Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2023; 13(9); 1574; doi: 10.3390/ani13091574

Equine Behavioural and Physiological Responses to Auditory Stimuli in the Presence and Absence of Noise-Damping Ear Covers.

Abstract: Despite numerous studies investigating responses to visual perception, there is limited research into how horses respond to different auditory stimuli. Although 'noise-damping' ear covers are frequently used on sport horses to minimise distraction from external auditory stimuli, the effectiveness of ear covers has not been established. This study aimed to (i) investigate the responses of horses to different sounds commonly present in a competition environment, and (ii) compare these responses in the presence and absence of ear covers. A total of 18 horses were presented with 5 sounds commonly heard in competition or stable environments both with and without ear covers, in a randomised order crossover design. Behavioural and heart rate responses were recorded. Responses were compared between sounds and with/without ear covers. Differences in physiological and behavioural responses to different complex auditory stimuli were shown. An overall difference in physiological and behavioural responses with and without ear covers was detected, although the only difference in heart rate between ear covers and no ear covers that individually achieved significance was the feed sound. These findings suggest that horses can discriminate sounds and alter their responses based on the individual stimulus, and these responses are reduced when wearing ear covers with varying effectiveness for different sounds.
Publication Date: 2023-05-08 PubMed ID: 37174609PubMed Central: PMC10177151DOI: 10.3390/ani13091574Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper investigates how horses react to different sounds typically found in competitive and stable environments, and how their reactions change when using ‘noise-damping’ ear covers. The findings indicate that horses can differentiate sounds and adjust their responses accordingly, and that these responses are toned down when they are wearing ear covers.

Study Design and Methodology

  • This study used 18 horses and exposed them to five common sounds found in competition or stable environments. This exposure happened in both situations: normal hearing and with noise-damping ear covers.
  • The animals were subjected to the sounds in a random sequence that followed a crossover design to suppress any potential order effects.
  • Researchers recorded the behavioral and heart rate responses of the horses as the primary data for analysis. These measures determined the horses’ reactions to the auditory stimuli.

Key Findings

  • Results of the research revealed mixed responses from horses towards diverse complex auditory stimuli. Meaning, horses show different physiological and behavioral reactions to different sounds. This indicates that horses have the ability to differentiate between various sounds.
  • The study found an overall variation in the physiological and behavioral responses with and without ear covers, thus providing evidence that the use of ear covers does affect the reactions of horses to sounds.
  • However, of all the sounds presented, the ‘feed sound’ was the only one that showed a significant difference in the horses’ heart rates when they were wearing ear covers.

Conclusions and Implications

  • From the findings, it can be inferred that horses do not react identically to all sounds and can discriminate between different auditory stimuli. Their responses vary depending on the specific sound they hear.
  • The study also suggests that ear covers do have an impact on the reactions of horses towards sounds, reducing the intensity of their responses. However, the level of effectiveness of these covers varies among different sounds.
  • While these findings may be considered preliminary, they hold significant implications for horse owners, trainers, and competition organizers as they shed light on how horses’ behavior can be managed through the use of noise-damping aids.

Cite This Article

APA
Hole C, Murray R, Marlin D, Freeman P. (2023). Equine Behavioural and Physiological Responses to Auditory Stimuli in the Presence and Absence of Noise-Damping Ear Covers. Animals (Basel), 13(9), 1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091574

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 9
PII: 1574

Researcher Affiliations

Hole, Clare
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK.
Murray, Rachel
  • Rossdales Veterinary Surgeons, Cotton End Road, Exning, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 7NN, UK.
Marlin, David
  • AnimalWeb Ltd., Cambridge CB4 0WZ, UK.
Freeman, Paul
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. Heffner HE, Heffner RS. Sound localization in large mammals: localization of complex sounds by horses.. Behav Neurosci 1984 Jun;98(3):541-55.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.98.3.541pubmed: 6732928google scholar: lookup
  2. Heffner RS, Heffner HE. Hearing in large mammals: Horses (Equus caballus) and cattle (Bos taurus). Behav. Neurosci. 1983;97:299–309.
  3. Timney B, Macuda T. Vision and hearing in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001 May 15;218(10):1567-74.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1567pubmed: 11393366google scholar: lookup
  4. Rietmann TR, Stuart AEA, Bernasconi P, Staᆲher M, Auer JA, Weishaupt MA. Assessment of mental stress in warmblood horses: Heart rate variability in comparison to heart rate and selected behavioural parameters. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;88:121–136.
  5. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, van der Werf JT, Schilder MB, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses.. Physiol Behav 2002 Jun 1;76(2):289-96.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00698-4pubmed: 12044602google scholar: lookup
  6. von Borell E, Langbein J, Després G, Hansen S, Leterrier C, Marchant J, Marchant-Forde R, Minero M, Mohr E, Prunier A, Valance D, Veissier I. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals -- a review.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):293-316.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007pubmed: 17320122google scholar: lookup
  7. Christensen JW, Keeling LJ, Nielsen BL. Responses of horses to novel visual, olfactory and auditory stimuli. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;93:53–65.
  8. Boissy A. Fear and fearfulness in animals.. Q Rev Biol 1995 Jun;70(2):165-91.
    doi: 10.1086/418981pubmed: 7610234google scholar: lookup
  9. Young T, Creighton E, Smith T, Hosie C. A novel scale of behavioural indicators of stress for use with domestic horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;140:33–43.
  10. Leiner L, Fendt M. Behavioural fear and heart rate responses of horses after exposure to novel objects: Effects of habituation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;131:104–109.
  11. McCall CA, Hall S, McElhenney WH, Cummins KA. Evaluation and comparison of four methods of ranking horses based on reactivity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;96:115–127.
  12. Christensen JW, Rundgren M. Predator odour per se does not frighten domestic horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;112:136–145.
  13. Houpt K, Marrow M, Seeliger M. A preliminary study of the effect of music on equine behavior. J. Equine. Vet. Sci. 2000;20:691–737.
  14. Nicol CJ. Equine learning: Progress and suggestions for future research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:193–208.
  15. Rochais C, Henry S, Hausberger M. Spontaneous attention-capture by auditory distractors as predictor of distractibility: a study of domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Sci Rep 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15283.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15654-5pmc: PMC5681571pubmed: 29127367google scholar: lookup
  16. . FEI Dressage Rules 2020. .
  17. Seaman SC, Davidson HPB, Waran NK. How reliable is temperament assessment in the domestic horse (Equus caballus)?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:175–191.
  18. Strand SC, Tiefenbacher S, Haskell M, Hosmer T, McDonnell SM, Freeman DA. Behavior and physiologic responses of mares to short-term isolation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:145–157.
  19. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Quantifying aspects of young horses’ temperament: Consistency of behavioural variables. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001;74:241–258.
  20. Wolff A, Hausberger M, Le Scolan N. Experimental tests to assess emotionality in horses.. Behav Processes 1997 Sep;40(3):209-21.
    doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00784-5pubmed: 24895882google scholar: lookup
  21. Prendergast A, Nansen C, Blache D. Responses of Domestic Horses and Ponies to Single, Combined and Conflicting Visual and Auditory Cues. J. Equine. Vet. Sci. 2016;46:40–46.
  22. Neveux C, Ferard M, Dickel L, Bouet V, Petit O, Valenchon M. Classical music reduces acute stress of domestic horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2016;15:81.
  23. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pmc: PMC7509108pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
  24. Heffner HE, Heffner RS. The hearing ability of horses. Equine Pract. 1983;5:27–32.
  25. Pond RL, Darre MJ, Scheifele PM, Browning DG. Characterization of equine vocalization. J. Vet. Behav. 2010;5:7–12.
  26. Lemasson A, Boutin A, Boivin S, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M. Horse (Equus caballus) whinnies: a source of social information.. Anim Cogn 2009 Sep;12(5):693-704.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0229-9pubmed: 19449192google scholar: lookup
  27. Proops L, McComb K, Reby D. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Jan 20;106(3):947-51.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809127105pmc: PMC2630083pubmed: 19075246google scholar: lookup
  28. Brubaker L, Udell MA. Cognition and learning in horses (Equus caballus): What we know and why we should ask more.. Behav Processes 2016 May;126:121-31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.017pubmed: 27018202google scholar: lookup
  29. Yeon SC. Acoustic communication in the domestic horse (Equus caballus). J. Vet. Behav. 2012;7:179–185.
  30. Fukuzawa M, Kajino S. Behavioral and heart rate responses of dogs to auditory stimuli. J. Vet. Behav. 2014;9:8.
  31. Saslow CA. Understanding the perceptual world of horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022;78:209–224.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Olczak K, Penar W, Nowicki J, Magiera A, Klocek C. The Role of Sound in Livestock Farming-Selected Aspects.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jul 14;13(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13142307pubmed: 37508083google scholar: lookup