Effects of ‘navicular’ shoeing on equine distal forelimb kinematics on different track surface.
Abstract: Orthopaedic shoeing applied for disorders such as navicular disease is mostly evaluated on hard track surfaces, but very often horses are ridden only on soft tracks. To compare the effects of normal shoes, eggbar shoes, and shoes with heel wedges (5 degrees) on the kinematics of the distal forelimb on hard and soft track surfaces, eleven sound Dutch Warmblood horses were led across three different tracks (an asphalt, a fibre/sand mix (= Agterberg), and a pure sand track) with three different shoe types (a normal shoe, an eggbar shoe, and a shoe with heel wedges). The hoof rotation and the maximal extension of the fetlock joint at midstance period were recorded by an infrared-light based gait analysis system (ProReflex) at walk and at trot. Statistical analysis revealed significant effects of track and shoe type, and a shoe-track interaction (p<0.05). On soft track surfaces, the equilibrium of the distal forelimb dictated a 1.5-4 degrees forward rotation of the normal or eggbar shod foot, the most on a sand track. The wedge effect on hoof rotation, however, was always significantly greater, but similar to that on the hard track surface (5 degrees forward rotation). The maximal fetlock extension was less on a soft surface, in particular on the sand track (p<0.05). This decrease was most pronounced when the horses were shod with heel wedges and was least pronounced with normal shoes. In conclusion, in particular the sand track allows a forward rotation of the hoof and thus relief of pressure in the navicular area, and a decrease in maximal fetlock extension and thus unloading of the fetlock joint. The extra forward rotation of the hoof induced by heel wedges on hard tracks was almost the same on soft track surfaces. Eggbars and fibre/sand mix tracks have intermediate effects on unloading of the distal forelimb.
Publication Date: 2002-01-05 PubMed ID: 11765238DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2001.9695111Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research investigates the effects of different types of horseshoes and varying track surfaces on the movement and pressure of the horse’s lower front limb. The study specifically examines normal shoes, eggbar shoes, and shoes with heel wedges across asphalt, a fiber/sand mix and pure sand track surfaces.
Methodology
- The study was conducted using eleven healthy Dutch Warmblood horses. These horses were made to walk and trot across three various track surfaces: an asphalt track, a fiber/sand mix track (Agterberg) and a pure sand track.
- Three different types of shoes were used for each track – a normal shoe, an eggbar shoe, and a shoe with heel wedges.
- The researchers recorded the rotation of the horse’s hoof and the maximal extension of the fetlock joint (the joint that connects the horse’s leg and hoof) during the midstance period – the moment when the hoof is bearing the most weight.
- An infrared light-based gait analysis system (ProReflex) was used to measure these factors.
Results
- The outcomes showed a significant impact of track and shoe type on hoof rotation and fetlock extension, as well as an interaction between shoe and track type.
- On softer track surfaces, the balance of the lower front limb led to a forward rotation of the hoof, between 1.5 and 4 degrees, when wearing either the normal or eggbar shoes. This forward rotation was greatest on the sand track.
- Shoes with heel wedges always created a significantly greater hoof rotation, similar to the rotation observed on hard track surfaces, resulting in a 5 degrees forward rotation of the hoof.
- The maximal extension of the fetlock joint was found to be less on soft surfaces, specifically on the sand track. This decrease was notable when the horses were shod with heel wedges and less pronounced with normal shoes.
Conclusion
- The research concluded that sand tracks particularly allow for a forward rotation of the hoof, thereby relieving pressure in the navicular area (a region in the horse’s hoof often affected by navicular disease) and lowering maximal fetlock extension. Hence, the joint is essentially unloaded.
- The additional forward rotation caused by wearing heel wedges on hard tracks is nearly the same on soft track surfaces.
- Eggbar shoes, as well as the fiber/sand mix tracks, yielded intermediate effects in unloading pressure from the lower front limb.
Cite This Article
APA
Scheffer CJ, Back W.
(2002).
Effects of ‘navicular’ shoeing on equine distal forelimb kinematics on different track surface.
Vet Q, 23(4), 191-195.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2001.9695111 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. c.j.w.scheffer@bit.nl
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Biomechanical Phenomena
- Female
- Foot Injuries / prevention & control
- Foot Injuries / veterinary
- Forelimb / physiology
- Hoof and Claw / physiology
- Horses
- Male
- Pressure
- Shoes
- Tarsal Bones / injuries
- Walking / physiology
Citations
This article has been cited 7 times.- Shaw KA, Brounts SH. The effect of heel elevation on the stiffness gradient index of the digital flexor tendons in the equine forelimb of clinically normal horses. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1610788.
- Aoun R, Takawira C, Lopez MJ. Horseshoe effects on equine gait-A systematic scoping review. Vet Surg 2025 Jan;54(1):31-51.
- Abushhiwa MH, Elmeshreghi TN, Alrtib AM, Bennour EM, Oheida AH. First phalanx exostosis in traditional equestrian horses in Western Libya. Open Vet J 2022 Jan-Feb;12(1):69-74.
- Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Carnall H, Hammond L, Peterson M, Millard S, Pfau T. Influence of Speed, Ground Surface and Shoeing Condition on Hoof Breakover Duration in Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 3;11(9).
- Stutz JC, Vidondo B, Ramseyer A, Maninchedda UE, Cruz AM. Effect of three types of horseshoes and unshod feet on selected non-podal forelimb kinematic variables measured by an extremity mounted inertial measurement unit sensor system in sound horses at the trot under conditions of treadmill and soft geotextile surface exercise. Vet Rec Open 2018;5(1):e000237.
- Wiggers N, Nauwelaerts SL, Hobbs SJ, Bool S, Wolschrijn CF, Back W. Functional locomotor consequences of uneven forefeet for trot symmetry in individual riding horses. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0114836.
- Lawson SE, Chateau H, Pourcelot P, Denoix JM, Crevier-Denoix N. Effect of toe and heel elevation on calculated tendon strains in the horse and the influence of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Anat 2007 May;210(5):583-91.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists