Analyze Diet
BMC public health2019; 19(1); 1672; doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7962-z

Does having a pet influence the physical activity of their young female owners?

Abstract: Many studies have shown that having a dog has an impact on the increase in physical activity (PA) of people. However, what is often not taken into account in many such studies is owning of other pets. The aim of this study was to compare PA levels between animal owners and non-owners and to research potential differences between owners of different kinds of animals. Methods: 111 young females of mean age 21 ± 1.2 years enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Czech version of short International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to assess PA level, supplemented with a question about whether they owned an animal and what kind. Results: People who owned a pet had higher frequency and duration of moderate physical activity (MPA) and spent more MET/min/wk. (p < 0.05). This difference has projected into total PA duration and also into calories burned in a week. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference between subgroups of animal owners was also confirmed for MPA and total PA in favour of horse owners. Conclusions: Animal owners generally reported higher PA levels compared to people who do not own any pets. However, similarly significant in this particular age group was the kind of animal these young women owned.
Publication Date: 2019-12-12 PubMed ID: 31830957PubMed Central: PMC6909525DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7962-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the impact of pet ownership on the physical activity levels of young women. The study found that, on average, pet owners display higher levels of physical activity and burn more calories per week than those who do not own pets, with horse owners demonstrating particularly significant physical activity levels.

Introduction and Methodology

The study was conducted on a group of 111 young women, with an average age of approximately 21 years. The primary objective was to explore possible differences in physical activity levels between young women who owned a pet and those who didn’t. It also aimed to investigate potential variations among owners of different kinds of animals. A short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), adapted to Czech, was employed to assess the physical activity level of the participants. In addition, the participants were asked if they owned a pet and what type of pet it was.

Results and Findings

  • The study revealed that pet owners generally had higher frequency and length of moderate physical activity (MPA).
  • These pet-owners also expended more Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) minutes per week, an indicator of energy expenditure, signifying more calorie burn.
  • This increased physical activity of pet-owners translated into longer total duration of physical activity and more calories burned per week.
  • The study further discovered a statistically significant difference among subsets of pet owners. Owners of horses reported higher MPA and total physical activity.
  • These findings suggest that not only does the presence of a pet result in increased physical activity among young women, but also the type of pet has an influence. Particularly, owning a horse seems to promote higher levels of activity.

Conclusions

The research concluded that young women who had pets generally reported higher physical activity levels than those who didn’t own any pets. This difference was notably pronounced in the case of horse owners. As such, the kind of animal owned was a determining factor in their respective levels of physical activity. This emphasizes the role of pet ownership, specifically horse ownership, in encouraging physical activity and sustaining a healthier lifestyle among young women.

Cite This Article

APA
Machová K, Daďová K, Chaloupková H, Svobodová I. (2019). Does having a pet influence the physical activity of their young female owners? BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1672. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7962-z

Publication

ISSN: 1471-2458
NlmUniqueID: 100968562
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 19
Issue: 1
Pages: 1672
PII: 1672

Researcher Affiliations

Machová, Kristýna
  • Department of Ethology and Companion Animals, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daďová, Klára
  • Department of Adapted Physical Education and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, J. Martího 31, 162 52, Prague, Czech Republic. dadova.klara@gmail.com.
Chaloupková, Helena
  • Department of Ethology and Companion Animals, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Svobodová, Ivona
  • Department of Ethology and Companion Animals, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dogs
  • Exercise
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Ownership / statistics & numerical data
  • Pets
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Grant Funding

  • Progress Q41 / Univerzita Karlova v Praze

Conflict of Interest Statement

This manuscript has not been previously submitted or published and is not under consideration in any other peer-reviewed media. To the best of our knowledge, no conflict of interest, financial or other, exists.

References

This article includes 37 references
  1. Feng Z, Dibben C, Witham MD, Donnan PT, Vadiveloo T, Sniehotta F, Crombie IK, McMurdo ME. Dog ownership and physical activity in later life: a cross-sectional observational study.. Prev Med 2014 Sep;66:101-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.004pubmed: 24931433google scholar: lookup
  2. Westgarth C, Christley RM, Christian HE. How might we increase physical activity through dog walking?: A comprehensive review of dog walking correlates.. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014 Aug 20;11:83.
    doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-83pmc: PMC4261546pubmed: 25142228google scholar: lookup
  3. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
  4. Caspersen CJ, Pereira MA, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age.. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000 Sep;32(9):1601-9.
  5. Scarapicchia TMF, Sabiston CM, Pila E, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Faulkner G. A longitudinal investigation of a multidimensional model of social support and physical activity over the first year of university. Psychol Sport Exerc 2017;31:11–20.
  6. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey.. Health Rep 2011 Mar;22(1):15-23.
    pubmed: 21510586
  7. Jago R, Anderson CB, Baranowski T, Watson K. Adolescent patterns of physical activity differences by gender, day, and time of day.. Am J Prev Med 2005 Jun;28(5):447-52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.02.007pubmed: 15894148google scholar: lookup
  8. Lenhart CM, Hanlon A, Kang Y, Daly BP, Brown MD, Patterson F. Gender disparity in structured physical activity and overall activity level in adolescence: evaluation of youth risk behavior surveillance data. ISRN Public Health 2012:8.
    doi: 10.5402/2012/674936google scholar: lookup
  9. Yungblut HE, Schinke RJ, McGannon KR. Views of adolescent female youth on physical activity during early adolescence.. J Sports Sci Med 2012;11(1):39-50.
    pmc: PMC3737842pubmed: 24149121
  10. Sjögren K, Hansson EE, Stjernberg L. Parenthood and factors that influence outdoor recreational physical activity from a gender perspective.. BMC Public Health 2011 Feb 10;11:93.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-93pmc: PMC3045950pubmed: 21310038google scholar: lookup
  11. Pal S, Cheng C, Ho S. The effect of two different health messages on physical activity levels and health in sedentary overweight, middle-aged women.. BMC Public Health 2011 Mar 31;11:204.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-204pmc: PMC3078883pubmed: 21453540google scholar: lookup
  12. Leslie E, Fotheringham MJ, Owen N, Bauman A. Age-related differences in physical activity levels of young adults.. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001 Feb;33(2):255-8.
  13. Cutt H, Giles-Corti B, Knuiman M, Timperio A, Bull F. Understanding dog owners' increased levels of physical activity: results from RESIDE.. Am J Public Health 2008 Jan;98(1):66-9.
    doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.103499pmc: PMC2156050pubmed: 18048786google scholar: lookup
  14. Ham SA, Epping J. Dog walking and physical activity in the United States.. Prev Chronic Dis 2006 Apr;3(2):A47.
    pmc: PMC1563959pubmed: 16539788
  15. Coleman KJ, Rosenberg DE, Conway TL, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Cain K. Physical activity, weight status, and neighborhood characteristics of dog walkers.. Prev Med 2008 Sep;47(3):309-12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.007pmc: PMC2587031pubmed: 18572234google scholar: lookup
  16. Hoerster KD, Mayer JA, Sallis JF, Pizzi N, Talley S, Pichon LC, Butler DA. Dog walking: its association with physical activity guideline adherence and its correlates.. Prev Med 2011 Jan;52(1):33-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.10.011pubmed: 21047528google scholar: lookup
  17. Rhodes RE, Murray H, Temple VA, Tuokko H, Higgins JW. Pilot study of a dog walking randomized intervention: effects of a focus on canine exercise.. Prev Med 2012 May;54(5):309-12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.014pubmed: 22405707google scholar: lookup
  18. Dall PM, Ellis SLH, Ellis BM, Grant PM, Colyer A, Gee NR, Granat MH, Mills DS. The influence of dog ownership on objective measures of free-living physical activity and sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults: a longitudinal case-controlled study.. BMC Public Health 2017 Jun 9;17(1):496.
    doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4422-5pmc: PMC5465590pubmed: 28595596google scholar: lookup
  19. Richards EA, Ogata N, Ting J. Dogs, physical activity, and walking (dogs PAW): acceptability and feasibility of a pilot physical activity intervention.. Health Promot Pract 2015 May;16(3):362-70.
    doi: 10.1177/1524839914553300pubmed: 25288560google scholar: lookup
  20. Kidd AH, Kelley HT, Kidd RM. Personality characteristics of horse, turtle, snake, and bird owners. Psychol Rep 1983;52:719–729.
    doi: 10.2466/pr0.1983.52.3.719google scholar: lookup
  21. Rhodes RE, Mark RS, Temmel CP. Adult sedentary behavior: a systematic review.. Am J Prev Med 2012 Mar;42(3):e3-28.
    doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.020pubmed: 22341176google scholar: lookup
  22. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95.
  23. Center for Kinanthropology Research. Mezinárodní dotazník k pohybové aktivitě – krátká verze. Olomouc: Palacký University; 2006.
  24. Fagaras SP, Radu LU, Vanvu G. The level of physical activity of university students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2015;197:1454–1457.
  25. Thorpe RJ Jr, Kreisle RA, Glickman LT, Simonsick EM, Newman AB, Kritchevsky S. Physical activity and pet ownership in year 3 of the Health ABC study.. J Aging Phys Act 2006 Apr;14(2):154-68.
    doi: 10.1123/japa.14.2.154pubmed: 19462546google scholar: lookup
  26. Oka K, Shibata A. Dog ownership and health-related physical activity among Japanese adults.. J Phys Act Health 2009 Jul;6(4):412-8.
    doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.4.412pubmed: 19842454google scholar: lookup
  27. Lail P, McCormack GR, Rock M. Does dog-ownership influence seasonal patterns of neighbourhood-based walking among adults? A longitudinal study.. BMC Public Health 2011 Mar 4;11:148.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-148pmc: PMC3087680pubmed: 21375754google scholar: lookup
  28. Temple V, Rhodes R, Wharf Higgins J. Unleashing physical activity: an observational study of park use, dog walking, and physical activity.. J Phys Act Health 2011 Aug;8(6):766-74.
    doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.6.766pubmed: 21832291google scholar: lookup
  29. Lentino C, Visek AJ, McDonnell K, DiPietro L. Dog walking is associated with a favorable risk profile independent of moderate to high volume of physical activity.. J Phys Act Health 2012 Mar;9(3):414-20.
    doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.3.414pubmed: 21934154google scholar: lookup
  30. Higgins JW, Temple V, Murray H, Kumm E, Rhodes R. Walking sole mates: dogs motivating, enabling and supporting guardians’ physical activity. Anthrozoös 2013;26(2):237–252.
  31. Byers CG, Wilson CC, Stephens MB, Goodie JL, Netings FE, Olsen CH. Owners and pets exercising together: canine response to veterinarian-prescribed physical activity. Anthrozoös 2014;27(3):325–333.
  32. Brown SG, Rhodes RE. Relationships among dog ownership and leisure-time walking in Western Canadian adults.. Am J Prev Med 2006 Feb;30(2):131-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.007pubmed: 16459211google scholar: lookup
  33. Cutt H, Giles-Corti B, Knuiman M. Encouraging physical activity through dog walking: why don't some owners walk with their dog?. Prev Med 2008 Feb;46(2):120-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.015pubmed: 17942146google scholar: lookup
  34. Yabroff KR, Troiano RP, Berrigan D. Walking the dog: is pet ownership associated with physical activity in California?. J Phys Act Health 2008 Mar;5(2):216-28.
    doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.2.216pubmed: 18382031google scholar: lookup
  35. Lim C, Rhodes RE. Sizing up physical activity: the relationships between dog characteristics, dog owners’ motivations, and dog walking. Psychol Sport Exerc 2016;24:65–71.
  36. Christian HE, McCormack GR, Evenson KR, Maitland C. Dog walking in walking. Published online: 20 Jun 2017; 113–135.
  37. Sklempe Kokic I, Znika M, Brumnic V. Physical activity, health-related quality of life and musculoskeletal pain among students of physiotherapy and social sciences in Eastern Croatia - Cross-sectional survey.. Ann Agric Environ Med 2019 Mar 22;26(1):182-190.
    doi: 10.26444/aaem/102723pubmed: 30922051google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 11 times.
  1. Ridwan Y, Sudarnika E, Dewi TIT, Budiono NG. Gastrointestinal helminth parasites of pets: Retrospective study at the veterinary teaching hospital, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia. Vet World 2023 May;16(5):1043-1051.
  2. Martins CF, Soares JP, Cortinhas A, Silva L, Cardoso L, Pires MA, Mota MP. Pet's influence on humans' daily physical activity and mental health: a meta-analysis. Front Public Health 2023;11:1196199.
    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1196199pubmed: 37325330google scholar: lookup
  3. Smith ET, Barcelos AM, Mills DS. Links between pet ownership and exercise on the mental health of veterinary professionals. Vet Rec Open 2023 Jun;10(1):e62.
    doi: 10.1002/vro2.62pubmed: 37234856google scholar: lookup
  4. Plante A, Bedrossian N, Cadotte G, Piché A, Michael F, Bédard S, Tessier H, Fernandez-Prada C, Sabiston CM, Dieudé M, Doré I. Pet ownership and lifestyle behaviours of immunosuppressed individuals and their relatives in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Prev Med Rep 2023 Jun;33:102210.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102210pubmed: 37090822google scholar: lookup
  5. Sáez I, León-Guereño P, Malchrowicz-Mośko E, Balerdi E, Río X, Lavín B, Solabarrieta J. Health Benefits and Participation Barriers of Different Level Horseback Riders Age-Wise. Front Psychol 2022;13:889605.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889605pubmed: 35572291google scholar: lookup
  6. do Vale B, Lopes AP, Fontes MDC, Silvestre M, Cardoso L, Coelho AC. A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge on Ownership, Zoonoses and Practices among Pet Owners in Northern Portugal. Animals (Basel) 2021 Dec 13;11(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11123543pubmed: 34944317google scholar: lookup
  7. Shoesmith E, Spanakis P, Peckham E, Heron P, Johnston G, Walker L, Crosland S, Ratschen E. The Role of Animal Ownership for People with Severe Mental Illness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study Investigating Links with Health and Loneliness. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 Nov 12;18(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211908pubmed: 34831665google scholar: lookup
  8. Shoesmith E, Shahab L, Kale D, Mills DS, Reeve C, Toner P, Santos de Assis L, Ratschen E. The Influence of Human-Animal Interactions on Mental and Physical Health during the First COVID-19 Lockdown Phase in the U.K.: A Qualitative Exploration. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 Jan 22;18(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030976pubmed: 33499354google scholar: lookup
  9. Pajaujiene S, Petrigna L. Walking and Playing with the Dog to Improve the Physical Activity Level of Adolescents: A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2024 Mar 11;12(6).
    doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060631pubmed: 38540596google scholar: lookup
  10. Kovács KE, Balogh ÉZ, Lovas B, Boris P, Nagy BE. The role of animal-assisted programs in physical health improvement of children and adolescents with special education needs - a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2024 Mar 15;24(1):824.
    doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18326-ypubmed: 38491498google scholar: lookup
  11. Martins CF, Silva L, Soares J, Pinto GS, Abrantes C, Cardoso L, Pires MA, Sousa H, Mota MP. Walk or be walked by the dog? The attachment role. BMC Public Health 2024 Mar 4;24(1):684.
    doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18037-4pubmed: 38438977google scholar: lookup