Equine influenza diagnosis: sample collection and transport.
- Journal Article
- Clinical Pathology
- Clinical Signs
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Technique
- Disease control
- Disease Diagnosis
- Disease Management
- Disease Surveillance
- Disease Treatment
- Epidemiology
- Equine Health
- Horses
- Infectious Disease
- Influenza
- Nasal
- Respiratory Disease
- Respiratory Health
- Veterinary Care
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Research
- Virus
Summary
The research article primarily deals with the specific methodology of diagnosis for equine influenza virus in horses, arguing that clinical signs alone are insufficient. It emphasizes the importance of obtaining proper specimens from horse’s respiratory secretions in order to effectively test for, monitor, and potentially prevent the virus. The article also indicates that nasopharyngeal swabs are more preferable than nasal swabs for this purpose.
Diagnosis of Equine Influenza
The article highlights the importance of a thorough diagnosis process to confirm an infection of equine influenza. It underlines that:
- The current presumptive diagnosis is often based merely on clinical signs, which is insufficient to accurately confirm cases of equine influenza.
- This is because many other infectious respiratory diseases affecting horses can present similar clinical signs, creating the risk of misdiagnosis.
The Need for Better Surveillance and Control
Improved and more accurate diagnosis methods are essential to better control and monitor equine influenza because:
- Detection of subclinical cases, which may not present obvious signs or symptoms, is necessary for effective control of the disease.
- Adequate specimens that contain the virus are critical for accurate testing and diagnosis.
Role of Respiratory Secretions
The collection of specimens from the horse’s respiratory secretions has multiple benefits:
- Respiratory secretions serve as an effective source for virus isolation.
- The isolated strains can be antigenically characterized.
- These characterizations can contribute to the development of vaccines, helping to prevent further spread of the disease.
Comparison between Nasal Swabs and Nasopharyngeal Swabs
The article suggests a preference for using nasopharyngeal swabs over nasal swabs due to:
- Similar invasiveness between the two methods, meaning neither is significantly more uncomfortable for the horse.
- The superior efficacy of nasopharyngeal swabs in yielding more abundant virus samples, making them better specimens for diagnosis.
- The methodology for obtaining nasopharyngeal swab specimens is explained within the article, shedding light on how practitioners can obtain more effective samples.
Cite This Article
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Science, OIE Reference Laboratory for Equine Influenza, Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, 1400 Nicholasville Road, Lexington, KY, 40546-0099, USA, tmcham1@uky.edu.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horse Diseases / diagnosis
- Horse Diseases / virology
- Horses / virology
- Nasopharynx / virology
- Orthomyxoviridae Infections / diagnosis
- Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
- Specimen Handling / methods
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Singh RK, Dhama K, Karthik K, Khandia R, Munjal A, Khurana SK, Chakraborty S, Malik YS, Virmani N, Singh R, Tripathi BN, Munir M, van der Kolk JH. A Comprehensive Review on Equine Influenza Virus: Etiology, Epidemiology, Pathobiology, Advances in Developing Diagnostics, Vaccines, and Control Strategies. Front Microbiol 2018;9:1941.