Analyze Diet
Veterinarni medicina2024; 69(9); 307-313; doi: 10.17221/18/2024-VETMED

Does a relation between bone histomorphometry and fractures exist? The case of the equine radius and tibia.

Abstract: Fractures of long bones in limbs are rare traumatic events in horses. This study investigates whether the incidence and types of fractures can be related to the histomorphometric features of the radius and tibia, which experience different biomechanical stresses and exhibit varying incidences and types of fractures. Clinical observations suggest that, in adults, slightly transverse and comminuted fractures are present in the radius, while the tibia shows a higher frequency of longitudinal and spiral fractures. Microscopic observations reveal no apparent distinctive characteristics between the radius and tibia, whereas the histomorphometric data highlight differences in the osteon density, eccentricity, and diameters of the osteons and Haversian canals. To sum up, tibial osteons are more numerous and smaller than those in the radius, resulting in a 15% higher total extension of the cement line in the tibia compared to the radius. These histomorphometric differences are an evolutionary adaptation to the different biomechanical stresses that involve the thoracic and pelvic limbs. Our results could help better understand numerous clinical realities detectable through retrospective analyses and aid in evaluating a specific bone's predisposition towards traumatic events in all mammals, including humans.
Publication Date: 2024-09-26 PubMed ID: 39474360PubMed Central: PMC11517812DOI: 10.17221/18/2024-VETMEDGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research aims to understand the relationship between the microscopic structure of bones (histomorphometry) and the incidence and type of fractures using the equine radius and tibia as case studies.

Understanding the Scope of the Study

  • The research focuses on horses, particularly investigating the incidence and types of fractures in relation to the histomorphometric aspects of the radius and tibia. These two bones were selected due to their different biomechanical stresses and varying incidences and types of fractures.

Clinical Observations

  • The paper begins with clinical observations that state fractures in adult horses typically present as slightly crosswise and splintered in the radius, while the tibia often has longitudinal and spiral fractures.

Microscopic Observations and Histomorphometric Data

  • The microscopy showed no noticeable distinctive characteristics between the radius and tibia.
  • The histomorphometric data, however, highlighted a difference in osteon density, eccentricity, and size of the osteons and Haversian canals between the two bones.
  • The tibia osteons are more numerous and smaller compared to the radius, causing a 15% higher total extension of the cement line in the tibia, which could explain the different types of fractures observed clinically.

Implications of the Study

  • The differences in histomorphometric features are considered an evolutionary adaptation to varying biomechanical stresses experienced by the thoracic and pelvic limbs of horses.
  • The findings could potentially help clinicians better understand and predict bone fractures by examining the predisposition of specific bones towards certain types of fractures.
  • Although the research focuses on horses, the authors suggest that the principles derived could apply to all mammals, including humans, providing an avenue for future research.

Cite This Article

APA
Zedda M, Babosova R, Gadau S, Lepore G, Succu S, Farina V. (2024). Does a relation between bone histomorphometry and fractures exist? The case of the equine radius and tibia. Vet Med (Praha), 69(9), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.17221/18/2024-VETMED

Publication

ISSN: 0375-8427
NlmUniqueID: 0063417
Country: Czech Republic
Language: English
Volume: 69
Issue: 9
Pages: 307-313

Researcher Affiliations

Zedda, Marco
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Babosova, Ramona
  • Department of Zoology and Anthropology, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Nitra, Slovak Republic.
Gadau, Sergio
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Lepore, Gianluca
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Succu, Sara
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Farina, Vittorio
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 29 references
  1. Auer J. Fractures of the radius. .
  2. Babosova R, Zedda M, Belica A, Golej M, Chovancova G, Kalas M, Vondrakova M. The enrichment of knowledge about the microstructure of brown bear compact bone tissue. Eur Zool J 2022 Apr 15;89:615-24.
  3. Baxter GM. Manual of equine lameness. .
  4. Catcott EJ, Smithcors JF. Equine medicine & surgery. .
  5. Chiang B, Xiaohua L. Osteon: Structure, turnover and regeneration. Tissue Engin 2022 Apr 10;28:261-78.
    pmc: PMC9063188pubmed: 33487116
  6. Cuijpers S. Histological identification of bone fragments in archaeology: Telling humans apart from horses and cattle. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2006 Jun;16:465-80.
  7. Currey JD. Bone architecture and fracture. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2005 Jun;3:52-6.
    pubmed: 16036102
  8. Denoix JM. Biomechanics and physical training of the horse. .
  9. Derungs SB, Furst AE, Hassig M, Auer JA. Frequency, consequences and clinical outcome of kick injuries in horses: 256 cases (1992–2000). Vet Med Austria/Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift 2004 Mar;91:114-49.
  10. Donati B, Furst AE, Hassig M, Jakson MA. Epidemiology of fractures: The role of kick injuries in equine fractures. Equine Vet J 2018 Feb;50:580-6.
    pubmed: 29441693
  11. Giua S, Farina V, Cacchioli A, Ravanetti F, Carcupino M, Mohadero Novas M, Zedda M. Comparative histology of the femur between mouflon (Ovis aries musimon) and sheep (Ovis aries aries). J Biol Res 2014 Dec;87:74-7.
  12. Henry GA. Fracture healing and complications. .
  13. Lopez MJ. Bone biology and fracture healing. .
  14. Mullins LP, Sassi V, Mchugh PE, Bruzzi MS. Differences in the crack resistance of interstitial, osteonal and trabecular bone tissue. Annals Biomed Engin 2009;37:2574-82.
    pubmed: 19763827
  15. Nixon AJ. Equine fracture repair. .
  16. O’Brien FJ, Hardiman DA, Hazenberg JG, Mercy MV, Moshin S, Taylor D, Lee TC. The behaviour of microcracks in compact bone. Eur J Morphol 2005;42:71-9.
    pubmed: 16123026
  17. Ortved KF, Richardson DW. Complications of equine orthopedic surgery. .
  18. Palombo MR, Zedda M. Surviving in a predator-free environment: Hints from a bone remodelling process in a dwarf Pleistocene deer from Crete. C R Palevol 2016 Jan;15:245-54.
  19. Palombo MR, Zedda M. The intriguing giant deer from the Bate cave (Crete): Could paleohistological evidence question its taxonomy and nomenclature?. Integr Zool 2022 Mar;17:54-77.
    pmc: PMC9292671pubmed: 33728744
  20. Pinilla MJ, Tranquille CA, Blunden AS, Chang YM, Parkin TDH, Murray RC. Histological features of the distal third metacarpal bone in thoroughbred racehorses, with and without lateral condylar fractures. J Comp Pathol 2017 Jul;157:1-10.
    pubmed: 28735663
  21. Rose R, Hogson D. Manual of equine practice. .
  22. Sanders-Shamis M, Bramlage LR, Gable AA. Radius fractures in the horse: A retrospective study of 47 cases. Equine Vet J 1986 Nov;18:432-7.
    pubmed: 3803355
  23. Schroeder OE, Aceto HW, Boyle AG. A field study of kick injuries to the radius and tibia in 51 horses (2000–2010). Can Vet 2013 Mar;54:271-5.
    pmc: PMC3573634pubmed: 23997265
  24. . Equine wound management. .
  25. Zedda M. The arrangement of osteons and Kepler’s conjecture. Appl Sci 2023 Apr;13(8):70.
  26. Zedda M, Babosova R. Does the osteon morphology depend on the body mass? A scaling study on macroscopic and histomorphometric differences between cow (Bos taurus) and sheep (Ovis aries). Zoomorphol 2021 Jan;140:169-81.
  27. Zedda M, Brits D, Giua S, Farina V. Distinguishing domestic pig femora and tibiae from wild boar through microscopic analyses. Zoomorphol 2019 Nov;138:159-70.
  28. Zedda M, Lepore G, Biggio GP, Gadau S, Mura E, Farina V. Morphology, morphometry and spatial distribution of secondary osteons in equine femur. Anat Histol Embryol 2015 Aug;44:328-32.
    pubmed: 25142967
  29. Zedda M, Sathe V, Chakraborty P, Palombo MR, Farina V. A first comparison of bone histomorphometry in extant domestic horses (Equus caballus) and a Pleistocene Indian wild horse (Equus namadicus). Integr Zool 2020 Apr;5:448-60.
    pubmed: 32297705

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.