Analyze Diet
Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS2007; 10(4); 309-329; doi: 10.1080/10888700701555576

Don’t fence me in: managing psychological well being for elite performance horses.

Abstract: This article posits that stereotypical behavior patterns and the overall psychological well being of today's performance horse could be substantially enhanced with care that acknowledges the relationship between domesticated horses and their forerunners. Feral horses typically roam in stable, social groups over large grazing territories, spending 16-20 hr per day foraging on mid- to poor-quality roughage. In contrast, today's elite show horses live in relatively small stalls, eat a limited-but rich-diet at specific feedings, and typically live in social isolation. Although the horse has been domesticated for more than 6000 years, there has been no selection for an equid who no longer requires an outlet for these natural behaviors. Using equine stereotypies as a welfare indicator, this researcher proposes that the psychological well being of today's performance horse is compromised. Furthermore, the article illustrates how minimal management changes can enhance horses' well being while still remaining compatible with the requirements of the sport-horse industry. The article discusses conclusions in terms of Fraser, Weary, Pajor, and Milligan's "integrative welfare model" (1997).
Publication Date: 2007-11-01 PubMed ID: 17970632DOI: 10.1080/10888700701555576Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on the mental well-being of elite performance horses, emphasizing how an understanding of their natural, non-domesticated behaviors can result in better care and improved performance.

Theoretical Basis: Integrative Welfare Model

The study uses Fraser, Weary, Pajor, and Milligan’s “integrative welfare model,” proposed in 1997, as its theoretical basis. This model aims to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and improving the welfare of animals.

  • It suggests that effective animal welfare requires an integrative viewpoint, where both the physiological health, and psychological well-being are considered.
  • The model recommends taking not only the current state of an animal, but also its evolutionary history into consideration when assessing its welfare needs.

Horse Nature vs. Domesticated Care

The article highlights the stark differences between the natural behaviors of feral horses, and the conditions in which modern elite performance horses live.

  • Feral, or wild, horses usually form stable, social groups and roam large territories for up to 20 hours a day, mainly foraging on roughage of middling to poor quality.
  • On the other hand, elite horses are kept in relatively small stalls, fed limited but rich diets at specific feedings, and experience social isolation as they are often kept alone.
  • These domestication practices have been in place for over 6000 years, but researchers argue that there has not been significant selection for horses that can thrive without their natural behaviors.

Equine Stereotypies as Mental Health Indicator

Equine stereotypies – repetitive, purposeless behaviors often seen in captive animals – are used in this study as a measure of psychological well-being of performance horses.

  • Since these behaviors are believed to be linked to stress and sub-optimal living conditions, their presence in the horses studied would indicate compromised psychological well-being.

Improving Horse Welfare

The research explores how minimal changes in the management of these horses can notably improve their mental health while still complying with the sport-horse industry’s needs.

  • Although the specifics of these suggested changes are not detailed in the abstract, this suggests that they are manageable adjustments that balance the horses’ natural instincts and their contemporary roles.

In conclusion, the article underscores the need for more attention to the psychological well-being of elite performance horses, arguing that this focus can enhance both the horses’ welfare and their performance.

Cite This Article

APA
Henderson AJ. (2007). Don’t fence me in: managing psychological well being for elite performance horses. J Appl Anim Welf Sci, 10(4), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700701555576

Publication

ISSN: 1088-8705
NlmUniqueID: 9804404
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 4
Pages: 309-329

Researcher Affiliations

Henderson, Antonia J Z
  • Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. zamoyska@shaw.ca

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Husbandry
  • Animal Welfare
  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Horses / psychology
  • Physical Conditioning, Animal
  • Stereotyped Behavior

Citations

This article has been cited 19 times.
  1. Ermers C, McGilchrist N, Fenner K, Wilson B, McGreevy P. The Fibre Requirements of Horses and the Consequences and Causes of Failure to Meet Them.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 20;13(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13081414pubmed: 37106977google scholar: lookup
  2. Ross M, Proudfoot K, Merkies K, Elsohaby I, Mills M, Macmillan K, Mckenna S, Ritter C. Horse Housing on Prince Edward Island, Canada: Attitudes and Experiences Related to Keeping Horses Outdoors and in Groups.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 13;13(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13020275pubmed: 36670815google scholar: lookup
  3. Wiśniewska A, Janczarek I, Tkaczyk E, Wilk I, Janicka W, Próchniak T, Kaczmarek B, Pokora E, Łuszczyński J. Minimizing the Effects of Social Isolation of Horses by Contact with Animals of a Different Species: The Domestic Goat as an Example.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 2;12(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12172271pubmed: 36077991google scholar: lookup
  4. Mejía JAB, Jaramillo JAN, Corrales NU. Colombian Creole Horse: Frequency of oral and motor stereotypies.. Vet World 2022 Apr;15(4):1113-1120.
  5. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom.. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  6. Mazzola SM, Colombani C, Pizzamiglio G, Cannas S, Palestrini C, Costa ED, Gazzonis AL, Bionda A, Crepaldi P. Do You Think I Am Living Well? A Four-Season Hair Cortisol Analysis on Leisure Horses in Different Housing and Management Conditions.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 20;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11072141pubmed: 34359269google scholar: lookup
  7. Campbell MLH. An Ethical Framework for the Use of Horses in Competitive Sport: Theory and Function.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 9;11(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061725pubmed: 34207809google scholar: lookup
  8. Hogg RC, Hodgins GA. Symbiosis or Sporting Tool? Competition and the Horse-Rider Relationship in Elite Equestrian Sports.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 10;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051352pubmed: 34068606google scholar: lookup
  9. Raspa F, Roggero A, Palestrini C, Marten Canavesio M, Bergero D, Valle E. Studying the Shape Variations of the Back, the Neck, and the Mandibular Angle of Horses Depending on Specific Feeding Postures Using Geometric Morphometrics.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 10;11(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030763pubmed: 33801885google scholar: lookup
  10. Bergmann IM. Naturalness and the Legitimacy of Thoroughbred Racing: A Photo-Elicitation Study with Industry and Animal Advocacy Informants.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 26;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091513pubmed: 32859112google scholar: lookup
  11. Dickson EC, Kayser WC, Latham CM, Leatherwood JL, Daigle CL, White SH. Evaluating equine feeding behavior utilizing GrowSafe Systems: a pilot study.. Transl Anim Sci 2019 Jan;3(1):288-294.
    doi: 10.1093/tas/txz002pubmed: 32704800google scholar: lookup
  12. Mach N, Ruet A, Clark A, Bars-Cortina D, Ramayo-Caldas Y, Crisci E, Pennarun S, Dhorne-Pollet S, Foury A, Moisan MP, Lansade L. Priming for welfare: gut microbiota is associated with equitation conditions and behavior in horse athletes.. Sci Rep 2020 May 20;10(1):8311.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65444-9pubmed: 32433513google scholar: lookup
  13. Bulmer LS, Murray JA, Burns NM, Garber A, Wemelsfelder F, McEwan NR, Hastie PM. High-starch diets alter equine faecal microbiota and increase behavioural reactivity.. Sci Rep 2019 Dec 9;9(1):18621.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54039-8pubmed: 31819069google scholar: lookup
  14. Connysson M, Rhodin M, Jansson A. Effects of Horse Housing System on Energy Balance during Post-Exercise Recovery.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 14;9(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9110976pubmed: 31739646google scholar: lookup
  15. Krueger K, Esch L, Byrne R. Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms.. PLoS One 2019;14(6):e0218954.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218954pubmed: 31242266google scholar: lookup
  16. Butler D, Valenchon M, Annan R, Whay HR, Mullan S. Stakeholder Perceptions of the Challenges to Racehorse Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jun 17;9(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9060363pubmed: 31212903google scholar: lookup
  17. Butler D, Valenchon M, Annan R, Whay HR, Mullan S. Living the 'Best Life' or 'One Size Fits All'-Stakeholder Perceptions of Racehorse Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Mar 31;9(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9040134pubmed: 30935137google scholar: lookup
  18. Rørvang MV, Christensen JW, Ladewig J, McLean A. Social Learning in Horses-Fact or Fiction?. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:212.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00212pubmed: 30238009google scholar: lookup
  19. Mazzola S, Palestrini C, Cannas S, Fè E, Bagnato GL, Vigo D, Frank D, Minero M. Efficacy of a Feed Dispenser for Horses in Decreasing Cribbing Behaviour.. Vet Med Int 2016;2016:4698602.
    doi: 10.1155/2016/4698602pubmed: 27818832google scholar: lookup