Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1985; 17(3); 178-180; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1985.tb02463.x

Do magnetic fields influence soft tissue wound healing?–A preliminary communication.

Abstract: Magnetic fields have been considered for treating many ailments over man's history. There have been many anecdotal unsupported claims for successful treatment of soft tissue injury although reports have been more substantive in the orthopaedic field. The widespread clinical and veterinary use of a light self-adhesive magnetic foil in Europe prompted this trial of experimental wound healing. One hundred and sixty Sprague-Dawley rats had a linear 2.5 cm incision or a circular 1 cm skin defect made over the mid-dorsal spine. Equal numbers were randomised to receive either a magnetic foil or a dummy (control) dressing. At three, seven, 10 or 14 days linear wounds were distracted using a tensiometer; open defects were measured, excised and assayed for collagen content; 14-day wounds were examined histologically. Although wound tensile strengths increased and open wounds decreased in size with increase of hydroxyproline, there were no statistically significant differences between treated or control animals. Although easy to apply the alternate magnetic foil (giving 400 Gauss at 7 mm) conferred no statistically significant effect on soft tissue healing.
Publication Date: 1985-05-01 PubMed ID: 4076125DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1985.tb02463.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates whether magnetic fields have any significant effect on the healing of soft tissue wounds, using experiments on rats as a basis for study. Essentially, the study found no notable differences in the healing process or outcome between the group that was exposed to a magnetic field and the control group.

Research Methods

  • The experiment involved a total of 160 Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were divided into two equal groups; one group was treated with a magnetic foil, whereas the other group was given a dummy or control dressing.
  • On each rat, a linear incision of 2.5 cm or a circular skin defect of 1 cm was made, strategically over the mid-dorsal spine.
  • Over a period of 14 days, researchers monitored the healing progress at intervals of three, seven, ten, and fourteen days.
  • In the case of linear wounds, their tensile strength was measured using a tensiometer. Open defects, on the other hand, were measured, excised, and assayed for collagen content.

Results

  • In both groups, researchers noted an increase in wound tensile strengths and a decrease in size of open wounds, along with an increase in hydroxyproline – an amino acid involved in collagen production.
  • However, upon comparing both groups, researchers found no statistically significant differences between the wounds treated with a magnetic field and those in the control group.

Conclusions

  • While the magnetic foil is easy to apply and was thought to potentially aid in healing due to historically anecdotal evidence, the research shows it had no significant impact on the healing process as compared to the control group.
  • This study’s findings, therefore, suggest that the use of magnetic fields, at least in the manner provided by the described magnetic foil, may not influence soft tissue wound healing significantly.

Cite This Article

APA
Leaper DJ, Foster ME, Brennan SS, Davies PW. (1985). Do magnetic fields influence soft tissue wound healing?–A preliminary communication. Equine Vet J, 17(3), 178-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1985.tb02463.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 3
Pages: 178-180

Researcher Affiliations

Leaper, D J
    Foster, M E
      Brennan, S S
        Davies, P W

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Female
          • Magnetics
          • Rats
          • Rats, Inbred Strains
          • Skin / injuries
          • Tensile Strength
          • Wound Healing

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.