Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2013; 197(2); 198-204; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.004

Equine hoof slip distance during trot at training speed: comparison between kinematic and accelerometric measurement techniques.

Abstract: Longitudinal sliding of horse's hooves at the beginning of stance can affect both performance and orthopaedic health. The objective of this study was to compare two measurement methods for quantifying hoof slip distances at training trot. The right front hoof of four French Trotters was equipped with an accelerometer (10 kHz) and kinematic markers. A firm wet sand track was equipped with a 50 m calibration corridor. A high-frequency camera (600 Hz) was mounted in a vehicle following each horse trotting at about 7 m/s. One of the horses was also trotted on raw dirt and harrowed dirt tracks. Longitudinal slip distance was calculated both from kinematic data, applying 2D direct linear transformation (2D-DLT) to the markers image coordinates, and from the double integration of the accelerometer signal. For each stride, both values were compared. The angle of the hoof with respect to the track was also measured. There was 'middling/satisfactory' agreement between accelerometric and 2D-DLT measurements for total slip and 'fairly good' agreement for hoof-flat slip. The influence of hoof rotation on total slip distance represented <6% of accelerometric measures. The differences between accelerometric and kinematic measures (from -0.5 cm to 2.1cm for total slip and from -0.2 cm to 1.4 cm for hoof-flat slip) were independent of slip distance magnitude. The accelerometric method was a simple method to measure hoof slip distances at a moderate training speed trot which may be useful to compare slip distances on various track surfaces.
Publication Date: 2013-03-13 PubMed ID: 23489849DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the comparison between two techniques—kinematic and accelerometric—for measuring hoof slip distances in horses during a training trot. The study findings indicate that the accelerometric method offers a simple and effective way to evaluate these slip distances.

Experiment Setup

  • Four French Trotter horses were utilized for this study.
  • The researchers equipped the right front hoof of each horse with an accelerometer and kinematic markers.
  • The horses ran on a firm, wet sand track outfitted with a 50-meter calibration corridor.
  • The horses were analysed through a high-frequency camera mounted on a vehicle following them at an approximately constant speed.
  • One horse was also tested on different terrains such as raw and harrowed dirt tracks.

Measurement Techniques

  • Two measurement methods were used to quantify the slip distances: Double integration of the accelerometer signal and 2D direct linear transformation (2D-DLT) applied to the marker’s image coordinates acquired from the kinematic data.
  • The hoof’s angle in relation to the track was also documented as part of the study.

Study Findings

  • The research found middling to satisfactory agreement between the distances measured by the accelerometric and 2D-DLT techniques.
  • There was fairly good agreement for the measurement of hoof-flat slip, which refers to the distance the hoof slips when it is flat on the ground.
  • The impact of hoof rotation on total slip distance was less than 6% of accelerometric measures, adding further validity to this method.
  • The differences between the two methods ranged from -0.5 cm to 2.1 cm for total slip and -0.2 cm to 1.4 cm for hoof-flat slip, and these differences were independent of the slip distance’s magnitude.
  • The accelerometric method offered a straightforward way to measure slip distances at a moderate training speed trot, making it a promising tool for comparing these distances across various track surfaces.

Cite This Article

APA
Holden-Douilly L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Falala S, Crevier-Denoix N, Chateau H. (2013). Equine hoof slip distance during trot at training speed: comparison between kinematic and accelerometric measurement techniques. Vet J, 197(2), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.004

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 197
Issue: 2
Pages: 198-204

Researcher Affiliations

Holden-Douilly, Laurène
  • Université Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, USC BPLC 957, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France. laurene.douilly@gmail.com
Pourcelot, Philippe
    Desquilbet, Loïc
      Falala, Sylvain
        Crevier-Denoix, Nathalie
          Chateau, Henry

            MeSH Terms

            • Accelerometry / veterinary
            • Animals
            • Biomechanical Phenomena
            • Gait
            • Hoof and Claw / physiology
            • Horses / physiology
            • Motion
            • Physical Conditioning, Animal

            Citations

            This article has been cited 6 times.
            1. Siedler C, Zinkanel YM, Schramel JP, Peham C. Comparing the Difference in Traction Between the Bare Hoof, Iron Horseshoes and Two Glue-On Models on Different Surfaces. Sensors (Basel) 2025 Sep 26;25(19).
              doi: 10.3390/s25195975pubmed: 41094798google scholar: lookup
            2. Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Carnall H, Brinkley L, Harborne D, Hammond L, Millard S, Weller R, Pfau T. Hoof slip duration at impact in galloping Thoroughbred ex-racehorses trialling eight shoe-surface combinations. PLoS One 2024;19(10):e0311899.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311899pubmed: 39392818google scholar: lookup
            3. Zalig V, Vengust M, Blagus R, Berner D, Sandow C, Hanna A, Miklavcic M. The difference in radiographic findings in the distal limbs of working Lipizzan horses, used for dressage or driving. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1393325.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1393325pubmed: 38868502google scholar: lookup
            4. Horan K, Price H, Day P, Mackechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Timing Differences in Stride Cycle Phases in Retired Racehorses Ridden in Rising and Two-Point Seat Positions at Trot on Turf, Artificial and Tarmac Surfaces. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 9;13(16).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13162563pubmed: 37627354google scholar: lookup
            5. Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Carnall H, Hammond L, Peterson M, Millard S, Pfau T. Influence of Speed, Ground Surface and Shoeing Condition on Hoof Breakover Duration in Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 3;11(9).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11092588pubmed: 34573553google scholar: lookup
            6. Moore LV, Zsoldos RR, Licka TF. Trot Accelerations of Equine Front and Hind Hooves Shod with Polyurethane Composite Shoes and Steel Shoes on Asphalt. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 11;9(12).
              doi: 10.3390/ani9121119pubmed: 31835771google scholar: lookup