Equid Nutritional Physiology and Behavior: An Evolutionary Perspective.
Abstract: Like other members of the odd-toed ungulates (the perissodactyls), equids once had a higher species diversity in the fossil record than they have today. This is generally explained in comparison to the enormous diversity of bovid ruminants. Theories on putative competitive disadvantages of equids include the use of a single toe as opposed to two toes per leg, the lack of a specific brain cooling (and hence water-saving) mechanism, longer gestation periods that delay reproductive output, and in particular digestive physiology. To date, there is no empirical support for the theory that equids fare better on low-quality forage than ruminants. In contrast to the traditional juxtaposition of hindgut and foregut fermenters, we suggest that it is more insightful to sketch the evolution of equid and ruminant digestive physiology as a case of convergence: both evolved a particularly high chewing efficacy in their respective groups, which facilitates comparatively high feed and hence energy intakes. But because the ruminant system, less based on tooth anatomy but more on a forestomach sorting mechanism, is more effective, equids depend more on high feed intakes than ruminants and may well be more susceptible to feed shortages. Arguably, the most underemphasized characteristic of equids may be that in contrast to many other herbivores including ruminants and coprophageous hindgut fermenters, equids do not use the microbial biomass growing in their gastrointestinal tract. Equids display behavioral and morphophysiological adaptations to high feed intakes, and their cranial anatomy that facilitates the cropping of forage while performing grinding chewing at the same time might be unique. Rather than looking for explanations how equids are better adapted to their present niches than other organisms, considering them remnants of a different morphophysiological solution may be more appropriate.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2023-03-08 PubMed ID: 36893821DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104265Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Review
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article discusses the evolution of equids, such as horses, and their nutritional physiology and behavior compared to ruminants like cows and goats. The researchers argue that equids approach digestion differently than expected, and these differences could inform why they are less diversified than ruminants.
Comparison of Equids to Ruminants
- The researchers start by looking at the diversity of ruminants versus that of equids. Ruminants, like cows and goats, maintain a higher species diversity. On the other hand, equids, such as horses and donkeys, have seen a decline in their species variety over time.
- The authors explore potential reasons for such divergence. Some theories include one-toed versus two-toed limb structure, different brain cooling mechanisms, longer gestation periods in equids, and the anatomy and physiology of their digestive systems.
Digestive Physiology of Equids
- An anatomical highlight of the research is that unlike other herbivores, equids do not rely on microbial biomass in their gut for digestion.
- Interestingly, no empirical data supports the idea that equids are better at processing low-quality forages than ruminants.
- Instead of the traditional perspective of comparing foregut fermentation (typical of ruminants) to hindgut fermentation (typical of equids), the authors suggest looking at how both equid and ruminant digestive physiologies evolved to promote high chewing efficacy, facilitating more significant feed and energy intake.
- However, the ruminant system, which relies less on chewing and more on sorting processes in the forestomach, is more efficient than the equid’s system. As a result, equids need more feed intake and are potentially more susceptible to food shortages.
Equid Adaptations
- Equids show behavioral and morphophysiological adaptations to high-feed intake. Their unique cranial anatomy allows them to both crop forage and grind it simultaneously.
- The researchers suggest that equids should not be seen as better adapted to their environmental niches than other organisms. Instead, they propose considering equids as remnants of a different morphophysiological approach that is not necessarily more advantageous but uniquely suited to their specific needs.
Cite This Article
APA
Clauss M, Codron D, Hummel J.
(2023).
Equid Nutritional Physiology and Behavior: An Evolutionary Perspective.
J Equine Vet Sci, 124, 104265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104265 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: mclauss@vetclinics.uzh.ch.
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
- Ruminant Nutrition, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cattle
- Digestive System Physiological Phenomena
- Ruminants / anatomy & histology
- Ruminants / physiology
- Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists