FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Rec / Duration of protective efficacy of equine influenza immunost...
The Veterinary record1994; 134(7); 158-162; doi: 10.1136/vr.134.7.158

Duration of protective efficacy of equine influenza immunostimulating complex/tetanus vaccines.

Abstract: Seven previously untreated five-month-old New Forest ponies received two doses of equine influenza immunostimulating complex vaccines, one with and one without an immunopurified tetanus toxoid component, given by deep intramuscular injection six weeks apart, followed by a booster dose without tetanus toxoid five months later. Fifteen months after the third dose of vaccine, the ponies were challenged by exposure to an aerosol of influenza A/Equine 2/Sussex/89 (H3N8), a virus isolated from a recent outbreak of influenza A/equine 2 in Britain. The challenge produced severe clinical signs of influenza (pyrexia and coughing) in five unvaccinated control ponies. Four of the vaccinated ponies were completely protected against clinical disease, and two of these were also protected against infection as demonstrated by their lack of an antibody response after challenge. No coughing was recorded among the vaccinated ponies, and only three of the seven vaccinated ponies experienced a transient mild pyrexia. The mean duration and severity of the pyrexia among the vaccinated ponies was significantly less (P or = 0.01/iu/ml) were maintained for at least 20 months after vaccination.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 1994-02-12 PubMed ID: 8160328DOI: 10.1136/vr.134.7.158Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated the long-term effectiveness of equine influenza vaccines, with and without a tetanus component, in New Forest ponies. The study found that the vaccines provided significant, lasting protection against influenza, with some ponies also showing resistance to infection. Tetanus anti-toxin levels also remained protective for as long as 20 months post-vaccination.

Study Objective and Methodology

  • The study aimed to assess how long the protective effects of equine influenza vaccines, supplemented with tetanus toxoid or not, last in New Forest ponies.
  • Seven ponies received two doses of the vaccines, six weeks apart, followed by a booster dose without the tetanus component five months later.
  • Five control ponies, who were not vaccinated, were also included for a comparative analysis.

Challenge and Findings

  • Fifteen months after the final vaccine dose, all ponies were exposed to an aerosol of influenza A/Equine 2/Sussex/89 (H3N8), a recently isolated virus from an equine influenza outbreak in Britain.
  • Unvaccinated ponies showed severe clinical signs of influenza, including fever and cough.
  • Four out of seven vaccinated ponies were fully protected against the disease; two among them also had no post-challenge antibody response, suggesting they were protected against the infection as well.
  • None of the vaccinated ponies experienced coughing while only three of them had brief, mild fever.

Statistical Comparison and Antitoxin Monitoring

  • A comparison revealed that severity and duration of fever among vaccinated ponies were significantly less than the controls, affirming the vaccines’ efficacy.
  • Additionally, virus excretion was nearly eliminated among vaccinated ponies, showcasing a reduced risk of the disease’s spread.
  • Tetanus antitoxin antibodies, monitored through the study, maintained protective levels for at least 20 months post-vaccination, demonstrating the long-term effectiveness of the administered tetanus component.

Conclusion

  • The research indicates that equine influenza immunostimulating complex vaccines, with or without a tetanus toxoid component, can provide significant and long-lasting protection against infection and clinical disease in ponies.

Cite This Article

APA
Mumford JA, Jessett DM, Rollinson EA, Hannant D, Draper ME. (1994). Duration of protective efficacy of equine influenza immunostimulating complex/tetanus vaccines. Vet Rec, 134(7), 158-162. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.134.7.158

Publication

The Veterinary record
ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 134
Issue: 7
Pages: 158-162

Researcher Affiliations

Mumford, J A
  • Department of Infectious Diseases, Animal Health Trust, Kennett, Newmarket, Suffolk.
Jessett, D M
    Rollinson, E A
      Hannant, D
        Draper, M E

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Antibodies, Viral / biosynthesis
          • Drug Therapy, Combination
          • Female
          • Horse Diseases / immunology
          • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
          • Horses
          • ISCOMs / immunology
          • Influenza A virus / immunology
          • Influenza Vaccines / immunology
          • Male
          • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / immunology
          • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / prevention & control
          • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
          • Tetanus Toxoid / immunology
          • Time Factors

          Citations

          This article has been cited 15 times.
          1. Carnet F, Perrin-Cocon L, Paillot R, Lotteau V, Pronost S, Vidalain PO. An inventory of adjuvants used for vaccination in horses: the past, the present and the future. Vet Res 2023 Mar 2;54(1):18.
            doi: 10.1186/s13567-023-01151-3pubmed: 36864517google scholar: lookup
          2. Ahearne MM, Pentzke-Lemus LL, Romano AM, Larsen ED, Watson AM, O'Fallon EA, Landolt GA. Disease progression, pathologic, and virologic findings of an equine influenza outbreak in rescue donkeys. J Vet Intern Med 2022 Nov;36(6):2230-2237.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.16563pubmed: 36205917google scholar: lookup
          3. Oladunni FS, Oseni SO, Martinez-Sobrido L, Chambers TM. Equine Influenza Virus and Vaccines. Viruses 2021 Aug 20;13(8).
            doi: 10.3390/v13081657pubmed: 34452521google scholar: lookup
          4. Halpin K, Graham K, Durr PA. Sero-Monitoring of Horses Demonstrates the Equivac(®) HeV Hendra Virus Vaccine to Be Highly Effective in Inducing Neutralising Antibody Titres. Vaccines (Basel) 2021 Jul 2;9(7).
            doi: 10.3390/vaccines9070731pubmed: 34358146google scholar: lookup
          5. Entenfellner J, Gahan J, Garvey M, Walsh C, Venner M, Cullinane A. Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2020 Jul 10;8(3).
            doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030372pubmed: 32664411google scholar: lookup
          6. Dilai M, Piro M, El Harrak M, Fougerolle S, Dehhaoui M, Dikrallah A, Legrand L, Paillot R, Fassi Fihri O. Impact of Mixed Equine Influenza Vaccination on Correlate of Protection in Horses. Vaccines (Basel) 2018 Oct 4;6(4).
            doi: 10.3390/vaccines6040071pubmed: 30287762google scholar: lookup
          7. Paillot R, Garrett D, Lopez-Alvarez MR, Birand I, Montesso F, Horspool L. The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain. Vaccines (Basel) 2018 Jul 2;6(3).
            doi: 10.3390/vaccines6030038pubmed: 30004410google scholar: lookup
          8. Francis MJ. Recent Advances in Vaccine Technologies. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2018 Mar;48(2):231-241.
            doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2017.10.002pubmed: 29217317google scholar: lookup
          9. Paillot R. A Systematic Review of Recent Advances in Equine Influenza Vaccination. Vaccines (Basel) 2014 Nov 14;2(4):797-831.
            doi: 10.3390/vaccines2040797pubmed: 26344892google scholar: lookup
          10. Galvin P, Gildea S, Arkins S, Walsh C, Cullinane A. The evaluation of a nucleoprotein ELISA for the detection of equine influenza antibodies and the differentiation of infected from vaccinated horses (DIVA). Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2013 Dec;7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):73-80.
            doi: 10.1111/irv.12195pubmed: 24224822google scholar: lookup
          11. Bryant NA, Paillot R, Rash AS, Medcalf E, Montesso F, Ross J, Watson J, Jeggo M, Lewis NS, Newton JR, Elton DM. Comparison of two modern vaccines and previous influenza infection against challenge with an equine influenza virus from the Australian 2007 outbreak. Vet Res 2010 Mar-Apr;41(2):19.
            doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009067pubmed: 19863903google scholar: lookup
          12. Patel JR, Heldens JG. Immunoprophylaxis against important virus disease of horses, farm animals and birds. Vaccine 2009 Mar 13;27(12):1797-1810.
            doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.12.063pubmed: 19402200google scholar: lookup
          13. Quinlivan M, Cullinane A, Nelly M, Van Maanen K, Heldens J, Arkins S. Comparison of sensitivities of virus isolation, antigen detection, and nucleic acid amplification for detection of equine influenza virus. J Clin Microbiol 2004 Feb;42(2):759-63.
            doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.759-763.2004pubmed: 14766849google scholar: lookup
          14. Bowersock TL. Evolving importance of biologics and novel delivery systems in the face of microbial resistance. AAPS PharmSci 2002;4(4):E33.
            doi: 10.1208/ps040433pubmed: 12646005google scholar: lookup
          15. Elliott S, Olufemi OT, Daly JM. Systematic Review of Equine Influenza A Virus Vaccine Studies and Meta-Analysis of Vaccine Efficacy. Viruses 2023 Nov 28;15(12).
            doi: 10.3390/v15122337pubmed: 38140577google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.