Effects of ground surface deformability, trimming, and shoeing on quasistatic hoof loading patterns in horses.
Abstract: To determine whether solar load distribution pattern on a solid nondeformable ground surface is the product of contact erosion and is the mirror image of load distribution on a deformable surface in horses. Methods: 30 clinically normal horses. Methods: Solar load distribution was compared among 25 clinically normal horses during quasistatic loading on a solid nondeformable surface and on a highly deformable surface. Changes in solar load distribution patterns were evaluated in 5 previously pasture-maintained horses housed on a flat nondeformable surface. Changes in solar load distribution created by traditional trimming and shoeing were recorded. Results: Unshod untrimmed horses had a 4-point (12/25, 48%) or a 3-point (13/25, 52%) wall load distribution pattern on a flat solid surface. Load distribution on a deformable ground surface was principally solar and located transversely across the central region of the foot. Ground surface contact areas on solid (24.2 +/- 8.62 cm2) and deformable (69.4 +/- 22.55 cm2) surfaces were significantly different. Maintaining unshod horses on a flat nondeformable surface resulted in a loss of the 3- and 4-point loading pattern and an increase in ground surface contact area (17.9 +/- 2.77 to 39.9 +/- 12.77 cm2). Trimming increased ground surface contact area (24.2 +/- 8.60 to 45.7 +/- 14.89 cm2). Conclusions: In horses, the solar surface is the primary weight-loading surface, and deformability of ground surface may have a role in foot expansion during loading. Increased surface area induced by loading on deformable surfaces, trimming, and shoeing protects the foot.
Publication Date: 2001-06-13 PubMed ID: 11400847DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.895Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research investigates how ground surface firmness, hoof trimming, and shoeing affect the weight distribution patterns on horse hooves. The results indicated that both the ground surface firmness and trimming/shoeing practices can significantly alter the contact area and load distribution on horse hooves.
Research Methodology
- The researchers observed the following methods in this study on horse feet:
- A total of 30 clinically normal horses were used in this study, 25 for the initial comparison and 5 for observing changes over time while the horses were housed on a flat nondeformable surface.
- Solar (bottom of the hoof) load distribution was recorded and compared on both solid nondeformable and highly deformable surfaces.
- Changes in load distribution after traditional hoof trimming and shoeing were recorded.
Research Findings
- The study identifies the weight distribution pattern on horse hooves in different scenarios.
- On a solid, nondeformable surface, the weight distribution pattern among normal horses was divided between four-point (48% of horses) and three-point (52% of horses) wall load distributions.
- On a deformable surface, the load distribution was primarily across the central region of the solar area of the hoof.
- Housing horses on a firm, nondeformable surface altered the weight distribution, removing the three- and four-point loading pattern and increasing the contact surface area.
- The contact surface area between the hoof and ground surface significantly increased when the ground surface was deformable compared to a solid, nondeformable surface.
- Trimming and shoeing practices also altered this contact area, with an overall trend towards increased ground surface contact area.
Conclusion
- The findings suggest that in horses, the solar surface carries the majority of weight, and the deformability of the ground surface plays a key role in hoof expansion during loading.
- The increased surface area induced by loading on deformable surfaces, trimming, and shoeing appears beneficial as it provides more protection to the foot.
Cite This Article
APA
Hood DM, Taylor D, Wagner IP.
(2001).
Effects of ground surface deformability, trimming, and shoeing on quasistatic hoof loading patterns in horses.
Am J Vet Res, 62(6), 895-900.
https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.895 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4466, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Biomechanical Phenomena
- Forelimb / physiology
- Hoof and Claw / physiology
- Horses / physiology
- Pressure
- Random Allocation
Citations
This article has been cited 8 times.- Antonioli ML, Canola PA, de Carvalho JRG, Fonseca MG, Ferraz GC. Immediate Effect of Hoof Trimming on Hoof and Thoracic Joint Angles in Mangalarga Mares. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 2;13(15).
- Faramarzi B, Nguyen A, Dong F. Changes in hoof kinetics and kinematics at walk in response to hoof trimming: pressure plate assessment. J Vet Sci 2018 Jul 31;19(4):557-562.
- Leśniak K, Williams J, Kuznik K, Douglas P. Does a 4-6 Week Shoeing Interval Promote Optimal Foot Balance in the Working Equine?. Animals (Basel) 2017 Mar 29;7(4).
- Stachurska A, Wnuk E, Łuszczyński J, Donderowicz W. Preliminary Biometric Study on Symmetry of Hoof Solear Aspect in Forelimbs in Four Horse Breeds. Animals (Basel) 2025 Nov 21;15(23).
- Seery S, Gardiner J, Bates KT, Pinchbeck G, Clegg P, Ireland JL, Milner PI. Changes in pressure distribution of the solar surface after a single trimming event are associated with external hoof measurements in the equine fore foot. Equine Vet J 2025 Sep;57(5):1255-1264.
- Skelton G, Acutt E, Stefanovski D, van Eps A. Evaluation of digital radiographic measurements for the diagnosis of acute laminitis. Equine Vet J 2025 Jul;57(4):931-942.
- Poochipakorn C, Sanigavatee K, Wonghanchao T, Huangsaksri O, Chanda M. Strategic palmar trimming before conventional shoeing shows potential for managing underrun heels in horses. F1000Res 2023;12:1504.
- Deeming LE, Beausoleil NJ, Stafford KJ, Webster JR, Cox N, Zobel G. Evaluating the immediate effects of hoof trimming on dairy goat hoof conformation and joint positions. Vet Res Commun 2024 Apr;48(2):1073-1082.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists