Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2015; 77(1); 39-49; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.1.39

Effect of various testing conditions on results for a handheld reference point indentation instrument in horses.

Abstract: To compare results obtained with a handheld reference point indentation instrument for bone material strength index (BMSi) measurements in the equine third metacarpal bone for various testing conditions. Methods: 24 third metacarpal bones. Methods: Third metacarpal bones from both forelimbs of 12 horses were obtained. The dorsal surface of each bone was divided into 6 testing regions. In vivo and ex vivo measurements of BMSi were obtained through the skin and on exposed bone, respectively, to determine effects of each testing condition. Difference plots were used to assess agreement between BMSi obtained for various conditions. Linear regression analysis was used to assess effects of age, sex, and body weight on BMSi. A mixed-model ANOVA was used to assess effects of age, sex, limb, bone region, and testing condition on BMSi values. Results: Indentation measurements were performed on standing sedated and recumbent anesthetized horses and on cadaveric bone. Regional differences in BMSi values were detected in adult horses. A significant linear relationship (r(2) = 0.71) was found between body weight and BMSi values. There was no difference between in vivo and ex vivo BMSi values. A small constant bias was detected between BMSi obtained through the skin, compared with values obtained directly on bone. Conclusions: Reference point indentation can be used for in vivo assessment of the resistance of bone tissue to microfracture in horses. Testing through the skin should account for a small constant bias, compared with results for testing directly on exposed bone.
Publication Date: 2015-12-29 PubMed ID: 26709935DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.77.1.39Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research compares results from a handheld tool used to measure bone strength in horses’ third metacarpal bones under various conditions. The findings highlight that the tool can be effectively used for in vivo studies to evaluate horses’ bone microfracture resistance, acknowledging a minor constant bias when measurements are done through the skin as compared to exposed bone.

Methods

  • For the study, researchers collected third metacarpal bones from the forelimbs of 12 horses.
  • Each bone was divided into 6 regions for testing.
  • In vivo (on a living animal) and ex vivo (outside a living organism) measurements of bone material strength index (BMSi) were taken, both through skin and directly on the bone to compare the effect of each condition.
  • Difference plots were created to compare the BMSi results under assorted conditions.
  • Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of factors like age, sex, and body weight on BMSi. Furthermore, a mixed-model ANOVA was utilized to assess effects of other variables such as age, sex, limb, bone region, and testing condition on BMSi values.

Results

  • It was observed that indentation measurements performed on standing sedated and recumbent anesthetized horses and on cadaveric bone showed noticeable regional differences in adult horses’ BMSi values.
  • A strong correlation (r2 = 0.71) was found between body weight and BMSi values.
  • No significant difference was noted between the in vivo and ex vivo BMSi values. However, a slight constant bias emerged when BMSi was measured through the skin compared to values obtained directly on bone.

Conclusion

  • The research concluded that Reference point indentation could be used for in vivo measurement of bone tissue’s resistance to microfracture. But when conducting measurements through the skin, a small constant bias should be taken into account when compared to results for testing directly on exposed bone.

Cite This Article

APA
Lescun TB, Hoffseth K, Yang HT, Hansma PK, Kopeikin HS, Chandrasekar S. (2015). Effect of various testing conditions on results for a handheld reference point indentation instrument in horses. Am J Vet Res, 77(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.77.1.39

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 77
Issue: 1
Pages: 39-49

Researcher Affiliations

Lescun, Timothy B
    Hoffseth, Kevin
      Yang, Henry T
        Hansma, Paul K
          Kopeikin, Hal S
            Chandrasekar, Srinivasan

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Biomechanical Phenomena
              • Bone Density / physiology
              • Cadaver
              • Horses
              • Materials Testing / instrumentation
              • Materials Testing / methods
              • Materials Testing / veterinary
              • Metacarpal Bones
              • Stress, Mechanical

              Grant Funding

              • R01 GM 065354 / NIGMS NIH HHS

              Citations

              This article has been cited 1 times.
              1. Schoeb M, Hamdy NAT, Malgo F, Winter EM, Appelman-Dijkstra NM. Added Value of Impact Microindentation in the Evaluation of Bone Fragility: A Systematic Review of the Literature.. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:15.
                doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00015pubmed: 32117052google scholar: lookup