artificial and Tarmac Surfaces.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 9;13(16).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13162563pubmed: 37627354google scholar: lookup
      2. Rohlf CM, Garcia TC, Marsh LJ, Acutt EV, le Jeune SS, Stover SM. Effects of Jumping Phase, Leading Limb, and Arena Surface Type on Forelimb Hoof Movement.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 27;13(13).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13132122pubmed: 37443919google scholar: lookup
      3. Harrison SM, Whitton RC, Stover SM, Symons JE, Cleary PW. A Coupled Biomechanical-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model for Horse Racing Tracks.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:766748.
        doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.766748pubmed: 35265590google scholar: lookup
      4. Horan K, Kourdache K, Coburn J, Day P, Carnall H, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Hammond L, Millard S, Lancaster B, Pfau T. The effect of horseshoes and surfaces on horse and jockey centre of mass displacements at gallop.. PLoS One 2021;16(11):e0257820.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257820pubmed: 34813584google scholar: lookup
      5. Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Carnall H, Hammond L, Peterson M, Millard S, Pfau T. Influence of Speed, Ground Surface and Shoeing Condition on Hoof Breakover Duration in Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 3;11(9).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11092588pubmed: 34573553google scholar: lookup