FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2023; 37(4); 1561-1567; doi: 10.1111/jvim.16740

Efficacy of high-level disinfection of endoscopes contaminated with Streptococcus equi subspecies equi with 2 different disinfectants.

Abstract: Prevention of spread of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi (S. equi) after an outbreak is best accomplished by endoscopic lavage of the guttural pouch, with samples tested by culture and real time, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Disinfection of endoscopes must eliminate bacteria and DNA to avoid false diagnosis of carrier horses of S. equi. Objective: Compare failure rates of disinfection of endoscopes contaminated with S. equi using 2 disinfectants (accelerated hydrogen peroxide [AHP] or ortho-phthalaldehyde [OPA]). The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the AHP and OPA products (based on culture and qPCR results) after disinfection. Methods: Endoscopes contaminated with S. equi were disinfected using AHP, OPA or water (control). Samples were collected before and after disinfection and submitted for detection of S. equi by culture and qPCR. Using a multivariable logistic regression model-adjusted probability, with endoscope and day as controlled variables, the probability of an endoscope being qPCR-positive was determined. Results: After disinfection, all endoscopes were culture-negative (0%). However, the raw unadjusted qPCR data were positive for 33% AHP, 73% OPA, and 71% control samples. The model-adjusted probability of being qPCR-positive after AHP disinfection was lower (0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.03-0.64) compared to OPA (0.81; 95% CI, 0.55-1.06), and control (0.72; 95% CI, 0.41-1.04). Conclusions: Disinfection using the AHP product resulted in significantly lower probability of endoscopes being qPCR-positive compared to the OPA product and control.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-05-26 PubMed ID: 37232523PubMed Central: PMC10365036DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16740Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study examines the efficacy of two different disinfectants, accelerated hydrogen peroxide (AHP) and ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA), in eliminating the bacteria Streptococcus equi subspecies equi (S. equi) from contaminated endoscopes. The results showed that AHP outperformed OPA in reducing the presence of S. equi.

Study Objective and Hypothesis

  • The aim of the study was to compare the failing rates of disinfection in endoscopes contaminated with S. equi using two disinfectants, AHP and OPA.
  • The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in the ability of AHP and OPA to disinfect endoscopes based on culture and qPCR results.

Methods

  • In the experimental process, endoscopes contaminated with S. equi were disinfected using either AHP, OPA, or water (which served as the control).
  • For each endoscope, samples were collected before and after the disinfection procedure and were then submitted for detecting the presence of S. equi using culture and qPCR.
  • They used a multivariable logistic regression model-adjusted probability approach, considering the type of endoscope and day of disinfection as controlled variables, to determine the chance of an endoscope having qPCR-positive results.

Results

  • All the endoscopes were found to be culture-negative post disinfection, indicating no growth of S. equi in any of the culture plates.
  • However, the raw unadjusted data from qPCR were positive for 33% of AHP disinfected, 73% of OPA disinfected, and 71% of control samples.
  • The model-adjusted probability of an endoscope being qPCR-positive after disinfection was lower for AHP (0.31; 95% CI, -0.03-0.64) compared to OPA (0.81; 95% CI, 0.55-1.06), and the control (0.72; 95% CI, 0.41-1.04).

Conclusions

  • The research concluded that disinfection using AHP resulted in a significantly lower probability of endoscopes being qPCR-positive when compared to the OPA product and control samples.
  • This implies that AHP is more effective in disinfecting endoscopes contaminated with S. equi, and hence, reducing the chances of false diagnosis of carrier horses of S. equi.

Cite This Article

APA
Nadruz V, Beard LA, Delph-Miller KM, Larson RL, Bai J, Chengappa MM. (2023). Efficacy of high-level disinfection of endoscopes contaminated with Streptococcus equi subspecies equi with 2 different disinfectants. J Vet Intern Med, 37(4), 1561-1567. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16740

Publication

Journal of veterinary internal medicine
ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 37
Issue: 4
Pages: 1561-1567

Researcher Affiliations

Nadruz, Veridiana
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Beard, Laurie A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Delph-Miller, Katherine M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Larson, Robert L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Bai, Jianfa
  • Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Chengappa, Muckatira M
  • Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.

Grant Funding

  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Dr. John and Mildred Gish Research Funds

Conflict of Interest Statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR. Streptococcus equi Infections in Horses: Guidelines for Treatment, Control, and Prevention of Strangles-Revised Consensus Statement.. J Vet Intern Med 2018 Mar;32(2):633-647.
    pmc: PMC5867011pubmed: 29424487doi: 10.1111/jvim.15043google scholar: lookup
  2. Newton JR, Wood JL, Dunn KA, DeBrauwere MN, Chanter N. Naturally occurring persistent and asymptomatic infection of the guttural pouches of horses with Streptococcus equi.. Vet Rec 1997 Jan 25;140(4):84-90.
    pubmed: 9032908doi: 10.1136/vr.140.4.84google scholar: lookup
  3. Boyle AG, Rankin SC, D￮ L, Boston RC, Wheeler-Aceto H. Streptococcus equi Detection Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Equine Nasopharyngeal and Guttural Pouch Wash Samples.. J Vet Intern Med 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):276-81.
    pmc: PMC4913660pubmed: 26678318doi: 10.1111/jvim.13808google scholar: lookup
  4. Keswani RN, Soper NJ. Endoscopes and the "Superbug" Outbreak.. JAMA Surg 2015 Sep;150(9):831-2.
    pubmed: 26132426doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1255google scholar: lookup
  5. Kovaleva J, Peters FT, van der Mei HC, Degener JE. Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013 Apr;26(2):231-54.
    pmc: PMC3623380pubmed: 23554415doi: 10.1128/cmr.00085-12google scholar: lookup
  6. Ofstead CL, Quick MR, Wetzler HP, Eiland JE, Heymann OL, Sonetti DA, Ferguson JS. Effectiveness of Reprocessing for Flexible Bronchoscopes and Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopes.. Chest 2018 Nov;154(5):1024-1034.
    pubmed: 29859183doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.045google scholar: lookup
  7. Svonni E, Andreasson M, Fernström LL, Rydén A, Pringle J, Riihimäki M. Potential for residual contamination by Streptococcus equi subspp equi of endoscopes and twitches used in diagnosis of carriers of strangles.. Equine Vet J 2020 Nov;52(6):884-890.
    pubmed: 32052491doi: 10.1111/evj.13248google scholar: lookup
  8. nMetricide OPA. Wall Chart [Internet]. 2022. https://www.caretek.com/PDF/metricideopaHowToUse.pdfn
  9. Omidbakhsh N. A new peroxide-based flexible endoscope-compatible high-level disinfectant.. Am J Infect Control 2006 Nov;34(9):571-7.
    pubmed: 17097451doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.02.003google scholar: lookup
  10. nPrevention HLD High Level Disinfectant [Internet]. 2022. https://www.viroxprobeauty.com/wp-content/assets/media/doc/Prevention_RefSheet_HLD8.pdfn
  11. Noll LW, Stoy CPA, Wang Y, Porter EG, Lu N, Liu X, Burklund A, Peddireddi L, Hanzlicek G, Henningson J, Chengappa MM, Bai J. Development of a nested PCR assay for detection of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi in clinical equine specimens and comparison with a qPCR assay.. J Microbiol Methods 2020 May;172:105887.
    pubmed: 32165161doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105887google scholar: lookup
  12. Santos LCS, Parvin F, Huizer-Pajkos A, Wang J, Inglis DW, Andrade D, Hu H, Vickery K. Contribution of usage to endoscope working channel damage and bacterial contamination.. J Hosp Infect 2020 Jun;105(2):176-182.
    pubmed: 32169614doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.007google scholar: lookup
  13. Jacangelo JG, Olivieri VP, Kawata K. Investigating the mechanism of inactivation of Escherichia coli B by monochloramine. J Am Water Works Assoc 1991;83:80‐87.
  14. Coburn KM, Wang Q, Rediske D, Viola RE, Hanson BL, Xue Z, Seo Y. Effects of Extracellular Polymeric Substance Composition on Bacteria Disinfection by Monochloramine: Application of MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and Multivariate Analysis.. Environ Sci Technol 2016 Sep 6;50(17):9197-205.
    pubmed: 27366970doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00927google scholar: lookup
  15. Pringle J, Venner M, Tscheschlok L, Bächi L, Riihimäki M. Long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi following strangles; carrier detection related to sampling site of collection and culture versus qPCR.. Vet J 2019 Apr;246:66-70.
    pubmed: 30902191doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.02.003google scholar: lookup
  16. Juven BJ, Pierson MD. Antibacterial Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide and Methods for Its Detection and Quantitation (†).. J Food Prot 1996 Nov;59(11):1233-1241.
    pubmed: 31195444doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-59.11.1233google scholar: lookup
  17. Linley E, Denyer SP, McDonnell G, Simons C, Maillard JY. Use of hydrogen peroxide as a biocide: new consideration of its mechanisms of biocidal action.. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012 Jul;67(7):1589-96.
    pubmed: 22532463doi: 10.1093/jac/dks129google scholar: lookup
  18. Simões M, Simões LC, Cleto S, Machado I, Pereira MO, Vieira MJ. Antimicrobial mechanisms of ortho-phthalaldehyde action.. J Basic Microbiol 2007 Jun;47(3):230-42.
    pubmed: 17518416doi: 10.1002/jobm.200610280google scholar: lookup
  19. . Revital‐OX™ RESERT high level disinfectant substrate compatibility. 2022.
  20. Atiyeh K, Chitkara A, Achlatis S, Branski RC, Amin MR. Allergic reaction to ortho-phthalaldehyde following flexible laryngoscopy.. Laryngoscope 2015 Oct;125(10):2349-52.
    pubmed: 26199135doi: 10.1002/lary.25421google scholar: lookup
  21. . Compatibility of Revital‐Ox™ Resert XL HLD High Level Disinfectant and Olympus Endoscopy Equipment. 2022.
  22. Robitaille C, Boulet LP. Occupational asthma after exposure to ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA).. Occup Environ Med 2015 May;72(5):381.
    pubmed: 25780032doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-102847google scholar: lookup
  23. Suzukawa M, Komiya A, Koketsu R, Kawakami A, Kimura M, Nito T, Yamamoto K, Yamaguchi M. Three cases of ortho-phthalaldehyde-induced anaphylaxis after laryngoscopy: detection of specific IgE in serum.. Allergol Int 2007 Sep;56(3):313-6.
    pubmed: 17582212doi: 10.2332/allergolint.c-06-51google scholar: lookup
  24. Liang T, Long H, Zhan Z, Zhu Y, Kuang P, Mo N, Wang Y, Cui S, Wu X. Simultaneous detection of viable Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus in bird's nest, donkey-hide gelatin, and wolfberry using PMA with multiplex real-time quantitative PCR.. Food Sci Nutr 2022 Sep;10(9):3165-3174.
    pmc: PMC9469859pubmed: 36171769doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2916google scholar: lookup
  25. Liu Y, Huang S, Zhou J, Zhang C, Hu F, Xiao Y, Qiu H, Yang Y. A new method for the rapid detection of the antibacterial and bacteriostatic activity of disinfectants based on Propidium Monoazide combined with real-time PCR.. Front Microbiol 2022;13:1051162.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1051162pmc: PMC9678941pubmed: 36425040google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,658 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.