Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1985; 17(3); 202-207; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1985.tb02470.x

Epidemiological approach to the control of horse strongyles.

Abstract: An investigation of the spring rise in strongyle egg output of grazing horses on two commercial horse farms in northern USA in 1981 and 1982 revealed two distinct spring and summer rises in faecal egg counts, with peaks in May and August/September. There was a marked rise in the concentration of infective larvae on pasture two to four weeks after the peaks in egg output, so that grazing horses were at serious risk from June onwards and pasture larval counts on one farm did not fall to low levels until June of the following year. The spring and summer rises in faecal egg counts appeared to be seasonal in nature, to be derived largely from worms developing from previously ingested larvae, rather than from newly ingested larvae, and to be unrelated to the date of foaling. An epidemiological approach to strongyle control based on prophylactic treatments in the spring successfully eliminated the spring rise in egg output but was inadequate to control the summer rise or subsequent escalation of pasture infectivity in September. It was, nevertheless, superior to a conventional treatment programme at eight week intervals, using the same drug, pyrantel pamoate. Prophylactic spring/summer treatments proved to be much more effective. Both pyrantel pamoate at four week intervals and ivermectin at eight week intervals kept faecal egg counts at low levels during spring and summer. As few as two ivermectin treatments (11 May, 6 July) resulted in a sixfold reduction in pasture larval counts on 9 November and 3 January for the treated group (8872, 8416 stage three larvae [L3]/kg) compared to the control group (52,824, 50,984 L3/kg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Date: 1985-05-01 PubMed ID: 3841055DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1985.tb02470.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the seasonal patterns of strongyle infections in horses and assesses different treatment strategies for controlling these infections. The study shows that both strategic prophylactic treatments were more effective than conventional ones at managing infection.

Research Overview

The study was conducted on two commercial horse farms in the northern USA in 1981 and 1982. It involved an analysis of strongyle egg output during different seasons, and the observation of associated patterns of infective larvae concentration on pasture. The research also included different treatment programs to find the most successful approach for controlling strongyle infection.

Observations

  • The researchers found a distinct pattern of two spring and summer rises in faecal egg counts, peaking in May and August/September.
  • The concentration of infective strongyle larvae on pasture increased two to four weeks following these peaks, posing a significant risk to horses grazing from June onwards.
  • Pasture larval counts remained high until the next year’s June on one of the farms.
  • The number of eggs didn’t appear related to the date of foaling, suggesting the increases were driven by weather and environmental elements or the life cycle of the worms rather than the life-cycle of the horses themselves.

Treatment Strategies

  • Prophylactic treatments in spring, aimed at prevention, successfully eliminated the spring rise in egg output but were insufficient to control the summer rise or the autumn increase in pasture infectivity.
  • This spring prophylactic approach outperformed the conventional treatment program that used pyrantel pamoate at eight-week intervals.
  • However, a modified prophylactic schedule of pyrantel pamoate at four-week intervals or ivermectin at eight-week intervals during spring and summer was found to be much more effective. These treatment schedules resulted in lower egg counts.
  • As few as two treatments with ivermectin (in May and July) resulted in a sixfold decrease in pasture larval count in November and January for the treated group.

Conclusion

The study concludes that strategic treatment strategies work better than conventional treatments for strongyle control in horses, with a modified prophylactic approach showing the most promise. This research could inform treatment protocols for strongyle management in horse farms, resulting in healthier horses and better farm productivity.

Cite This Article

APA
Herd RP, Willardson KL, Gabel AA. (1985). Epidemiological approach to the control of horse strongyles. Equine Vet J, 17(3), 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1985.tb02470.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 3
Pages: 202-207

Researcher Affiliations

Herd, R P
    Willardson, K L
      Gabel, A A

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
        • Feces / parasitology
        • Horses
        • Ivermectin
        • Lactones / therapeutic use
        • Larva
        • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
        • Pyrantel / analogs & derivatives
        • Pyrantel Pamoate / therapeutic use
        • Strongyle Infections, Equine / drug therapy
        • Strongyle Infections, Equine / epidemiology
        • Strongyle Infections, Equine / parasitology