Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2018; 51(1); 108-114; doi: 10.1111/evj.12952

Does ‘hacking’ surface type affect equine forelimb foot placement, movement symmetry or hoof impact deceleration during ridden walk and trot exercise?

Abstract: Both pleasure and competition horses regularly exercise on surfaces such as tarmac, gravel and turf during 'hacking'. Despite this, there is limited evidence relating to the effect of these surfaces upon foot-surface interaction. Objective: To investigate forelimb foot placement, hoof vibration and movement symmetry in pleasure horses on three commonly encountered hacking surfaces. Methods: Quantitative gait study in a convenience sample. Methods: Six horses regularly partaking in hacking exercise were ridden in walk and trot on all surfaces. Horses were equipped with one hoof-mounted, accelerometer and four body-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) to measure foot impact and movement symmetry. High-speed (400 FPS) video footage of foot-placement was acquired (dorsal, palmar, lateral views). Foot-impact and movement symmetry were analysed with a mixed effects model and Bowker symmetry tests for foot-placement analysis. Results: Vibration power and frequency parameters increase as perceived surface firmness increases from grass, to gravel, to tarmac (P≤0.001). Vibration power parameters were consistently greater at trot compared with walk (P≤0.001), but the same was not true for vibration frequency (P≥0.2). Greatest movement asymmetry was recorded during grass surface trotting. No significant difference in foot-placement was detected between the three surfaces. Conclusions: This was a field study using three commonly encountered hacking surfaces. Surface properties change easily with water content and temperature fluctuations so care must be taken when considering other similar surfaces, especially at different times of the year. Six leisure horses were used so the results may not be representative of horses of all types. Conclusions: Vibration parameters generally increase as perceived surface firmness increases. Increasing speed alters vibration power but not frequency. Further investigations are required to determine the role that this may play in the development of musculoskeletal disease in horses.
Publication Date: 2018-05-12 PubMed ID: 29665054DOI: 10.1111/evj.12952Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates how different “hacking” surfaces affect horse movement, specifically relating to forelimb foot placement, hoof vibration, and movement symmetry. The study finds that surface type can indeed influence these parameters, potentially offering insights into the relationship between leg health and riding surface in horses.

Methodology

  • This study leveraged a quantitative gait study with six horses who regularly participate in hacking activity, i.e., riding over different types of terrain.
  • Horses were ridden in walk and trot modes over three common types of tracks: grass, gravel, and tarmac.
  • Each horse was fitted with one hoof-mounted accelerometer and four body-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) to record details about the foot’s impact and the horse’s movement symmetry.
  • Simultaneously, high-speed video footage recording the horses’ foot placement was taken from dorsal (top), palmar (back), and lateral (side) viewpoints.
  • Data on foot-impact, movement symmetry, and foot-placement were analyzed using statistical tools.

Results

  • The study found that hoof vibration power and frequency increased as the perceived hardness of the surface increased (from grass to gravel to tarmac).
  • At the trotting speed, the vibration power was consistently higher than at walking speed, though the vibration frequency did not show any significant difference based on the speed.
  • The highest movement asymmetry was measured when trotting on a grass surface.
  • No significant difference was found in foot placement between the three surfaces.

Conclusions

  • This study, conducted in real field settings, reveals that horse movement, specifically forelimb foot placement, movement symmetry, and hoof vibration, is influenced by the surface type over which the horses are ridden.
  • However, it’s crucial to consider that these results were obtained from only six leisure horses and may not represent all horse types.
  • Also, the study notes that surface properties can change with water content and temperature fluctuations, which could affect the results if the experiment were conducted in different seasonal conditions.
  • In conclusion, the study suggests that further investigations are needed to determine the role that these vibration parameters might play in the development of musculoskeletal diseases in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Barstow A, Bailey J, Campbell J, Harris C, Weller R, Pfau T. (2018). Does ‘hacking’ surface type affect equine forelimb foot placement, movement symmetry or hoof impact deceleration during ridden walk and trot exercise? Equine Vet J, 51(1), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12952

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 1
Pages: 108-114

Researcher Affiliations

Barstow, A
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
  • Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Bailey, J
  • Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Campbell, J
  • Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Harris, C
  • Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Weller, R
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
  • Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Pfau, T
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
  • Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Accelerometry / instrumentation
  • Accelerometry / veterinary
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Animals
  • Floors and Floorcoverings / classification
  • Floors and Floorcoverings / standards
  • Foot / physiology
  • Forelimb / physiology
  • Gait / physiology
  • Hoof and Claw / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Lameness, Animal / etiology
  • Vibration
  • Videotape Recording

Grant Funding

  • Royal Veterinary College Mellon Trust
  • British Horse Society
  • Horse Betting Levy Board

Citations

This article has been cited 10 times.