FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Effects of Porcine Zona Pellucida Immunocontraception on Mar...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(23); doi: 10.3390/ani14233550

Effects of Porcine Zona Pellucida Immunocontraception on Mare Body Condition and Foaling Season Length in Two Western Wild Horse Populations.

Abstract: Wildlife managers and the public have expressed considerable interest in the use of contraception to help manage the populations of wild horses and burros (Equus caballus and E. asinus). Field testing has shown that two preparations of the porcine zona pellucida (PZP) vaccine, a simple emulsion (ZonaStat-H) and PZP-22 (which supplements ZonaStat-H with a controlled-release component) effectively prevent pregnancy in individual mares and can substantially reduce population foaling rates. To determine whether some PZP preparations might have secondary effects that harm treated mares or their foals, we examined the effects of PZP-22 vaccinations and the follow-up boosters of either PZP-22 or ZonaStat-H on adult female body condition, foaling season, and foal mortality in two wild horse herds in the western USA, Cedar Mountains Herd Management Area, Utah (CM; 2008-2015), and Sand Wash Basin Herd Management Area, Colorado (SWB; 2008-2014). At both sites in every study year, summer body condition scores improved faster in mares without foals than mares with foals (p < 0.001; CM, n = 234; SWB, n = 172), but PZP treatments did not affect mare body condition apart from their contraceptive effects. Births to mares treated with PZP within the previous three years were delayed and spread out over the foaling season, but foal mortality rates through the first and second year were low, unrelated to date of birth, and virtually identical for the foals of PZP-treated and untreated mothers (all comparisons n.s.; CM, n = 775, SWB, n = 640). Thus, in these two populations, we found no evidence that changes in reproductive timing associated with PZP treatments were harmful to either mares or foals.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-12-09 PubMed ID: 39682515PubMed Central: PMC11640156DOI: 10.3390/ani14233550Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article is about the study of the effectiveness and potential side effects of porcine zona pellucida (PZP) vaccines in controlling wild horse and burro populations, by observing the body conditions, birth seasons, and foal mortality rates of vaccinated mares.

Objective of the Study

  • The chief goal of the research was to observe potential side effects of PZP vaccinations, specifically PZP-22, on wild horse populations by studying the body conditions, fertility durations, and foal death rates of vaccinated mares.

Methodology

  • The researchers carried out their studies on two wild horse populations residing in Cedar Mountains Herd Management Area, Utah and Sand Wash Basin Herd Management Area, Colorado from the year 2008 to 2015 and 2008 to 2014 respectively.
  • The study subjects were mares that were either vaccinated with PZP or not, along with their foals.
  • They compared the summer body conditions of mares without foals and those with foals.
  • The births from the mares that were treated with PZP within three years prior were also monitored to see the effect on the timing and spread throughout the foaling season.
  • The researchers also monitored the mortality rate of foals born within the first and second year of their lives and checked for any correlation with the date of birth.

Findings

  • The study found that the body condition scores during summer improved faster in mares without foals as compared to those with foals.
  • However, the vaccination (PZP treatment) did not affect the body conditions of the mares apart from presenting contraceptive effects.
  • Births to mares that were treated with PZP within the previous three years were found to be delayed and spread throughout the foaling season.
  • The mortality rates of the foals during the first and second year of life were found to be low, unconnected to the date of birth, and almost equal for both sets of foals born to treated and untreated mothers.
  • Therefore, the research did not find any evidence suggesting that changes in reproductive timing due to PZP treatments had any harmful effects on either mares or their foals.

Cite This Article

APA
Rutberg AT, Grams KA. (2024). Effects of Porcine Zona Pellucida Immunocontraception on Mare Body Condition and Foaling Season Length in Two Western Wild Horse Populations. Animals (Basel), 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14233550

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 23

Researcher Affiliations

Rutberg, Allen T
  • Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, 200 Westboro Road, North Grafton, MA 01536, USA.
Grams, Kayla A
  • Science and Conservation Center, 2100 South Shiloh Road, Billings, MT 59106, USA.

Grant Funding

  • n/a / Annenberg Foundation
  • n/a / Humane Society of the United States

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Asa C, Moresco A. Fertility control in wildlife: Review of current status, including novel and future technologies.. 2019;pp. 507–543.
    pubmed: 31471808
  2. Massei G, Cowan D. Fertility control to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts: A review.. Wildl. Res. 2014;41:1–21.
    doi: 10.1071/WR13141google scholar: lookup
  3. Kirkpatrick JF, Liu IKM, Turner JW Jr. Remotely delivered immunocontraception in feral horses.. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1990;18:326–330.
  4. Turner JW Jr, Liu IKM, Flanagan DR, Bynum KS, Rutberg AT. Porcine zona pellucida (PZP) immunocontraception of wild horses (Equus caballus) in Nevada: A 10 year study.. Reproduction 2002;60:177–186.
    pubmed: 12220157
  5. Ransom JI, Roelle JE, Cade BS, Coates-Markle L, Kane AJ. Foaling rates in feral horses treated with the immunocontraceptive porcine zona pellucida.. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2011;35:343–352.
    doi: 10.1002/wsb.66google scholar: lookup
  6. Baker DL, Powers JG, Ransom JI, McCann BE, Oehler MW, Bruemmer JE, Galloway NL, Eckery DC, Nett TM. Reimmunization increases contraceptive effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccine (GonaCon-Equine) in free-ranging horses (Equus caballus): Limitations and side effects.. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0201570.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201570pmc: PMC6067756pubmed: 30063758google scholar: lookup
  7. Bechert US, Turner JW Jr, Baker DL, Eckery DC, Bruemmer JE, Lyman CC, Prado TM, King SRB, Fraker MA. Fertility control options for management of free-roaming horse populations.. Hum. Wildl. Interact. 2022;16:179–216.
  8. Gionfriddo JP, DeNicola AJ, Miller LA, Fagerstone KA. Efficacy of GnRH immunocontraception of wild white-tailed deer in New Jersey.. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2011;35:142–148.
    doi: 10.1002/wsb.32google scholar: lookup
  9. Rutberg AT, Naugle R, Turner JW Jr, Fraker M, Flanagan D, Liu IKM. Tests of one-treatment immunocontraceptive vaccines on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on Fripp Island, SC.. Wildl. Res. 2013;40:281–288.
    doi: 10.1071/WR12117google scholar: lookup
  10. Bertschinger HJ, Delsink A, van Altena JJ, Kirkpatrick JF. Porcine zona pellucida vaccine immunocontraception of African elephant (Loxodona africana) cows: A review of 22 years of research.. Bothalia 2018;48:a2324.
    doi: 10.4102/abc.v48i2.2324google scholar: lookup
  11. Shiels AB, Runte J, Ruell EW, Eckery DC, Witmer GW, Salkeld DJ. Treatment with the immunocontraceptive vaccine, GonaCon, induces temporary fertility control in free-ranging prairie dog populations in Colorado, USA.. Wildl. Res. 2023;51:WR22135.
    doi: 10.1071/WR22135google scholar: lookup
  12. Frank KM, Lyda RO, Kirkpatrick JF. Immunocontraception of captive exotic species. IV. Species difference in response to the porcine zona pellucida vaccine, timing of booster inoculations, and procedural failures.. Zoo Biol. 2005;24:349–358.
    doi: 10.1002/zoo.20060google scholar: lookup
  13. Turner A, Kirkpatrick JF. Effects of immunocontraception on population, longevity, and body condition in wild mares (Equus caballus). Reproduction 2002;60:187–195.
    pubmed: 12220158
  14. Rutberg AT, Naugle RE, Verret F. Single-treatment porcine zona pellucida immunocontraception associated with reduction of a population of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2013;44:S75–S83.
    doi: 10.1638/1042-7260-44.4S.S75pubmed: 24437087google scholar: lookup
  15. Grams K, Rutberg AT, Turner JW Jr. Reduction in growth rates of wild horse populations treated with the controlled-release immunocontraceptive PZP-22 in the western United States.. Wildl. Res. 2022;49:738–748.
    doi: 10.1071/WR21101google scholar: lookup
  16. McShea WJ, Monfort SL, Hakim S, Kirkpatrick JF, Liu IKM, Turner JW Jr, Chassy L, Munson L. The effect of immunocontraception on the behavior and reproduction of white-tailed deer.. J. Wildl. Manag. 1997;61:560–569.
    doi: 10.2307/3802615google scholar: lookup
  17. Madosky JM, Rubenstein DI, Howard JJ, Stuska S. The effects of immunocontraception on harem fidelity in a feral horse (Equus caballus) population.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;128:50–56.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.013google scholar: lookup
  18. Ransom JI, Cade BS, Hobbs NT. Influences of immunocontraception on time budgets, social behavior, and body condition in feral horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;124:51–60.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.01.015google scholar: lookup
  19. Duncan CL, King JL, Stapp P. Effects of prolonged immunocontraception on the breeding behavior of American bison.. J. Mammal. 2017;98:1272–1287.
    doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx087pmc: PMC5901074pubmed: 29674785google scholar: lookup
  20. Nunez CMV, Adelman JS, Mason C, Rubenstein DI. Immunocontraception decreases group fidelity in a feral horse population during the non-breeding season.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;117:74–83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.12.001google scholar: lookup
  21. Nunez CMV, Adelman JS, Rubenstein DI. Immunocontraception in wild horses (Equus caballus) extends reproductive cycling beyond the normal breeding season.. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e13635.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013635pmc: PMC2964306pubmed: 21049017google scholar: lookup
  22. Ransom JI, Hobbs NT, Bruemmer J. Contraception can lead to trophic asynchrony between birth pulse and resources.. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e54972.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054972pmc: PMC3557234pubmed: 23383018google scholar: lookup
  23. Nunez CMV, Adelman JS, Carr HA, Alvarez CM, Rubenstein DI. Lingering effects of contraception management on feral mare (Equus caballus) fertility and social behavior.. Conserv. Phsiol. 2017;5:cox018.
    pmc: PMC6007543pubmed: 29977561
  24. Jones MM, Nunez CMV. Decreased female fidelity alters male behavior in a feral horse population managed with immunocontraception.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019;214:34–41.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.03.005google scholar: lookup
  25. Rutberg AT, Grams K, Turner JW Jr, Hopkins H. Contraceptive efficacy of priming and boosting doses of controlled-release PZP in wild horses.. Wildl. Res. 2017;44:174–181.
    doi: 10.1071/WR16123google scholar: lookup
  26. Rudman R, Keiper RR. The body condition of feral ponies on Assateague Island.. Equine Vet. J. 1991;23:453–456.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1991.tb03760.xpubmed: 1778164google scholar: lookup
  27. Turner JW Jr, Liu IKM, Flanagan DR, Rutberg AT, Kirkpatrick JF. Immunocontraception in wild horses: One inoculation provides two years of infertility.. J. Wildl. Manag. 2007;71:662–667.
    doi: 10.2193/2005-779google scholar: lookup
  28. Kirkpatrick JF, Turner A. Absence of effects from immunocontraception on seasonal birth patterns and foal survival among barrier island wild horses.. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2003;6:301–308.
    doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0604_4pubmed: 14965784google scholar: lookup
  29. Berger J. Wild Horses of the Great Basin.. 1986.
  30. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ, Minot EO, Stafford KH. Feral horse demography and population growth in the Kaimanawa Ranges, New Zealand.. Wildl. Res. 2004;31:119–128.
    doi: 10.1071/WR02067google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.