Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2018; 259; 6-12; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.07.001

Equine parasite control and the role of national legislation – A multinational questionnaire survey.

Abstract: Experts recommend a change in the control of equine parasites across the world in order to adopt a surveillance-based approach utilizing parasite faecal egg counts (FEC). Several European countries have implemented prescription-only restrictions of anthelmintic usage by law, which is in stark contrast to US, where all anthelmintic products continue to be available over the counter. This study aimed to describe and compare equine parasite control strategies employed in Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, US, and Denmark. An invitation to participate in an online questionnaire survey was published on a large equine news website in each of the participating countries. The main focus of the study was on usage of FEC and anthelmintic treatment intensity in three different equine age groups; foals, 1-3 year-olds and >3 years old. A total of 3092 respondents participated in the study. Danish respondents used significantly more faecal analyses in their parasite control strategies than participants from the other four countries (p < 0.0001). Similarly, Danish participants administered significantly fewer anthelmintic treatments per horse per year (p < 0.0001) independent of the age of the horse, and had been using a selective treatment strategy for a significantly longer time period than their counterparts in other countries (p < 0.0001). Only minor differences were found between respondents from the other four countries. This is remarkable as both Austria and Germany have had prescription-only restrictions for 3-4 decades. Yet, their parasite control strategies were more similar to those employed by American respondents. The Netherlands had only recently introduced prescription-only restrictions by the time this survey was conducted which can explain why Dutch respondents were also similar to their American counterparts. Taken together, this study illustrates substantially different worm control strategies practiced in Denmark, and this difference cannot be explained by legislation alone.
Publication Date: 2018-07-02 PubMed ID: 30056985DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.07.001Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research conducts a comparative survey on the equine parasite control strategies implemented in several countries including Germany, Austria, Netherlands, US, and Denmark. The study finds that Denmark utilizes significantly more faecal analyses and fewer anthelmintic treatments in controlling equine parasites than the other countries.

Methodology

  • The researchers conducted an online questionnaire survey where participants from each country were recruited via an equine news website.
  • The survey centered on the use of faecal egg counts (FEC) and anthelmintic treatment intensity in different equine age groups – foals, 1-3 years olds, and horses older than 3 years.

Findings

  • A total of 3092 respondents participated in the survey.
  • Danish respondents utilized significantly more faecal analyses in their parasite control strategies, which indicates a higher reliance on surveillance-based methods.
  • Danish participants also reported administering fewer anthelmintic treatments per horse per year, regardless of the horse’s age. This suggests a more conservative use of anthelmintic drugs.
  • Compared to other countries, Denmark has been using a selective treatment strategy for a substantially longer period.
  • Despite Austria and Germany having had prescription-only restrictions for three to four decades, their parasite control strategies were found to be more similar to those of the US, where anthelmintic products can be purchased over the counter.
  • The Netherlands, which had only recently introduced prescription-only restrictions, also found their practices similar to those in the US.

Conclusion

  • The study reveals significant differences in equine parasite control strategies across the reviewed countries, with Denmark being the notable outlier with its emphasis on faecal analysis and cautious use of anthelmintic treatments.
  • These differences cannot be attributed to legislation alone. Other factors such as existing equine health practices, awareness and local attitudes towards parasite control may also play a role. Therefore, further research is warranted for the comprehensive understanding of the influences on these practices.

Cite This Article

APA
Becher AM, van Doorn DC, Pfister K, Kaplan RM, Reist M, Nielsen MK. (2018). Equine parasite control and the role of national legislation – A multinational questionnaire survey. Vet Parasitol, 259, 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.07.001

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2550
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 259
Pages: 6-12
PII: S0304-4017(18)30264-4

Researcher Affiliations

Becher, A M
  • Dr Becher Griesbauer gmbh, Hans-Adlhoch-Straße 13, Straubing, 94315, Germany. Electronic address: a.becher@entwurmungpferd.de.
van Doorn, D C
  • Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584CL, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pfister, K
  • Parasite Consulting GmbH, Wendschatzstrasse 8, CH-3006, Bern, Switzerland.
Kaplan, R M
  • Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.
Reist, M
  • Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Schwarzenburgstrasse 155, 3003, Bern, Switzerland.
Nielsen, M K
  • M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546-0099, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Age Factors
  • Animal Husbandry / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Animal Husbandry / statistics & numerical data
  • Animals
  • Anthelmintics / supply & distribution
  • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
  • Austria / epidemiology
  • Communicable Disease Control / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Communicable Disease Control / methods
  • Denmark / epidemiology
  • Europe / epidemiology
  • Feces / parasitology
  • Germany / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horses / parasitology
  • Netherlands / epidemiology
  • Parasite Egg Count / methods
  • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / drug therapy
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / epidemiology
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / prevention & control
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States / epidemiology

Citations

This article has been cited 10 times.
  1. Boelow H, Krücken J, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Epidemiological study on factors influencing the occurrence of helminth eggs in horses in Germany based on sent-in diagnostic samples.. Parasitol Res 2023 Mar;122(3):749-767.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07765-4pubmed: 36627515google scholar: lookup
  2. Malsa J, Courtot É, Boisseau M, Dumont B, Gombault P, Kuzmina TA, Basiaga M, Lluch J, Annonay G, Dhorne-Pollet S, Mach N, Sutra JF, Wimel L, Dubois C, Guégnard F, Serreau D, Lespine A, Sallé G, Fleurance G. Effect of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on cyathostomin eggs excretion, larval development, larval community structure and efficacy of ivermectin treatment in horses.. Parasitology 2022 Sep;149(11):1439-1449.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182022000853pubmed: 35929352google scholar: lookup
  3. Jürgenschellert L, Krücken J, Bousquet E, Bartz J, Heyer N, Nielsen MK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Occurrence of Strongylid Nematode Parasites on Horse Farms in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, With High Seroprevalence of Strongylus vulgaris Infection.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:892920.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.892920pubmed: 35754549google scholar: lookup
  4. Boelow H, Krücken J, Thomas E, Mirams G, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Comparison of FECPAK(G2), a modified Mini-FLOTAC technique and combined sedimentation and flotation for the coproscopic examination of helminth eggs in horses.. Parasit Vectors 2022 May 12;15(1):166.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05266-ypubmed: 35549990google scholar: lookup
  5. Scala A, Tamponi C, Sanna G, Predieri G, Dessì G, Sedda G, Buono F, Cappai MG, Veneziano V, Varcasia A. Gastrointestinal Strongyles Egg Excretion in Relation to Age, Gender, and Management of Horses in Italy.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 3;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122283pubmed: 33287298google scholar: lookup
  6. Nielsen MK, Banahan M, Kaplan RM. Importation of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins on a US thoroughbred farm.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2020 Dec;14:99-104.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2020.09.004pubmed: 33022574google scholar: lookup
  7. Hedberg-Alm Y, Penell J, Riihimäki M, Osterman-Lind E, Nielsen MK, Tydén E. Parasite Occurrence and Parasite Management in Swedish Horses Presenting with Gastrointestinal Disease-A Case-Control Study.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Apr 7;10(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10040638pubmed: 32272754google scholar: lookup
  8. Leathwick DM, Sauermann CW, Nielsen MK. Managing anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin parasites: Investigating the benefits of refugia-based strategies.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2019 Aug;10:118-124.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.08.008pubmed: 31491731google scholar: lookup
  9. Cain JL, Foulk D, Jedrzejewski E, Stofanak H, Nielsen MK. The importance of anthelmintic efficacy monitoring: results of an outreach effort.. Parasitol Res 2019 Oct;118(10):2877-2883.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06423-6pubmed: 31422463google scholar: lookup
  10. Harvey AM, Meggiolaro MN, Hall E, Watts ET, Ramp D, Šlapeta J. Wild horse populations in south-east Australia have a high prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris and may act as a reservoir of infection for domestic horses.. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2019 Apr;8:156-163.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.01.008pubmed: 30815358google scholar: lookup