Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(1); 232; doi: 10.3390/ani11010232

Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids.

Abstract: There is risk of dropping an amputated ovary within the abdomen during standing laparoscopic ovariectomies in mares. If the ovary can no longer be directly visualized with the laparoscope, the procedure is then converted to a flank laparotomy for manual retrieval of the ovary which negates the minimally invasive nature of the laparoscopic procedure. The objective was to identify if ovaries left in the abdomen after amputation would atrophy or if they re-vascularize. Standing bilateral ovariectomies were performed in mature mares, but after transection of the ovarian pedicle, the ovaries were intentionally dropped and left within the abdomen. Post-operative endocrine values were at basal levels and an improvement in all mare's behavior and general herd dynamics was observed. While this study does not encourage to leave ovaries in the abdomen after amputation, we report no complication related to their voluntary release into the abdomen.
Publication Date: 2021-01-18 PubMed ID: 33477730PubMed Central: PMC7832334DOI: 10.3390/ani11010232Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the implications of leaving amputated ovaries in the abdomen during procedures for equids. The findings reveal that this practice does not result in complications, with no recorded evidence of revascularization of the amputated ovaries.

Objective of Research

  • This research was aimed at understanding the effects of leaving amputated ovaries in the abdomen after performing elective bilateral standing laparoscopic ovariectomies on equids. This is a common issue which often renders the whole process of laparoscopy futile by requiring a flank laparotomy to locate and remove the ovary, especially when it is no longer directly visible.

Procedure

  • During the study, standing bilateral ovariectomies were performed on mature mares.
  • The distinctive aspect of the process was that after the transection of the ovarian pedicle, the ovaries were purposefully dropped and left within the abdomen. This unusual step was necessary to study the reactions and eventual outcomes of ovarian retention in the body.

Findings

  • Following the aforementioned procedure, the endocrine values post-operation decreased to basal levels.
  • Another noteworthy finding was the improvements observed in the mares’ behaviour as well as overall herd dynamics. This emphasizes the potential positive impacts of the procedure on the mares.
  • However, the study did not indicate any evidence of revascularization, or the natural process of new blood vessel formation, in the amputated ovaries.

Conclusion

  • None of the mares in this study suffered any complications due to the retained amputated ovaries.
  • Even though the study does not endorse the practice of leaving amputated ovaries within the body, it provides significant insights into the potential effects of such a situation. It concludes that the retention of ovaries does not seem to cause any short-term issues, but it encourages further research on possible long-term risks and effects.

Cite This Article

APA
Devick IF, Hendrickson DA. (2021). Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids. Animals (Basel), 11(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010232

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
PII: 232

Researcher Affiliations

Devick, Ian F
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Hendrickson, Dean A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Grant Funding

  • private funding / Marion and Hadley Stuart Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this report.

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Röcken M, Mosel G, Seyrek-Intas K, Seyrek-Intas D, Litzke F, Verver J, Rijkenhuizen AB. Unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in 157 mares: a retrospective multicenter study.. Vet Surg 2011 Dec;40(8):1009-14.
  2. Palmer SE. Standing laparoscopic laser technique for ovariectomy in five mares.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993 Jul 15;203(2):279-83.
    pubmed: 8407491
  3. Hanson CA, Galuppo LD. Bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in standing mares: 22 cases.. Vet Surg 1999 Mar-Apr;28(2):106-12.
    doi: 10.1053/jvet.1999.0106pubmed: 10100764google scholar: lookup
  4. Shoemaker RW, Read EK, Duke T, Wilson DG. In situ coagulation and transection of the ovarian pedicle: an alternative to laparoscopic ovariectomy in juvenile horses.. Can J Vet Res 2004 Jan;68(1):27-32.
    pmc: PMC1142126pubmed: 14979432
  5. Cokelaere SM, Martens AM, Wiemer P. Laparoscopic ovariectomy in mares using a polyamide tie-rap.. Vet Surg 2005 Nov-Dec;34(6):651-6.
  6. Hendrickson D. Laparoscopic cryptorchidectomy and ovariectomy in horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2006 Dec;22(3):777-98.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2006.08.006pubmed: 17129803google scholar: lookup
  7. Lee M, Hendrickson DA. A review of equine standing laparoscopic ovariectomy. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2008;28:105–111.
  8. Hendrickson DA. Complications of laparoscopic surgery.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2008 Dec;24(3):557-71, viii.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2008.09.003pubmed: 19203701google scholar: lookup
  9. Rodgerson DH, Brown MP, Watt BC, Keoughan CG, Hanrath M. Hand-assisted laparoscopic technique for removal of ovarian tumors in standing mares.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002 May 15;220(10):1503-7, 1475.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.1503pubmed: 12018378google scholar: lookup
  10. Devick IF, Leise BS, Rao S, Hendrickson DA. Evaluation of post-operative pain after active desufflation at completion of laparoscopy in mares undergoing ovariectomy.. Can Vet J 2018 Mar;59(3):261-266.
    pmc: PMC5819046pubmed: 29599556
  11. Colbath AC, Hackett ES, Lesser CS, Hendrickson DA. Left paralumbar laparoscopic bilateral ovariectomy in mares.. Vet Surg 2017 May;46(4):574-579.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12637pubmed: 28233906google scholar: lookup
  12. Ragle CA, Southwood LL, Schneider RK. Injury to abdominal wall vessels during laparoscopy in three horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998 Jan 1;212(1):87-9.
    pubmed: 9426786
  13. Hendrickson DA, Wilson DG. Instrumentation and techniques for laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery in the horse.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1996 Aug;12(2):235-59.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30281-Xpubmed: 8856876google scholar: lookup
  14. Seabaugh KA, Goodrich LR, Bohn AA, Morley PS, Hendrickson DA. A comparison of peritoneal fluid values in mares following bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy using a vessel sealing and dividing device versus placement of two ligating loops.. Vet J 2014 Nov;202(2):297-302.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.025pubmed: 25280800google scholar: lookup
  15. Van Hoogmoed LM, Galuppo LD. Laparoscopic ovariectomy using the endo-GIA stapling device and endo-catch pouches and evaluation of analgesic efficacy of epidural morphine sulfate in 10 mares.. Vet Surg 2005 Nov-Dec;34(6):646-50.
  16. Walmsley JP. Review of equine laparoscopy and an analysis of 158 laparoscopies in the horse.. Equine Vet J 1999 Nov;31(6):456-64.
  17. Shettko DL. Complications in laparoscopic surgery.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2000 Aug;16(2):377-83, vii-viii.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30112-8pubmed: 14983914google scholar: lookup
  18. Crist DW, Gadacz TR. Complications of laparoscopic surgery.. Surg Clin North Am 1993 Apr;73(2):265-89.
    doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)45981-5pubmed: 8456357google scholar: lookup
  19. Rodgerson DH, Hanson RR. Ligature slippage during standing laparoscopic ovariectomy in a mare.. Can Vet J 2000 May;41(5):395-7.
    pmc: PMC1476268pubmed: 10816833
  20. Rodgerson DH, Belknap JK, Wilson DA. Laparoscopic ovariectomy using sequential electrocoagulation and sharp transection of the equine mesovarium.. Vet Surg 2001 Nov-Dec;30(6):572-9.
    doi: 10.1053/jvet.2001.28435pubmed: 11704954google scholar: lookup
  21. Hand R, Rakestraw P, Taylor T. Evaluation of a vessel-sealing device for use in laparoscopic ovariectomy in mares.. Vet Surg 2002 May-Jun;31(3):240-4.
    doi: 10.1053/jvet.2002.33482pubmed: 11994851google scholar: lookup
  22. Habermehl NL. Heifer ovariectomy using the Willis spay instrument: Technique, morbidity and mortality.. Can Vet J 1993 Nov;34(11):664-7.
    pmc: PMC1686692pubmed: 17424320
  23. Stabenfeldt GH, Hughes JP, Kennedy PC, Meagher DM, Neely DP. Clinical findings, pathological changes and endocrinological secretory patterns in mares with ovarian tumours.. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1979;(27):277-85.
    pubmed: 289801
  24. Hughes JP, Stabenfeldt GH, Kennedy PC. The estrous cycle and selected functional and pathologic ovarian abnormalities in the mare.. Vet Clin North Am Large Anim Pract 1980 Nov;2(2):225-39.
    doi: 10.1016/S0196-9846(17)30158-1pubmed: 7233768google scholar: lookup
  25. McCue PM, Roser JF, Munro CJ, Liu IK, Lasley BL. Granulosa cell tumors of the equine ovary.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2006 Dec;22(3):799-817.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2006.08.008pubmed: 17129804google scholar: lookup
  26. Ellenberger C, Bartmann CP, Hoppen HO, Kratzsch J, Aupperle H, Klug E, Schoon D, Schoon HA. Histomorphological and immunohistochemical characterization of equine granulosa cell tumours.. J Comp Pathol 2007 Feb-Apr;136(2-3):167-76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2007.01.011pubmed: 17416235google scholar: lookup
  27. Almeida J, Ball BA, Conley AJ, Place NJ, Liu IK, Scholtz EL, Mathewson L, Stanley SD, Moeller BC. Biological and clinical significance of anti-Müllerian hormone determination in blood serum of the mare.. Theriogenology 2011 Nov;76(8):1393-403.
  28. Devick IF, Leise BS, McCue PM, Rao S, Hendrickson DA. Ovarian histopathology, pre- and post-operative endocrinological analysis and behavior alterations in 27 mares undergoing bilateral standing laparoscopic ovariectomy.. Can Vet J 2020 Feb;61(2):181-186.
    pmc: PMC6973214pubmed: 32020939
  29. Holl K, Lundin E, Kaasila M, Grankvist K, Afanasyeva Y, Hallmans G, Lehtinen M, Pukkala E, Surcel HM, Toniolo P, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Koskela P, Lukanova A. Effect of long-term storage on hormone measurements in samples from pregnant women: the experience of the Finnish Maternity Cohort.. Acta Oncol 2008;47(3):406-12.
    doi: 10.1080/02841860701592400pmc: PMC2886582pubmed: 17891670google scholar: lookup
  30. Comstock GW, Burke AE, Norkus EP, Gordon GB, Hoffman SC, Helzlsouer KJ. Effects of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on concentrations of cholesterol, micronutrients, and hormones in human plasma and serum.. Clin Chem 2001 Jan;47(1):139-42.
    doi: 10.1093/clinchem/47.1.139pubmed: 11148194google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.