Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(8); 1013; doi: 10.3390/ani12081013

Effects of Intravenous Antimicrobial Drugs on the Equine Fecal Microbiome.

Abstract: Alterations in the gastrointestinal microbiota after antimicrobial therapy in horses can result in loss of colonization resistance and changes in bacterial metabolic function. It is hypothesized that these changes facilitate gastrointestinal inflammation, pathogen expansion and the development of diarrhea. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of intravenous administration of antimicrobial drugs (ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, oxytetracycline) on equine fecal bacterial communities over time, to investigate whether those changes are detectable after 5 days of treatment and whether they persist over time (30 days). Sixteen horses were randomly assigned into 4 treatment groups: group 1 (enrofloxacin, n = 4); group 2 (ceftiofur sodium, n = 4); group 3 (oxytetracycline, n = 4); group 4 (0.9% saline solution, placebo, n = 4). Antimicrobial therapy was administered for 5 days. Fecal samples were obtained before (day 0) and at 3, 5 and 30 days of the study period. Bacterial DNA was amplified using specific primers to the hypervariable region V1−V3 of the 16S rRNA gene using a 454 FLX-Titanium pyrosequencer. Antimicrobial therapy failed to cause any changes in physical examination parameters, behavior, appetite or fecal output or consistency throughout the study in any horse. There was a significant effect of treatment on alpha diversity indices (richness) over the treatment interval for ceftiofur on days 0 vs. 3 (p 0.05). Microbial composition was significantly different (p < 0.05) across treatment group and day, but not for interactions between treatment and day, regardless of taxonomic level and beta-diversity distance metric. The most significant antimicrobial effects on relative abundance were noted after intravenous administration of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin. The relative abundance of Fibrobacteres was markedly lower on day 3 compared to other days in the ceftiofur and enrofloxacin treatment groups. There was an increase in Clostridia and Lachnospiraceae from day 0 to days 3 and 5 in ceftiofur and enrofloxacin treated groups. These findings showed the negative effect of antimicrobial drugs on bacterial communities associated with gut health (Fibrobacteres and Lachnospiraceae) and indicate that changes in specific taxa could predispose horses to gastrointestinal inflammation and the development of diarrhea.
Publication Date: 2022-04-13 PubMed ID: 35454258PubMed Central: PMC9030835DOI: 10.3390/ani12081013Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the impact of intravenous antimicrobial drugs on the gut microbiome of horses with a particular focus on the organisms’ potential to trigger gut inflammation and diarrhea. The study monitored horses after administering three different antimicrobial drugs to gather evidence of microbial community changes over a period of 30 days.

Research Design and Methods

  • The study involved 16 horses divided into four groups, each subject to a different treatment. Group 1 was given enrofloxacin, Group 2 received ceftiofur sodium, Group 3 was treated with oxytetracycline, and Group 4 functioned as the control group, receiving only a saline solution.
  • The therapy period lasted for five days during which each horse’s health was monitored regularly with particular attention paid to changes in behavior, appetite, or fecal output and consistency.
  • Fecal samples from each horse were collected at several intervals: before the study commenced (Day 0), and then at Day 3, Day 5, and Day 30 of the study period. Bacterial DNA from these samples was then amplified for analysis.

Results of the Study

  • The researchers found that there were no significant clinical changes in the horses due to the antimicrobial therapy. However, bacterial diversity indices changed significantly over the treatment period for horses treated with ceftiofur.
  • The microbial compositions varied significantly across different treatment groups and days, but there was no interaction observed between treatment and day. The notable effects on relative abundance were seen in the horses treated with ceftiofur and enrofloxacin.
  • On day 3, there was a marked decrease in Fibrobacteres in the ceftiofur and enrofloxacin groups as compared to the other days. There was also a significant increase in Clostridia and Lachnospiraceae after ceftiofur and enrofloxacin treatment on days 3 and 5, compared to day 0.

These observations indicate that the antimicrobial drugs had an impact on the equine gut microbiota, particularly reducing microbes that are usually associated with a healthy gut. The research suggests that any alterations in the gut microbiome due to antimicrobial treatment could potentially predispose horses to gut inflammation and diarrhea.

Implications of the Findings

  • These findings highlight the importance of further research into the effects of antimicrobial drugs on the gut microbiota across different species. Such studies could help identify ways to mitigate any negative impacts on gut health caused by such treatments.
  • Insights from this study could inform therapeutic strategies for the treatment of horses and other animals with antimicrobial drugs. Considering these impacts could help improve long-term animal health and welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Liepman RS, Swink JM, Habing GG, Boyaka PN, Caddey B, Costa M, Gomez DE, Toribio RE. (2022). Effects of Intravenous Antimicrobial Drugs on the Equine Fecal Microbiome. Animals (Basel), 12(8), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12081013

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 8
PII: 1013

Researcher Affiliations

Liepman, Rachel S
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Swink, Jacob M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Habing, Greg G
  • Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Boyaka, Prosper N
  • Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Caddey, Benjamin
  • Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Costa, Marcio
  • Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, University of Montreal, Saint Hyacinthe, QC J2S 2M2, Canada.
Gomez, Diego E
  • Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Toribio, Ramiro E
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Grant Funding

  • 60048069 / Boehringer-Ingelheim Vetmedica

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 47 references
  1. Båverud V. Clostridium difficile infections in animals with special reference to the horse. A review.. Vet Q 2002 Dec;24(4):203-19.
    doi: 10.1080/01652176.2002.9695137pubmed: 12540137google scholar: lookup
  2. Båverud V, Franklin A, Gunnarsson A, Gustafsson A, Hellander-Edman A. Clostridium difficile associated with acute colitis in mares when their foals are treated with erythromycin and rifampicin for Rhodococcus equi pneumonia.. Equine Vet J 1998 Nov;30(6):482-8.
  3. Båverud V, Gustafsson A, Franklin A, Lindholm A, Gunnarsson A. Clostridium difficile associated with acute colitis in mature horses treated with antibiotics.. Equine Vet J 1997 Jul;29(4):279-84.
  4. Barr BS, Waldridge BM, Morresey PR, Reed SM, Clark C, Belgrave R, Donecker JM, Weigel DJ. Antimicrobial-associated diarrhoea in three equine referral practices.. Equine Vet J 2013 Mar;45(2):154-8.
  5. Stratton-Phelps M, Wilson WD, Gardner IA. Risk of adverse effects in pneumonic foals treated with erythromycin versus other antibiotics: 143 cases (1986-1996).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000 Jul 1;217(1):68-73.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2000.217.68pubmed: 10909450google scholar: lookup
  6. Abad CLR, Safdar N. A Review of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea.. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2021 Jun;50(2):323-340.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.02.010pubmed: 34024444google scholar: lookup
  7. McGorum BC, Pirie RS. Antimicrobial associated diarrhoea in the horse. Part 1: Overview, pathogenesis and risk factors.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2010;11:369–373.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X476871google scholar: lookup
  8. Ross CL, Spinler JK, Savidge TC. Structural and functional changes within the gut microbiota and susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection.. Anaerobe 2016 Oct;41:37-43.
  9. Keeney KM, Yurist-Doutsch S, Arrieta MC, Finlay BB. Effects of antibiotics on human microbiota and subsequent disease.. Annu Rev Microbiol 2014;68:217-35.
  10. Kim S, Covington A, Pamer EG. The intestinal microbiota: Antibiotics, colonization resistance, and enteric pathogens.. Immunol Rev 2017 Sep;279(1):90-105.
    doi: 10.1111/imr.12563pmc: PMC6026851pubmed: 28856737google scholar: lookup
  11. Dethlefsen L, Relman DA. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4554-61.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000087107pmc: PMC3063582pubmed: 20847294google scholar: lookup
  12. Foditsch C, Pereira RVV, Siler JD, Altier C, Warnick LD. Effects of treatment with enrofloxacin or tulathromycin on fecal microbiota composition and genetic function of dairy calves.. PLoS One 2019;14(12):e0219635.
  13. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes RG, Weese JS. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs.. BMC Vet Res 2015 Feb 3;11:19.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0335-7pmc: PMC4323147pubmed: 25644524google scholar: lookup
  14. Collinet A, Grimm P, Julliand S, Julliand V. Multidimensional Approach for Investigating the Effects of an Antibiotic-Probiotic Combination on the Equine Hindgut Ecosystem and Microbial Fibrolysis.. Front Microbiol 2021;12:646294.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.646294pmc: PMC8027512pubmed: 33841371google scholar: lookup
  15. Di Pietro R, Arroyo LG, Leclere M, Costa MC. Species-Level Gut Microbiota Analysis after Antibiotic-Induced Dysbiosis in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 30;11(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102859pmc: PMC8533001pubmed: 34679880google scholar: lookup
  16. Arnold C, Pilla R, Chaffin K, Lidbury J, Steiner J, Suchodolski J. Alterations in the Fecal Microbiome and Metabolome of Horses with Antimicrobial-Associated Diarrhea Compared to Antibiotic-Treated and Non-Treated Healthy Case Controls.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 17;11(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061807pmc: PMC8235368pubmed: 34204371google scholar: lookup
  17. Arnold CE, Isaiah A, Pilla R, Lidbury J, Coverdale JS, Callaway TR, Lawhon SD, Steiner J, Suchodolski JS. The cecal and fecal microbiomes and metabolomes of horses before and after metronidazole administration.. PLoS One 2020;15(5):e0232905.
  18. Sun Y, Wolcott RD, Dowd SE. Tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing for the elucidation of microbial and functional gene diversity in any environment.. Methods Mol Biol 2011;733:129-41.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-089-8_9pubmed: 21431767google scholar: lookup
  19. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09pmc: PMC2786419pubmed: 19801464google scholar: lookup
  20. Arroyo LG, Rossi L, Santos BP, Gomez DE, Surette MG, Costa MC. Luminal and Mucosal Microbiota of the Cecum and Large Colon of Healthy and Diarrheic Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 12;10(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10081403pmc: PMC7460328pubmed: 32806591google scholar: lookup
  21. Costa MC, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Stämpfli HR, Kim PT, Sturgeon A, Weese JS. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene.. PLoS One 2012;7(7):e41484.
  22. Leclere M, Costa MC. Fecal microbiota in horses with asthma.. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Mar;34(2):996-1006.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15748pmc: PMC7096608pubmed: 32128892google scholar: lookup
  23. Martin de Bustamante M, Gomez D, MacNicol J, Hamor R, Plummer C. The Fecal Bacterial Microbiota in Horses with Equine Recurrent Uveitis.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 9;11(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030745pmc: PMC7998804pubmed: 33803123google scholar: lookup
  24. Martin de Bustamante M, Plummer C, MacNicol J, Gomez D. Impact of Ambient Temperature Sample Storage on the Equine Fecal Microbiota.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 15;11(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030819pmc: PMC8001224pubmed: 33803934google scholar: lookup
  25. Langner K, Blaue D, Schedlbauer C, Starzonek J, Julliand V, Vervuert I. Changes in the faecal microbiota of horses and ponies during a two-year body weight gain programme.. PLoS One 2020;15(3):e0230015.
  26. Fernandes KA, Rogers CW, Gee EK, Kittelmann S, Bolwell CF, Bermingham EN, Biggs PJ, Thomas DG. Resilience of Faecal Microbiota in Stabled Thoroughbred Horses Following Abrupt Dietary Transition between Freshly Cut Pasture and Three Forage-Based Diets.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 6;11(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11092611pmc: PMC8471312pubmed: 34573577google scholar: lookup
  27. Kunz IGZ, Reed KJ, Metcalf JL, Hassel DM, Coleman RJ, Hess TM, Coleman SJ. Equine Fecal Microbiota Changes Associated With Anthelmintic Administration.. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 Jun;77:98-106.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.01.018pubmed: 31133326google scholar: lookup
  28. Garber A, Hastie P, McGuinness D, Malarange P, Murray JA. Abrupt dietary changes between grass and hay alter faecal microbiota of ponies.. PLoS One 2020;15(8):e0237869.
  29. Arnold CE, Pilla R, Chaffin MK, Leatherwood JL, Wickersham TA, Callaway TR, Lawhon SD, Lidbury JA, Steiner JM, Suchodolski JS. The effects of signalment, diet, geographic location, season, and colitis associated with antimicrobial use or Salmonella infection on the fecal microbiome of horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Sep;35(5):2437-2448.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16206pmc: PMC8478058pubmed: 34268795google scholar: lookup
  30. Siddiqui MT, Cresci GAM. The Immunomodulatory Functions of Butyrate.. J Inflamm Res 2021;14:6025-6041.
    doi: 10.2147/JIR.S300989pmc: PMC8608412pubmed: 34819742google scholar: lookup
  31. Wong JM, de Souza R, Kendall CW, Emam A, Jenkins DJ. Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids.. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006 Mar;40(3):235-43.
  32. Daly K, Proudman CJ, Duncan SH, Flint HJ, Dyer J, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Alterations in microbiota and fermentation products in equine large intestine in response to dietary variation and intestinal disease.. Br J Nutr 2012 Apr;107(7):989-95.
    doi: 10.1017/S0007114511003825pubmed: 21816118google scholar: lookup
  33. Milinovich GJ, Klieve AV, Pollitt CC, Trott DJ. Microbial events in the hindgut during carbohydrate-induced equine laminitis.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2010 Apr;26(1):79-94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.01.007pubmed: 20381737google scholar: lookup
  34. Milinovich GJ, Burrell PC, Pollitt CC, Klieve AV, Blackall LL, Ouwerkerk D, Woodland E, Trott DJ. Microbial ecology of the equine hindgut during oligofructose-induced laminitis.. ISME J 2008 Nov;2(11):1089-100.
    doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.67pubmed: 18580970google scholar: lookup
  35. Bailey SR, Menzies-Gow NJ, Marr CM, Elliott J. The effects of vasoactive amines found in the equine hindgut on digital blood flow in the normal horse.. Equine Vet J 2004 Apr;36(3):267-72.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044877297pubmed: 15147136google scholar: lookup
  36. Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F, Petito V, Gasbarrini A. Commensal Clostridia: leading players in the maintenance of gut homeostasis.. Gut Pathog 2013 Aug 13;5(1):23.
    doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-23pmc: PMC3751348pubmed: 23941657google scholar: lookup
  37. Umesaki Y, Setoyama H, Matsumoto S, Imaoka A, Itoh K. Differential roles of segmented filamentous bacteria and clostridia in development of the intestinal immune system.. Infect Immun 1999 Jul;67(7):3504-11.
  38. Gomez DE, Arroyo LG, Costa MC, Viel L, Weese JS. Characterization of the Fecal Bacterial Microbiota of Healthy and Diarrheic Dairy Calves.. J Vet Intern Med 2017 May;31(3):928-939.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.14695pmc: PMC5435056pubmed: 28390070google scholar: lookup
  39. Vacca M, Celano G, Calabrese FM, Portincasa P, Gobbetti M, De Angelis M. The Controversial Role of Human Gut Lachnospiraceae.. Microorganisms 2020 Apr 15;8(4).
  40. Uzal FA, Arroyo LG, Navarro MA, Gomez DE, Asín J, Henderson E. Bacterial and viral enterocolitis in horses: a review.. J Vet Diagn Invest 2022 May;34(3):354-375.
    doi: 10.1177/10406387211057469pubmed: 34763560google scholar: lookup
  41. Baker JR, Leyland A. Diarrhoea in the horse associated with stress and tetracycline therapy.. Vet Rec 1973 Dec 1;93(22):583-4.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.93.22.583pubmed: 4785348google scholar: lookup
  42. Cook W. Diarrhoea in the horse associated with stress and tetracycline therapy.. Vet Rec 1973 Jul 7;93(1):15-7.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.93.1.15pubmed: 4739039google scholar: lookup
  43. Andersson G, Ekman L, Månsson I, Persson S, Rubarth S, Tufvesson G. Lethal complications following administration of oxytetracycline in the horse.. Nord Vet Med 1971 Jan;23(1):9-22.
    pubmed: 5291055
  44. White G, Prior SD. Comparative effects of oral administration of trimethoprim/sulphadiazine or oxytetracycline on the faecal flora of horses.. Vet Rec 1982 Oct 2;111(14):316-8.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.111.14.316pubmed: 6293150google scholar: lookup
  45. Li K, Bihan M, Methé BA. Analyses of the stability and core taxonomic memberships of the human microbiome.. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e63139.
  46. Shreffler J., Huecker M.R. Type I and Type II Errors and Statistical Power. StatPearls; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2021.
  47. Kelly BJ, Gross R, Bittinger K, Sherrill-Mix S, Lewis JD, Collman RG, Bushman FD, Li H. Power and sample-size estimation for microbiome studies using pairwise distances and PERMANOVA.. Bioinformatics 2015 Aug 1;31(15):2461-8.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Tyrnenopoulou P, Fthenakis GC. Clinical Aspects of Bacterial Distribution and Antibiotic Resistance in the Reproductive System of Equids.. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023 Mar 28;12(4).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040664pubmed: 37107026google scholar: lookup