Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2009; 181(1); 56-62; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.011

Effects on behaviour and rein tension on horses ridden with or without martingales and rein inserts.

Abstract: Unsteady hand position can cause discomfort to the horse, potentially leading to conflict behaviours (CB) such as head tossing or tail lashing. Some instructors feel that martingales or elastic rein inserts can reduce discomfort caused by inexperienced and unsteady hands. Others consider these devices to be inappropriate 'crutches'. Four horses and nine riders were tested under three conditions in random order: plain reins, adjustable training martingales (TM), and elasticised rein inserts (RI). Rein-tension data (7s) and behavioural data (30s) were collected in each direction. Rein-tension data were collected via strain-gauge transducers. Behavioural data were assessed using an ethogram of defined behaviours. No differences in the number of CB were observed. Mean rein tension for TM was higher than that of RI or controls. Relative to the withers, the head was lower for horses ridden with martingales. Carefully fitted martingales may have a place in riding schools that teach novices.
Publication Date: 2009-04-17 PubMed ID: 19375959DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.011Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the influence of riding gear, specifically martingales and rein inserts, on horses’ behaviour and rein tension. The experiment, involving four horses and nine riders, didn’t find significant differences in horses’ conflict behaviours but observed a notable variation in rein tension.

Study Methodology

  • The research involved four horses and nine riders, used to test the effects of three different riding conditions. The conditions were, namely, plain reins (without any additional gadget), adjustable training martingales (TM), and elasticized rein inserts (RI).
  • The order of the conditions was random to avoid any bias or predictability issues.
  • Data related to rein-tension and horses’ behaviour were collected in all these conditions.

Data Collection

  • The rein-tension data were collected for seven seconds in each riding condition using strain-gauge transducers, a type of device that measures force or pressure.
  • The experiment collected behavioural data for 30 seconds across each condition.
  • The behavioural data were compiled using an ‘ethogram’, a catalogue of all possible behaviours of a species in a particular study.

Results and Observations

  • No significant difference was observed in the number of conflict behaviours (CB) of horses under the three conditions.
  • An important observation was that the mean rein tension was higher when the horses were ridden with training martingales. On the other hand, the tension was lower in cases of reins with elasticised inserts or plain reins.
  • It was also noted that relative to the withers (the highest part of the horse’s back), the head was positioned lower when horses were ridden with martingales.

Implications and Suggestions

  • The findings suggest that although the martingales and rein inserts don’t significantly alter the conflict behaviour in horses, they influence the rein tension and the position of the horse’s head.
  • Given that mean rein tension was observed to be higher with training martingales, their use may cause more discomfort to horses. However, the horse’s head was lower when ridden with martingales, which might suggest a more relaxed state.
  • Therefore, a carefully fitted martingale could be beneficial, especially in riding schools dealing with novice riders. However, more studies are needed to further substantiate this observation.

Cite This Article

APA
Heleski CR, McGreevy PD, Kaiser LJ, Lavagnino M, Tans E, Bello N, Clayton HM. (2009). Effects on behaviour and rein tension on horses ridden with or without martingales and rein inserts. Vet J, 181(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.011

Publication

ISSN: 1090-0233
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 181
Issue: 1
Pages: 56-62

Researcher Affiliations

Heleski, C R
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Heleski@msu.edu
McGreevy, P D
    Kaiser, L J
      Lavagnino, M
        Tans, E
          Bello, N
            Clayton, H M

              MeSH Terms

              • Analysis of Variance
              • Animals
              • Behavior, Animal
              • Conflict, Psychological
              • Female
              • Hand
              • Handling, Psychological
              • Horses / physiology
              • Horses / psychology
              • Humans
              • Male
              • Posture

              Citations

              This article has been cited 14 times.
              1. Musial F, Weiss T. What if Horses Were Humans? Comparing Rein Tension and Bit Pressures to Human Pressure Pain Thresholds. Animals (Basel) 2025 Oct 15;15(20).
                doi: 10.3390/ani15202989pubmed: 41153916google scholar: lookup
              2. Uldahl M, Mellor DJ. Regulatory Integrity and Welfare in Horse Sport: A Constructively Critical Perspective. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 30;15(13).
                doi: 10.3390/ani15131934pubmed: 40646833google scholar: lookup
              3. Visser EK, Jens AL, Nieuwe Weme LE, Spaapen AA, Maarleveld KN, Enzerink KH, Tromp PN, Haven-Pross SC. Assessing Equine Behavioural Responses in Equine-Assisted Services: A Field Study Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 25;15(5).
                doi: 10.3390/ani15050671pubmed: 40075954google scholar: lookup
              4. Biau S, Pycik E, Boichot L, Berg LC, Ruet A. Rein tensions and behaviour with five rein types in international-level vaulting horses. PLoS One 2024;19(10):e0311919.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311919pubmed: 39418261google scholar: lookup
              5. Scholler D, Zablotski Y, May A. Evaluation of Substance P as a New Stress Parameter in Horses in a Stress Model Involving Four Different Stress Levels. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 24;13(7).
                doi: 10.3390/ani13071142pubmed: 37048398google scholar: lookup
              6. Elmeua González M, Šarabon N. The Effects of a Real-Time Visual Kinetic Feedback Intervention on Shock Attenuation of the Equestrian Rider's Trunk: A Pilot Study. Front Sports Act Living 2022;4:899379.
                doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.899379pubmed: 35813050google scholar: lookup
              7. Clayton H, MacKechnie-Guire R, Byström A, Le Jeune S, Egenvall A. Guidelines for the Measurement of Rein Tension in Equestrian Sport. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 30;11(10).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11102875pubmed: 34679895google scholar: lookup
              8. Fenner K, Matlock S, Williams J, Wilson B, McLean A, Serpell J, McGreevy P. Validation of the Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ): A New Survey Instrument for Exploring and Monitoring the Domestic Equine Triad. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 28;10(11).
                doi: 10.3390/ani10111982pubmed: 33126670google scholar: lookup
              9. Mellor DJ. Mouth Pain in Horses: Physiological Foundations, Behavioural Indices, Welfare Implications, and a Suggested Solution. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 29;10(4).
                doi: 10.3390/ani10040572pubmed: 32235343google scholar: lookup
              10. Aune A, Fenner K, Wilson B, Cameron E, McLean A, McGreevy P. Reported Behavioural Differences between Geldings and Mares Challenge Sex-Driven Stereotypes in Ridden Equine Behaviour. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 2;10(3).
                doi: 10.3390/ani10030414pubmed: 32131444google scholar: lookup
              11. Kau S, Potz IK, Pospisil K, Sellke L, Schramel JP, Peham C. Bit type exerts an influence on self-controlled rein tension in unridden horses. Sci Rep 2020 Feb 12;10(1):2420.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59400-wpubmed: 32051498google scholar: lookup
              12. Veen I, Killian D, Vlaminck L, Vernooij JCM, Back W. The use of a rein tension device to compare different training methods for neck flexion in base-level trained Warmblood horses at the walk. Equine Vet J 2018 Nov;50(6):825-830.
                doi: 10.1111/evj.12831pubmed: 29517811google scholar: lookup
              13. Fenner K, Webb H, Starling MJ, Freire R, Buckley P, McGreevy PD. Effects of pre-conditioning on behavior and physiology of horses during a standardised learning task. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0174313.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174313pubmed: 28358892google scholar: lookup
              14. König von Borstel U, Glißman C. Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e87285.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087285pubmed: 24489890google scholar: lookup